Question Description
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013 inserted Section 326A and Section 326B in the Indian Penal Code, 1860 creating special provisions for the victims of acid attack. Section 326 A of the IPC criminalizes throwing or administering or attempting to throw acid on any person, irrespective of gender, with the intent to disfigure or maim that person causing him permanent or partial damage. The following Section, i.e., Section 326B criminalizes attempts to throw or administer acid on any person. The offenders convicted under these sections shall be imprisoned for a minimum sentence of ten years which may increase up to life imprisonment along with fine; that fine should cover the medical expenses incurred by the victim. The term “acid” can be used for any substance that is corrosive in nature. It could be a substance of burning nature. It should be capable of inflicting temporary or permanent disfigurement or disability to a person. For a person to be convicted under this offence it is not a requirement that the disfigurement must be irreversible in nature. Under Section 326A the punishment for attempting to throw acid on a person is punishable for a time period of 5-7 years under Section 326B irrespective of the nature of the damage caused to the victim. The victim is liable for compensation, up to Rs. 3 lakhs. The compensation should be payable in addition to the payment of the fine by the culprit.Q.Did Sunitas argument hold ground during her trial for attempting to throw acid on her colleague, Riya, but being caught before executing the attack?a)Yes, the section only applies to cases where the offender successfully throws or administers acid on the victim.b)No, the section applies to attempts to throw or administer acid on a person, regardless of whether the attempt was successful or not.c)Yes, the punishment for an attempt to throw acid is lesser than the punishment for actually throwing acid, and therefore, the section only applies in successful attempts.d)No, the section applies to both successful attempts and attempts that were foiled before they could cause any damage.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013 inserted Section 326A and Section 326B in the Indian Penal Code, 1860 creating special provisions for the victims of acid attack. Section 326 A of the IPC criminalizes throwing or administering or attempting to throw acid on any person, irrespective of gender, with the intent to disfigure or maim that person causing him permanent or partial damage. The following Section, i.e., Section 326B criminalizes attempts to throw or administer acid on any person. The offenders convicted under these sections shall be imprisoned for a minimum sentence of ten years which may increase up to life imprisonment along with fine; that fine should cover the medical expenses incurred by the victim. The term “acid” can be used for any substance that is corrosive in nature. It could be a substance of burning nature. It should be capable of inflicting temporary or permanent disfigurement or disability to a person. For a person to be convicted under this offence it is not a requirement that the disfigurement must be irreversible in nature. Under Section 326A the punishment for attempting to throw acid on a person is punishable for a time period of 5-7 years under Section 326B irrespective of the nature of the damage caused to the victim. The victim is liable for compensation, up to Rs. 3 lakhs. The compensation should be payable in addition to the payment of the fine by the culprit.Q.Did Sunitas argument hold ground during her trial for attempting to throw acid on her colleague, Riya, but being caught before executing the attack?a)Yes, the section only applies to cases where the offender successfully throws or administers acid on the victim.b)No, the section applies to attempts to throw or administer acid on a person, regardless of whether the attempt was successful or not.c)Yes, the punishment for an attempt to throw acid is lesser than the punishment for actually throwing acid, and therefore, the section only applies in successful attempts.d)No, the section applies to both successful attempts and attempts that were foiled before they could cause any damage.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013 inserted Section 326A and Section 326B in the Indian Penal Code, 1860 creating special provisions for the victims of acid attack. Section 326 A of the IPC criminalizes throwing or administering or attempting to throw acid on any person, irrespective of gender, with the intent to disfigure or maim that person causing him permanent or partial damage. The following Section, i.e., Section 326B criminalizes attempts to throw or administer acid on any person. The offenders convicted under these sections shall be imprisoned for a minimum sentence of ten years which may increase up to life imprisonment along with fine; that fine should cover the medical expenses incurred by the victim. The term “acid” can be used for any substance that is corrosive in nature. It could be a substance of burning nature. It should be capable of inflicting temporary or permanent disfigurement or disability to a person. For a person to be convicted under this offence it is not a requirement that the disfigurement must be irreversible in nature. Under Section 326A the punishment for attempting to throw acid on a person is punishable for a time period of 5-7 years under Section 326B irrespective of the nature of the damage caused to the victim. The victim is liable for compensation, up to Rs. 3 lakhs. The compensation should be payable in addition to the payment of the fine by the culprit.Q.Did Sunitas argument hold ground during her trial for attempting to throw acid on her colleague, Riya, but being caught before executing the attack?a)Yes, the section only applies to cases where the offender successfully throws or administers acid on the victim.b)No, the section applies to attempts to throw or administer acid on a person, regardless of whether the attempt was successful or not.c)Yes, the punishment for an attempt to throw acid is lesser than the punishment for actually throwing acid, and therefore, the section only applies in successful attempts.d)No, the section applies to both successful attempts and attempts that were foiled before they could cause any damage.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013 inserted Section 326A and Section 326B in the Indian Penal Code, 1860 creating special provisions for the victims of acid attack. Section 326 A of the IPC criminalizes throwing or administering or attempting to throw acid on any person, irrespective of gender, with the intent to disfigure or maim that person causing him permanent or partial damage. The following Section, i.e., Section 326B criminalizes attempts to throw or administer acid on any person. The offenders convicted under these sections shall be imprisoned for a minimum sentence of ten years which may increase up to life imprisonment along with fine; that fine should cover the medical expenses incurred by the victim. The term “acid” can be used for any substance that is corrosive in nature. It could be a substance of burning nature. It should be capable of inflicting temporary or permanent disfigurement or disability to a person. For a person to be convicted under this offence it is not a requirement that the disfigurement must be irreversible in nature. Under Section 326A the punishment for attempting to throw acid on a person is punishable for a time period of 5-7 years under Section 326B irrespective of the nature of the damage caused to the victim. The victim is liable for compensation, up to Rs. 3 lakhs. The compensation should be payable in addition to the payment of the fine by the culprit.Q.Did Sunitas argument hold ground during her trial for attempting to throw acid on her colleague, Riya, but being caught before executing the attack?a)Yes, the section only applies to cases where the offender successfully throws or administers acid on the victim.b)No, the section applies to attempts to throw or administer acid on a person, regardless of whether the attempt was successful or not.c)Yes, the punishment for an attempt to throw acid is lesser than the punishment for actually throwing acid, and therefore, the section only applies in successful attempts.d)No, the section applies to both successful attempts and attempts that were foiled before they could cause any damage.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013 inserted Section 326A and Section 326B in the Indian Penal Code, 1860 creating special provisions for the victims of acid attack. Section 326 A of the IPC criminalizes throwing or administering or attempting to throw acid on any person, irrespective of gender, with the intent to disfigure or maim that person causing him permanent or partial damage. The following Section, i.e., Section 326B criminalizes attempts to throw or administer acid on any person. The offenders convicted under these sections shall be imprisoned for a minimum sentence of ten years which may increase up to life imprisonment along with fine; that fine should cover the medical expenses incurred by the victim. The term “acid” can be used for any substance that is corrosive in nature. It could be a substance of burning nature. It should be capable of inflicting temporary or permanent disfigurement or disability to a person. For a person to be convicted under this offence it is not a requirement that the disfigurement must be irreversible in nature. Under Section 326A the punishment for attempting to throw acid on a person is punishable for a time period of 5-7 years under Section 326B irrespective of the nature of the damage caused to the victim. The victim is liable for compensation, up to Rs. 3 lakhs. The compensation should be payable in addition to the payment of the fine by the culprit.Q.Did Sunitas argument hold ground during her trial for attempting to throw acid on her colleague, Riya, but being caught before executing the attack?a)Yes, the section only applies to cases where the offender successfully throws or administers acid on the victim.b)No, the section applies to attempts to throw or administer acid on a person, regardless of whether the attempt was successful or not.c)Yes, the punishment for an attempt to throw acid is lesser than the punishment for actually throwing acid, and therefore, the section only applies in successful attempts.d)No, the section applies to both successful attempts and attempts that were foiled before they could cause any damage.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013 inserted Section 326A and Section 326B in the Indian Penal Code, 1860 creating special provisions for the victims of acid attack. Section 326 A of the IPC criminalizes throwing or administering or attempting to throw acid on any person, irrespective of gender, with the intent to disfigure or maim that person causing him permanent or partial damage. The following Section, i.e., Section 326B criminalizes attempts to throw or administer acid on any person. The offenders convicted under these sections shall be imprisoned for a minimum sentence of ten years which may increase up to life imprisonment along with fine; that fine should cover the medical expenses incurred by the victim. The term “acid” can be used for any substance that is corrosive in nature. It could be a substance of burning nature. It should be capable of inflicting temporary or permanent disfigurement or disability to a person. For a person to be convicted under this offence it is not a requirement that the disfigurement must be irreversible in nature. Under Section 326A the punishment for attempting to throw acid on a person is punishable for a time period of 5-7 years under Section 326B irrespective of the nature of the damage caused to the victim. The victim is liable for compensation, up to Rs. 3 lakhs. The compensation should be payable in addition to the payment of the fine by the culprit.Q.Did Sunitas argument hold ground during her trial for attempting to throw acid on her colleague, Riya, but being caught before executing the attack?a)Yes, the section only applies to cases where the offender successfully throws or administers acid on the victim.b)No, the section applies to attempts to throw or administer acid on a person, regardless of whether the attempt was successful or not.c)Yes, the punishment for an attempt to throw acid is lesser than the punishment for actually throwing acid, and therefore, the section only applies in successful attempts.d)No, the section applies to both successful attempts and attempts that were foiled before they could cause any damage.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013 inserted Section 326A and Section 326B in the Indian Penal Code, 1860 creating special provisions for the victims of acid attack. Section 326 A of the IPC criminalizes throwing or administering or attempting to throw acid on any person, irrespective of gender, with the intent to disfigure or maim that person causing him permanent or partial damage. The following Section, i.e., Section 326B criminalizes attempts to throw or administer acid on any person. The offenders convicted under these sections shall be imprisoned for a minimum sentence of ten years which may increase up to life imprisonment along with fine; that fine should cover the medical expenses incurred by the victim. The term “acid” can be used for any substance that is corrosive in nature. It could be a substance of burning nature. It should be capable of inflicting temporary or permanent disfigurement or disability to a person. For a person to be convicted under this offence it is not a requirement that the disfigurement must be irreversible in nature. Under Section 326A the punishment for attempting to throw acid on a person is punishable for a time period of 5-7 years under Section 326B irrespective of the nature of the damage caused to the victim. The victim is liable for compensation, up to Rs. 3 lakhs. The compensation should be payable in addition to the payment of the fine by the culprit.Q.Did Sunitas argument hold ground during her trial for attempting to throw acid on her colleague, Riya, but being caught before executing the attack?a)Yes, the section only applies to cases where the offender successfully throws or administers acid on the victim.b)No, the section applies to attempts to throw or administer acid on a person, regardless of whether the attempt was successful or not.c)Yes, the punishment for an attempt to throw acid is lesser than the punishment for actually throwing acid, and therefore, the section only applies in successful attempts.d)No, the section applies to both successful attempts and attempts that were foiled before they could cause any damage.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013 inserted Section 326A and Section 326B in the Indian Penal Code, 1860 creating special provisions for the victims of acid attack. Section 326 A of the IPC criminalizes throwing or administering or attempting to throw acid on any person, irrespective of gender, with the intent to disfigure or maim that person causing him permanent or partial damage. The following Section, i.e., Section 326B criminalizes attempts to throw or administer acid on any person. The offenders convicted under these sections shall be imprisoned for a minimum sentence of ten years which may increase up to life imprisonment along with fine; that fine should cover the medical expenses incurred by the victim. The term “acid” can be used for any substance that is corrosive in nature. It could be a substance of burning nature. It should be capable of inflicting temporary or permanent disfigurement or disability to a person. For a person to be convicted under this offence it is not a requirement that the disfigurement must be irreversible in nature. Under Section 326A the punishment for attempting to throw acid on a person is punishable for a time period of 5-7 years under Section 326B irrespective of the nature of the damage caused to the victim. The victim is liable for compensation, up to Rs. 3 lakhs. The compensation should be payable in addition to the payment of the fine by the culprit.Q.Did Sunitas argument hold ground during her trial for attempting to throw acid on her colleague, Riya, but being caught before executing the attack?a)Yes, the section only applies to cases where the offender successfully throws or administers acid on the victim.b)No, the section applies to attempts to throw or administer acid on a person, regardless of whether the attempt was successful or not.c)Yes, the punishment for an attempt to throw acid is lesser than the punishment for actually throwing acid, and therefore, the section only applies in successful attempts.d)No, the section applies to both successful attempts and attempts that were foiled before they could cause any damage.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013 inserted Section 326A and Section 326B in the Indian Penal Code, 1860 creating special provisions for the victims of acid attack. Section 326 A of the IPC criminalizes throwing or administering or attempting to throw acid on any person, irrespective of gender, with the intent to disfigure or maim that person causing him permanent or partial damage. The following Section, i.e., Section 326B criminalizes attempts to throw or administer acid on any person. The offenders convicted under these sections shall be imprisoned for a minimum sentence of ten years which may increase up to life imprisonment along with fine; that fine should cover the medical expenses incurred by the victim. The term “acid” can be used for any substance that is corrosive in nature. It could be a substance of burning nature. It should be capable of inflicting temporary or permanent disfigurement or disability to a person. For a person to be convicted under this offence it is not a requirement that the disfigurement must be irreversible in nature. Under Section 326A the punishment for attempting to throw acid on a person is punishable for a time period of 5-7 years under Section 326B irrespective of the nature of the damage caused to the victim. The victim is liable for compensation, up to Rs. 3 lakhs. The compensation should be payable in addition to the payment of the fine by the culprit.Q.Did Sunitas argument hold ground during her trial for attempting to throw acid on her colleague, Riya, but being caught before executing the attack?a)Yes, the section only applies to cases where the offender successfully throws or administers acid on the victim.b)No, the section applies to attempts to throw or administer acid on a person, regardless of whether the attempt was successful or not.c)Yes, the punishment for an attempt to throw acid is lesser than the punishment for actually throwing acid, and therefore, the section only applies in successful attempts.d)No, the section applies to both successful attempts and attempts that were foiled before they could cause any damage.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.