UPSC Exam  >  UPSC Questions  >  What was the result of the 11th Battle of the... Start Learning for Free
What was the result of the 11th Battle of the Isonzo in 1917?
  • a)
    It led to the capture of Trieste by Italian forces
  • b)
    It strained Austrian resistance severely but did not result in significant territorial gains
  • c)
    It marked a major breakthrough for the Austrian forces
  • d)
    It resulted in the complete defeat of the Italian army
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
What was the result of the 11th Battle of the Isonzo in 1917?a)It led ...
The result of the 11th Battle of the Isonzo in 1917 was that it "strained Austrian resistance severely but did not result in significant territorial gains" for the Italian forces. While the battle put pressure on the Austrian defenders, it did not lead to any substantial breakthroughs or territorial changes.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Similar UPSC Doubts

From ‘apparel to aerospace’, ‘steel to software’, the pace of technological innovation is quickening. No longer can companies afford to miss generation of technology and expect to remain competitive. Adding to the pressure, innovations are increasingly crossing industry boundaries; a new fibre developed by the textile industry has potential for building materials and medical equipment. Some companies are adept at using a diversity of technologies to create new products that transform markets. But many others are floundering because they rely on a technology strategy that no longer works in such a fast changing environment. The difference between success and failure is not how much a company spends on research and development(R&D), but how it approaches it. There are two possible approaches. Either a company can invest in R&D that uses an older generation of technology, the ‘breakthrough’ approach-or its focus on combining existing technologies into hybrid technologies - the ‘technologies fusion’ approach. It blends incremental technical improvements from several previously separate fields of technology to create products that revolutionise markets. In a world where the old maxim ‘one technology one industry’ no longer applies, a singular breakthrough strategy is inadequate; companies need to include both the breakthrough and fusion approaches in their technology strategy. Relying on breakthroughs alone fails because it focuses the R&D efforts to narrowly, ignoring the possibilities of combining technologies. Yet many western companies still rely almost exclusively - on the breakthrough approach. The reasons are complex: a distrust of outside innovations and not-invented here engineering and arrogance and aversion to sharing research results.Which of the following would correctly reflect the position regarding the two approaches to technology adoption?

From ‘apparel to aerospace’, ‘steel to software’, the pace of technological innovation is quickening. No longer can companies afford to miss generation of technology and expect to remain competitive. Adding to the pressure, innovations are increasingly crossing industry boundaries; a new fibre developed by the textile industry has potential for building materials and medical equipment. Some companies are adept at using a diversity of technologies to create new products that transform markets. But many others are floundering because they rely on a technology strategy that no longer works in such a fast changing environment. The difference between success and failure is not how much a company spends on research and development(R&D), but how it approaches it. There are two possible approaches. Either a company can invest in R&D that uses an older generation of technology, the ‘breakthrough’ approach-or its focus on combining existing technologies into hybrid technologies - the ‘technologies fusion’ approach. It blends incremental technical improvements from several previously separate fields of technology to create products that revolutionise markets. In a world where the old maxim ‘one technology one industry’ no longer applies, a singular breakthrough strategy is inadequate; companies need to include both the breakthrough and fusion approaches in their technology strategy. Relying on breakthroughs alone fails because it focuses the R&D efforts to narrowly, ignoring the possibilities of combining technologies. Yet many western companies still rely almost exclusively - on the breakthrough approach. The reasons are complex: a distrust of outside innovations and not-invented here engineering and arrogance and aversion to sharing research results.What, according to the author, is adding to the pressure on the companies?

From ‘apparel to aerospace’, ‘steel to software’, the pace of technological innovation is quickening. No longer can companies afford to miss generation of technology and expect to remain competitive. Adding to the pressure, innovations are increasingly crossing industry boundaries; a new fibre developed by the textile industry has potential for building materials and medical equipment. Some companies are adept at using a diversity of technologies to create new products that transform markets. But many others are floundering because they rely on a technology strategy that no longer works in such a fast changing environment. The difference between success and failure is not how much a company spends on research and development(R&D), but how it approaches it. There are two possible approaches. Either a company can invest in R&D that uses an older generation of technology, the ‘breakthrough’ approach-or its focus on combining existing technologies into hybrid technologies - the ‘technologies fusion’ approach. It blends incremental technical improvements from several previously separate fields of technology to create products that revolutionise markets. In a world where the old maxim ‘one technology one industry’ no longer applies, a singular breakthrough strategy is inadequate; companies need to include both the breakthrough and fusion approaches in their technology strategy. Relying on breakthroughs alone fails because it focuses the R&D efforts to narrowly, ignoring the possibilities of combining technologies. Yet many western companies still rely almost exclusively - on the breakthrough approach. The reasons are complex: a distrust of outside innovations and not-invented here engineering and arrogance and aversion to sharing research results.Which of the following features of technology has been highlighted most prominently by the author of the passage?

Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.From ‘apparel to aerospace’, ‘steel to software’, the pace of technological innovation is quickening. No longer can companies afford to miss generation of technology and expect to remain competitive. Adding to the pressure, innovations are increasingly crossing industry boundaries; a new fibre developed by the textile industry has potential for building materials and medical equipment. Some companies are adept at using a diversity of technologies to create new products that transform markets. But many others are floundering because they rely on a technology strategy that no longer works in such a fast-changing environment. The difference between success and failure is not how much a company spends on research and development (R&D), but how it approaches it. There are two possibleapproaches. Either a company can invest in R&D that an older generation of technology the ‘break through’ approach-or its focus on combining existing technologies into hybrid technologies – the ‘technologies fusion’ approach. It blends incremental technical improvements from several previously separate field of technology to create products that revolutionise markets. In a world where the old maxim ‘one technology one industry’ no longer applies, a singular breakthrough strategy is inadequate; companies need to include both the breakthrough and fusion approaches in their technology strategy. Relying on breakthroughs alone fails because it focuses the R&D efforts to narrowly, ignoring the possibilities of combining technologies. Yet many western companies still rely almost exclusively – on the breakthrough approach. The reasons are complex: a distrust of outside innovations and not-invented here engineering and arrogance and aversion to sharing research results.Q.Why do Western companies avoid the technology fusion approach?

Top Courses for UPSC

What was the result of the 11th Battle of the Isonzo in 1917?a)It led to the capture of Trieste by Italian forcesb)It strained Austrian resistance severely but did not result in significant territorial gainsc)It marked a major breakthrough for the Austrian forcesd)It resulted in the complete defeat of the Italian armyCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
What was the result of the 11th Battle of the Isonzo in 1917?a)It led to the capture of Trieste by Italian forcesb)It strained Austrian resistance severely but did not result in significant territorial gainsc)It marked a major breakthrough for the Austrian forcesd)It resulted in the complete defeat of the Italian armyCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about What was the result of the 11th Battle of the Isonzo in 1917?a)It led to the capture of Trieste by Italian forcesb)It strained Austrian resistance severely but did not result in significant territorial gainsc)It marked a major breakthrough for the Austrian forcesd)It resulted in the complete defeat of the Italian armyCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for What was the result of the 11th Battle of the Isonzo in 1917?a)It led to the capture of Trieste by Italian forcesb)It strained Austrian resistance severely but did not result in significant territorial gainsc)It marked a major breakthrough for the Austrian forcesd)It resulted in the complete defeat of the Italian armyCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for What was the result of the 11th Battle of the Isonzo in 1917?a)It led to the capture of Trieste by Italian forcesb)It strained Austrian resistance severely but did not result in significant territorial gainsc)It marked a major breakthrough for the Austrian forcesd)It resulted in the complete defeat of the Italian armyCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of What was the result of the 11th Battle of the Isonzo in 1917?a)It led to the capture of Trieste by Italian forcesb)It strained Austrian resistance severely but did not result in significant territorial gainsc)It marked a major breakthrough for the Austrian forcesd)It resulted in the complete defeat of the Italian armyCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of What was the result of the 11th Battle of the Isonzo in 1917?a)It led to the capture of Trieste by Italian forcesb)It strained Austrian resistance severely but did not result in significant territorial gainsc)It marked a major breakthrough for the Austrian forcesd)It resulted in the complete defeat of the Italian armyCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for What was the result of the 11th Battle of the Isonzo in 1917?a)It led to the capture of Trieste by Italian forcesb)It strained Austrian resistance severely but did not result in significant territorial gainsc)It marked a major breakthrough for the Austrian forcesd)It resulted in the complete defeat of the Italian armyCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of What was the result of the 11th Battle of the Isonzo in 1917?a)It led to the capture of Trieste by Italian forcesb)It strained Austrian resistance severely but did not result in significant territorial gainsc)It marked a major breakthrough for the Austrian forcesd)It resulted in the complete defeat of the Italian armyCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice What was the result of the 11th Battle of the Isonzo in 1917?a)It led to the capture of Trieste by Italian forcesb)It strained Austrian resistance severely but did not result in significant territorial gainsc)It marked a major breakthrough for the Austrian forcesd)It resulted in the complete defeat of the Italian armyCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Top Courses for UPSC

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev