UPSC Exam > UPSC Questions > What was the outcome of the "Shreya Sing...
Start Learning for Free
What was the outcome of the "Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India" case?
- a)Right to a healthy environment recognized
- b)Section 66A, curbing free speech, was quashed
- c)Implementation of Constitutional provisions ensured
- d)Prisoners gained access to free legal aid
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
What was the outcome of the "Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India&qu...
The Supreme Court's decision in "Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India" resulted in the striking down of Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, which was considered arbitrary and violated freedom of speech.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
What was the outcome of the "Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India&qu...
Outcome of "Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India"
The landmark case "Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India" was decided by the Supreme Court of India in March 2015. The primary focus of this case was on the constitutionality of Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, which dealt with offensive messages sent through communication service, etc.
Quashing of Section 66A
- The Supreme Court ruled that Section 66A was unconstitutional.
- The court stated that the provision imposed unreasonable restrictions on free speech, violating Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution.
- It highlighted that the language of Section 66A was vague and broad, leading to potential misuse and arbitrary enforcement by authorities.
Significance of the Ruling
- The quashing of Section 66A marked a significant victory for the right to free expression in India.
- It reinforced the importance of safeguarding individual rights against overreach by the state in the digital age.
- This ruling set a precedent for future cases related to freedom of speech and expression, encouraging a more liberal interpretation of these rights.
Wider Implications
- The decision has had a lasting impact on the legal landscape regarding digital communication in India.
- It encourages a more responsible approach towards regulating online speech without infringing upon fundamental rights.
In summary, the correct answer to the question is option 'B': Section 66A, curbing free speech, was quashed, highlighting the court's commitment to upholding constitutional rights in the context of evolving digital communication.
The landmark case "Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India" was decided by the Supreme Court of India in March 2015. The primary focus of this case was on the constitutionality of Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, which dealt with offensive messages sent through communication service, etc.
Quashing of Section 66A
- The Supreme Court ruled that Section 66A was unconstitutional.
- The court stated that the provision imposed unreasonable restrictions on free speech, violating Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution.
- It highlighted that the language of Section 66A was vague and broad, leading to potential misuse and arbitrary enforcement by authorities.
Significance of the Ruling
- The quashing of Section 66A marked a significant victory for the right to free expression in India.
- It reinforced the importance of safeguarding individual rights against overreach by the state in the digital age.
- This ruling set a precedent for future cases related to freedom of speech and expression, encouraging a more liberal interpretation of these rights.
Wider Implications
- The decision has had a lasting impact on the legal landscape regarding digital communication in India.
- It encourages a more responsible approach towards regulating online speech without infringing upon fundamental rights.
In summary, the correct answer to the question is option 'B': Section 66A, curbing free speech, was quashed, highlighting the court's commitment to upholding constitutional rights in the context of evolving digital communication.
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|
|
Top Courses for UPSCView all
What was the outcome of the "Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India" case?a)Right to a healthy environment recognizedb)Section 66A, curbing free speech, was quashedc)Implementation of Constitutional provisions ensuredd)Prisoners gained access to free legal aidCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
What was the outcome of the "Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India" case?a)Right to a healthy environment recognizedb)Section 66A, curbing free speech, was quashedc)Implementation of Constitutional provisions ensuredd)Prisoners gained access to free legal aidCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2025 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about What was the outcome of the "Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India" case?a)Right to a healthy environment recognizedb)Section 66A, curbing free speech, was quashedc)Implementation of Constitutional provisions ensuredd)Prisoners gained access to free legal aidCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for What was the outcome of the "Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India" case?a)Right to a healthy environment recognizedb)Section 66A, curbing free speech, was quashedc)Implementation of Constitutional provisions ensuredd)Prisoners gained access to free legal aidCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
What was the outcome of the "Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India" case?a)Right to a healthy environment recognizedb)Section 66A, curbing free speech, was quashedc)Implementation of Constitutional provisions ensuredd)Prisoners gained access to free legal aidCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2025 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about What was the outcome of the "Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India" case?a)Right to a healthy environment recognizedb)Section 66A, curbing free speech, was quashedc)Implementation of Constitutional provisions ensuredd)Prisoners gained access to free legal aidCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for What was the outcome of the "Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India" case?a)Right to a healthy environment recognizedb)Section 66A, curbing free speech, was quashedc)Implementation of Constitutional provisions ensuredd)Prisoners gained access to free legal aidCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for What was the outcome of the "Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India" case?a)Right to a healthy environment recognizedb)Section 66A, curbing free speech, was quashedc)Implementation of Constitutional provisions ensuredd)Prisoners gained access to free legal aidCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of What was the outcome of the "Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India" case?a)Right to a healthy environment recognizedb)Section 66A, curbing free speech, was quashedc)Implementation of Constitutional provisions ensuredd)Prisoners gained access to free legal aidCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
What was the outcome of the "Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India" case?a)Right to a healthy environment recognizedb)Section 66A, curbing free speech, was quashedc)Implementation of Constitutional provisions ensuredd)Prisoners gained access to free legal aidCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for What was the outcome of the "Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India" case?a)Right to a healthy environment recognizedb)Section 66A, curbing free speech, was quashedc)Implementation of Constitutional provisions ensuredd)Prisoners gained access to free legal aidCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of What was the outcome of the "Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India" case?a)Right to a healthy environment recognizedb)Section 66A, curbing free speech, was quashedc)Implementation of Constitutional provisions ensuredd)Prisoners gained access to free legal aidCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice What was the outcome of the "Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India" case?a)Right to a healthy environment recognizedb)Section 66A, curbing free speech, was quashedc)Implementation of Constitutional provisions ensuredd)Prisoners gained access to free legal aidCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup