All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Directions: Read the following passage and an... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.
Section 4 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 specifically deals with sale and agreement to sell. It expresses that, firstly, an agreement to sell products is an agreement whereby the merchant moves or consents to move the property in merchandise to the purchaser at a cost. There might be an agreement of offer between one section proprietor and another. Secondly, an agreement to sell might be total or restrictive. Thirdly, where under an agreement to sell, the property in the merchandise is moved from the seller to the buyer, the agreement is known as a sale, yet where the exchange of the property in the products is to happen at a future time or subject to some condition from that point to be satisfied, the agreement is called an agreement to sell. Lastly, an agreement to sell turns into a sale when the time slips by or the conditions are satisfied depending upon which the property in the merchandise is to be moved.
Section 4(1) defines sale as a contract, whereby the seller transfers or agrees to transfer the property in goods to the buyer for a price or consideration. Thus, it happens in the present.
Such an event of sale is fixed, conditional and binding upon both the parties. A contract of sale is made by an idea to purchase or sell merchandise at a cost and the affirmation of such an offer. The existing goods mostly form the subject of the contract of sale. However, the goods could also be owned or possessed by the seller of future goods.
Title is an important condition precedent to the sale. If it is not with the seller, then the sale will not be valid unless the condition stipulated is with respect to future goods but will be only an agreement to sale. In such a condition, the seller will be liable to compensate for any loss to the buyer.
An agreement to sell can be defined as the transfer of property in goods that is to take place in future time or the transfer might take place depending on the fulfillment of certain conditions. The same had been defined in Section 4(3). An agreement to sell also becomes a sale when the given time elapses or the conditions that are needed for the transfer to happen get fulfilled. Thus, an agreement to sell establishes the terms and conditions of the offer of a property by the seller to the buyer.
[Extracted with edits and revisions from Sale and Agreement to Sell: An Analysis of Statutory Provisions, blog by ipleaders]
Q. Rowland purchased a second-hand motor vehicle from Divall and used it for a period of four months. However, Divall did not have legal ownership of the car, and as a result, Rowland had to return it to the actual owner. Rowland decided to take legal action to recover the full purchase price he had paid to Divall. Will Rowland's legal claim be successful?
  • a)
    No, Rowland will not succeed because he was wrongfully in possession of the car.
  • b)
    No, Rowland will not succeed because he should have conducted a thorough investigation into the true owner before buying the vehicle.
  • c)
    Yes, Rowland will succeed since the title to the vehicle was defective, and Divall is legally responsible.
  • d)
    Yes, Rowland will succeed as this case involves fraudulent behavior on the part of Divall.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Section...
When the seller lacks legal title to the goods, the sale becomes invalid. In such a situation, the seller becomes responsible for compensating any losses incurred by the buyer. Consequently, Divall bears liability in this case.
Attention CLAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Section 4 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 specifically deals with sale and agreement to sell. It expresses that, firstly, an agreement to sell products is an agreement whereby the merchant moves or consents to move the property in merchandise to the purchaser at a cost. There might be an agreement of offer between one section proprietor and another. Secondly, an agreement to sell might be total or restrictive. Thirdly, where under an agreement to sell, the property in the merchandise is moved from the seller to the buyer, the agreement is known as a sale, yet where the exchange of the property in the products is to happen at a future time or subject to some condition from that point to be satisfied, the agreement is called an agreement to sell. Lastly, an agreement to sell turns into a sale when the time slips by or the conditions are satisfied depending upon which the property in the merchandise is to be moved.Section 4(1) defines sale as a contract, whereby the seller transfers or agrees to transfer the property in goods to the buyer for a price or consideration. Thus, it happens in the present.Such an event of sale is fixed, conditional and binding upon both the parties. A contract of sale is made by an idea to purchase or sell merchandise at a cost and the affirmation of such an offer. The existing goods mostly form the subject of the contract of sale. However, the goods could also be owned or possessed by the seller of future goods.Title is an important condition precedent to the sale. If it is not with the seller, then the sale will not be valid unless the condition stipulated is with respect to future goods but will be only an agreement to sale. In such a condition, the seller will be liable to compensate for any loss to the buyer.An agreement to sell can be defined as the transfer of property in goods that is to take place in future time or the transfer might take place depending on the fulfillment of certain conditions. The same had been defined in Section 4(3). An agreement to sell also becomes a sale when the given time elapses or the conditions that are needed for the transfer to happen get fulfilled. Thus, an agreement to sell establishes the terms and conditions of the offer of a property by the seller to the buyer.[Extracted with edits and revisions from Sale and Agreement to Sell: An Analysis of Statutory Provisions, blog by ipleaders]Q.Jackson proposes to sell his bicycle to Michael for an agreed consideration of Rs. 50,000, with the understanding that the sale will take effect after a three-month period from the agreement date, which is November 1, 2019. Michael paid the agreed amount for the bicycle and acquired possession of it on February 2, 2020, asserting ownership through the sale. Is this sale legally valid?

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Section 4 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 specifically deals with sale and agreement to sell. It expresses that, firstly, an agreement to sell products is an agreement whereby the merchant moves or consents to move the property in merchandise to the purchaser at a cost. There might be an agreement of offer between one section proprietor and another. Secondly, an agreement to sell might be total or restrictive. Thirdly, where under an agreement to sell, the property in the merchandise is moved from the seller to the buyer, the agreement is known as a sale, yet where the exchange of the property in the products is to happen at a future time or subject to some condition from that point to be satisfied, the agreement is called an agreement to sell. Lastly, an agreement to sell turns into a sale when the time slips by or the conditions are satisfied depending upon which the property in the merchandise is to be moved.Section 4(1) defines sale as a contract, whereby the seller transfers or agrees to transfer the property in goods to the buyer for a price or consideration. Thus, it happens in the present.Such an event of sale is fixed, conditional and binding upon both the parties. A contract of sale is made by an idea to purchase or sell merchandise at a cost and the affirmation of such an offer. The existing goods mostly form the subject of the contract of sale. However, the goods could also be owned or possessed by the seller of future goods.Title is an important condition precedent to the sale. If it is not with the seller, then the sale will not be valid unless the condition stipulated is with respect to future goods but will be only an agreement to sale. In such a condition, the seller will be liable to compensate for any loss to the buyer.An agreement to sell can be defined as the transfer of property in goods that is to take place in future time or the transfer might take place depending on the fulfillment of certain conditions. The same had been defined in Section 4(3). An agreement to sell also becomes a sale when the given time elapses or the conditions that are needed for the transfer to happen get fulfilled. Thus, an agreement to sell establishes the terms and conditions of the offer of a property by the seller to the buyer.[Extracted with edits and revisions from Sale and Agreement to Sell: An Analysis of Statutory Provisions, blog by ipleaders]Q.Ganesh did not have physical possession of the headphones at the time of the agreement when he agreed to sell them to Anmol. However, he committed to delivering them within two months. Within the specified two-month period, Ganesh received the headphones and handed them over to Anmol, who rejected the delivery, asserting that it was not a valid sale because Ganesh did not possess the headphones at the time of the agreement. Is this sale legally valid?

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Section 4 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 specifically deals with sale and agreement to sell. It expresses that, firstly, an agreement to sell products is an agreement whereby the merchant moves or consents to move the property in merchandise to the purchaser at a cost. There might be an agreement of offer between one section proprietor and another. Secondly, an agreement to sell might be total or restrictive. Thirdly, where under an agreement to sell, the property in the merchandise is moved from the seller to the buyer, the agreement is known as a sale, yet where the exchange of the property in the products is to happen at a future time or subject to some condition from that point to be satisfied, the agreement is called an agreement to sell. Lastly, an agreement to sell turns into a sale when the time slips by or the conditions are satisfied depending upon which the property in the merchandise is to be moved.Section 4(1) defines sale as a contract, whereby the seller transfers or agrees to transfer the property in goods to the buyer for a price or consideration. Thus, it happens in the present.Such an event of sale is fixed, conditional and binding upon both the parties. A contract of sale is made by an idea to purchase or sell merchandise at a cost and the affirmation of such an offer. The existing goods mostly form the subject of the contract of sale. However, the goods could also be owned or possessed by the seller of future goods.Title is an important condition precedent to the sale. If it is not with the seller, then the sale will not be valid unless the condition stipulated is with respect to future goods but will be only an agreement to sale. In such a condition, the seller will be liable to compensate for any loss to the buyer.An agreement to sell can be defined as the transfer of property in goods that is to take place in future time or the transfer might take place depending on the fulfillment of certain conditions. The same had been defined in Section 4(3). An agreement to sell also becomes a sale when the given time elapses or the conditions that are needed for the transfer to happen get fulfilled. Thus, an agreement to sell establishes the terms and conditions of the offer of a property by the seller to the buyer.[Extracted with edits and revisions from Sale and Agreement to Sell: An Analysis of Statutory Provisions, blog by ipleaders]Q.Ram gave his watch to Shyam as a gift. Subsequently, Ram decided to reclaim it, asserting his ownership. Shyam disputed this, citing ownership through a sale. Is Shyams assertion valid?

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Section 4 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 specifically deals with sale and agreement to sell. It expresses that, firstly, an agreement to sell products is an agreement whereby the merchant moves or consents to move the property in merchandise to the purchaser at a cost. There might be an agreement of offer between one section proprietor and another. Secondly, an agreement to sell might be total or restrictive. Thirdly, where under an agreement to sell, the property in the merchandise is moved from the seller to the buyer, the agreement is known as a sale, yet where the exchange of the property in the products is to happen at a future time or subject to some condition from that point to be satisfied, the agreement is called an agreement to sell. Lastly, an agreement to sell turns into a sale when the time slips by or the conditions are satisfied depending upon which the property in the merchandise is to be moved.Section 4(1) defines sale as a contract, whereby the seller transfers or agrees to transfer the property in goods to the buyer for a price or consideration. Thus, it happens in the present.Such an event of sale is fixed, conditional and binding upon both the parties. A contract of sale is made by an idea to purchase or sell merchandise at a cost and the affirmation of such an offer. The existing goods mostly form the subject of the contract of sale. However, the goods could also be owned or possessed by the seller of future goods.Title is an important condition precedent to the sale. If it is not with the seller, then the sale will not be valid unless the condition stipulated is with respect to future goods but will be only an agreement to sale. In such a condition, the seller will be liable to compensate for any loss to the buyer.An agreement to sell can be defined as the transfer of property in goods that is to take place in future time or the transfer might take place depending on the fulfillment of certain conditions. The same had been defined in Section 4(3). An agreement to sell also becomes a sale when the given time elapses or the conditions that are needed for the transfer to happen get fulfilled. Thus, an agreement to sell establishes the terms and conditions of the offer of a property by the seller to the buyer.[Extracted with edits and revisions from Sale and Agreement to Sell: An Analysis of Statutory Provisions, blog by ipleaders]Q.What is the key difference between a sale and an agreement to sell, as defined in Section 4 of the Sale of Goods Act?

Directions: Read the passage carefully and answer the questions given beside.It has been repeatedly held that the PMLA (Prevention of Money Laundering Act) is a sui generis legislation, enacted to tackle money laundering through white-collar crimes. According to Section 3 of the PMLA, the act of projecting or claiming proceeds of crime to be untainted property constitutes the offense of money laundering. Under the Schedule to the PMLA, a number of offenses under the Indian Penal Code and other special statutes have been included, which serve as the basis for the offense of money laundering. In other words, the existence of predicate offense is sine qua non to charge someone with money laundering. It is crucial to note that the investigation and prosecution of the predicate offense are done typically by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) or the State Police.Section 50 of the PMLA provides powers of a civil court to the ED authorities for summoning persons suspected of money laundering and recording statements. However, the Supreme Court held that ED authorities are not police officers. It observed in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary v. Union of India (2022) that “the process envisaged by Section 50 of the PMLA is in the nature of an inquiry against the proceeds of crime and is not ‘investigation’ in strict sense of the term for initiating prosecution.” There are other dissimilarities between ED authorities and the police. While the police are required to register a First Information Report (FIR) for a cognizable offense before conducting an investigation, ED authorities begin with search procedures and undertake their investigation for the purpose of gathering materials and tracing the ‘proceeds of crime’ by issuing summons. Any statement made by an accused to the police is inadmissible as evidence in court, whereas a statement made to an ED authority is admissible. A copy of the FIR is accessible to the accused, whereas the Enforcement Case Information Report is seldom available.While the police investigating the predicate offense are empowered to arrest and seek custody of the accused, the ED is meant to focus on recovering the proceeds of crime in order to redistribute the same to victims. It is not clear whether the ED has managed to do this. Per contra, the Proceeds of Crime Act, 2002, the analogous legislation in the U.K., almost entirely concentrates on the confiscation of assets through dedicated civil proceedings. Unfortunately, of late, much of the ED’s powers have been discharged in effecting pretrial arrests, which used to be the prerogative of the police investigating the predicate offence. In the past, the CBI was used to impart fear among political opponents. In the process, the agency received the condemnation of various courts and earned the nickname “caged parrot”. Whether the ED will go down the same path or reorient its approach will entirely depend on the intervention of the country’s constitutional courts.Q.Which of the following is not the appropriate cause-and-effect relationship in the passages context?

Top Courses for CLATView all

Top Courses for CLAT

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Section 4 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 specifically deals with sale and agreement to sell. It expresses that, firstly, an agreement to sell products is an agreement whereby the merchant moves or consents to move the property in merchandise to the purchaser at a cost. There might be an agreement of offer between one section proprietor and another. Secondly, an agreement to sell might be total or restrictive. Thirdly, where under an agreement to sell, the property in the merchandise is moved from the seller to the buyer, the agreement is known as a sale, yet where the exchange of the property in the products is to happen at a future time or subject to some condition from that point to be satisfied, the agreement is called an agreement to sell. Lastly, an agreement to sell turns into a sale when the time slips by or the conditions are satisfied depending upon which the property in the merchandise is to be moved.Section 4(1) defines sale as a contract, whereby the seller transfers or agrees to transfer the property in goods to the buyer for a price or consideration. Thus, it happens in the present.Such an event of sale is fixed, conditional and binding upon both the parties. A contract of sale is made by an idea to purchase or sell merchandise at a cost and the affirmation of such an offer. The existing goods mostly form the subject of the contract of sale. However, the goods could also be owned or possessed by the seller of future goods.Title is an important condition precedent to the sale. If it is not with the seller, then the sale will not be valid unless the condition stipulated is with respect to future goods but will be only an agreement to sale. In such a condition, the seller will be liable to compensate for any loss to the buyer.An agreement to sell can be defined as the transfer of property in goods that is to take place in future time or the transfer might take place depending on the fulfillment of certain conditions. The same had been defined in Section 4(3). An agreement to sell also becomes a sale when the given time elapses or the conditions that are needed for the transfer to happen get fulfilled. Thus, an agreement to sell establishes the terms and conditions of the offer of a property by the seller to the buyer.[Extracted with edits and revisions from Sale and Agreement to Sell: An Analysis of Statutory Provisions, blog by ipleaders]Q.Rowland purchased a second-hand motor vehicle from Divall and used it for a period of four months. However, Divall did not have legal ownership of the car, and as a result, Rowland had to return it to the actual owner. Rowland decided to take legal action to recover the full purchase price he had paid to Divall. Will Rowlands legal claim be successful?a)No, Rowland will not succeed because he was wrongfully in possession of the car.b)No, Rowland will not succeed because he should have conducted a thorough investigation into the true owner before buying the vehicle.c)Yes, Rowland will succeed since the title to the vehicle was defective, and Divall is legally responsible.d)Yes, Rowland will succeed as this case involves fraudulent behavior on the part of Divall.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Section 4 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 specifically deals with sale and agreement to sell. It expresses that, firstly, an agreement to sell products is an agreement whereby the merchant moves or consents to move the property in merchandise to the purchaser at a cost. There might be an agreement of offer between one section proprietor and another. Secondly, an agreement to sell might be total or restrictive. Thirdly, where under an agreement to sell, the property in the merchandise is moved from the seller to the buyer, the agreement is known as a sale, yet where the exchange of the property in the products is to happen at a future time or subject to some condition from that point to be satisfied, the agreement is called an agreement to sell. Lastly, an agreement to sell turns into a sale when the time slips by or the conditions are satisfied depending upon which the property in the merchandise is to be moved.Section 4(1) defines sale as a contract, whereby the seller transfers or agrees to transfer the property in goods to the buyer for a price or consideration. Thus, it happens in the present.Such an event of sale is fixed, conditional and binding upon both the parties. A contract of sale is made by an idea to purchase or sell merchandise at a cost and the affirmation of such an offer. The existing goods mostly form the subject of the contract of sale. However, the goods could also be owned or possessed by the seller of future goods.Title is an important condition precedent to the sale. If it is not with the seller, then the sale will not be valid unless the condition stipulated is with respect to future goods but will be only an agreement to sale. In such a condition, the seller will be liable to compensate for any loss to the buyer.An agreement to sell can be defined as the transfer of property in goods that is to take place in future time or the transfer might take place depending on the fulfillment of certain conditions. The same had been defined in Section 4(3). An agreement to sell also becomes a sale when the given time elapses or the conditions that are needed for the transfer to happen get fulfilled. Thus, an agreement to sell establishes the terms and conditions of the offer of a property by the seller to the buyer.[Extracted with edits and revisions from Sale and Agreement to Sell: An Analysis of Statutory Provisions, blog by ipleaders]Q.Rowland purchased a second-hand motor vehicle from Divall and used it for a period of four months. However, Divall did not have legal ownership of the car, and as a result, Rowland had to return it to the actual owner. Rowland decided to take legal action to recover the full purchase price he had paid to Divall. Will Rowlands legal claim be successful?a)No, Rowland will not succeed because he was wrongfully in possession of the car.b)No, Rowland will not succeed because he should have conducted a thorough investigation into the true owner before buying the vehicle.c)Yes, Rowland will succeed since the title to the vehicle was defective, and Divall is legally responsible.d)Yes, Rowland will succeed as this case involves fraudulent behavior on the part of Divall.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Section 4 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 specifically deals with sale and agreement to sell. It expresses that, firstly, an agreement to sell products is an agreement whereby the merchant moves or consents to move the property in merchandise to the purchaser at a cost. There might be an agreement of offer between one section proprietor and another. Secondly, an agreement to sell might be total or restrictive. Thirdly, where under an agreement to sell, the property in the merchandise is moved from the seller to the buyer, the agreement is known as a sale, yet where the exchange of the property in the products is to happen at a future time or subject to some condition from that point to be satisfied, the agreement is called an agreement to sell. Lastly, an agreement to sell turns into a sale when the time slips by or the conditions are satisfied depending upon which the property in the merchandise is to be moved.Section 4(1) defines sale as a contract, whereby the seller transfers or agrees to transfer the property in goods to the buyer for a price or consideration. Thus, it happens in the present.Such an event of sale is fixed, conditional and binding upon both the parties. A contract of sale is made by an idea to purchase or sell merchandise at a cost and the affirmation of such an offer. The existing goods mostly form the subject of the contract of sale. However, the goods could also be owned or possessed by the seller of future goods.Title is an important condition precedent to the sale. If it is not with the seller, then the sale will not be valid unless the condition stipulated is with respect to future goods but will be only an agreement to sale. In such a condition, the seller will be liable to compensate for any loss to the buyer.An agreement to sell can be defined as the transfer of property in goods that is to take place in future time or the transfer might take place depending on the fulfillment of certain conditions. The same had been defined in Section 4(3). An agreement to sell also becomes a sale when the given time elapses or the conditions that are needed for the transfer to happen get fulfilled. Thus, an agreement to sell establishes the terms and conditions of the offer of a property by the seller to the buyer.[Extracted with edits and revisions from Sale and Agreement to Sell: An Analysis of Statutory Provisions, blog by ipleaders]Q.Rowland purchased a second-hand motor vehicle from Divall and used it for a period of four months. However, Divall did not have legal ownership of the car, and as a result, Rowland had to return it to the actual owner. Rowland decided to take legal action to recover the full purchase price he had paid to Divall. Will Rowlands legal claim be successful?a)No, Rowland will not succeed because he was wrongfully in possession of the car.b)No, Rowland will not succeed because he should have conducted a thorough investigation into the true owner before buying the vehicle.c)Yes, Rowland will succeed since the title to the vehicle was defective, and Divall is legally responsible.d)Yes, Rowland will succeed as this case involves fraudulent behavior on the part of Divall.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Section 4 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 specifically deals with sale and agreement to sell. It expresses that, firstly, an agreement to sell products is an agreement whereby the merchant moves or consents to move the property in merchandise to the purchaser at a cost. There might be an agreement of offer between one section proprietor and another. Secondly, an agreement to sell might be total or restrictive. Thirdly, where under an agreement to sell, the property in the merchandise is moved from the seller to the buyer, the agreement is known as a sale, yet where the exchange of the property in the products is to happen at a future time or subject to some condition from that point to be satisfied, the agreement is called an agreement to sell. Lastly, an agreement to sell turns into a sale when the time slips by or the conditions are satisfied depending upon which the property in the merchandise is to be moved.Section 4(1) defines sale as a contract, whereby the seller transfers or agrees to transfer the property in goods to the buyer for a price or consideration. Thus, it happens in the present.Such an event of sale is fixed, conditional and binding upon both the parties. A contract of sale is made by an idea to purchase or sell merchandise at a cost and the affirmation of such an offer. The existing goods mostly form the subject of the contract of sale. However, the goods could also be owned or possessed by the seller of future goods.Title is an important condition precedent to the sale. If it is not with the seller, then the sale will not be valid unless the condition stipulated is with respect to future goods but will be only an agreement to sale. In such a condition, the seller will be liable to compensate for any loss to the buyer.An agreement to sell can be defined as the transfer of property in goods that is to take place in future time or the transfer might take place depending on the fulfillment of certain conditions. The same had been defined in Section 4(3). An agreement to sell also becomes a sale when the given time elapses or the conditions that are needed for the transfer to happen get fulfilled. Thus, an agreement to sell establishes the terms and conditions of the offer of a property by the seller to the buyer.[Extracted with edits and revisions from Sale and Agreement to Sell: An Analysis of Statutory Provisions, blog by ipleaders]Q.Rowland purchased a second-hand motor vehicle from Divall and used it for a period of four months. However, Divall did not have legal ownership of the car, and as a result, Rowland had to return it to the actual owner. Rowland decided to take legal action to recover the full purchase price he had paid to Divall. Will Rowlands legal claim be successful?a)No, Rowland will not succeed because he was wrongfully in possession of the car.b)No, Rowland will not succeed because he should have conducted a thorough investigation into the true owner before buying the vehicle.c)Yes, Rowland will succeed since the title to the vehicle was defective, and Divall is legally responsible.d)Yes, Rowland will succeed as this case involves fraudulent behavior on the part of Divall.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Section 4 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 specifically deals with sale and agreement to sell. It expresses that, firstly, an agreement to sell products is an agreement whereby the merchant moves or consents to move the property in merchandise to the purchaser at a cost. There might be an agreement of offer between one section proprietor and another. Secondly, an agreement to sell might be total or restrictive. Thirdly, where under an agreement to sell, the property in the merchandise is moved from the seller to the buyer, the agreement is known as a sale, yet where the exchange of the property in the products is to happen at a future time or subject to some condition from that point to be satisfied, the agreement is called an agreement to sell. Lastly, an agreement to sell turns into a sale when the time slips by or the conditions are satisfied depending upon which the property in the merchandise is to be moved.Section 4(1) defines sale as a contract, whereby the seller transfers or agrees to transfer the property in goods to the buyer for a price or consideration. Thus, it happens in the present.Such an event of sale is fixed, conditional and binding upon both the parties. A contract of sale is made by an idea to purchase or sell merchandise at a cost and the affirmation of such an offer. The existing goods mostly form the subject of the contract of sale. However, the goods could also be owned or possessed by the seller of future goods.Title is an important condition precedent to the sale. If it is not with the seller, then the sale will not be valid unless the condition stipulated is with respect to future goods but will be only an agreement to sale. In such a condition, the seller will be liable to compensate for any loss to the buyer.An agreement to sell can be defined as the transfer of property in goods that is to take place in future time or the transfer might take place depending on the fulfillment of certain conditions. The same had been defined in Section 4(3). An agreement to sell also becomes a sale when the given time elapses or the conditions that are needed for the transfer to happen get fulfilled. Thus, an agreement to sell establishes the terms and conditions of the offer of a property by the seller to the buyer.[Extracted with edits and revisions from Sale and Agreement to Sell: An Analysis of Statutory Provisions, blog by ipleaders]Q.Rowland purchased a second-hand motor vehicle from Divall and used it for a period of four months. However, Divall did not have legal ownership of the car, and as a result, Rowland had to return it to the actual owner. Rowland decided to take legal action to recover the full purchase price he had paid to Divall. Will Rowlands legal claim be successful?a)No, Rowland will not succeed because he was wrongfully in possession of the car.b)No, Rowland will not succeed because he should have conducted a thorough investigation into the true owner before buying the vehicle.c)Yes, Rowland will succeed since the title to the vehicle was defective, and Divall is legally responsible.d)Yes, Rowland will succeed as this case involves fraudulent behavior on the part of Divall.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Section 4 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 specifically deals with sale and agreement to sell. It expresses that, firstly, an agreement to sell products is an agreement whereby the merchant moves or consents to move the property in merchandise to the purchaser at a cost. There might be an agreement of offer between one section proprietor and another. Secondly, an agreement to sell might be total or restrictive. Thirdly, where under an agreement to sell, the property in the merchandise is moved from the seller to the buyer, the agreement is known as a sale, yet where the exchange of the property in the products is to happen at a future time or subject to some condition from that point to be satisfied, the agreement is called an agreement to sell. Lastly, an agreement to sell turns into a sale when the time slips by or the conditions are satisfied depending upon which the property in the merchandise is to be moved.Section 4(1) defines sale as a contract, whereby the seller transfers or agrees to transfer the property in goods to the buyer for a price or consideration. Thus, it happens in the present.Such an event of sale is fixed, conditional and binding upon both the parties. A contract of sale is made by an idea to purchase or sell merchandise at a cost and the affirmation of such an offer. The existing goods mostly form the subject of the contract of sale. However, the goods could also be owned or possessed by the seller of future goods.Title is an important condition precedent to the sale. If it is not with the seller, then the sale will not be valid unless the condition stipulated is with respect to future goods but will be only an agreement to sale. In such a condition, the seller will be liable to compensate for any loss to the buyer.An agreement to sell can be defined as the transfer of property in goods that is to take place in future time or the transfer might take place depending on the fulfillment of certain conditions. The same had been defined in Section 4(3). An agreement to sell also becomes a sale when the given time elapses or the conditions that are needed for the transfer to happen get fulfilled. Thus, an agreement to sell establishes the terms and conditions of the offer of a property by the seller to the buyer.[Extracted with edits and revisions from Sale and Agreement to Sell: An Analysis of Statutory Provisions, blog by ipleaders]Q.Rowland purchased a second-hand motor vehicle from Divall and used it for a period of four months. However, Divall did not have legal ownership of the car, and as a result, Rowland had to return it to the actual owner. Rowland decided to take legal action to recover the full purchase price he had paid to Divall. Will Rowlands legal claim be successful?a)No, Rowland will not succeed because he was wrongfully in possession of the car.b)No, Rowland will not succeed because he should have conducted a thorough investigation into the true owner before buying the vehicle.c)Yes, Rowland will succeed since the title to the vehicle was defective, and Divall is legally responsible.d)Yes, Rowland will succeed as this case involves fraudulent behavior on the part of Divall.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Section 4 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 specifically deals with sale and agreement to sell. It expresses that, firstly, an agreement to sell products is an agreement whereby the merchant moves or consents to move the property in merchandise to the purchaser at a cost. There might be an agreement of offer between one section proprietor and another. Secondly, an agreement to sell might be total or restrictive. Thirdly, where under an agreement to sell, the property in the merchandise is moved from the seller to the buyer, the agreement is known as a sale, yet where the exchange of the property in the products is to happen at a future time or subject to some condition from that point to be satisfied, the agreement is called an agreement to sell. Lastly, an agreement to sell turns into a sale when the time slips by or the conditions are satisfied depending upon which the property in the merchandise is to be moved.Section 4(1) defines sale as a contract, whereby the seller transfers or agrees to transfer the property in goods to the buyer for a price or consideration. Thus, it happens in the present.Such an event of sale is fixed, conditional and binding upon both the parties. A contract of sale is made by an idea to purchase or sell merchandise at a cost and the affirmation of such an offer. The existing goods mostly form the subject of the contract of sale. However, the goods could also be owned or possessed by the seller of future goods.Title is an important condition precedent to the sale. If it is not with the seller, then the sale will not be valid unless the condition stipulated is with respect to future goods but will be only an agreement to sale. In such a condition, the seller will be liable to compensate for any loss to the buyer.An agreement to sell can be defined as the transfer of property in goods that is to take place in future time or the transfer might take place depending on the fulfillment of certain conditions. The same had been defined in Section 4(3). An agreement to sell also becomes a sale when the given time elapses or the conditions that are needed for the transfer to happen get fulfilled. Thus, an agreement to sell establishes the terms and conditions of the offer of a property by the seller to the buyer.[Extracted with edits and revisions from Sale and Agreement to Sell: An Analysis of Statutory Provisions, blog by ipleaders]Q.Rowland purchased a second-hand motor vehicle from Divall and used it for a period of four months. However, Divall did not have legal ownership of the car, and as a result, Rowland had to return it to the actual owner. Rowland decided to take legal action to recover the full purchase price he had paid to Divall. Will Rowlands legal claim be successful?a)No, Rowland will not succeed because he was wrongfully in possession of the car.b)No, Rowland will not succeed because he should have conducted a thorough investigation into the true owner before buying the vehicle.c)Yes, Rowland will succeed since the title to the vehicle was defective, and Divall is legally responsible.d)Yes, Rowland will succeed as this case involves fraudulent behavior on the part of Divall.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Section 4 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 specifically deals with sale and agreement to sell. It expresses that, firstly, an agreement to sell products is an agreement whereby the merchant moves or consents to move the property in merchandise to the purchaser at a cost. There might be an agreement of offer between one section proprietor and another. Secondly, an agreement to sell might be total or restrictive. Thirdly, where under an agreement to sell, the property in the merchandise is moved from the seller to the buyer, the agreement is known as a sale, yet where the exchange of the property in the products is to happen at a future time or subject to some condition from that point to be satisfied, the agreement is called an agreement to sell. Lastly, an agreement to sell turns into a sale when the time slips by or the conditions are satisfied depending upon which the property in the merchandise is to be moved.Section 4(1) defines sale as a contract, whereby the seller transfers or agrees to transfer the property in goods to the buyer for a price or consideration. Thus, it happens in the present.Such an event of sale is fixed, conditional and binding upon both the parties. A contract of sale is made by an idea to purchase or sell merchandise at a cost and the affirmation of such an offer. The existing goods mostly form the subject of the contract of sale. However, the goods could also be owned or possessed by the seller of future goods.Title is an important condition precedent to the sale. If it is not with the seller, then the sale will not be valid unless the condition stipulated is with respect to future goods but will be only an agreement to sale. In such a condition, the seller will be liable to compensate for any loss to the buyer.An agreement to sell can be defined as the transfer of property in goods that is to take place in future time or the transfer might take place depending on the fulfillment of certain conditions. The same had been defined in Section 4(3). An agreement to sell also becomes a sale when the given time elapses or the conditions that are needed for the transfer to happen get fulfilled. Thus, an agreement to sell establishes the terms and conditions of the offer of a property by the seller to the buyer.[Extracted with edits and revisions from Sale and Agreement to Sell: An Analysis of Statutory Provisions, blog by ipleaders]Q.Rowland purchased a second-hand motor vehicle from Divall and used it for a period of four months. However, Divall did not have legal ownership of the car, and as a result, Rowland had to return it to the actual owner. Rowland decided to take legal action to recover the full purchase price he had paid to Divall. Will Rowlands legal claim be successful?a)No, Rowland will not succeed because he was wrongfully in possession of the car.b)No, Rowland will not succeed because he should have conducted a thorough investigation into the true owner before buying the vehicle.c)Yes, Rowland will succeed since the title to the vehicle was defective, and Divall is legally responsible.d)Yes, Rowland will succeed as this case involves fraudulent behavior on the part of Divall.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Section 4 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 specifically deals with sale and agreement to sell. It expresses that, firstly, an agreement to sell products is an agreement whereby the merchant moves or consents to move the property in merchandise to the purchaser at a cost. There might be an agreement of offer between one section proprietor and another. Secondly, an agreement to sell might be total or restrictive. Thirdly, where under an agreement to sell, the property in the merchandise is moved from the seller to the buyer, the agreement is known as a sale, yet where the exchange of the property in the products is to happen at a future time or subject to some condition from that point to be satisfied, the agreement is called an agreement to sell. Lastly, an agreement to sell turns into a sale when the time slips by or the conditions are satisfied depending upon which the property in the merchandise is to be moved.Section 4(1) defines sale as a contract, whereby the seller transfers or agrees to transfer the property in goods to the buyer for a price or consideration. Thus, it happens in the present.Such an event of sale is fixed, conditional and binding upon both the parties. A contract of sale is made by an idea to purchase or sell merchandise at a cost and the affirmation of such an offer. The existing goods mostly form the subject of the contract of sale. However, the goods could also be owned or possessed by the seller of future goods.Title is an important condition precedent to the sale. If it is not with the seller, then the sale will not be valid unless the condition stipulated is with respect to future goods but will be only an agreement to sale. In such a condition, the seller will be liable to compensate for any loss to the buyer.An agreement to sell can be defined as the transfer of property in goods that is to take place in future time or the transfer might take place depending on the fulfillment of certain conditions. The same had been defined in Section 4(3). An agreement to sell also becomes a sale when the given time elapses or the conditions that are needed for the transfer to happen get fulfilled. Thus, an agreement to sell establishes the terms and conditions of the offer of a property by the seller to the buyer.[Extracted with edits and revisions from Sale and Agreement to Sell: An Analysis of Statutory Provisions, blog by ipleaders]Q.Rowland purchased a second-hand motor vehicle from Divall and used it for a period of four months. However, Divall did not have legal ownership of the car, and as a result, Rowland had to return it to the actual owner. Rowland decided to take legal action to recover the full purchase price he had paid to Divall. Will Rowlands legal claim be successful?a)No, Rowland will not succeed because he was wrongfully in possession of the car.b)No, Rowland will not succeed because he should have conducted a thorough investigation into the true owner before buying the vehicle.c)Yes, Rowland will succeed since the title to the vehicle was defective, and Divall is legally responsible.d)Yes, Rowland will succeed as this case involves fraudulent behavior on the part of Divall.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Section 4 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 specifically deals with sale and agreement to sell. It expresses that, firstly, an agreement to sell products is an agreement whereby the merchant moves or consents to move the property in merchandise to the purchaser at a cost. There might be an agreement of offer between one section proprietor and another. Secondly, an agreement to sell might be total or restrictive. Thirdly, where under an agreement to sell, the property in the merchandise is moved from the seller to the buyer, the agreement is known as a sale, yet where the exchange of the property in the products is to happen at a future time or subject to some condition from that point to be satisfied, the agreement is called an agreement to sell. Lastly, an agreement to sell turns into a sale when the time slips by or the conditions are satisfied depending upon which the property in the merchandise is to be moved.Section 4(1) defines sale as a contract, whereby the seller transfers or agrees to transfer the property in goods to the buyer for a price or consideration. Thus, it happens in the present.Such an event of sale is fixed, conditional and binding upon both the parties. A contract of sale is made by an idea to purchase or sell merchandise at a cost and the affirmation of such an offer. The existing goods mostly form the subject of the contract of sale. However, the goods could also be owned or possessed by the seller of future goods.Title is an important condition precedent to the sale. If it is not with the seller, then the sale will not be valid unless the condition stipulated is with respect to future goods but will be only an agreement to sale. In such a condition, the seller will be liable to compensate for any loss to the buyer.An agreement to sell can be defined as the transfer of property in goods that is to take place in future time or the transfer might take place depending on the fulfillment of certain conditions. The same had been defined in Section 4(3). An agreement to sell also becomes a sale when the given time elapses or the conditions that are needed for the transfer to happen get fulfilled. Thus, an agreement to sell establishes the terms and conditions of the offer of a property by the seller to the buyer.[Extracted with edits and revisions from Sale and Agreement to Sell: An Analysis of Statutory Provisions, blog by ipleaders]Q.Rowland purchased a second-hand motor vehicle from Divall and used it for a period of four months. However, Divall did not have legal ownership of the car, and as a result, Rowland had to return it to the actual owner. Rowland decided to take legal action to recover the full purchase price he had paid to Divall. Will Rowlands legal claim be successful?a)No, Rowland will not succeed because he was wrongfully in possession of the car.b)No, Rowland will not succeed because he should have conducted a thorough investigation into the true owner before buying the vehicle.c)Yes, Rowland will succeed since the title to the vehicle was defective, and Divall is legally responsible.d)Yes, Rowland will succeed as this case involves fraudulent behavior on the part of Divall.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup