Question Description
Which case held that the Parliament's power to amend the Constitution is not absolute and can be restricted by the concept of the basic structure?a)Sajjan Singh case (1965)b)Golaknath case (1967)c)Kesavananda Bharati case (1973)d)Shankari Prasad Case (1951)Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Which case held that the Parliament's power to amend the Constitution is not absolute and can be restricted by the concept of the basic structure?a)Sajjan Singh case (1965)b)Golaknath case (1967)c)Kesavananda Bharati case (1973)d)Shankari Prasad Case (1951)Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Which case held that the Parliament's power to amend the Constitution is not absolute and can be restricted by the concept of the basic structure?a)Sajjan Singh case (1965)b)Golaknath case (1967)c)Kesavananda Bharati case (1973)d)Shankari Prasad Case (1951)Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Which case held that the Parliament's power to amend the Constitution is not absolute and can be restricted by the concept of the basic structure?a)Sajjan Singh case (1965)b)Golaknath case (1967)c)Kesavananda Bharati case (1973)d)Shankari Prasad Case (1951)Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Which case held that the Parliament's power to amend the Constitution is not absolute and can be restricted by the concept of the basic structure?a)Sajjan Singh case (1965)b)Golaknath case (1967)c)Kesavananda Bharati case (1973)d)Shankari Prasad Case (1951)Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Which case held that the Parliament's power to amend the Constitution is not absolute and can be restricted by the concept of the basic structure?a)Sajjan Singh case (1965)b)Golaknath case (1967)c)Kesavananda Bharati case (1973)d)Shankari Prasad Case (1951)Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Which case held that the Parliament's power to amend the Constitution is not absolute and can be restricted by the concept of the basic structure?a)Sajjan Singh case (1965)b)Golaknath case (1967)c)Kesavananda Bharati case (1973)d)Shankari Prasad Case (1951)Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Which case held that the Parliament's power to amend the Constitution is not absolute and can be restricted by the concept of the basic structure?a)Sajjan Singh case (1965)b)Golaknath case (1967)c)Kesavananda Bharati case (1973)d)Shankari Prasad Case (1951)Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Which case held that the Parliament's power to amend the Constitution is not absolute and can be restricted by the concept of the basic structure?a)Sajjan Singh case (1965)b)Golaknath case (1967)c)Kesavananda Bharati case (1973)d)Shankari Prasad Case (1951)Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.