UPSC Exam > UPSC Questions > What did the Supreme Court clarify in the Kih...
Start Learning for Free
What did the Supreme Court clarify in the Kihota Hollohon vs. Zachilhu (1992) judgment regarding the 10th schedule?
- a)That the 10th schedule is unconstitutional.
- b)That it impinges upon the freedom of speech and expression.
- c)That it is constitutionally valid.
- d)That it promotes legislative oversight.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
What did the Supreme Court clarify in the Kihota Hollohon vs. Zachilhu...
In the Kihota Hollohon vs. Zachilhu (1992) judgment, the Supreme Court clarified that the 10th schedule is constitutionally valid.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
What did the Supreme Court clarify in the Kihota Hollohon vs. Zachilhu...
Clarification by the Supreme Court in the Kihota Hollohon vs. Zachilhu (1992) judgment regarding the 10th schedule:
Constitutional Validity:
- The Supreme Court clarified that the 10th schedule, also known as the Anti-Defection Law, is constitutionally valid.
- The 10th schedule was added to the Indian Constitution in 1985 to address the issue of political defections.
Background:
- The case of Kihota Hollohon vs. Zachilhu involved the disqualification of Members of the Nagaland Legislative Assembly under the 10th schedule.
- The petitioners challenged the constitutionality of the 10th schedule, arguing that it violated the freedom of speech and expression.
Ruling:
- The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the 10th schedule in its judgment.
- The court clarified that the Anti-Defection Law was necessary to maintain the integrity of the political process and prevent opportunistic defections.
- The law was deemed essential for ensuring stability and coherence in the functioning of the parliamentary system.
Key Takeaway:
- The Supreme Court's ruling in the Kihota Hollohon case reaffirmed the constitutionality of the 10th schedule and its importance in preserving the democratic principles of the Indian political system.
Constitutional Validity:
- The Supreme Court clarified that the 10th schedule, also known as the Anti-Defection Law, is constitutionally valid.
- The 10th schedule was added to the Indian Constitution in 1985 to address the issue of political defections.
Background:
- The case of Kihota Hollohon vs. Zachilhu involved the disqualification of Members of the Nagaland Legislative Assembly under the 10th schedule.
- The petitioners challenged the constitutionality of the 10th schedule, arguing that it violated the freedom of speech and expression.
Ruling:
- The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the 10th schedule in its judgment.
- The court clarified that the Anti-Defection Law was necessary to maintain the integrity of the political process and prevent opportunistic defections.
- The law was deemed essential for ensuring stability and coherence in the functioning of the parliamentary system.
Key Takeaway:
- The Supreme Court's ruling in the Kihota Hollohon case reaffirmed the constitutionality of the 10th schedule and its importance in preserving the democratic principles of the Indian political system.
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|
|
Similar UPSC Doubts
Top Courses for UPSCView all
What did the Supreme Court clarify in the Kihota Hollohon vs. Zachilhu (1992) judgment regarding the 10th schedule?a)That the 10th schedule is unconstitutional.b)That it impinges upon the freedom of speech and expression.c)That it is constitutionally valid.d)That it promotes legislative oversight.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
What did the Supreme Court clarify in the Kihota Hollohon vs. Zachilhu (1992) judgment regarding the 10th schedule?a)That the 10th schedule is unconstitutional.b)That it impinges upon the freedom of speech and expression.c)That it is constitutionally valid.d)That it promotes legislative oversight.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2025 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about What did the Supreme Court clarify in the Kihota Hollohon vs. Zachilhu (1992) judgment regarding the 10th schedule?a)That the 10th schedule is unconstitutional.b)That it impinges upon the freedom of speech and expression.c)That it is constitutionally valid.d)That it promotes legislative oversight.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for What did the Supreme Court clarify in the Kihota Hollohon vs. Zachilhu (1992) judgment regarding the 10th schedule?a)That the 10th schedule is unconstitutional.b)That it impinges upon the freedom of speech and expression.c)That it is constitutionally valid.d)That it promotes legislative oversight.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
What did the Supreme Court clarify in the Kihota Hollohon vs. Zachilhu (1992) judgment regarding the 10th schedule?a)That the 10th schedule is unconstitutional.b)That it impinges upon the freedom of speech and expression.c)That it is constitutionally valid.d)That it promotes legislative oversight.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2025 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about What did the Supreme Court clarify in the Kihota Hollohon vs. Zachilhu (1992) judgment regarding the 10th schedule?a)That the 10th schedule is unconstitutional.b)That it impinges upon the freedom of speech and expression.c)That it is constitutionally valid.d)That it promotes legislative oversight.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for What did the Supreme Court clarify in the Kihota Hollohon vs. Zachilhu (1992) judgment regarding the 10th schedule?a)That the 10th schedule is unconstitutional.b)That it impinges upon the freedom of speech and expression.c)That it is constitutionally valid.d)That it promotes legislative oversight.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for What did the Supreme Court clarify in the Kihota Hollohon vs. Zachilhu (1992) judgment regarding the 10th schedule?a)That the 10th schedule is unconstitutional.b)That it impinges upon the freedom of speech and expression.c)That it is constitutionally valid.d)That it promotes legislative oversight.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of What did the Supreme Court clarify in the Kihota Hollohon vs. Zachilhu (1992) judgment regarding the 10th schedule?a)That the 10th schedule is unconstitutional.b)That it impinges upon the freedom of speech and expression.c)That it is constitutionally valid.d)That it promotes legislative oversight.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
What did the Supreme Court clarify in the Kihota Hollohon vs. Zachilhu (1992) judgment regarding the 10th schedule?a)That the 10th schedule is unconstitutional.b)That it impinges upon the freedom of speech and expression.c)That it is constitutionally valid.d)That it promotes legislative oversight.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for What did the Supreme Court clarify in the Kihota Hollohon vs. Zachilhu (1992) judgment regarding the 10th schedule?a)That the 10th schedule is unconstitutional.b)That it impinges upon the freedom of speech and expression.c)That it is constitutionally valid.d)That it promotes legislative oversight.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of What did the Supreme Court clarify in the Kihota Hollohon vs. Zachilhu (1992) judgment regarding the 10th schedule?a)That the 10th schedule is unconstitutional.b)That it impinges upon the freedom of speech and expression.c)That it is constitutionally valid.d)That it promotes legislative oversight.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice What did the Supreme Court clarify in the Kihota Hollohon vs. Zachilhu (1992) judgment regarding the 10th schedule?a)That the 10th schedule is unconstitutional.b)That it impinges upon the freedom of speech and expression.c)That it is constitutionally valid.d)That it promotes legislative oversight.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup