Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions.Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code provides that an appeal can be moved to the High Court from every decree passed in appeal by any subordinate Court if the High Court finds that the case includes a substantial question of law. Taking this into context, the memorandum of appeal must clearly state the substantial question of law in this appeal. If the High Court deems it to be satisfactory, it may go on to formulate the pertinent questions, based on which the appeal would be heard. Also, the High Court may hear the appeal on any other substantial question of law not formulated by it if it feels that the case involves such question. It may be noted that a second appeal is only meant for questions of law and hence cannot be made on the grounds of an erroneous finding of fact. On the same page, in the absence of any errors or defects in the procedure, the finding of the first appellate court will be considered as final, if the particular Court produces evidence to support its findings. In another important note, second appeals cannot be made for a decree if the subject matter of the original suit is intended to recover a sum of Rs. 25,000.Q.In a legal dispute, Party A appeals the ruling made by the first appellate court to the High Court. After reviewing the memorandum of appeal, the High Court determines that Party A has not distinctly presented any important legal issue. Which of the following answers provide the best legal justification in this case?a)Since Party A failed to express a significant legal issue in the memorandum of appeal, the High Court must deny the appeal.b)Based on its own interpretation of the facts of the case, the High Court may continue with the appeal and formulate the important legal issues.c)The appeal can only be heard by the High Court if Party A submits an updated memorandum of appeal identifying the main legal issue.d)The High Court may hear the appeal, but only if the first appellate court made an incorrect factual determination.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Directions: Read the following passage carefu...

Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions.

Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code provides that an appeal can be moved to the High Court from every decree passed in appeal by any subordinate Court if the High Court finds that the case includes a substantial question of law. Taking this into context, the memorandum of appeal must clearly state the substantial question of law in this appeal. If the High Court deems it to be satisfactory, it may go on to formulate the pertinent questions, based on which the appeal would be heard. Also, the High Court may hear the appeal on any other substantial question of law not formulated by it if it feels that the case involves such question. It may be noted that a second appeal is only meant for questions of law and hence cannot be made on the grounds of an erroneous finding of fact. On the same page, in the absence of any errors or defects in the procedure, the finding of the first appellate court will be considered as final, if the particular Court produces evidence to support its findings. In another important note, second appeals cannot be made for a decree if the subject matter of the original suit is intended to recover a sum of Rs. 25,000.

Q. In a legal dispute, Party A appeals the ruling made by the first appellate court to the High Court. After reviewing the memorandum of appeal, the High Court determines that Party A has not distinctly presented any important legal issue. Which of the following answers provide the best legal justification in this case?

a)
Since Party A failed to express a significant legal issue in the memorandum of appeal, the High Court must deny the appeal.
b)
Based on its own interpretation of the facts of the case, the High Court may continue with the appeal and formulate the important legal issues.
c)
The appeal can only be heard by the High Court if Party A submits an updated memorandum of appeal identifying the main legal issue.
d)
The High Court may hear the appeal, but only if the first appellate court made an incorrect factual determination.

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questi...

The appeal can only be taken to the High Court if Party A produces an updated memorandum of appeal identifying the main legal issue. The memorandum of appeal must explicitly outline the main legal issue, based on the material supplied. The High Court cannot move further with the appeal as it stands in this case because Party A failed to express a substantial legal question in a clear and concise manner. For the appeal to be taken into consideration by the court, Party A must submit a revised memorandum of appeal addressing the substantive legal matter in full detail.

The ideal selection is C.

Answered by Glance Learning Institute · View profile

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions.Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code provides that an appeal can be moved to the High Court from every decree passed in appeal by any subordinate Court if the High Court finds that the case includes a substantial question of law. Taking this into context, the memorandum of appeal must clearly state the substantial question of law in this appeal. If the High Court deems it to be satisfactory, it may go on to formulate the pertinent questions, based on which the appeal would be heard. Also, the High Court may hear the appeal on any other substantial question of law not formulated by it if it feels that the case involves such question. It may be noted that a second appeal is only meant for questions of law and hence cannot be made on the grounds of an erroneous finding of fact. On the same page, in the absence of any errors or defects in the procedure, the finding of the first appellate court will be considered as final, if the particular Court produces evidence to support its findings. In another important note, second appeals cannot be made for a decree if the subject matter of the original suit is intended to recover a sum of Rs. 25,000.Q.In a civil case, Party A challenges the decision made by the first appellate court by filing a second appeal with the High Court. The recovery of Rs. 20,000 is the goal of the original lawsuits subject matter. After reviewing the appeals memorandum, the High Court determines that Party A has raised important legal issues. Which of the following answers provide the best legal justification in this case?

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions.Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code provides that an appeal can be moved to the High Court from every decree passed in appeal by any subordinate Court if the High Court finds that the case includes a substantial question of law. Taking this into context, the memorandum of appeal must clearly state the substantial question of law in this appeal. If the High Court deems it to be satisfactory, it may go on to formulate the pertinent questions, based on which the appeal would be heard. Also, the High Court may hear the appeal on any other substantial question of law not formulated by it if it feels that the case involves such question. It may be noted that a second appeal is only meant for questions of law and hence cannot be made on the grounds of an erroneous finding of fact. On the same page, in the absence of any errors or defects in the procedure, the finding of the first appellate court will be considered as final, if the particular Court produces evidence to support its findings. In another important note, second appeals cannot be made for a decree if the subject matter of the original suit is intended to recover a sum of Rs. 25,000.Q.The District Court made a ruling in favor of Mr. Rajesh Gupta in a civil case involving Mr. Arjun Sharma and Mr. Gupta. Mr. Arjun Sharma appealed the judgement to the State Appellate Court because he was not happy with it. The State Appellate Court overturned the District Courts judgment and granted Mr. Arjun Sharma a judgment. Rajesh Gupta chooses to seek a second appeal with the High Court after being upset by this judgment.In Mr. Rajesh Guptas memorandum of appeal before the High Court, which of the following alternatives best expresses the basis that he should include?

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions.Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code provides that an appeal can be moved to the High Court from every decree passed in appeal by any subordinate Court if the High Court finds that the case includes a substantial question of law. Taking this into context, the memorandum of appeal must clearly state the substantial question of law in this appeal. If the High Court deems it to be satisfactory, it may go on to formulate the pertinent questions, based on which the appeal would be heard. Also, the High Court may hear the appeal on any other substantial question of law not formulated by it if it feels that the case involves such question. It may be noted that a second appeal is only meant for questions of law and hence cannot be made on the grounds of an erroneous finding of fact. On the same page, in the absence of any errors or defects in the procedure, the finding of the first appellate court will be considered as final, if the particular Court produces evidence to support its findings. In another important note, second appeals cannot be made for a decree if the subject matter of the original suit is intended to recover a sum of Rs. 25,000.Q.Under what circumstances can a second appeal be made to the High Court?

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions.Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code provides that an appeal can be moved to the High Court from every decree passed in appeal by any subordinate Court if the High Court finds that the case includes a substantial question of law. Taking this into context, the memorandum of appeal must clearly state the substantial question of law in this appeal. If the High Court deems it to be satisfactory, it may go on to formulate the pertinent questions, based on which the appeal would be heard. Also, the High Court may hear the appeal on any other substantial question of law not formulated by it if it feels that the case involves such question. It may be noted that a second appeal is only meant for questions of law and hence cannot be made on the grounds of an erroneous finding of fact. On the same page, in the absence of any errors or defects in the procedure, the finding of the first appellate court will be considered as final, if the particular Court produces evidence to support its findings. In another important note, second appeals cannot be made for a decree if the subject matter of the original suit is intended to recover a sum of Rs. 25,000.Q.According to Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, when can an appeal be moved to the High Court from a subordinate Courts decree?

View answer

What vision of equality does our Constitution commit us to? The answer has been contested repeatedly throughout the fraught legal history of Articles 15 and 16.Article 15(1) states:“The State shall not discriminate against any citizen on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth or any of them.”And, Article 16(1) states:“There shall be equality of opportunity for all citizens in matters relating to employment or appointment to any office under the State.”These two articles are remedial in nature, that is, they seek to remedy, through law, historical wrongs – in this case, the wrong of discrimination. How, exactly, do they propose to do this? To fix ideas, let us start by proposing two tentative definitions. A colour-blind vision of equality is one that treats all classifications based on certain prohibited bases as inherently suspect, and in need of a compelling justification. This theory argues that the historical wrong in question was sorting people by the colour of their skin, their sex, or their caste, and treating them in an inferior manner on that ground. Race, sex, caste etc. are simply irrelevant to our worth as persons – hence, the term “colour-blind”.At the heart of the colour-blind theory is not simply a distaste of classifications, but the idea that citizens must be treated as individuals, and not as members of groups. Thus, one of the concerns that is standardly expressed by supporters of the colour-blind theory is that reservations and affirmative action – that classifies on the basis of groups – will serve only to perpetuate a society in which people are characterized and defined by their affiliation to and membership of stipulated social groups.Against the colour-blind theory of equality stands the group-subordination theory. The group-subordination theory holds that insofar as our society has been historically rife with discriminatory forms of injustice, such injustice has been meted out to groups qua groups – to women, to “lower-castes”, (at different stages and at different places) to Hindus or to Muslims. Insofar as individuals have suffered, they have suffered by virtue of their membership of these groups – as women, as Dalits, and so on. Thus, genuine, substantive equality can be achieved only by ensuring that historically subordinated groups are no longer subordinated.Thus, it is not enough for a Constitution to simply declare equality – if, because of a history of past discrimination and continuing non-legal present discrimination, minority groups are placed at a significant disadvantage qua minority groups, the government is permitted to take positive action to remedy that situation. One such action – the most famous and the most controversial – is affirmative action, i.e., Reservation.Q. The Delhi Government is planning to bring in a new scheme that seeks to provide the women of the State with free bus transit facility, to ensure their safety at the odd hours. The scheme is motivated by the results of a government survey, which revealed that substantial number of the women in state do not have financial autonomy and struggle for their daily expenditure in their male-dominated households. Mrs. X questions this scheme in court as violative of right to equality. Which of the following school of ideology is Mrs. X most likely to belong from?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Crash Course for CLAT

CLAT Mock Test Series 2026

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions.Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code provides that an appeal can be moved to the High Court from every decree passed in appeal by any subordinate Court if the High Court finds that the case includes a substantial question of law. Taking this into context, the memorandum of appeal must clearly state the substantial question of law in this appeal. If the High Court deems it to be satisfactory, it may go on to formulate the pertinent questions, based on which the appeal would be heard. Also, the High Court may hear the appeal on any other substantial question of law not formulated by it if it feels that the case involves such question. It may be noted that a second appeal is only meant for questions of law and hence cannot be made on the grounds of an erroneous finding of fact. On the same page, in the absence of any errors or defects in the procedure, the finding of the first appellate court will be considered as final, if the particular Court produces evidence to support its findings. In another important note, second appeals cannot be made for a decree if the subject matter of the original suit is intended to recover a sum of Rs. 25,000.Q.In a legal dispute, Party A appeals the ruling made by the first appellate court to the High Court. After reviewing the memorandum of appeal, the High Court determines that Party A has not distinctly presented any important legal issue. Which of the following answers provide the best legal justification in this case?a)Since Party A failed to express a significant legal issue in the memorandum of appeal, the High Court must deny the appeal.b)Based on its own interpretation of the facts of the case, the High Court may continue with the appeal and formulate the important legal issues.c)The appeal can only be heard by the High Court if Party A submits an updated memorandum of appeal identifying the main legal issue.d)The High Court may hear the appeal, but only if the first appellate court made an incorrect factual determination.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions.Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code provides that an appeal can be moved to the High Court from every decree passed in appeal by any subordinate Court if the High Court finds that the case includes a substantial question of law. Taking this into context, the memorandum of appeal must clearly state the substantial question of law in this appeal. If the High Court deems it to be satisfactory, it may go on to formulate the pertinent questions, based on which the appeal would be heard. Also, the High Court may hear the appeal on any other substantial question of law not formulated by it if it feels that the case involves such question. It may be noted that a second appeal is only meant for questions of law and hence cannot be made on the grounds of an erroneous finding of fact. On the same page, in the absence of any errors or defects in the procedure, the finding of the first appellate court will be considered as final, if the particular Court produces evidence to support its findings. In another important note, second appeals cannot be made for a decree if the subject matter of the original suit is intended to recover a sum of Rs. 25,000.Q.In a legal dispute, Party A appeals the ruling made by the first appellate court to the High Court. After reviewing the memorandum of appeal, the High Court determines that Party A has not distinctly presented any important legal issue. Which of the following answers provide the best legal justification in this case?a)Since Party A failed to express a significant legal issue in the memorandum of appeal, the High Court must deny the appeal.b)Based on its own interpretation of the facts of the case, the High Court may continue with the appeal and formulate the important legal issues.c)The appeal can only be heard by the High Court if Party A submits an updated memorandum of appeal identifying the main legal issue.d)The High Court may hear the appeal, but only if the first appellate court made an incorrect factual determination.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions.Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code provides that an appeal can be moved to the High Court from every decree passed in appeal by any subordinate Court if the High Court finds that the case includes a substantial question of law. Taking this into context, the memorandum of appeal must clearly state the substantial question of law in this appeal. If the High Court deems it to be satisfactory, it may go on to formulate the pertinent questions, based on which the appeal would be heard. Also, the High Court may hear the appeal on any other substantial question of law not formulated by it if it feels that the case involves such question. It may be noted that a second appeal is only meant for questions of law and hence cannot be made on the grounds of an erroneous finding of fact. On the same page, in the absence of any errors or defects in the procedure, the finding of the first appellate court will be considered as final, if the particular Court produces evidence to support its findings. In another important note, second appeals cannot be made for a decree if the subject matter of the original suit is intended to recover a sum of Rs. 25,000.Q.In a legal dispute, Party A appeals the ruling made by the first appellate court to the High Court. After reviewing the memorandum of appeal, the High Court determines that Party A has not distinctly presented any important legal issue. Which of the following answers provide the best legal justification in this case?a)Since Party A failed to express a significant legal issue in the memorandum of appeal, the High Court must deny the appeal.b)Based on its own interpretation of the facts of the case, the High Court may continue with the appeal and formulate the important legal issues.c)The appeal can only be heard by the High Court if Party A submits an updated memorandum of appeal identifying the main legal issue.d)The High Court may hear the appeal, but only if the first appellate court made an incorrect factual determination.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions.Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code provides that an appeal can be moved to the High Court from every decree passed in appeal by any subordinate Court if the High Court finds that the case includes a substantial question of law. Taking this into context, the memorandum of appeal must clearly state the substantial question of law in this appeal. If the High Court deems it to be satisfactory, it may go on to formulate the pertinent questions, based on which the appeal would be heard. Also, the High Court may hear the appeal on any other substantial question of law not formulated by it if it feels that the case involves such question. It may be noted that a second appeal is only meant for questions of law and hence cannot be made on the grounds of an erroneous finding of fact. On the same page, in the absence of any errors or defects in the procedure, the finding of the first appellate court will be considered as final, if the particular Court produces evidence to support its findings. In another important note, second appeals cannot be made for a decree if the subject matter of the original suit is intended to recover a sum of Rs. 25,000.Q.In a legal dispute, Party A appeals the ruling made by the first appellate court to the High Court. After reviewing the memorandum of appeal, the High Court determines that Party A has not distinctly presented any important legal issue. Which of the following answers provide the best legal justification in this case?a)Since Party A failed to express a significant legal issue in the memorandum of appeal, the High Court must deny the appeal.b)Based on its own interpretation of the facts of the case, the High Court may continue with the appeal and formulate the important legal issues.c)The appeal can only be heard by the High Court if Party A submits an updated memorandum of appeal identifying the main legal issue.d)The High Court may hear the appeal, but only if the first appellate court made an incorrect factual determination.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions.Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code provides that an appeal can be moved to the High Court from every decree passed in appeal by any subordinate Court if the High Court finds that the case includes a substantial question of law. Taking this into context, the memorandum of appeal must clearly state the substantial question of law in this appeal. If the High Court deems it to be satisfactory, it may go on to formulate the pertinent questions, based on which the appeal would be heard. Also, the High Court may hear the appeal on any other substantial question of law not formulated by it if it feels that the case involves such question. It may be noted that a second appeal is only meant for questions of law and hence cannot be made on the grounds of an erroneous finding of fact. On the same page, in the absence of any errors or defects in the procedure, the finding of the first appellate court will be considered as final, if the particular Court produces evidence to support its findings. In another important note, second appeals cannot be made for a decree if the subject matter of the original suit is intended to recover a sum of Rs. 25,000.Q.In a legal dispute, Party A appeals the ruling made by the first appellate court to the High Court. After reviewing the memorandum of appeal, the High Court determines that Party A has not distinctly presented any important legal issue. Which of the following answers provide the best legal justification in this case?a)Since Party A failed to express a significant legal issue in the memorandum of appeal, the High Court must deny the appeal.b)Based on its own interpretation of the facts of the case, the High Court may continue with the appeal and formulate the important legal issues.c)The appeal can only be heard by the High Court if Party A submits an updated memorandum of appeal identifying the main legal issue.d)The High Court may hear the appeal, but only if the first appellate court made an incorrect factual determination.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions.Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code provides that an appeal can be moved to the High Court from every decree passed in appeal by any subordinate Court if the High Court finds that the case includes a substantial question of law. Taking this into context, the memorandum of appeal must clearly state the substantial question of law in this appeal. If the High Court deems it to be satisfactory, it may go on to formulate the pertinent questions, based on which the appeal would be heard. Also, the High Court may hear the appeal on any other substantial question of law not formulated by it if it feels that the case involves such question. It may be noted that a second appeal is only meant for questions of law and hence cannot be made on the grounds of an erroneous finding of fact. On the same page, in the absence of any errors or defects in the procedure, the finding of the first appellate court will be considered as final, if the particular Court produces evidence to support its findings. In another important note, second appeals cannot be made for a decree if the subject matter of the original suit is intended to recover a sum of Rs. 25,000.Q.In a legal dispute, Party A appeals the ruling made by the first appellate court to the High Court. After reviewing the memorandum of appeal, the High Court determines that Party A has not distinctly presented any important legal issue. Which of the following answers provide the best legal justification in this case?a)Since Party A failed to express a significant legal issue in the memorandum of appeal, the High Court must deny the appeal.b)Based on its own interpretation of the facts of the case, the High Court may continue with the appeal and formulate the important legal issues.c)The appeal can only be heard by the High Court if Party A submits an updated memorandum of appeal identifying the main legal issue.d)The High Court may hear the appeal, but only if the first appellate court made an incorrect factual determination.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions.Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code provides that an appeal can be moved to the High Court from every decree passed in appeal by any subordinate Court if the High Court finds that the case includes a substantial question of law. Taking this into context, the memorandum of appeal must clearly state the substantial question of law in this appeal. If the High Court deems it to be satisfactory, it may go on to formulate the pertinent questions, based on which the appeal would be heard. Also, the High Court may hear the appeal on any other substantial question of law not formulated by it if it feels that the case involves such question. It may be noted that a second appeal is only meant for questions of law and hence cannot be made on the grounds of an erroneous finding of fact. On the same page, in the absence of any errors or defects in the procedure, the finding of the first appellate court will be considered as final, if the particular Court produces evidence to support its findings. In another important note, second appeals cannot be made for a decree if the subject matter of the original suit is intended to recover a sum of Rs. 25,000.Q.In a legal dispute, Party A appeals the ruling made by the first appellate court to the High Court. After reviewing the memorandum of appeal, the High Court determines that Party A has not distinctly presented any important legal issue. Which of the following answers provide the best legal justification in this case?a)Since Party A failed to express a significant legal issue in the memorandum of appeal, the High Court must deny the appeal.b)Based on its own interpretation of the facts of the case, the High Court may continue with the appeal and formulate the important legal issues.c)The appeal can only be heard by the High Court if Party A submits an updated memorandum of appeal identifying the main legal issue.d)The High Court may hear the appeal, but only if the first appellate court made an incorrect factual determination.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions.Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code provides that an appeal can be moved to the High Court from every decree passed in appeal by any subordinate Court if the High Court finds that the case includes a substantial question of law. Taking this into context, the memorandum of appeal must clearly state the substantial question of law in this appeal. If the High Court deems it to be satisfactory, it may go on to formulate the pertinent questions, based on which the appeal would be heard. Also, the High Court may hear the appeal on any other substantial question of law not formulated by it if it feels that the case involves such question. It may be noted that a second appeal is only meant for questions of law and hence cannot be made on the grounds of an erroneous finding of fact. On the same page, in the absence of any errors or defects in the procedure, the finding of the first appellate court will be considered as final, if the particular Court produces evidence to support its findings. In another important note, second appeals cannot be made for a decree if the subject matter of the original suit is intended to recover a sum of Rs. 25,000.Q.In a legal dispute, Party A appeals the ruling made by the first appellate court to the High Court. After reviewing the memorandum of appeal, the High Court determines that Party A has not distinctly presented any important legal issue. Which of the following answers provide the best legal justification in this case?a)Since Party A failed to express a significant legal issue in the memorandum of appeal, the High Court must deny the appeal.b)Based on its own interpretation of the facts of the case, the High Court may continue with the appeal and formulate the important legal issues.c)The appeal can only be heard by the High Court if Party A submits an updated memorandum of appeal identifying the main legal issue.d)The High Court may hear the appeal, but only if the first appellate court made an incorrect factual determination.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions.Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code provides that an appeal can be moved to the High Court from every decree passed in appeal by any subordinate Court if the High Court finds that the case includes a substantial question of law. Taking this into context, the memorandum of appeal must clearly state the substantial question of law in this appeal. If the High Court deems it to be satisfactory, it may go on to formulate the pertinent questions, based on which the appeal would be heard. Also, the High Court may hear the appeal on any other substantial question of law not formulated by it if it feels that the case involves such question. It may be noted that a second appeal is only meant for questions of law and hence cannot be made on the grounds of an erroneous finding of fact. On the same page, in the absence of any errors or defects in the procedure, the finding of the first appellate court will be considered as final, if the particular Court produces evidence to support its findings. In another important note, second appeals cannot be made for a decree if the subject matter of the original suit is intended to recover a sum of Rs. 25,000.Q.In a legal dispute, Party A appeals the ruling made by the first appellate court to the High Court. After reviewing the memorandum of appeal, the High Court determines that Party A has not distinctly presented any important legal issue. Which of the following answers provide the best legal justification in this case?a)Since Party A failed to express a significant legal issue in the memorandum of appeal, the High Court must deny the appeal.b)Based on its own interpretation of the facts of the case, the High Court may continue with the appeal and formulate the important legal issues.c)The appeal can only be heard by the High Court if Party A submits an updated memorandum of appeal identifying the main legal issue.d)The High Court may hear the appeal, but only if the first appellate court made an incorrect factual determination.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions.Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code provides that an appeal can be moved to the High Court from every decree passed in appeal by any subordinate Court if the High Court finds that the case includes a substantial question of law. Taking this into context, the memorandum of appeal must clearly state the substantial question of law in this appeal. If the High Court deems it to be satisfactory, it may go on to formulate the pertinent questions, based on which the appeal would be heard. Also, the High Court may hear the appeal on any other substantial question of law not formulated by it if it feels that the case involves such question. It may be noted that a second appeal is only meant for questions of law and hence cannot be made on the grounds of an erroneous finding of fact. On the same page, in the absence of any errors or defects in the procedure, the finding of the first appellate court will be considered as final, if the particular Court produces evidence to support its findings. In another important note, second appeals cannot be made for a decree if the subject matter of the original suit is intended to recover a sum of Rs. 25,000.Q.In a legal dispute, Party A appeals the ruling made by the first appellate court to the High Court. After reviewing the memorandum of appeal, the High Court determines that Party A has not distinctly presented any important legal issue. Which of the following answers provide the best legal justification in this case?a)Since Party A failed to express a significant legal issue in the memorandum of appeal, the High Court must deny the appeal.b)Based on its own interpretation of the facts of the case, the High Court may continue with the appeal and formulate the important legal issues.c)The appeal can only be heard by the High Court if Party A submits an updated memorandum of appeal identifying the main legal issue.d)The High Court may hear the appeal, but only if the first appellate court made an incorrect factual determination.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam