Direction: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given below.The TRAI paper is right in initiating a review of the policies on radio. These also encompass the computation of licence fees, the duration of the licence, and importantly, whether mobile phones must mandatorily have an FM radio receiver. But the right to broadcast news and current affairs is the most significant issue here. According to the existing rules, FM radio broadcasters can only air AIR bulletins in andlsquo;exactly the same formatandrsquo;. This is a glaring anomaly in an age where private TV channels and the Internet are allowed to broadcast news and current affairs programmes. While stakeholders have argued that radio is important as a source of information in rural areas where the availability of newspapers, TV and electrical connection is limited, the overriding argument here is one of principle: in a democracy, there must be free flow of information across mediums, subject to curbs in the form of fake news and hate speech. The government takes recourse to restrictions to freedom of speech including security, public order, decency/morality et al under Article 19(2) and has argued before various courts, where the policy has been challenged through different public interest petitions, that telecast of news on radio cannot be permitted as it andldquo;might be misused by antinational and radical elements and there is no mechanism to monitor news content on all radio stationsandrdquo;. This is sheer paranoia.The medium has played a critical role in strengthening peace initiatives in countries like Timor Leste and Cambodia on one hand and has been a catalyst for social progression and rural development in young democracies like Nepal. In contrast to the best of global practices which have led to radio being a primary source of not just entertainment but crisp, professionally produced and, most importantly, localised news, India is stuck in a time warp. FM channels have not warmed to broadcasting AIR news, as it could jar with the sound and tenor of their stations. Popular FM channels have been impressing upon governments for over two decades that they should be allowed to produce news content for their niche audiences. Allowing FM and community radio stations to broadcast their own news content will help in creating an informed polity all around, and strengthen grassroots democracy. The law is ably equipped to deal with transgressions, such as fake news, hate speech and defamation.Q.What does the passage criticize India for in comparison to global practices?a)Indias reliance on FM channels for news.b)Indias lack of entertainment on FM channels.c)Indias resistance to broadcasting AIR news.d)Indias strict laws against hate speech.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Direction: Kindly read the passage carefully ...

Join the Discussion on the App

Direction: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given below.

The TRAI paper is right in initiating a review of the policies on radio. These also encompass the computation of licence fees, the duration of the licence, and importantly, whether mobile phones must mandatorily have an FM radio receiver. But the right to broadcast news and current affairs is the most significant issue here. According to the existing rules, FM radio broadcasters can only air AIR bulletins in ‘exactly the same format’. This is a glaring anomaly in an age where private TV channels and the Internet are allowed to broadcast news and current affairs programmes. While stakeholders have argued that radio is important as a source of information in rural areas where the availability of newspapers, TV and electrical connection is limited, the overriding argument here is one of principle: in a democracy, there must be free flow of information across mediums, subject to curbs in the form of fake news and hate speech. The government takes recourse to restrictions to freedom of speech including security, public order, decency/morality et al under Article 19(2) and has argued before various courts, where the policy has been challenged through different public interest petitions, that telecast of news on radio cannot be permitted as it “might be misused by antinational and radical elements and there is no mechanism to monitor news content on all radio stations”. This is sheer paranoia.

The medium has played a critical role in strengthening peace initiatives in countries like Timor Leste and Cambodia on one hand and has been a catalyst for social progression and rural development in young democracies like Nepal. In contrast to the best of global practices which have led to radio being a primary source of not just entertainment but crisp, professionally produced and, most importantly, localised news, India is stuck in a time warp. FM channels have not warmed to broadcasting AIR news, as it could jar with the sound and tenor of their stations. Popular FM channels have been impressing upon governments for over two decades that they should be allowed to produce news content for their niche audiences. Allowing FM and community radio stations to broadcast their own news content will help in creating an informed polity all around, and strengthen grassroots democracy. The law is ably equipped to deal with transgressions, such as fake news, hate speech and defamation.

Q. What does the passage criticize India for in comparison to global practices?

a)
India's reliance on FM channels for news.
b)
India's lack of entertainment on FM channels.
c)
India's resistance to broadcasting AIR news.
d)
India's strict laws against hate speech.

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Test: CLAT Mock Test - 4

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Most Upvoted Answer

Direction: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions ...

The passage criticizes India for not adopting global practices in the field of radio broadcasting. It specifically mentions that in contrast to global practices where radio is a primary source of local news, India is stuck in a time warp by not allowing popular FM channels to broadcast All India Radio (AIR) news, even though these channels have been requesting permission to do so for over two decades. The passage suggests that this reluctance is hindering the progress of radio as a source of news in India.

Answered by Glance Learning Institute · View profile

Attention CLAT Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

CLAT Mock Test Series 2025

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Direction: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given below.The TRAI paper is right in initiating a review of the policies on radio. These also encompass the computation of licence fees, the duration of the licence, and importantly, whether mobile phones must mandatorily have an FM radio receiver. But the right to broadcast news and current affairs is the most significant issue here. According to the existing rules, FM radio broadcasters can only air AIR bulletins in ‘exactly the same format’. This is a glaring anomaly in an age where private TV channels and the Internet are allowed to broadcast news and current affairs programmes. While stakeholders have argued that radio is important as a source of information in rural areas where the availability of newspapers, TV and electrical connection is limited, the overriding argument here is one of principle: in a democracy, there must be free flow of information across mediums, subject to curbs in the form of fake news and hate speech. The government takes recourse to restrictions to freedom of speech including security, public order, decency/morality et al under Article 19(2) and has argued before various courts, where the policy has been challenged through different public interest petitions, that telecast of news on radio cannot be permitted as it “might be misused by antinational and radical elements and there is no mechanism to monitor news content on all radio stations”. This is sheer paranoia.The medium has played a critical role in strengthening peace initiatives in countries like Timor Leste and Cambodia on one hand and has been a catalyst for social progression and rural development in young democracies like Nepal. In contrast to the best of global practices which have led to radio being a primary source of not just entertainment but crisp, professionally produced and, most importantly, localised news, India is stuck in a time warp. FM channels have not warmed to broadcasting AIR news, as it could jar with the sound and tenor of their stations. Popular FM channels have been impressing upon governments for over two decades that they should be allowed to produce news content for their niche audiences. Allowing FM and community radio stations to broadcast their own news content will help in creating an informed polity all around, and strengthen grassroots democracy. The law is ably equipped to deal with transgressions, such as fake news, hate speech and defamation.Q.What is the main concern raised in the passage regarding FM radio broadcasting in India?

View answer

Direction: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given below.The TRAI paper is right in initiating a review of the policies on radio. These also encompass the computation of licence fees, the duration of the licence, and importantly, whether mobile phones must mandatorily have an FM radio receiver. But the right to broadcast news and current affairs is the most significant issue here. According to the existing rules, FM radio broadcasters can only air AIR bulletins in ‘exactly the same format’. This is a glaring anomaly in an age where private TV channels and the Internet are allowed to broadcast news and current affairs programmes. While stakeholders have argued that radio is important as a source of information in rural areas where the availability of newspapers, TV and electrical connection is limited, the overriding argument here is one of principle: in a democracy, there must be free flow of information across mediums, subject to curbs in the form of fake news and hate speech. The government takes recourse to restrictions to freedom of speech including security, public order, decency/morality et al under Article 19(2) and has argued before various courts, where the policy has been challenged through different public interest petitions, that telecast of news on radio cannot be permitted as it “might be misused by antinational and radical elements and there is no mechanism to monitor news content on all radio stations”. This is sheer paranoia.The medium has played a critical role in strengthening peace initiatives in countries like Timor Leste and Cambodia on one hand and has been a catalyst for social progression and rural development in young democracies like Nepal. In contrast to the best of global practices which have led to radio being a primary source of not just entertainment but crisp, professionally produced and, most importantly, localised news, India is stuck in a time warp. FM channels have not warmed to broadcasting AIR news, as it could jar with the sound and tenor of their stations. Popular FM channels have been impressing upon governments for over two decades that they should be allowed to produce news content for their niche audiences. Allowing FM and community radio stations to broadcast their own news content will help in creating an informed polity all around, and strengthen grassroots democracy. The law is ably equipped to deal with transgressions, such as fake news, hate speech and defamation.Q.Which of the following statements would provide additional support for the argument in favor of permitting private FM channels to produce their own news content?

View answer

Direction: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given below.The TRAI paper is right in initiating a review of the policies on radio. These also encompass the computation of licence fees, the duration of the licence, and importantly, whether mobile phones must mandatorily have an FM radio receiver. But the right to broadcast news and current affairs is the most significant issue here. According to the existing rules, FM radio broadcasters can only air AIR bulletins in ‘exactly the same format’. This is a glaring anomaly in an age where private TV channels and the Internet are allowed to broadcast news and current affairs programmes. While stakeholders have argued that radio is important as a source of information in rural areas where the availability of newspapers, TV and electrical connection is limited, the overriding argument here is one of principle: in a democracy, there must be free flow of information across mediums, subject to curbs in the form of fake news and hate speech. The government takes recourse to restrictions to freedom of speech including security, public order, decency/morality et al under Article 19(2) and has argued before various courts, where the policy has been challenged through different public interest petitions, that telecast of news on radio cannot be permitted as it “might be misused by antinational and radical elements and there is no mechanism to monitor news content on all radio stations”. This is sheer paranoia.The medium has played a critical role in strengthening peace initiatives in countries like Timor Leste and Cambodia on one hand and has been a catalyst for social progression and rural development in young democracies like Nepal. In contrast to the best of global practices which have led to radio being a primary source of not just entertainment but crisp, professionally produced and, most importantly, localised news, India is stuck in a time warp. FM channels have not warmed to broadcasting AIR news, as it could jar with the sound and tenor of their stations. Popular FM channels have been impressing upon governments for over two decades that they should be allowed to produce news content for their niche audiences. Allowing FM and community radio stations to broadcast their own news content will help in creating an informed polity all around, and strengthen grassroots democracy. The law is ably equipped to deal with transgressions, such as fake news, hate speech and defamation.Q.What potential cause-and-effect relationship regarding the governments restrictions on radio news and the free flow of information in a democracy is suggested by the passage?

View answer

Direction: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given below.The TRAI paper is right in initiating a review of the policies on radio. These also encompass the computation of licence fees, the duration of the licence, and importantly, whether mobile phones must mandatorily have an FM radio receiver. But the right to broadcast news and current affairs is the most significant issue here. According to the existing rules, FM radio broadcasters can only air AIR bulletins in ‘exactly the same format’. This is a glaring anomaly in an age where private TV channels and the Internet are allowed to broadcast news and current affairs programmes. While stakeholders have argued that radio is important as a source of information in rural areas where the availability of newspapers, TV and electrical connection is limited, the overriding argument here is one of principle: in a democracy, there must be free flow of information across mediums, subject to curbs in the form of fake news and hate speech. The government takes recourse to restrictions to freedom of speech including security, public order, decency/morality et al under Article 19(2) and has argued before various courts, where the policy has been challenged through different public interest petitions, that telecast of news on radio cannot be permitted as it “might be misused by antinational and radical elements and there is no mechanism to monitor news content on all radio stations”. This is sheer paranoia.The medium has played a critical role in strengthening peace initiatives in countries like Timor Leste and Cambodia on one hand and has been a catalyst for social progression and rural development in young democracies like Nepal. In contrast to the best of global practices which have led to radio being a primary source of not just entertainment but crisp, professionally produced and, most importantly, localised news, India is stuck in a time warp. FM channels have not warmed to broadcasting AIR news, as it could jar with the sound and tenor of their stations. Popular FM channels have been impressing upon governments for over two decades that they should be allowed to produce news content for their niche audiences. Allowing FM and community radio stations to broadcast their own news content will help in creating an informed polity all around, and strengthen grassroots democracy. The law is ably equipped to deal with transgressions, such as fake news, hate speech and defamation.Q.According to the passage, what is the primary argument in favor of allowing FM and community radio stations to broadcast their own news content?

View answer

Read the information given below and answer the questions based on it.Section 124Aof theIndian Penal Codelays down the punishment forsedition. Sedition is overt conduct, such as speech and organization, that tends toward insurrection against the established order. Sedition often includes subversion of a constitution and incitement of discontent towards, or resistance against established authority. Offences like “sedition” have been subjected to sanction by the government before such charges can be framed. Courts have propounded various guidelines with respect to such sanction taking into account its importance. Section 196 of Cr.PC prohibits the magistrate to take cognizance for any offences under Chapter 6 of Indian Penal Code (“sedition” is one of the offences which falls under Chapter 6 of I.P.C) except with the prior sanction of the government. It substantiates the offences against the state which clearly provides for the purpose of sanction under section 196. The object of Section 196 under Cr.PC is to ensure prosecution only after due consideration by the appropriate authority so that frivolous or needless prosecutions can be avoided.There have been many instances wherein Government has delayed the granting of sanction by not responding towards the request from the police officials. The difficulty arises when such delay hinders with the speedy trial system in the country. Such delays are often caused by the hidden political motives of the government. The courts have deliberated upon such issues and has provided for a time frame within which such sanction has to be taken from the government by the police (especially in offences such as “sedition”). Often the court is seen transgressing from its own propounded guidelines at various occasions. The furor created by controversy in the case of Kanhaiya Kumar v. State (hereinafter Kanhaiya Kumar’s cas e) is a classic example of such transgression. It was for more than 4 times that the Police officials failed to provide the requisite sanction to the court. The chief metropolitan court on the order dated 8th April 2019 provided the police officials with a time up till 23 June 2019 for taking the requisite sanction. The courts have already provided an extended amount of time limit to the police officials who have been unable to acquire the sanction within stipulated time period, these types of situation certainly create a conundrum which further affects the justice delivery system. It is a common phenomenon as to court transgressing from its own time limit, but it has to be adjudged with regards to the judiciary’s intention of providing a particular time limit and whether such time limit was subject to extension without any qualification. It is the duty of the court to identify as what shall be the consequences when it deviates from an established guideline in the interest of justice in controversial matters involving political motives behind such delays. Although the solutions can be unfruitful and infructuous in such controversial matters but it will still be dependent on court’s interpretation and Government’s discretion.Q.According to the passage, the view point of author towards the judiciary and law enforcement bodies is said to be

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

CLAT Mock Test Series 2025

Crash Course for CLAT

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Direction: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given below.The TRAI paper is right in initiating a review of the policies on radio. These also encompass the computation of licence fees, the duration of the licence, and importantly, whether mobile phones must mandatorily have an FM radio receiver. But the right to broadcast news and current affairs is the most significant issue here. According to the existing rules, FM radio broadcasters can only air AIR bulletins in ‘exactly the same format’. This is a glaring anomaly in an age where private TV channels and the Internet are allowed to broadcast news and current affairs programmes. While stakeholders have argued that radio is important as a source of information in rural areas where the availability of newspapers, TV and electrical connection is limited, the overriding argument here is one of principle: in a democracy, there must be free flow of information across mediums, subject to curbs in the form of fake news and hate speech. The government takes recourse to restrictions to freedom of speech including security, public order, decency/morality et al under Article 19(2) and has argued before various courts, where the policy has been challenged through different public interest petitions, that telecast of news on radio cannot be permitted as it “might be misused by antinational and radical elements and there is no mechanism to monitor news content on all radio stations”. This is sheer paranoia.The medium has played a critical role in strengthening peace initiatives in countries like Timor Leste and Cambodia on one hand and has been a catalyst for social progression and rural development in young democracies like Nepal. In contrast to the best of global practices which have led to radio being a primary source of not just entertainment but crisp, professionally produced and, most importantly, localised news, India is stuck in a time warp. FM channels have not warmed to broadcasting AIR news, as it could jar with the sound and tenor of their stations. Popular FM channels have been impressing upon governments for over two decades that they should be allowed to produce news content for their niche audiences. Allowing FM and community radio stations to broadcast their own news content will help in creating an informed polity all around, and strengthen grassroots democracy. The law is ably equipped to deal with transgressions, such as fake news, hate speech and defamation.Q.What does the passage criticize India for in comparison to global practices?a)Indias reliance on FM channels for news.b)Indias lack of entertainment on FM channels.c)Indias resistance to broadcasting AIR news.d)Indias strict laws against hate speech.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Direction: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given below.The TRAI paper is right in initiating a review of the policies on radio. These also encompass the computation of licence fees, the duration of the licence, and importantly, whether mobile phones must mandatorily have an FM radio receiver. But the right to broadcast news and current affairs is the most significant issue here. According to the existing rules, FM radio broadcasters can only air AIR bulletins in ‘exactly the same format’. This is a glaring anomaly in an age where private TV channels and the Internet are allowed to broadcast news and current affairs programmes. While stakeholders have argued that radio is important as a source of information in rural areas where the availability of newspapers, TV and electrical connection is limited, the overriding argument here is one of principle: in a democracy, there must be free flow of information across mediums, subject to curbs in the form of fake news and hate speech. The government takes recourse to restrictions to freedom of speech including security, public order, decency/morality et al under Article 19(2) and has argued before various courts, where the policy has been challenged through different public interest petitions, that telecast of news on radio cannot be permitted as it “might be misused by antinational and radical elements and there is no mechanism to monitor news content on all radio stations”. This is sheer paranoia.The medium has played a critical role in strengthening peace initiatives in countries like Timor Leste and Cambodia on one hand and has been a catalyst for social progression and rural development in young democracies like Nepal. In contrast to the best of global practices which have led to radio being a primary source of not just entertainment but crisp, professionally produced and, most importantly, localised news, India is stuck in a time warp. FM channels have not warmed to broadcasting AIR news, as it could jar with the sound and tenor of their stations. Popular FM channels have been impressing upon governments for over two decades that they should be allowed to produce news content for their niche audiences. Allowing FM and community radio stations to broadcast their own news content will help in creating an informed polity all around, and strengthen grassroots democracy. The law is ably equipped to deal with transgressions, such as fake news, hate speech and defamation.Q.What does the passage criticize India for in comparison to global practices?a)Indias reliance on FM channels for news.b)Indias lack of entertainment on FM channels.c)Indias resistance to broadcasting AIR news.d)Indias strict laws against hate speech.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given below.The TRAI paper is right in initiating a review of the policies on radio. These also encompass the computation of licence fees, the duration of the licence, and importantly, whether mobile phones must mandatorily have an FM radio receiver. But the right to broadcast news and current affairs is the most significant issue here. According to the existing rules, FM radio broadcasters can only air AIR bulletins in ‘exactly the same format’. This is a glaring anomaly in an age where private TV channels and the Internet are allowed to broadcast news and current affairs programmes. While stakeholders have argued that radio is important as a source of information in rural areas where the availability of newspapers, TV and electrical connection is limited, the overriding argument here is one of principle: in a democracy, there must be free flow of information across mediums, subject to curbs in the form of fake news and hate speech. The government takes recourse to restrictions to freedom of speech including security, public order, decency/morality et al under Article 19(2) and has argued before various courts, where the policy has been challenged through different public interest petitions, that telecast of news on radio cannot be permitted as it “might be misused by antinational and radical elements and there is no mechanism to monitor news content on all radio stations”. This is sheer paranoia.The medium has played a critical role in strengthening peace initiatives in countries like Timor Leste and Cambodia on one hand and has been a catalyst for social progression and rural development in young democracies like Nepal. In contrast to the best of global practices which have led to radio being a primary source of not just entertainment but crisp, professionally produced and, most importantly, localised news, India is stuck in a time warp. FM channels have not warmed to broadcasting AIR news, as it could jar with the sound and tenor of their stations. Popular FM channels have been impressing upon governments for over two decades that they should be allowed to produce news content for their niche audiences. Allowing FM and community radio stations to broadcast their own news content will help in creating an informed polity all around, and strengthen grassroots democracy. The law is ably equipped to deal with transgressions, such as fake news, hate speech and defamation.Q.What does the passage criticize India for in comparison to global practices?a)Indias reliance on FM channels for news.b)Indias lack of entertainment on FM channels.c)Indias resistance to broadcasting AIR news.d)Indias strict laws against hate speech.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given below.The TRAI paper is right in initiating a review of the policies on radio. These also encompass the computation of licence fees, the duration of the licence, and importantly, whether mobile phones must mandatorily have an FM radio receiver. But the right to broadcast news and current affairs is the most significant issue here. According to the existing rules, FM radio broadcasters can only air AIR bulletins in ‘exactly the same format’. This is a glaring anomaly in an age where private TV channels and the Internet are allowed to broadcast news and current affairs programmes. While stakeholders have argued that radio is important as a source of information in rural areas where the availability of newspapers, TV and electrical connection is limited, the overriding argument here is one of principle: in a democracy, there must be free flow of information across mediums, subject to curbs in the form of fake news and hate speech. The government takes recourse to restrictions to freedom of speech including security, public order, decency/morality et al under Article 19(2) and has argued before various courts, where the policy has been challenged through different public interest petitions, that telecast of news on radio cannot be permitted as it “might be misused by antinational and radical elements and there is no mechanism to monitor news content on all radio stations”. This is sheer paranoia.The medium has played a critical role in strengthening peace initiatives in countries like Timor Leste and Cambodia on one hand and has been a catalyst for social progression and rural development in young democracies like Nepal. In contrast to the best of global practices which have led to radio being a primary source of not just entertainment but crisp, professionally produced and, most importantly, localised news, India is stuck in a time warp. FM channels have not warmed to broadcasting AIR news, as it could jar with the sound and tenor of their stations. Popular FM channels have been impressing upon governments for over two decades that they should be allowed to produce news content for their niche audiences. Allowing FM and community radio stations to broadcast their own news content will help in creating an informed polity all around, and strengthen grassroots democracy. The law is ably equipped to deal with transgressions, such as fake news, hate speech and defamation.Q.What does the passage criticize India for in comparison to global practices?a)Indias reliance on FM channels for news.b)Indias lack of entertainment on FM channels.c)Indias resistance to broadcasting AIR news.d)Indias strict laws against hate speech.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given below.The TRAI paper is right in initiating a review of the policies on radio. These also encompass the computation of licence fees, the duration of the licence, and importantly, whether mobile phones must mandatorily have an FM radio receiver. But the right to broadcast news and current affairs is the most significant issue here. According to the existing rules, FM radio broadcasters can only air AIR bulletins in ‘exactly the same format’. This is a glaring anomaly in an age where private TV channels and the Internet are allowed to broadcast news and current affairs programmes. While stakeholders have argued that radio is important as a source of information in rural areas where the availability of newspapers, TV and electrical connection is limited, the overriding argument here is one of principle: in a democracy, there must be free flow of information across mediums, subject to curbs in the form of fake news and hate speech. The government takes recourse to restrictions to freedom of speech including security, public order, decency/morality et al under Article 19(2) and has argued before various courts, where the policy has been challenged through different public interest petitions, that telecast of news on radio cannot be permitted as it “might be misused by antinational and radical elements and there is no mechanism to monitor news content on all radio stations”. This is sheer paranoia.The medium has played a critical role in strengthening peace initiatives in countries like Timor Leste and Cambodia on one hand and has been a catalyst for social progression and rural development in young democracies like Nepal. In contrast to the best of global practices which have led to radio being a primary source of not just entertainment but crisp, professionally produced and, most importantly, localised news, India is stuck in a time warp. FM channels have not warmed to broadcasting AIR news, as it could jar with the sound and tenor of their stations. Popular FM channels have been impressing upon governments for over two decades that they should be allowed to produce news content for their niche audiences. Allowing FM and community radio stations to broadcast their own news content will help in creating an informed polity all around, and strengthen grassroots democracy. The law is ably equipped to deal with transgressions, such as fake news, hate speech and defamation.Q.What does the passage criticize India for in comparison to global practices?a)Indias reliance on FM channels for news.b)Indias lack of entertainment on FM channels.c)Indias resistance to broadcasting AIR news.d)Indias strict laws against hate speech.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given below.The TRAI paper is right in initiating a review of the policies on radio. These also encompass the computation of licence fees, the duration of the licence, and importantly, whether mobile phones must mandatorily have an FM radio receiver. But the right to broadcast news and current affairs is the most significant issue here. According to the existing rules, FM radio broadcasters can only air AIR bulletins in ‘exactly the same format’. This is a glaring anomaly in an age where private TV channels and the Internet are allowed to broadcast news and current affairs programmes. While stakeholders have argued that radio is important as a source of information in rural areas where the availability of newspapers, TV and electrical connection is limited, the overriding argument here is one of principle: in a democracy, there must be free flow of information across mediums, subject to curbs in the form of fake news and hate speech. The government takes recourse to restrictions to freedom of speech including security, public order, decency/morality et al under Article 19(2) and has argued before various courts, where the policy has been challenged through different public interest petitions, that telecast of news on radio cannot be permitted as it “might be misused by antinational and radical elements and there is no mechanism to monitor news content on all radio stations”. This is sheer paranoia.The medium has played a critical role in strengthening peace initiatives in countries like Timor Leste and Cambodia on one hand and has been a catalyst for social progression and rural development in young democracies like Nepal. In contrast to the best of global practices which have led to radio being a primary source of not just entertainment but crisp, professionally produced and, most importantly, localised news, India is stuck in a time warp. FM channels have not warmed to broadcasting AIR news, as it could jar with the sound and tenor of their stations. Popular FM channels have been impressing upon governments for over two decades that they should be allowed to produce news content for their niche audiences. Allowing FM and community radio stations to broadcast their own news content will help in creating an informed polity all around, and strengthen grassroots democracy. The law is ably equipped to deal with transgressions, such as fake news, hate speech and defamation.Q.What does the passage criticize India for in comparison to global practices?a)Indias reliance on FM channels for news.b)Indias lack of entertainment on FM channels.c)Indias resistance to broadcasting AIR news.d)Indias strict laws against hate speech.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given below.The TRAI paper is right in initiating a review of the policies on radio. These also encompass the computation of licence fees, the duration of the licence, and importantly, whether mobile phones must mandatorily have an FM radio receiver. But the right to broadcast news and current affairs is the most significant issue here. According to the existing rules, FM radio broadcasters can only air AIR bulletins in ‘exactly the same format’. This is a glaring anomaly in an age where private TV channels and the Internet are allowed to broadcast news and current affairs programmes. While stakeholders have argued that radio is important as a source of information in rural areas where the availability of newspapers, TV and electrical connection is limited, the overriding argument here is one of principle: in a democracy, there must be free flow of information across mediums, subject to curbs in the form of fake news and hate speech. The government takes recourse to restrictions to freedom of speech including security, public order, decency/morality et al under Article 19(2) and has argued before various courts, where the policy has been challenged through different public interest petitions, that telecast of news on radio cannot be permitted as it “might be misused by antinational and radical elements and there is no mechanism to monitor news content on all radio stations”. This is sheer paranoia.The medium has played a critical role in strengthening peace initiatives in countries like Timor Leste and Cambodia on one hand and has been a catalyst for social progression and rural development in young democracies like Nepal. In contrast to the best of global practices which have led to radio being a primary source of not just entertainment but crisp, professionally produced and, most importantly, localised news, India is stuck in a time warp. FM channels have not warmed to broadcasting AIR news, as it could jar with the sound and tenor of their stations. Popular FM channels have been impressing upon governments for over two decades that they should be allowed to produce news content for their niche audiences. Allowing FM and community radio stations to broadcast their own news content will help in creating an informed polity all around, and strengthen grassroots democracy. The law is ably equipped to deal with transgressions, such as fake news, hate speech and defamation.Q.What does the passage criticize India for in comparison to global practices?a)Indias reliance on FM channels for news.b)Indias lack of entertainment on FM channels.c)Indias resistance to broadcasting AIR news.d)Indias strict laws against hate speech.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given below.The TRAI paper is right in initiating a review of the policies on radio. These also encompass the computation of licence fees, the duration of the licence, and importantly, whether mobile phones must mandatorily have an FM radio receiver. But the right to broadcast news and current affairs is the most significant issue here. According to the existing rules, FM radio broadcasters can only air AIR bulletins in ‘exactly the same format’. This is a glaring anomaly in an age where private TV channels and the Internet are allowed to broadcast news and current affairs programmes. While stakeholders have argued that radio is important as a source of information in rural areas where the availability of newspapers, TV and electrical connection is limited, the overriding argument here is one of principle: in a democracy, there must be free flow of information across mediums, subject to curbs in the form of fake news and hate speech. The government takes recourse to restrictions to freedom of speech including security, public order, decency/morality et al under Article 19(2) and has argued before various courts, where the policy has been challenged through different public interest petitions, that telecast of news on radio cannot be permitted as it “might be misused by antinational and radical elements and there is no mechanism to monitor news content on all radio stations”. This is sheer paranoia.The medium has played a critical role in strengthening peace initiatives in countries like Timor Leste and Cambodia on one hand and has been a catalyst for social progression and rural development in young democracies like Nepal. In contrast to the best of global practices which have led to radio being a primary source of not just entertainment but crisp, professionally produced and, most importantly, localised news, India is stuck in a time warp. FM channels have not warmed to broadcasting AIR news, as it could jar with the sound and tenor of their stations. Popular FM channels have been impressing upon governments for over two decades that they should be allowed to produce news content for their niche audiences. Allowing FM and community radio stations to broadcast their own news content will help in creating an informed polity all around, and strengthen grassroots democracy. The law is ably equipped to deal with transgressions, such as fake news, hate speech and defamation.Q.What does the passage criticize India for in comparison to global practices?a)Indias reliance on FM channels for news.b)Indias lack of entertainment on FM channels.c)Indias resistance to broadcasting AIR news.d)Indias strict laws against hate speech.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given below.The TRAI paper is right in initiating a review of the policies on radio. These also encompass the computation of licence fees, the duration of the licence, and importantly, whether mobile phones must mandatorily have an FM radio receiver. But the right to broadcast news and current affairs is the most significant issue here. According to the existing rules, FM radio broadcasters can only air AIR bulletins in ‘exactly the same format’. This is a glaring anomaly in an age where private TV channels and the Internet are allowed to broadcast news and current affairs programmes. While stakeholders have argued that radio is important as a source of information in rural areas where the availability of newspapers, TV and electrical connection is limited, the overriding argument here is one of principle: in a democracy, there must be free flow of information across mediums, subject to curbs in the form of fake news and hate speech. The government takes recourse to restrictions to freedom of speech including security, public order, decency/morality et al under Article 19(2) and has argued before various courts, where the policy has been challenged through different public interest petitions, that telecast of news on radio cannot be permitted as it “might be misused by antinational and radical elements and there is no mechanism to monitor news content on all radio stations”. This is sheer paranoia.The medium has played a critical role in strengthening peace initiatives in countries like Timor Leste and Cambodia on one hand and has been a catalyst for social progression and rural development in young democracies like Nepal. In contrast to the best of global practices which have led to radio being a primary source of not just entertainment but crisp, professionally produced and, most importantly, localised news, India is stuck in a time warp. FM channels have not warmed to broadcasting AIR news, as it could jar with the sound and tenor of their stations. Popular FM channels have been impressing upon governments for over two decades that they should be allowed to produce news content for their niche audiences. Allowing FM and community radio stations to broadcast their own news content will help in creating an informed polity all around, and strengthen grassroots democracy. The law is ably equipped to deal with transgressions, such as fake news, hate speech and defamation.Q.What does the passage criticize India for in comparison to global practices?a)Indias reliance on FM channels for news.b)Indias lack of entertainment on FM channels.c)Indias resistance to broadcasting AIR news.d)Indias strict laws against hate speech.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given below.The TRAI paper is right in initiating a review of the policies on radio. These also encompass the computation of licence fees, the duration of the licence, and importantly, whether mobile phones must mandatorily have an FM radio receiver. But the right to broadcast news and current affairs is the most significant issue here. According to the existing rules, FM radio broadcasters can only air AIR bulletins in ‘exactly the same format’. This is a glaring anomaly in an age where private TV channels and the Internet are allowed to broadcast news and current affairs programmes. While stakeholders have argued that radio is important as a source of information in rural areas where the availability of newspapers, TV and electrical connection is limited, the overriding argument here is one of principle: in a democracy, there must be free flow of information across mediums, subject to curbs in the form of fake news and hate speech. The government takes recourse to restrictions to freedom of speech including security, public order, decency/morality et al under Article 19(2) and has argued before various courts, where the policy has been challenged through different public interest petitions, that telecast of news on radio cannot be permitted as it “might be misused by antinational and radical elements and there is no mechanism to monitor news content on all radio stations”. This is sheer paranoia.The medium has played a critical role in strengthening peace initiatives in countries like Timor Leste and Cambodia on one hand and has been a catalyst for social progression and rural development in young democracies like Nepal. In contrast to the best of global practices which have led to radio being a primary source of not just entertainment but crisp, professionally produced and, most importantly, localised news, India is stuck in a time warp. FM channels have not warmed to broadcasting AIR news, as it could jar with the sound and tenor of their stations. Popular FM channels have been impressing upon governments for over two decades that they should be allowed to produce news content for their niche audiences. Allowing FM and community radio stations to broadcast their own news content will help in creating an informed polity all around, and strengthen grassroots democracy. The law is ably equipped to deal with transgressions, such as fake news, hate speech and defamation.Q.What does the passage criticize India for in comparison to global practices?a)Indias reliance on FM channels for news.b)Indias lack of entertainment on FM channels.c)Indias resistance to broadcasting AIR news.d)Indias strict laws against hate speech.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam