Question Description
The suicide of an actress in Mumbai had grabbed newspaper headlines. As the interpersonal relationship of the victim and her boyfriend was put under the microscope, details of the relationship began to emerge, where it was alleged that the actress was fine the day before, was subjected to controlling behavior of the boyfriend on previous occasions. However, amidst the minutiae of the personal story, suicide was never construed as an act of domestic violence.In contrast, when a man walked on the streets of Pune with the chopped head of his wife in his hand, the act was immediately reported as a murder or an act of violence. Public condemnation and outrage was widespread in denouncing the insane act of the husband.However, what happens when a man walks out of an interpersonal relationship killing a woman, but without the head of a woman in his hand? In this circumstance, the death of a woman is instantly labeled as a suicide rather than a result of domestic violence. This trend of labeling "deaths under mysterious circumstances" as suicides negates the experiences of violence endured by women in the intimate relationship and contributes to the invisibility of domestic violence in intimate relationships.Treating the suicide as an unnatural death rather than as violence is out of sync with the current literature on domestic violence as well as the legal definition of domestic violence provided under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), 2005.We must adopt a socio-legal perspective to critically examine the social phenomenon of systematically downgrading the death of women in intimate relationships to a suicide as an outcome of a personal or private affair of two individuals. When the death in intimate relationships is termed as a suicide, the label ignores the social context of the correlation between the interpersonal realm and the act of death. It mitigates the personal circumstances of the women, who experience different forms of violence from their intimate partners over a period.Q. If domestic violence under the Protection of W omen from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), 2005 is defined as actual abuse or the threat of abuse whether physical, sexual, verbal, emotional or economic; and if the allegations in the case mentioned in the first paragraph is true, then under the act what the husband did would be:a)An act of domestic violence since the husband committed physical violence.b)An act of domestic violence since the women took her own life.c)An act of domestic violence if a controlling behavior is a form of abuse.d)An act of domestic violence only if it can be proven that there was physical abuse.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about The suicide of an actress in Mumbai had grabbed newspaper headlines. As the interpersonal relationship of the victim and her boyfriend was put under the microscope, details of the relationship began to emerge, where it was alleged that the actress was fine the day before, was subjected to controlling behavior of the boyfriend on previous occasions. However, amidst the minutiae of the personal story, suicide was never construed as an act of domestic violence.In contrast, when a man walked on the streets of Pune with the chopped head of his wife in his hand, the act was immediately reported as a murder or an act of violence. Public condemnation and outrage was widespread in denouncing the insane act of the husband.However, what happens when a man walks out of an interpersonal relationship killing a woman, but without the head of a woman in his hand? In this circumstance, the death of a woman is instantly labeled as a suicide rather than a result of domestic violence. This trend of labeling "deaths under mysterious circumstances" as suicides negates the experiences of violence endured by women in the intimate relationship and contributes to the invisibility of domestic violence in intimate relationships.Treating the suicide as an unnatural death rather than as violence is out of sync with the current literature on domestic violence as well as the legal definition of domestic violence provided under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), 2005.We must adopt a socio-legal perspective to critically examine the social phenomenon of systematically downgrading the death of women in intimate relationships to a suicide as an outcome of a personal or private affair of two individuals. When the death in intimate relationships is termed as a suicide, the label ignores the social context of the correlation between the interpersonal realm and the act of death. It mitigates the personal circumstances of the women, who experience different forms of violence from their intimate partners over a period.Q. If domestic violence under the Protection of W omen from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), 2005 is defined as actual abuse or the threat of abuse whether physical, sexual, verbal, emotional or economic; and if the allegations in the case mentioned in the first paragraph is true, then under the act what the husband did would be:a)An act of domestic violence since the husband committed physical violence.b)An act of domestic violence since the women took her own life.c)An act of domestic violence if a controlling behavior is a form of abuse.d)An act of domestic violence only if it can be proven that there was physical abuse.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The suicide of an actress in Mumbai had grabbed newspaper headlines. As the interpersonal relationship of the victim and her boyfriend was put under the microscope, details of the relationship began to emerge, where it was alleged that the actress was fine the day before, was subjected to controlling behavior of the boyfriend on previous occasions. However, amidst the minutiae of the personal story, suicide was never construed as an act of domestic violence.In contrast, when a man walked on the streets of Pune with the chopped head of his wife in his hand, the act was immediately reported as a murder or an act of violence. Public condemnation and outrage was widespread in denouncing the insane act of the husband.However, what happens when a man walks out of an interpersonal relationship killing a woman, but without the head of a woman in his hand? In this circumstance, the death of a woman is instantly labeled as a suicide rather than a result of domestic violence. This trend of labeling "deaths under mysterious circumstances" as suicides negates the experiences of violence endured by women in the intimate relationship and contributes to the invisibility of domestic violence in intimate relationships.Treating the suicide as an unnatural death rather than as violence is out of sync with the current literature on domestic violence as well as the legal definition of domestic violence provided under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), 2005.We must adopt a socio-legal perspective to critically examine the social phenomenon of systematically downgrading the death of women in intimate relationships to a suicide as an outcome of a personal or private affair of two individuals. When the death in intimate relationships is termed as a suicide, the label ignores the social context of the correlation between the interpersonal realm and the act of death. It mitigates the personal circumstances of the women, who experience different forms of violence from their intimate partners over a period.Q. If domestic violence under the Protection of W omen from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), 2005 is defined as actual abuse or the threat of abuse whether physical, sexual, verbal, emotional or economic; and if the allegations in the case mentioned in the first paragraph is true, then under the act what the husband did would be:a)An act of domestic violence since the husband committed physical violence.b)An act of domestic violence since the women took her own life.c)An act of domestic violence if a controlling behavior is a form of abuse.d)An act of domestic violence only if it can be proven that there was physical abuse.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for The suicide of an actress in Mumbai had grabbed newspaper headlines. As the interpersonal relationship of the victim and her boyfriend was put under the microscope, details of the relationship began to emerge, where it was alleged that the actress was fine the day before, was subjected to controlling behavior of the boyfriend on previous occasions. However, amidst the minutiae of the personal story, suicide was never construed as an act of domestic violence.In contrast, when a man walked on the streets of Pune with the chopped head of his wife in his hand, the act was immediately reported as a murder or an act of violence. Public condemnation and outrage was widespread in denouncing the insane act of the husband.However, what happens when a man walks out of an interpersonal relationship killing a woman, but without the head of a woman in his hand? In this circumstance, the death of a woman is instantly labeled as a suicide rather than a result of domestic violence. This trend of labeling "deaths under mysterious circumstances" as suicides negates the experiences of violence endured by women in the intimate relationship and contributes to the invisibility of domestic violence in intimate relationships.Treating the suicide as an unnatural death rather than as violence is out of sync with the current literature on domestic violence as well as the legal definition of domestic violence provided under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), 2005.We must adopt a socio-legal perspective to critically examine the social phenomenon of systematically downgrading the death of women in intimate relationships to a suicide as an outcome of a personal or private affair of two individuals. When the death in intimate relationships is termed as a suicide, the label ignores the social context of the correlation between the interpersonal realm and the act of death. It mitigates the personal circumstances of the women, who experience different forms of violence from their intimate partners over a period.Q. If domestic violence under the Protection of W omen from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), 2005 is defined as actual abuse or the threat of abuse whether physical, sexual, verbal, emotional or economic; and if the allegations in the case mentioned in the first paragraph is true, then under the act what the husband did would be:a)An act of domestic violence since the husband committed physical violence.b)An act of domestic violence since the women took her own life.c)An act of domestic violence if a controlling behavior is a form of abuse.d)An act of domestic violence only if it can be proven that there was physical abuse.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of The suicide of an actress in Mumbai had grabbed newspaper headlines. As the interpersonal relationship of the victim and her boyfriend was put under the microscope, details of the relationship began to emerge, where it was alleged that the actress was fine the day before, was subjected to controlling behavior of the boyfriend on previous occasions. However, amidst the minutiae of the personal story, suicide was never construed as an act of domestic violence.In contrast, when a man walked on the streets of Pune with the chopped head of his wife in his hand, the act was immediately reported as a murder or an act of violence. Public condemnation and outrage was widespread in denouncing the insane act of the husband.However, what happens when a man walks out of an interpersonal relationship killing a woman, but without the head of a woman in his hand? In this circumstance, the death of a woman is instantly labeled as a suicide rather than a result of domestic violence. This trend of labeling "deaths under mysterious circumstances" as suicides negates the experiences of violence endured by women in the intimate relationship and contributes to the invisibility of domestic violence in intimate relationships.Treating the suicide as an unnatural death rather than as violence is out of sync with the current literature on domestic violence as well as the legal definition of domestic violence provided under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), 2005.We must adopt a socio-legal perspective to critically examine the social phenomenon of systematically downgrading the death of women in intimate relationships to a suicide as an outcome of a personal or private affair of two individuals. When the death in intimate relationships is termed as a suicide, the label ignores the social context of the correlation between the interpersonal realm and the act of death. It mitigates the personal circumstances of the women, who experience different forms of violence from their intimate partners over a period.Q. If domestic violence under the Protection of W omen from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), 2005 is defined as actual abuse or the threat of abuse whether physical, sexual, verbal, emotional or economic; and if the allegations in the case mentioned in the first paragraph is true, then under the act what the husband did would be:a)An act of domestic violence since the husband committed physical violence.b)An act of domestic violence since the women took her own life.c)An act of domestic violence if a controlling behavior is a form of abuse.d)An act of domestic violence only if it can be proven that there was physical abuse.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The suicide of an actress in Mumbai had grabbed newspaper headlines. As the interpersonal relationship of the victim and her boyfriend was put under the microscope, details of the relationship began to emerge, where it was alleged that the actress was fine the day before, was subjected to controlling behavior of the boyfriend on previous occasions. However, amidst the minutiae of the personal story, suicide was never construed as an act of domestic violence.In contrast, when a man walked on the streets of Pune with the chopped head of his wife in his hand, the act was immediately reported as a murder or an act of violence. Public condemnation and outrage was widespread in denouncing the insane act of the husband.However, what happens when a man walks out of an interpersonal relationship killing a woman, but without the head of a woman in his hand? In this circumstance, the death of a woman is instantly labeled as a suicide rather than a result of domestic violence. This trend of labeling "deaths under mysterious circumstances" as suicides negates the experiences of violence endured by women in the intimate relationship and contributes to the invisibility of domestic violence in intimate relationships.Treating the suicide as an unnatural death rather than as violence is out of sync with the current literature on domestic violence as well as the legal definition of domestic violence provided under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), 2005.We must adopt a socio-legal perspective to critically examine the social phenomenon of systematically downgrading the death of women in intimate relationships to a suicide as an outcome of a personal or private affair of two individuals. When the death in intimate relationships is termed as a suicide, the label ignores the social context of the correlation between the interpersonal realm and the act of death. It mitigates the personal circumstances of the women, who experience different forms of violence from their intimate partners over a period.Q. If domestic violence under the Protection of W omen from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), 2005 is defined as actual abuse or the threat of abuse whether physical, sexual, verbal, emotional or economic; and if the allegations in the case mentioned in the first paragraph is true, then under the act what the husband did would be:a)An act of domestic violence since the husband committed physical violence.b)An act of domestic violence since the women took her own life.c)An act of domestic violence if a controlling behavior is a form of abuse.d)An act of domestic violence only if it can be proven that there was physical abuse.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The suicide of an actress in Mumbai had grabbed newspaper headlines. As the interpersonal relationship of the victim and her boyfriend was put under the microscope, details of the relationship began to emerge, where it was alleged that the actress was fine the day before, was subjected to controlling behavior of the boyfriend on previous occasions. However, amidst the minutiae of the personal story, suicide was never construed as an act of domestic violence.In contrast, when a man walked on the streets of Pune with the chopped head of his wife in his hand, the act was immediately reported as a murder or an act of violence. Public condemnation and outrage was widespread in denouncing the insane act of the husband.However, what happens when a man walks out of an interpersonal relationship killing a woman, but without the head of a woman in his hand? In this circumstance, the death of a woman is instantly labeled as a suicide rather than a result of domestic violence. This trend of labeling "deaths under mysterious circumstances" as suicides negates the experiences of violence endured by women in the intimate relationship and contributes to the invisibility of domestic violence in intimate relationships.Treating the suicide as an unnatural death rather than as violence is out of sync with the current literature on domestic violence as well as the legal definition of domestic violence provided under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), 2005.We must adopt a socio-legal perspective to critically examine the social phenomenon of systematically downgrading the death of women in intimate relationships to a suicide as an outcome of a personal or private affair of two individuals. When the death in intimate relationships is termed as a suicide, the label ignores the social context of the correlation between the interpersonal realm and the act of death. It mitigates the personal circumstances of the women, who experience different forms of violence from their intimate partners over a period.Q. If domestic violence under the Protection of W omen from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), 2005 is defined as actual abuse or the threat of abuse whether physical, sexual, verbal, emotional or economic; and if the allegations in the case mentioned in the first paragraph is true, then under the act what the husband did would be:a)An act of domestic violence since the husband committed physical violence.b)An act of domestic violence since the women took her own life.c)An act of domestic violence if a controlling behavior is a form of abuse.d)An act of domestic violence only if it can be proven that there was physical abuse.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The suicide of an actress in Mumbai had grabbed newspaper headlines. As the interpersonal relationship of the victim and her boyfriend was put under the microscope, details of the relationship began to emerge, where it was alleged that the actress was fine the day before, was subjected to controlling behavior of the boyfriend on previous occasions. However, amidst the minutiae of the personal story, suicide was never construed as an act of domestic violence.In contrast, when a man walked on the streets of Pune with the chopped head of his wife in his hand, the act was immediately reported as a murder or an act of violence. Public condemnation and outrage was widespread in denouncing the insane act of the husband.However, what happens when a man walks out of an interpersonal relationship killing a woman, but without the head of a woman in his hand? In this circumstance, the death of a woman is instantly labeled as a suicide rather than a result of domestic violence. This trend of labeling "deaths under mysterious circumstances" as suicides negates the experiences of violence endured by women in the intimate relationship and contributes to the invisibility of domestic violence in intimate relationships.Treating the suicide as an unnatural death rather than as violence is out of sync with the current literature on domestic violence as well as the legal definition of domestic violence provided under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), 2005.We must adopt a socio-legal perspective to critically examine the social phenomenon of systematically downgrading the death of women in intimate relationships to a suicide as an outcome of a personal or private affair of two individuals. When the death in intimate relationships is termed as a suicide, the label ignores the social context of the correlation between the interpersonal realm and the act of death. It mitigates the personal circumstances of the women, who experience different forms of violence from their intimate partners over a period.Q. If domestic violence under the Protection of W omen from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), 2005 is defined as actual abuse or the threat of abuse whether physical, sexual, verbal, emotional or economic; and if the allegations in the case mentioned in the first paragraph is true, then under the act what the husband did would be:a)An act of domestic violence since the husband committed physical violence.b)An act of domestic violence since the women took her own life.c)An act of domestic violence if a controlling behavior is a form of abuse.d)An act of domestic violence only if it can be proven that there was physical abuse.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The suicide of an actress in Mumbai had grabbed newspaper headlines. As the interpersonal relationship of the victim and her boyfriend was put under the microscope, details of the relationship began to emerge, where it was alleged that the actress was fine the day before, was subjected to controlling behavior of the boyfriend on previous occasions. However, amidst the minutiae of the personal story, suicide was never construed as an act of domestic violence.In contrast, when a man walked on the streets of Pune with the chopped head of his wife in his hand, the act was immediately reported as a murder or an act of violence. Public condemnation and outrage was widespread in denouncing the insane act of the husband.However, what happens when a man walks out of an interpersonal relationship killing a woman, but without the head of a woman in his hand? In this circumstance, the death of a woman is instantly labeled as a suicide rather than a result of domestic violence. This trend of labeling "deaths under mysterious circumstances" as suicides negates the experiences of violence endured by women in the intimate relationship and contributes to the invisibility of domestic violence in intimate relationships.Treating the suicide as an unnatural death rather than as violence is out of sync with the current literature on domestic violence as well as the legal definition of domestic violence provided under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), 2005.We must adopt a socio-legal perspective to critically examine the social phenomenon of systematically downgrading the death of women in intimate relationships to a suicide as an outcome of a personal or private affair of two individuals. When the death in intimate relationships is termed as a suicide, the label ignores the social context of the correlation between the interpersonal realm and the act of death. It mitigates the personal circumstances of the women, who experience different forms of violence from their intimate partners over a period.Q. If domestic violence under the Protection of W omen from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), 2005 is defined as actual abuse or the threat of abuse whether physical, sexual, verbal, emotional or economic; and if the allegations in the case mentioned in the first paragraph is true, then under the act what the husband did would be:a)An act of domestic violence since the husband committed physical violence.b)An act of domestic violence since the women took her own life.c)An act of domestic violence if a controlling behavior is a form of abuse.d)An act of domestic violence only if it can be proven that there was physical abuse.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.