Question Description
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:In a significant verdict of March 2023, the Supreme Court on overruled its 2011 judgments in Arup Bhuyan vs State of Assam, Indra Das vs State of Assam and State of Kerala vs Raneef which held that mere membership of a banned association is not sufficient to constitute an offence under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967 or the Terrorism and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, unless it is accompanied with some overt violent act. A 3 Judge bench upheld Section 10(a)(i) of the UAPA which makes membership of an association, which has been declared to be unlawful, to be an offence. The UAPA Act extends to the whole of India. Anyone in our country who violates this Act’s provisions and is found to be responsible is subject to punishment under this Act. Any person who commits an offense outside of India that is punishable by this Act would be treated in accordance with its provisions in the same way as if the offense had been committed within India. The provisions of this Act apply also to-citizens of India outside India; persons in the service of the Government, wherever they may be; persons on ships and aircraft, registered in India, wherever they may be. As per UAPA, if the Central Government believes that a certain association is or has become an unlawful association, it may proclaim the association to be unlawful by publishing a notice in the Official Gazette. Each of these notifications must state the grounds for their issuance. No such notification shall take effect until the Tribunal has approved the declaration contained therein except:- The Central Government may, for reasons to be stated in writing, declare an association to be unlawful with immediate effect if it believes that circumstances exist that make such a declaration necessary.Q.For belonging to an association that the Central Government has deemed illegal, a person is detained and charged under the UAPA Act. The person contends that he was unaware of any illegal activity the association was engaged in. Which of the following legal arguments would allow the court to find the defendant guilty?a)The person can be found guilty since the UAPA Act makes it illegal to be a member of an organization that has been deemed illegal, regardless of knowledge.b)The defendant cannot be found guilty because, without some overt act of violence, participation in an association does not, by itself, violate the UAPA Act.c)Only if the prosecution can demonstrate that the defendant knew about the associations involvement in illegal actions will he be found guilty.d)Because the Central Government did not declare the group unlawful through the correct process, the defendant cannot be found guilty.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:In a significant verdict of March 2023, the Supreme Court on overruled its 2011 judgments in Arup Bhuyan vs State of Assam, Indra Das vs State of Assam and State of Kerala vs Raneef which held that mere membership of a banned association is not sufficient to constitute an offence under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967 or the Terrorism and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, unless it is accompanied with some overt violent act. A 3 Judge bench upheld Section 10(a)(i) of the UAPA which makes membership of an association, which has been declared to be unlawful, to be an offence. The UAPA Act extends to the whole of India. Anyone in our country who violates this Act’s provisions and is found to be responsible is subject to punishment under this Act. Any person who commits an offense outside of India that is punishable by this Act would be treated in accordance with its provisions in the same way as if the offense had been committed within India. The provisions of this Act apply also to-citizens of India outside India; persons in the service of the Government, wherever they may be; persons on ships and aircraft, registered in India, wherever they may be. As per UAPA, if the Central Government believes that a certain association is or has become an unlawful association, it may proclaim the association to be unlawful by publishing a notice in the Official Gazette. Each of these notifications must state the grounds for their issuance. No such notification shall take effect until the Tribunal has approved the declaration contained therein except:- The Central Government may, for reasons to be stated in writing, declare an association to be unlawful with immediate effect if it believes that circumstances exist that make such a declaration necessary.Q.For belonging to an association that the Central Government has deemed illegal, a person is detained and charged under the UAPA Act. The person contends that he was unaware of any illegal activity the association was engaged in. Which of the following legal arguments would allow the court to find the defendant guilty?a)The person can be found guilty since the UAPA Act makes it illegal to be a member of an organization that has been deemed illegal, regardless of knowledge.b)The defendant cannot be found guilty because, without some overt act of violence, participation in an association does not, by itself, violate the UAPA Act.c)Only if the prosecution can demonstrate that the defendant knew about the associations involvement in illegal actions will he be found guilty.d)Because the Central Government did not declare the group unlawful through the correct process, the defendant cannot be found guilty.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:In a significant verdict of March 2023, the Supreme Court on overruled its 2011 judgments in Arup Bhuyan vs State of Assam, Indra Das vs State of Assam and State of Kerala vs Raneef which held that mere membership of a banned association is not sufficient to constitute an offence under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967 or the Terrorism and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, unless it is accompanied with some overt violent act. A 3 Judge bench upheld Section 10(a)(i) of the UAPA which makes membership of an association, which has been declared to be unlawful, to be an offence. The UAPA Act extends to the whole of India. Anyone in our country who violates this Act’s provisions and is found to be responsible is subject to punishment under this Act. Any person who commits an offense outside of India that is punishable by this Act would be treated in accordance with its provisions in the same way as if the offense had been committed within India. The provisions of this Act apply also to-citizens of India outside India; persons in the service of the Government, wherever they may be; persons on ships and aircraft, registered in India, wherever they may be. As per UAPA, if the Central Government believes that a certain association is or has become an unlawful association, it may proclaim the association to be unlawful by publishing a notice in the Official Gazette. Each of these notifications must state the grounds for their issuance. No such notification shall take effect until the Tribunal has approved the declaration contained therein except:- The Central Government may, for reasons to be stated in writing, declare an association to be unlawful with immediate effect if it believes that circumstances exist that make such a declaration necessary.Q.For belonging to an association that the Central Government has deemed illegal, a person is detained and charged under the UAPA Act. The person contends that he was unaware of any illegal activity the association was engaged in. Which of the following legal arguments would allow the court to find the defendant guilty?a)The person can be found guilty since the UAPA Act makes it illegal to be a member of an organization that has been deemed illegal, regardless of knowledge.b)The defendant cannot be found guilty because, without some overt act of violence, participation in an association does not, by itself, violate the UAPA Act.c)Only if the prosecution can demonstrate that the defendant knew about the associations involvement in illegal actions will he be found guilty.d)Because the Central Government did not declare the group unlawful through the correct process, the defendant cannot be found guilty.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:In a significant verdict of March 2023, the Supreme Court on overruled its 2011 judgments in Arup Bhuyan vs State of Assam, Indra Das vs State of Assam and State of Kerala vs Raneef which held that mere membership of a banned association is not sufficient to constitute an offence under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967 or the Terrorism and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, unless it is accompanied with some overt violent act. A 3 Judge bench upheld Section 10(a)(i) of the UAPA which makes membership of an association, which has been declared to be unlawful, to be an offence. The UAPA Act extends to the whole of India. Anyone in our country who violates this Act’s provisions and is found to be responsible is subject to punishment under this Act. Any person who commits an offense outside of India that is punishable by this Act would be treated in accordance with its provisions in the same way as if the offense had been committed within India. The provisions of this Act apply also to-citizens of India outside India; persons in the service of the Government, wherever they may be; persons on ships and aircraft, registered in India, wherever they may be. As per UAPA, if the Central Government believes that a certain association is or has become an unlawful association, it may proclaim the association to be unlawful by publishing a notice in the Official Gazette. Each of these notifications must state the grounds for their issuance. No such notification shall take effect until the Tribunal has approved the declaration contained therein except:- The Central Government may, for reasons to be stated in writing, declare an association to be unlawful with immediate effect if it believes that circumstances exist that make such a declaration necessary.Q.For belonging to an association that the Central Government has deemed illegal, a person is detained and charged under the UAPA Act. The person contends that he was unaware of any illegal activity the association was engaged in. Which of the following legal arguments would allow the court to find the defendant guilty?a)The person can be found guilty since the UAPA Act makes it illegal to be a member of an organization that has been deemed illegal, regardless of knowledge.b)The defendant cannot be found guilty because, without some overt act of violence, participation in an association does not, by itself, violate the UAPA Act.c)Only if the prosecution can demonstrate that the defendant knew about the associations involvement in illegal actions will he be found guilty.d)Because the Central Government did not declare the group unlawful through the correct process, the defendant cannot be found guilty.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:In a significant verdict of March 2023, the Supreme Court on overruled its 2011 judgments in Arup Bhuyan vs State of Assam, Indra Das vs State of Assam and State of Kerala vs Raneef which held that mere membership of a banned association is not sufficient to constitute an offence under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967 or the Terrorism and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, unless it is accompanied with some overt violent act. A 3 Judge bench upheld Section 10(a)(i) of the UAPA which makes membership of an association, which has been declared to be unlawful, to be an offence. The UAPA Act extends to the whole of India. Anyone in our country who violates this Act’s provisions and is found to be responsible is subject to punishment under this Act. Any person who commits an offense outside of India that is punishable by this Act would be treated in accordance with its provisions in the same way as if the offense had been committed within India. The provisions of this Act apply also to-citizens of India outside India; persons in the service of the Government, wherever they may be; persons on ships and aircraft, registered in India, wherever they may be. As per UAPA, if the Central Government believes that a certain association is or has become an unlawful association, it may proclaim the association to be unlawful by publishing a notice in the Official Gazette. Each of these notifications must state the grounds for their issuance. No such notification shall take effect until the Tribunal has approved the declaration contained therein except:- The Central Government may, for reasons to be stated in writing, declare an association to be unlawful with immediate effect if it believes that circumstances exist that make such a declaration necessary.Q.For belonging to an association that the Central Government has deemed illegal, a person is detained and charged under the UAPA Act. The person contends that he was unaware of any illegal activity the association was engaged in. Which of the following legal arguments would allow the court to find the defendant guilty?a)The person can be found guilty since the UAPA Act makes it illegal to be a member of an organization that has been deemed illegal, regardless of knowledge.b)The defendant cannot be found guilty because, without some overt act of violence, participation in an association does not, by itself, violate the UAPA Act.c)Only if the prosecution can demonstrate that the defendant knew about the associations involvement in illegal actions will he be found guilty.d)Because the Central Government did not declare the group unlawful through the correct process, the defendant cannot be found guilty.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:In a significant verdict of March 2023, the Supreme Court on overruled its 2011 judgments in Arup Bhuyan vs State of Assam, Indra Das vs State of Assam and State of Kerala vs Raneef which held that mere membership of a banned association is not sufficient to constitute an offence under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967 or the Terrorism and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, unless it is accompanied with some overt violent act. A 3 Judge bench upheld Section 10(a)(i) of the UAPA which makes membership of an association, which has been declared to be unlawful, to be an offence. The UAPA Act extends to the whole of India. Anyone in our country who violates this Act’s provisions and is found to be responsible is subject to punishment under this Act. Any person who commits an offense outside of India that is punishable by this Act would be treated in accordance with its provisions in the same way as if the offense had been committed within India. The provisions of this Act apply also to-citizens of India outside India; persons in the service of the Government, wherever they may be; persons on ships and aircraft, registered in India, wherever they may be. As per UAPA, if the Central Government believes that a certain association is or has become an unlawful association, it may proclaim the association to be unlawful by publishing a notice in the Official Gazette. Each of these notifications must state the grounds for their issuance. No such notification shall take effect until the Tribunal has approved the declaration contained therein except:- The Central Government may, for reasons to be stated in writing, declare an association to be unlawful with immediate effect if it believes that circumstances exist that make such a declaration necessary.Q.For belonging to an association that the Central Government has deemed illegal, a person is detained and charged under the UAPA Act. The person contends that he was unaware of any illegal activity the association was engaged in. Which of the following legal arguments would allow the court to find the defendant guilty?a)The person can be found guilty since the UAPA Act makes it illegal to be a member of an organization that has been deemed illegal, regardless of knowledge.b)The defendant cannot be found guilty because, without some overt act of violence, participation in an association does not, by itself, violate the UAPA Act.c)Only if the prosecution can demonstrate that the defendant knew about the associations involvement in illegal actions will he be found guilty.d)Because the Central Government did not declare the group unlawful through the correct process, the defendant cannot be found guilty.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:In a significant verdict of March 2023, the Supreme Court on overruled its 2011 judgments in Arup Bhuyan vs State of Assam, Indra Das vs State of Assam and State of Kerala vs Raneef which held that mere membership of a banned association is not sufficient to constitute an offence under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967 or the Terrorism and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, unless it is accompanied with some overt violent act. A 3 Judge bench upheld Section 10(a)(i) of the UAPA which makes membership of an association, which has been declared to be unlawful, to be an offence. The UAPA Act extends to the whole of India. Anyone in our country who violates this Act’s provisions and is found to be responsible is subject to punishment under this Act. Any person who commits an offense outside of India that is punishable by this Act would be treated in accordance with its provisions in the same way as if the offense had been committed within India. The provisions of this Act apply also to-citizens of India outside India; persons in the service of the Government, wherever they may be; persons on ships and aircraft, registered in India, wherever they may be. As per UAPA, if the Central Government believes that a certain association is or has become an unlawful association, it may proclaim the association to be unlawful by publishing a notice in the Official Gazette. Each of these notifications must state the grounds for their issuance. No such notification shall take effect until the Tribunal has approved the declaration contained therein except:- The Central Government may, for reasons to be stated in writing, declare an association to be unlawful with immediate effect if it believes that circumstances exist that make such a declaration necessary.Q.For belonging to an association that the Central Government has deemed illegal, a person is detained and charged under the UAPA Act. The person contends that he was unaware of any illegal activity the association was engaged in. Which of the following legal arguments would allow the court to find the defendant guilty?a)The person can be found guilty since the UAPA Act makes it illegal to be a member of an organization that has been deemed illegal, regardless of knowledge.b)The defendant cannot be found guilty because, without some overt act of violence, participation in an association does not, by itself, violate the UAPA Act.c)Only if the prosecution can demonstrate that the defendant knew about the associations involvement in illegal actions will he be found guilty.d)Because the Central Government did not declare the group unlawful through the correct process, the defendant cannot be found guilty.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:In a significant verdict of March 2023, the Supreme Court on overruled its 2011 judgments in Arup Bhuyan vs State of Assam, Indra Das vs State of Assam and State of Kerala vs Raneef which held that mere membership of a banned association is not sufficient to constitute an offence under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967 or the Terrorism and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, unless it is accompanied with some overt violent act. A 3 Judge bench upheld Section 10(a)(i) of the UAPA which makes membership of an association, which has been declared to be unlawful, to be an offence. The UAPA Act extends to the whole of India. Anyone in our country who violates this Act’s provisions and is found to be responsible is subject to punishment under this Act. Any person who commits an offense outside of India that is punishable by this Act would be treated in accordance with its provisions in the same way as if the offense had been committed within India. The provisions of this Act apply also to-citizens of India outside India; persons in the service of the Government, wherever they may be; persons on ships and aircraft, registered in India, wherever they may be. As per UAPA, if the Central Government believes that a certain association is or has become an unlawful association, it may proclaim the association to be unlawful by publishing a notice in the Official Gazette. Each of these notifications must state the grounds for their issuance. No such notification shall take effect until the Tribunal has approved the declaration contained therein except:- The Central Government may, for reasons to be stated in writing, declare an association to be unlawful with immediate effect if it believes that circumstances exist that make such a declaration necessary.Q.For belonging to an association that the Central Government has deemed illegal, a person is detained and charged under the UAPA Act. The person contends that he was unaware of any illegal activity the association was engaged in. Which of the following legal arguments would allow the court to find the defendant guilty?a)The person can be found guilty since the UAPA Act makes it illegal to be a member of an organization that has been deemed illegal, regardless of knowledge.b)The defendant cannot be found guilty because, without some overt act of violence, participation in an association does not, by itself, violate the UAPA Act.c)Only if the prosecution can demonstrate that the defendant knew about the associations involvement in illegal actions will he be found guilty.d)Because the Central Government did not declare the group unlawful through the correct process, the defendant cannot be found guilty.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:In a significant verdict of March 2023, the Supreme Court on overruled its 2011 judgments in Arup Bhuyan vs State of Assam, Indra Das vs State of Assam and State of Kerala vs Raneef which held that mere membership of a banned association is not sufficient to constitute an offence under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967 or the Terrorism and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, unless it is accompanied with some overt violent act. A 3 Judge bench upheld Section 10(a)(i) of the UAPA which makes membership of an association, which has been declared to be unlawful, to be an offence. The UAPA Act extends to the whole of India. Anyone in our country who violates this Act’s provisions and is found to be responsible is subject to punishment under this Act. Any person who commits an offense outside of India that is punishable by this Act would be treated in accordance with its provisions in the same way as if the offense had been committed within India. The provisions of this Act apply also to-citizens of India outside India; persons in the service of the Government, wherever they may be; persons on ships and aircraft, registered in India, wherever they may be. As per UAPA, if the Central Government believes that a certain association is or has become an unlawful association, it may proclaim the association to be unlawful by publishing a notice in the Official Gazette. Each of these notifications must state the grounds for their issuance. No such notification shall take effect until the Tribunal has approved the declaration contained therein except:- The Central Government may, for reasons to be stated in writing, declare an association to be unlawful with immediate effect if it believes that circumstances exist that make such a declaration necessary.Q.For belonging to an association that the Central Government has deemed illegal, a person is detained and charged under the UAPA Act. The person contends that he was unaware of any illegal activity the association was engaged in. Which of the following legal arguments would allow the court to find the defendant guilty?a)The person can be found guilty since the UAPA Act makes it illegal to be a member of an organization that has been deemed illegal, regardless of knowledge.b)The defendant cannot be found guilty because, without some overt act of violence, participation in an association does not, by itself, violate the UAPA Act.c)Only if the prosecution can demonstrate that the defendant knew about the associations involvement in illegal actions will he be found guilty.d)Because the Central Government did not declare the group unlawful through the correct process, the defendant cannot be found guilty.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.