Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:In a significant verdict of March 2023, the Supreme Court on overruled its 2011 judgments in Arup Bhuyan vs State of Assam, Indra Das vs State of Assam and State of Kerala vs Raneef which held that mere membership of a banned association is not sufficient to constitute an offence under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967 or the Terrorism and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, unless it is accompanied with some overt violent act. A 3 Judge bench upheld Section 10(a)(i) of the UAPA which makes membership of an association, which has been declared to be unlawful, to be an offence. The UAPA Act extends to the whole of India. Anyone in our country who violates this Actandrsquo;s provisions and is found to be responsible is subject to punishment under this Act. Any person who commits an offense outside of India that is punishable by this Act would be treated in accordance with its provisions in the same way as if the offense had been committed within India. The provisions of this Act apply also to-citizens of India outside India; persons in the service of the Government, wherever they may be; persons on ships and aircraft, registered in India, wherever they may be. As per UAPA, if the Central Government believes that a certain association is or has become an unlawful association, it may proclaim the association to be unlawful by publishing a notice in the Official Gazette. Each of these notifications must state the grounds for their issuance. No such notification shall take effect until the Tribunal has approved the declaration contained therein except:- The Central Government may, for reasons to be stated in writing, declare an association to be unlawful with immediate effect if it believes that circumstances exist that make such a declaration necessary.Q.An organization that the Central Government of India has deemed illegal has been connected to a group of people in India. What would not be regarded as a breach of the UAPA Act of the following?a)The people dont immediately stop being members of the illegal organization.b)Despite not engaging in any overt acts of violence, the people continue to be affiliated with the illegal group.c)The individuals give the illegal group financial support.d)The individuals alert law enforcement authorities about the illegal organizations operations.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Direction: Read the following passage careful...

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:

In a significant verdict of March 2023, the Supreme Court on overruled its 2011 judgments in Arup Bhuyan vs State of Assam, Indra Das vs State of Assam and State of Kerala vs Raneef which held that mere membership of a banned association is not sufficient to constitute an offence under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967 or the Terrorism and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, unless it is accompanied with some overt violent act. A 3 Judge bench upheld Section 10(a)(i) of the UAPA which makes membership of an association, which has been declared to be unlawful, to be an offence. The UAPA Act extends to the whole of India. Anyone in our country who violates this Act’s provisions and is found to be responsible is subject to punishment under this Act. Any person who commits an offense outside of India that is punishable by this Act would be treated in accordance with its provisions in the same way as if the offense had been committed within India. The provisions of this Act apply also to-citizens of India outside India; persons in the service of the Government, wherever they may be; persons on ships and aircraft, registered in India, wherever they may be. As per UAPA, if the Central Government believes that a certain association is or has become an unlawful association, it may proclaim the association to be unlawful by publishing a notice in the Official Gazette. Each of these notifications must state the grounds for their issuance. No such notification shall take effect until the Tribunal has approved the declaration contained therein except:- The Central Government may, for reasons to be stated in writing, declare an association to be unlawful with immediate effect if it believes that circumstances exist that make such a declaration necessary.

Q. An organization that the Central Government of India has deemed illegal has been connected to a group of people in India. What would not be regarded as a breach of the UAPA Act of the following?

a)
The people don't immediately stop being members of the illegal organization.
b)
Despite not engaging in any overt acts of violence, the people continue to be affiliated with the illegal group.
c)
The individuals give the illegal group financial support.
d)
The individuals alert law enforcement authorities about the illegal organization's operations.

Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questio...

Option (d) does not violate the UAPA Act because there is no relationship with the prohibited organization. Options (a), (b), and (c) would all be regarded as contraventions of Section 10(a)(i) of the UAPA Act, which defines membership in an unlawful organization as a crime in and of itself.

Hence, option D is correct.

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Hungamaland is known for exotic wines, beers and other alcoholic drinks. Hungamaland liquor is one of the best attractions of the world. Recently, Hungamaland witnessed a change in ruling political party which came to power on the promise of prohibition of alcohol. In pursuance of the political promise, Govt. of Hungamaland notified the closure of breweries. Closure order led to huge unemployment.Reports pointed a rise in criminal activities by the unemployed populace. To remedy the situation, Govt. notified the employment of the brewery workers in Coal mines. This notification successfully led to a decline in the crimes. However after two years, Hungamaland Govt. closed the sulphur emitting coal mines by withdrawing the employment notification. Govt. argued due to Paris commitment, achievement of the climate targets has become imminent.Later on, Government of Hungamaland announced tax exemptions and subsidies to promote industrial production.To bridge inter-regional disparities, investment allowances were announced for investors who set up industries in the rural areas. Laws and notifications were formulated to give effect to the announcements. Hungamaland to raise revenue, withdrawn the tax exemptions, subsidies & investment allowances laws and notifications. Investors and Industrialists pleaded for the right of being heard before the withdrawal which was not conceded.In due course, Hungamaland policies gave a big boost to the economy. To deal with any dispute arising out of the terms, conditions and contract of services, Tribunal was established by the Hungamaland Legislature. Tribunal was headed by a Chairman. Law stipulated that Chairman shall continue for 5 years from the date of joining the services or till the attainment of 65 years, whichever is earlier. After two years, Legislature abolished the Tribunal by passing a Tribunal (Repeal) law. Government Contracts are useful instrument to deliver public service. Contract/Tender notifications lay down the following guidelines:- A person has a legal expectation of being treated in a certain way by administrative/legislative authority. The expectation may arise either from a representation or promise made by the authority, including an implied representation, or from consistent past practice. Principle of legal expectation requires opportunity of being heard to the person affected where a promise is made and is withdrawn. Change in Govt. Policy due to overriding public interest must be given due weight while considering claim of legal expectation. Q. Unemployed workers challenged the action of Govt. on account of legal expectation of continuous employment. Has Government violated the law?Choose the option with the correct answer and explanation.

View answer

Passage:Management is a set of processesthat can keep a complicated system of people and technology running smoothly. The most important aspects of management include planning, budgeting, organizing, staffing, controlling, and problem-solving. Leadership is a set of processes that creates organisations in the first place or adapts them to significantly changing circumstances. Leadership defines what the future should look like, aligns people with that vision, and inspires them to make it happen despite the obstacles. This distinction is absolutely crucial for our purposes here: Successful transformation is 70 to 90 percent leadership and only 10 to 30 percent management. Yet for historical reasons, many organisations today don‘t have much leadership. And almost everyone thinks about the problems here as one of managing change. For most of this century, as we created thousands and thousands of large organizations for the first time in human history, we didn‘t have enough good managers to keep all those bureaucracies functioning. So many companies and universities developed management programs, and hundreds and thousands of people were encouraged to learn management on the job. And they did. But, people were taught little about leadership. To some degree, management was emphasized because it‘s easier to teach than leadership. But even more so, management was the main item on the twentieth-century agenda because that‘s what was needed. For every entrepreneur or business builder who was a leader, we needed hundreds of managers to run their ever growing enterprises. Unfortunately for us today, this emphasis on management has often been institutionalized in corporate cultures that discourage employees from learning how to lead. Ironically, past success is usually the key ingredient in producing this outcome.The syndrome, as I have observed it on many occasions, goes like this: success creates some degree of market dominance, which in turn produces much growth. After a while keeping the ever larger organizations under control becomes the primary challenge. So attention turns inward, and managerial competencies are nurtured. With a strong emphasis on management but not on leadership, bureaucracy and an inward focus take over. But with continued success, the result mostly of market dominance, the problem often goes unaddressed and an unhealthy arrogance begins to evolve. All of these characteristics then make any transformation effort much more difficult. Arrogant managers can over- evaluate their current performance and competitive position, listen poorly, and learn slowly. Inwardly focused employees can have difficulty seeing the very forces that present threats and opportunities.Bureaucratic cultures can smother those who want to respond to shifting conditions. And the lack of leadership leaves no fore inside these organizations to break out of the morass.Q.Management education was emphasized in the management programs because

View answer

Passage:Management is a set of processesthat can keep a complicated system of people and technology running smoothly. The most important aspects of management include planning, budgeting, organizing, staffing, controlling, and problem-solving. Leadership is a set of processes that creates organisations in the first place or adapts them to significantly changing circumstances. Leadership defines what the future should look like, aligns people with that vision, and inspires them to make it happen despite the obstacles. This distinction is absolutely crucial for our purposes here: Successful transformation is 70 to 90 percent leadership and only 10 to 30 percent management. Yet for historical reasons, many organisations today don‘t have much leadership. And almost everyone thinks about the problems here as one of managing change. For most of this century, as we created thousands and thousands of large organizations for the first time in human history, we didn‘t have enough good managers to keep all those bureaucracies functioning. So many companies and universities developed management programs, and hundreds and thousands of people were encouraged to learn management on the job. And they did. But, people were taught little about leadership. To some degree, management was emphasized because it‘s easier to teach than leadership. But even more so, management was the main item on the twentieth-century agenda because that‘s what was needed. For every entrepreneur or business builder who was a leader, we needed hundreds of managers to run their ever growing enterprises. Unfortunately for us today, this emphasis on management has often been institutionalized in corporate cultures that discourage employees from learning how to lead. Ironically, past success is usually the key ingredient in producing this outcome.The syndrome, as I have observed it on many occasions, goes like this: success creates some degree of market dominance, which in turn produces much growth. After a while keeping the ever larger organizations under control becomes the primary challenge. So attention turns inward, and managerial competencies are nurtured. With a strong emphasis on management but not on leadership, bureaucracy and an inward focus take over. But with continued success, the result mostly of market dominance, the problem often goes unaddressed and an unhealthy arrogance begins to evolve. All of these characteristics then make any transformation effort much more difficult. Arrogant managers can over- evaluate their current performance and competitive position, listen poorly, and learn slowly. Inwardly focused employees can have difficulty seeing the very forces that present threats and opportunities.Bureaucratic cultures can smother those who want to respond to shifting conditions. And the lack of leadership leaves no fore inside these organizations to break out of the morass.Q.Why did companies and universities develop programs to prepare managers in such a large number?

View answer

Passage:Management is a set of processesthat can keep a complicated system of people and technology running smoothly. The most important aspects of management include planning, budgeting, organizing, staffing, controlling, and problem-solving. Leadership is a set of processes that creates organisations in the first place or adapts them to significantly changing circumstances. Leadership defines what the future should look like, aligns people with that vision, and inspires them to make it happen despite the obstacles. This distinction is absolutely crucial for our purposes here: Successful transformation is 70 to 90 per cent leadership and only 10 to 30 per cent management. Yet for historical reasons, many organisations today don‘t have much leadership. And almost everyone thinks about the problems here as one of managing change. For most of this century, as we created thousands and thousands of large organizations for the first time in human history, we didn‘t have enough good managers to keep all those burrreaucracies functioning. So many companies and universities developed management programmes, and hundreds and thousands of people were encouraged to learn management on the job. And they did. But, people were taught little about leadership. To some degree, management was emphasized because it‘s easier to teach than leadership. But even more so, management was the main item on the twentieth-century agenda because that‘s what was needed. For every entrepreneur or business builder who was a leader, we needed hundreds of managers to run their ever growing enterprises. Unfortunately for us today, this emphasis on management has often been institutionalized in corporate cultures that discourage employees from learning how to lead. Ironically, past success is usually the key ingredient in producing this outcome.The syndrome, as I have observed it on many occasions, goes like this: success creates some degree of market dominance, which in turn produces much growth. After a while keeping the ever larger organizations under control becomes the primary challenge. So attention turns inward, and managerial competencies are nurtured. With a strong emphasis on management but not on leadership, bureaucracy and an inward focus take over. But with continued success, the result mostly of market dominance, the problem often goes unaddressed and an unhealthy arrogance begins to evolve. All of these characteristics then make any transformation effort much more difficult. Arrogant managers can over- evaluate their current performance and competitive position, listen poorly, and learn slowly. Inwardly focused employees can have difficulty seeing the very forces that present threats and opportunities.Bureaucratic cultures an smother those who want to respond to shifting conditions. And the lack of leadership leaves no fore inside these organizations to break out of the morass.Q.In the passage, management is equated with

View answer

Passage: Management is a set of processesthat can keep a complicated system of people and technology running smoothly. The most important aspects of management include planning, budgeting, organizing, staffing, controlling, and problem-solving. Leadership is a set of processes that creates organisations in the first place or adapts them to significantly changing circumstances. Leadership defines what the future should look like, aligns people with that vision, and inspires them to make it happen despite the obstacles. This distinction is absolutely crucial for our purposes here: Successful transformation is 70 to 90 per cent leadership and only 10 to 30 per cent management. Yet for historical reasons, many organisations today don‘t have much leadership. And almost everyone thinks about the problems here as one of managing change. For most of this century, as we created thousands and thousands of large organizations for the first time in human history, we didn‘t have enough good managers to keep all those burrreaucracies functioning. So many companies and universities developed management programmes, and hundreds and thousands of people were encouraged to learn management on the job. And they did. But, people were taught little about leadership. To some degree, management was emphasized because it‘s easier to teach than leadership. But even more so, management was the main item on the twentieth-century agenda because that‘s what was needed. For every entrepreneur or business builder who was a leader, we needed hundreds of managers to run their ever growing enterprises. Unfortunately for us today, this emphasis on management has often been institutionalized in corporate cultures that discourage employees from learning how to lead. Ironically, past success is usually the key ingredient in producing this outcome.The syndrome, as I have observed it on many occasions, goes like this: success creates some degree of market dominance, which in turn produces much growth. After a while keeping the ever larger organizations under control becomes the primary challenge. So attention turns inward, and managerial competencies are nurtured. With a strong emphasis on management but not on leadership, bureaucracy and an inward focus take over. But with continued success, the result mostly of market dominance, the problem often goes unaddressed and an unhealthy arrogance begins to evolve. All of these characteristics then make any transformation effort much more difficult. Arrogant managers can over- evaluate their current performance and competitive position, listen poorly, and learn slowly. Inwardly focused employees can have difficulty seeing the very forces that present threats and opportunities.Bureaucratic cultures an smother those who want to respond to shifting conditions. And the lack of leadership leaves no fore inside these organizations to break out of the morass.Q.Why, according to the author, is a distinction between management and leadership crucial?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Crash Course for CLAT

CLAT Mock Test Series 2026

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:In a significant verdict of March 2023, the Supreme Court on overruled its 2011 judgments in Arup Bhuyan vs State of Assam, Indra Das vs State of Assam and State of Kerala vs Raneef which held that mere membership of a banned association is not sufficient to constitute an offence under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967 or the Terrorism and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, unless it is accompanied with some overt violent act. A 3 Judge bench upheld Section 10(a)(i) of the UAPA which makes membership of an association, which has been declared to be unlawful, to be an offence. The UAPA Act extends to the whole of India. Anyone in our country who violates this Act’s provisions and is found to be responsible is subject to punishment under this Act. Any person who commits an offense outside of India that is punishable by this Act would be treated in accordance with its provisions in the same way as if the offense had been committed within India. The provisions of this Act apply also to-citizens of India outside India; persons in the service of the Government, wherever they may be; persons on ships and aircraft, registered in India, wherever they may be. As per UAPA, if the Central Government believes that a certain association is or has become an unlawful association, it may proclaim the association to be unlawful by publishing a notice in the Official Gazette. Each of these notifications must state the grounds for their issuance. No such notification shall take effect until the Tribunal has approved the declaration contained therein except:- The Central Government may, for reasons to be stated in writing, declare an association to be unlawful with immediate effect if it believes that circumstances exist that make such a declaration necessary.Q.An organization that the Central Government of India has deemed illegal has been connected to a group of people in India. What would not be regarded as a breach of the UAPA Act of the following?a)The people dont immediately stop being members of the illegal organization.b)Despite not engaging in any overt acts of violence, the people continue to be affiliated with the illegal group.c)The individuals give the illegal group financial support.d)The individuals alert law enforcement authorities about the illegal organizations operations.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:In a significant verdict of March 2023, the Supreme Court on overruled its 2011 judgments in Arup Bhuyan vs State of Assam, Indra Das vs State of Assam and State of Kerala vs Raneef which held that mere membership of a banned association is not sufficient to constitute an offence under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967 or the Terrorism and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, unless it is accompanied with some overt violent act. A 3 Judge bench upheld Section 10(a)(i) of the UAPA which makes membership of an association, which has been declared to be unlawful, to be an offence. The UAPA Act extends to the whole of India. Anyone in our country who violates this Act’s provisions and is found to be responsible is subject to punishment under this Act. Any person who commits an offense outside of India that is punishable by this Act would be treated in accordance with its provisions in the same way as if the offense had been committed within India. The provisions of this Act apply also to-citizens of India outside India; persons in the service of the Government, wherever they may be; persons on ships and aircraft, registered in India, wherever they may be. As per UAPA, if the Central Government believes that a certain association is or has become an unlawful association, it may proclaim the association to be unlawful by publishing a notice in the Official Gazette. Each of these notifications must state the grounds for their issuance. No such notification shall take effect until the Tribunal has approved the declaration contained therein except:- The Central Government may, for reasons to be stated in writing, declare an association to be unlawful with immediate effect if it believes that circumstances exist that make such a declaration necessary.Q.An organization that the Central Government of India has deemed illegal has been connected to a group of people in India. What would not be regarded as a breach of the UAPA Act of the following?a)The people dont immediately stop being members of the illegal organization.b)Despite not engaging in any overt acts of violence, the people continue to be affiliated with the illegal group.c)The individuals give the illegal group financial support.d)The individuals alert law enforcement authorities about the illegal organizations operations.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:In a significant verdict of March 2023, the Supreme Court on overruled its 2011 judgments in Arup Bhuyan vs State of Assam, Indra Das vs State of Assam and State of Kerala vs Raneef which held that mere membership of a banned association is not sufficient to constitute an offence under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967 or the Terrorism and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, unless it is accompanied with some overt violent act. A 3 Judge bench upheld Section 10(a)(i) of the UAPA which makes membership of an association, which has been declared to be unlawful, to be an offence. The UAPA Act extends to the whole of India. Anyone in our country who violates this Act’s provisions and is found to be responsible is subject to punishment under this Act. Any person who commits an offense outside of India that is punishable by this Act would be treated in accordance with its provisions in the same way as if the offense had been committed within India. The provisions of this Act apply also to-citizens of India outside India; persons in the service of the Government, wherever they may be; persons on ships and aircraft, registered in India, wherever they may be. As per UAPA, if the Central Government believes that a certain association is or has become an unlawful association, it may proclaim the association to be unlawful by publishing a notice in the Official Gazette. Each of these notifications must state the grounds for their issuance. No such notification shall take effect until the Tribunal has approved the declaration contained therein except:- The Central Government may, for reasons to be stated in writing, declare an association to be unlawful with immediate effect if it believes that circumstances exist that make such a declaration necessary.Q.An organization that the Central Government of India has deemed illegal has been connected to a group of people in India. What would not be regarded as a breach of the UAPA Act of the following?a)The people dont immediately stop being members of the illegal organization.b)Despite not engaging in any overt acts of violence, the people continue to be affiliated with the illegal group.c)The individuals give the illegal group financial support.d)The individuals alert law enforcement authorities about the illegal organizations operations.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:In a significant verdict of March 2023, the Supreme Court on overruled its 2011 judgments in Arup Bhuyan vs State of Assam, Indra Das vs State of Assam and State of Kerala vs Raneef which held that mere membership of a banned association is not sufficient to constitute an offence under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967 or the Terrorism and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, unless it is accompanied with some overt violent act. A 3 Judge bench upheld Section 10(a)(i) of the UAPA which makes membership of an association, which has been declared to be unlawful, to be an offence. The UAPA Act extends to the whole of India. Anyone in our country who violates this Act’s provisions and is found to be responsible is subject to punishment under this Act. Any person who commits an offense outside of India that is punishable by this Act would be treated in accordance with its provisions in the same way as if the offense had been committed within India. The provisions of this Act apply also to-citizens of India outside India; persons in the service of the Government, wherever they may be; persons on ships and aircraft, registered in India, wherever they may be. As per UAPA, if the Central Government believes that a certain association is or has become an unlawful association, it may proclaim the association to be unlawful by publishing a notice in the Official Gazette. Each of these notifications must state the grounds for their issuance. No such notification shall take effect until the Tribunal has approved the declaration contained therein except:- The Central Government may, for reasons to be stated in writing, declare an association to be unlawful with immediate effect if it believes that circumstances exist that make such a declaration necessary.Q.An organization that the Central Government of India has deemed illegal has been connected to a group of people in India. What would not be regarded as a breach of the UAPA Act of the following?a)The people dont immediately stop being members of the illegal organization.b)Despite not engaging in any overt acts of violence, the people continue to be affiliated with the illegal group.c)The individuals give the illegal group financial support.d)The individuals alert law enforcement authorities about the illegal organizations operations.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:In a significant verdict of March 2023, the Supreme Court on overruled its 2011 judgments in Arup Bhuyan vs State of Assam, Indra Das vs State of Assam and State of Kerala vs Raneef which held that mere membership of a banned association is not sufficient to constitute an offence under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967 or the Terrorism and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, unless it is accompanied with some overt violent act. A 3 Judge bench upheld Section 10(a)(i) of the UAPA which makes membership of an association, which has been declared to be unlawful, to be an offence. The UAPA Act extends to the whole of India. Anyone in our country who violates this Act’s provisions and is found to be responsible is subject to punishment under this Act. Any person who commits an offense outside of India that is punishable by this Act would be treated in accordance with its provisions in the same way as if the offense had been committed within India. The provisions of this Act apply also to-citizens of India outside India; persons in the service of the Government, wherever they may be; persons on ships and aircraft, registered in India, wherever they may be. As per UAPA, if the Central Government believes that a certain association is or has become an unlawful association, it may proclaim the association to be unlawful by publishing a notice in the Official Gazette. Each of these notifications must state the grounds for their issuance. No such notification shall take effect until the Tribunal has approved the declaration contained therein except:- The Central Government may, for reasons to be stated in writing, declare an association to be unlawful with immediate effect if it believes that circumstances exist that make such a declaration necessary.Q.An organization that the Central Government of India has deemed illegal has been connected to a group of people in India. What would not be regarded as a breach of the UAPA Act of the following?a)The people dont immediately stop being members of the illegal organization.b)Despite not engaging in any overt acts of violence, the people continue to be affiliated with the illegal group.c)The individuals give the illegal group financial support.d)The individuals alert law enforcement authorities about the illegal organizations operations.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:In a significant verdict of March 2023, the Supreme Court on overruled its 2011 judgments in Arup Bhuyan vs State of Assam, Indra Das vs State of Assam and State of Kerala vs Raneef which held that mere membership of a banned association is not sufficient to constitute an offence under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967 or the Terrorism and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, unless it is accompanied with some overt violent act. A 3 Judge bench upheld Section 10(a)(i) of the UAPA which makes membership of an association, which has been declared to be unlawful, to be an offence. The UAPA Act extends to the whole of India. Anyone in our country who violates this Act’s provisions and is found to be responsible is subject to punishment under this Act. Any person who commits an offense outside of India that is punishable by this Act would be treated in accordance with its provisions in the same way as if the offense had been committed within India. The provisions of this Act apply also to-citizens of India outside India; persons in the service of the Government, wherever they may be; persons on ships and aircraft, registered in India, wherever they may be. As per UAPA, if the Central Government believes that a certain association is or has become an unlawful association, it may proclaim the association to be unlawful by publishing a notice in the Official Gazette. Each of these notifications must state the grounds for their issuance. No such notification shall take effect until the Tribunal has approved the declaration contained therein except:- The Central Government may, for reasons to be stated in writing, declare an association to be unlawful with immediate effect if it believes that circumstances exist that make such a declaration necessary.Q.An organization that the Central Government of India has deemed illegal has been connected to a group of people in India. What would not be regarded as a breach of the UAPA Act of the following?a)The people dont immediately stop being members of the illegal organization.b)Despite not engaging in any overt acts of violence, the people continue to be affiliated with the illegal group.c)The individuals give the illegal group financial support.d)The individuals alert law enforcement authorities about the illegal organizations operations.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:In a significant verdict of March 2023, the Supreme Court on overruled its 2011 judgments in Arup Bhuyan vs State of Assam, Indra Das vs State of Assam and State of Kerala vs Raneef which held that mere membership of a banned association is not sufficient to constitute an offence under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967 or the Terrorism and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, unless it is accompanied with some overt violent act. A 3 Judge bench upheld Section 10(a)(i) of the UAPA which makes membership of an association, which has been declared to be unlawful, to be an offence. The UAPA Act extends to the whole of India. Anyone in our country who violates this Act’s provisions and is found to be responsible is subject to punishment under this Act. Any person who commits an offense outside of India that is punishable by this Act would be treated in accordance with its provisions in the same way as if the offense had been committed within India. The provisions of this Act apply also to-citizens of India outside India; persons in the service of the Government, wherever they may be; persons on ships and aircraft, registered in India, wherever they may be. As per UAPA, if the Central Government believes that a certain association is or has become an unlawful association, it may proclaim the association to be unlawful by publishing a notice in the Official Gazette. Each of these notifications must state the grounds for their issuance. No such notification shall take effect until the Tribunal has approved the declaration contained therein except:- The Central Government may, for reasons to be stated in writing, declare an association to be unlawful with immediate effect if it believes that circumstances exist that make such a declaration necessary.Q.An organization that the Central Government of India has deemed illegal has been connected to a group of people in India. What would not be regarded as a breach of the UAPA Act of the following?a)The people dont immediately stop being members of the illegal organization.b)Despite not engaging in any overt acts of violence, the people continue to be affiliated with the illegal group.c)The individuals give the illegal group financial support.d)The individuals alert law enforcement authorities about the illegal organizations operations.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:In a significant verdict of March 2023, the Supreme Court on overruled its 2011 judgments in Arup Bhuyan vs State of Assam, Indra Das vs State of Assam and State of Kerala vs Raneef which held that mere membership of a banned association is not sufficient to constitute an offence under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967 or the Terrorism and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, unless it is accompanied with some overt violent act. A 3 Judge bench upheld Section 10(a)(i) of the UAPA which makes membership of an association, which has been declared to be unlawful, to be an offence. The UAPA Act extends to the whole of India. Anyone in our country who violates this Act’s provisions and is found to be responsible is subject to punishment under this Act. Any person who commits an offense outside of India that is punishable by this Act would be treated in accordance with its provisions in the same way as if the offense had been committed within India. The provisions of this Act apply also to-citizens of India outside India; persons in the service of the Government, wherever they may be; persons on ships and aircraft, registered in India, wherever they may be. As per UAPA, if the Central Government believes that a certain association is or has become an unlawful association, it may proclaim the association to be unlawful by publishing a notice in the Official Gazette. Each of these notifications must state the grounds for their issuance. No such notification shall take effect until the Tribunal has approved the declaration contained therein except:- The Central Government may, for reasons to be stated in writing, declare an association to be unlawful with immediate effect if it believes that circumstances exist that make such a declaration necessary.Q.An organization that the Central Government of India has deemed illegal has been connected to a group of people in India. What would not be regarded as a breach of the UAPA Act of the following?a)The people dont immediately stop being members of the illegal organization.b)Despite not engaging in any overt acts of violence, the people continue to be affiliated with the illegal group.c)The individuals give the illegal group financial support.d)The individuals alert law enforcement authorities about the illegal organizations operations.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:In a significant verdict of March 2023, the Supreme Court on overruled its 2011 judgments in Arup Bhuyan vs State of Assam, Indra Das vs State of Assam and State of Kerala vs Raneef which held that mere membership of a banned association is not sufficient to constitute an offence under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967 or the Terrorism and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, unless it is accompanied with some overt violent act. A 3 Judge bench upheld Section 10(a)(i) of the UAPA which makes membership of an association, which has been declared to be unlawful, to be an offence. The UAPA Act extends to the whole of India. Anyone in our country who violates this Act’s provisions and is found to be responsible is subject to punishment under this Act. Any person who commits an offense outside of India that is punishable by this Act would be treated in accordance with its provisions in the same way as if the offense had been committed within India. The provisions of this Act apply also to-citizens of India outside India; persons in the service of the Government, wherever they may be; persons on ships and aircraft, registered in India, wherever they may be. As per UAPA, if the Central Government believes that a certain association is or has become an unlawful association, it may proclaim the association to be unlawful by publishing a notice in the Official Gazette. Each of these notifications must state the grounds for their issuance. No such notification shall take effect until the Tribunal has approved the declaration contained therein except:- The Central Government may, for reasons to be stated in writing, declare an association to be unlawful with immediate effect if it believes that circumstances exist that make such a declaration necessary.Q.An organization that the Central Government of India has deemed illegal has been connected to a group of people in India. What would not be regarded as a breach of the UAPA Act of the following?a)The people dont immediately stop being members of the illegal organization.b)Despite not engaging in any overt acts of violence, the people continue to be affiliated with the illegal group.c)The individuals give the illegal group financial support.d)The individuals alert law enforcement authorities about the illegal organizations operations.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:In a significant verdict of March 2023, the Supreme Court on overruled its 2011 judgments in Arup Bhuyan vs State of Assam, Indra Das vs State of Assam and State of Kerala vs Raneef which held that mere membership of a banned association is not sufficient to constitute an offence under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967 or the Terrorism and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, unless it is accompanied with some overt violent act. A 3 Judge bench upheld Section 10(a)(i) of the UAPA which makes membership of an association, which has been declared to be unlawful, to be an offence. The UAPA Act extends to the whole of India. Anyone in our country who violates this Act’s provisions and is found to be responsible is subject to punishment under this Act. Any person who commits an offense outside of India that is punishable by this Act would be treated in accordance with its provisions in the same way as if the offense had been committed within India. The provisions of this Act apply also to-citizens of India outside India; persons in the service of the Government, wherever they may be; persons on ships and aircraft, registered in India, wherever they may be. As per UAPA, if the Central Government believes that a certain association is or has become an unlawful association, it may proclaim the association to be unlawful by publishing a notice in the Official Gazette. Each of these notifications must state the grounds for their issuance. No such notification shall take effect until the Tribunal has approved the declaration contained therein except:- The Central Government may, for reasons to be stated in writing, declare an association to be unlawful with immediate effect if it believes that circumstances exist that make such a declaration necessary.Q.An organization that the Central Government of India has deemed illegal has been connected to a group of people in India. What would not be regarded as a breach of the UAPA Act of the following?a)The people dont immediately stop being members of the illegal organization.b)Despite not engaging in any overt acts of violence, the people continue to be affiliated with the illegal group.c)The individuals give the illegal group financial support.d)The individuals alert law enforcement authorities about the illegal organizations operations.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam