Question Description
The suicide of an actress in Mumbai had grabbed newspaper headlines. As the interpersonal relationship of the victim and her boyfriend was put under the microscope, details of the relationship began to emerge, where it was alleged that the actress was fine the day before, was subjected to controlling behavior of the boyfriend on previous occasions. However, amidst the minutiae of the personal story, suicide was never construed as an act of domestic violence.In contrast, when a man walked on the streets of Pune with the chopped head of his wife in his hand, the act was immediately reported as a murder or an act of violence. Public condemnation and outrage was widespread in denouncing the insane act of the husband.However, what happens when a man walks out of an interpersonal relationship killing a woman, but without the head of a woman in his hand? In this circumstance, the death of a woman is instantly labeled as a suicide rather than a result of domestic violence. This trend of labeling "deaths under mysterious circumstances" as suicides negates the experiences of violence endured by women in the intimate relationship and contributes to the invisibility of domestic violence in intimate relationships.Treating the suicide as an unnatural death rather than as violence is out of sync with the current literature on domestic violence as well as the legal definition of domestic violence provided under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), 2005.We must adopt a socio-legal perspective to critically examine the social phenomenon of systematically downgrading the death of women in intimate relationships to a suicide as an outcome of a personal or private affair of two individuals. When the death in intimate relationships is termed as a suicide, the label ignores the social context of the correlation between the interpersonal realm and the act of death. It mitigates the personal circumstances of the women, who experience different forms of violence from their intimate partners over a period.Q. Saraswathy and Bhim, a powerful and resource rich businessman, are married to each other. Under the pressure of dowry demand she brought 50 sovereign gold ornaments and 1 kg silver articles. After four months of the marriage, Bhim and his family demanded more dowry in the form of cash and jewels.The appellant was not able to satisfy the said demand and had to face violence from her in-law. Out of mental agony and pain, she committed suicide. Based on the author's reasoning in the passage above:a)This should be labelled as homicide rather than suicide.b)This should be labelled as murder under mysterious circumstancesc)This should be considered as an offence culpable homicide.d)This should be considered as death caused by domestic violence.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about The suicide of an actress in Mumbai had grabbed newspaper headlines. As the interpersonal relationship of the victim and her boyfriend was put under the microscope, details of the relationship began to emerge, where it was alleged that the actress was fine the day before, was subjected to controlling behavior of the boyfriend on previous occasions. However, amidst the minutiae of the personal story, suicide was never construed as an act of domestic violence.In contrast, when a man walked on the streets of Pune with the chopped head of his wife in his hand, the act was immediately reported as a murder or an act of violence. Public condemnation and outrage was widespread in denouncing the insane act of the husband.However, what happens when a man walks out of an interpersonal relationship killing a woman, but without the head of a woman in his hand? In this circumstance, the death of a woman is instantly labeled as a suicide rather than a result of domestic violence. This trend of labeling "deaths under mysterious circumstances" as suicides negates the experiences of violence endured by women in the intimate relationship and contributes to the invisibility of domestic violence in intimate relationships.Treating the suicide as an unnatural death rather than as violence is out of sync with the current literature on domestic violence as well as the legal definition of domestic violence provided under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), 2005.We must adopt a socio-legal perspective to critically examine the social phenomenon of systematically downgrading the death of women in intimate relationships to a suicide as an outcome of a personal or private affair of two individuals. When the death in intimate relationships is termed as a suicide, the label ignores the social context of the correlation between the interpersonal realm and the act of death. It mitigates the personal circumstances of the women, who experience different forms of violence from their intimate partners over a period.Q. Saraswathy and Bhim, a powerful and resource rich businessman, are married to each other. Under the pressure of dowry demand she brought 50 sovereign gold ornaments and 1 kg silver articles. After four months of the marriage, Bhim and his family demanded more dowry in the form of cash and jewels.The appellant was not able to satisfy the said demand and had to face violence from her in-law. Out of mental agony and pain, she committed suicide. Based on the author's reasoning in the passage above:a)This should be labelled as homicide rather than suicide.b)This should be labelled as murder under mysterious circumstancesc)This should be considered as an offence culpable homicide.d)This should be considered as death caused by domestic violence.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The suicide of an actress in Mumbai had grabbed newspaper headlines. As the interpersonal relationship of the victim and her boyfriend was put under the microscope, details of the relationship began to emerge, where it was alleged that the actress was fine the day before, was subjected to controlling behavior of the boyfriend on previous occasions. However, amidst the minutiae of the personal story, suicide was never construed as an act of domestic violence.In contrast, when a man walked on the streets of Pune with the chopped head of his wife in his hand, the act was immediately reported as a murder or an act of violence. Public condemnation and outrage was widespread in denouncing the insane act of the husband.However, what happens when a man walks out of an interpersonal relationship killing a woman, but without the head of a woman in his hand? In this circumstance, the death of a woman is instantly labeled as a suicide rather than a result of domestic violence. This trend of labeling "deaths under mysterious circumstances" as suicides negates the experiences of violence endured by women in the intimate relationship and contributes to the invisibility of domestic violence in intimate relationships.Treating the suicide as an unnatural death rather than as violence is out of sync with the current literature on domestic violence as well as the legal definition of domestic violence provided under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), 2005.We must adopt a socio-legal perspective to critically examine the social phenomenon of systematically downgrading the death of women in intimate relationships to a suicide as an outcome of a personal or private affair of two individuals. When the death in intimate relationships is termed as a suicide, the label ignores the social context of the correlation between the interpersonal realm and the act of death. It mitigates the personal circumstances of the women, who experience different forms of violence from their intimate partners over a period.Q. Saraswathy and Bhim, a powerful and resource rich businessman, are married to each other. Under the pressure of dowry demand she brought 50 sovereign gold ornaments and 1 kg silver articles. After four months of the marriage, Bhim and his family demanded more dowry in the form of cash and jewels.The appellant was not able to satisfy the said demand and had to face violence from her in-law. Out of mental agony and pain, she committed suicide. Based on the author's reasoning in the passage above:a)This should be labelled as homicide rather than suicide.b)This should be labelled as murder under mysterious circumstancesc)This should be considered as an offence culpable homicide.d)This should be considered as death caused by domestic violence.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for The suicide of an actress in Mumbai had grabbed newspaper headlines. As the interpersonal relationship of the victim and her boyfriend was put under the microscope, details of the relationship began to emerge, where it was alleged that the actress was fine the day before, was subjected to controlling behavior of the boyfriend on previous occasions. However, amidst the minutiae of the personal story, suicide was never construed as an act of domestic violence.In contrast, when a man walked on the streets of Pune with the chopped head of his wife in his hand, the act was immediately reported as a murder or an act of violence. Public condemnation and outrage was widespread in denouncing the insane act of the husband.However, what happens when a man walks out of an interpersonal relationship killing a woman, but without the head of a woman in his hand? In this circumstance, the death of a woman is instantly labeled as a suicide rather than a result of domestic violence. This trend of labeling "deaths under mysterious circumstances" as suicides negates the experiences of violence endured by women in the intimate relationship and contributes to the invisibility of domestic violence in intimate relationships.Treating the suicide as an unnatural death rather than as violence is out of sync with the current literature on domestic violence as well as the legal definition of domestic violence provided under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), 2005.We must adopt a socio-legal perspective to critically examine the social phenomenon of systematically downgrading the death of women in intimate relationships to a suicide as an outcome of a personal or private affair of two individuals. When the death in intimate relationships is termed as a suicide, the label ignores the social context of the correlation between the interpersonal realm and the act of death. It mitigates the personal circumstances of the women, who experience different forms of violence from their intimate partners over a period.Q. Saraswathy and Bhim, a powerful and resource rich businessman, are married to each other. Under the pressure of dowry demand she brought 50 sovereign gold ornaments and 1 kg silver articles. After four months of the marriage, Bhim and his family demanded more dowry in the form of cash and jewels.The appellant was not able to satisfy the said demand and had to face violence from her in-law. Out of mental agony and pain, she committed suicide. Based on the author's reasoning in the passage above:a)This should be labelled as homicide rather than suicide.b)This should be labelled as murder under mysterious circumstancesc)This should be considered as an offence culpable homicide.d)This should be considered as death caused by domestic violence.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of The suicide of an actress in Mumbai had grabbed newspaper headlines. As the interpersonal relationship of the victim and her boyfriend was put under the microscope, details of the relationship began to emerge, where it was alleged that the actress was fine the day before, was subjected to controlling behavior of the boyfriend on previous occasions. However, amidst the minutiae of the personal story, suicide was never construed as an act of domestic violence.In contrast, when a man walked on the streets of Pune with the chopped head of his wife in his hand, the act was immediately reported as a murder or an act of violence. Public condemnation and outrage was widespread in denouncing the insane act of the husband.However, what happens when a man walks out of an interpersonal relationship killing a woman, but without the head of a woman in his hand? In this circumstance, the death of a woman is instantly labeled as a suicide rather than a result of domestic violence. This trend of labeling "deaths under mysterious circumstances" as suicides negates the experiences of violence endured by women in the intimate relationship and contributes to the invisibility of domestic violence in intimate relationships.Treating the suicide as an unnatural death rather than as violence is out of sync with the current literature on domestic violence as well as the legal definition of domestic violence provided under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), 2005.We must adopt a socio-legal perspective to critically examine the social phenomenon of systematically downgrading the death of women in intimate relationships to a suicide as an outcome of a personal or private affair of two individuals. When the death in intimate relationships is termed as a suicide, the label ignores the social context of the correlation between the interpersonal realm and the act of death. It mitigates the personal circumstances of the women, who experience different forms of violence from their intimate partners over a period.Q. Saraswathy and Bhim, a powerful and resource rich businessman, are married to each other. Under the pressure of dowry demand she brought 50 sovereign gold ornaments and 1 kg silver articles. After four months of the marriage, Bhim and his family demanded more dowry in the form of cash and jewels.The appellant was not able to satisfy the said demand and had to face violence from her in-law. Out of mental agony and pain, she committed suicide. Based on the author's reasoning in the passage above:a)This should be labelled as homicide rather than suicide.b)This should be labelled as murder under mysterious circumstancesc)This should be considered as an offence culpable homicide.d)This should be considered as death caused by domestic violence.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The suicide of an actress in Mumbai had grabbed newspaper headlines. As the interpersonal relationship of the victim and her boyfriend was put under the microscope, details of the relationship began to emerge, where it was alleged that the actress was fine the day before, was subjected to controlling behavior of the boyfriend on previous occasions. However, amidst the minutiae of the personal story, suicide was never construed as an act of domestic violence.In contrast, when a man walked on the streets of Pune with the chopped head of his wife in his hand, the act was immediately reported as a murder or an act of violence. Public condemnation and outrage was widespread in denouncing the insane act of the husband.However, what happens when a man walks out of an interpersonal relationship killing a woman, but without the head of a woman in his hand? In this circumstance, the death of a woman is instantly labeled as a suicide rather than a result of domestic violence. This trend of labeling "deaths under mysterious circumstances" as suicides negates the experiences of violence endured by women in the intimate relationship and contributes to the invisibility of domestic violence in intimate relationships.Treating the suicide as an unnatural death rather than as violence is out of sync with the current literature on domestic violence as well as the legal definition of domestic violence provided under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), 2005.We must adopt a socio-legal perspective to critically examine the social phenomenon of systematically downgrading the death of women in intimate relationships to a suicide as an outcome of a personal or private affair of two individuals. When the death in intimate relationships is termed as a suicide, the label ignores the social context of the correlation between the interpersonal realm and the act of death. It mitigates the personal circumstances of the women, who experience different forms of violence from their intimate partners over a period.Q. Saraswathy and Bhim, a powerful and resource rich businessman, are married to each other. Under the pressure of dowry demand she brought 50 sovereign gold ornaments and 1 kg silver articles. After four months of the marriage, Bhim and his family demanded more dowry in the form of cash and jewels.The appellant was not able to satisfy the said demand and had to face violence from her in-law. Out of mental agony and pain, she committed suicide. Based on the author's reasoning in the passage above:a)This should be labelled as homicide rather than suicide.b)This should be labelled as murder under mysterious circumstancesc)This should be considered as an offence culpable homicide.d)This should be considered as death caused by domestic violence.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The suicide of an actress in Mumbai had grabbed newspaper headlines. As the interpersonal relationship of the victim and her boyfriend was put under the microscope, details of the relationship began to emerge, where it was alleged that the actress was fine the day before, was subjected to controlling behavior of the boyfriend on previous occasions. However, amidst the minutiae of the personal story, suicide was never construed as an act of domestic violence.In contrast, when a man walked on the streets of Pune with the chopped head of his wife in his hand, the act was immediately reported as a murder or an act of violence. Public condemnation and outrage was widespread in denouncing the insane act of the husband.However, what happens when a man walks out of an interpersonal relationship killing a woman, but without the head of a woman in his hand? In this circumstance, the death of a woman is instantly labeled as a suicide rather than a result of domestic violence. This trend of labeling "deaths under mysterious circumstances" as suicides negates the experiences of violence endured by women in the intimate relationship and contributes to the invisibility of domestic violence in intimate relationships.Treating the suicide as an unnatural death rather than as violence is out of sync with the current literature on domestic violence as well as the legal definition of domestic violence provided under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), 2005.We must adopt a socio-legal perspective to critically examine the social phenomenon of systematically downgrading the death of women in intimate relationships to a suicide as an outcome of a personal or private affair of two individuals. When the death in intimate relationships is termed as a suicide, the label ignores the social context of the correlation between the interpersonal realm and the act of death. It mitigates the personal circumstances of the women, who experience different forms of violence from their intimate partners over a period.Q. Saraswathy and Bhim, a powerful and resource rich businessman, are married to each other. Under the pressure of dowry demand she brought 50 sovereign gold ornaments and 1 kg silver articles. After four months of the marriage, Bhim and his family demanded more dowry in the form of cash and jewels.The appellant was not able to satisfy the said demand and had to face violence from her in-law. Out of mental agony and pain, she committed suicide. Based on the author's reasoning in the passage above:a)This should be labelled as homicide rather than suicide.b)This should be labelled as murder under mysterious circumstancesc)This should be considered as an offence culpable homicide.d)This should be considered as death caused by domestic violence.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The suicide of an actress in Mumbai had grabbed newspaper headlines. As the interpersonal relationship of the victim and her boyfriend was put under the microscope, details of the relationship began to emerge, where it was alleged that the actress was fine the day before, was subjected to controlling behavior of the boyfriend on previous occasions. However, amidst the minutiae of the personal story, suicide was never construed as an act of domestic violence.In contrast, when a man walked on the streets of Pune with the chopped head of his wife in his hand, the act was immediately reported as a murder or an act of violence. Public condemnation and outrage was widespread in denouncing the insane act of the husband.However, what happens when a man walks out of an interpersonal relationship killing a woman, but without the head of a woman in his hand? In this circumstance, the death of a woman is instantly labeled as a suicide rather than a result of domestic violence. This trend of labeling "deaths under mysterious circumstances" as suicides negates the experiences of violence endured by women in the intimate relationship and contributes to the invisibility of domestic violence in intimate relationships.Treating the suicide as an unnatural death rather than as violence is out of sync with the current literature on domestic violence as well as the legal definition of domestic violence provided under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), 2005.We must adopt a socio-legal perspective to critically examine the social phenomenon of systematically downgrading the death of women in intimate relationships to a suicide as an outcome of a personal or private affair of two individuals. When the death in intimate relationships is termed as a suicide, the label ignores the social context of the correlation between the interpersonal realm and the act of death. It mitigates the personal circumstances of the women, who experience different forms of violence from their intimate partners over a period.Q. Saraswathy and Bhim, a powerful and resource rich businessman, are married to each other. Under the pressure of dowry demand she brought 50 sovereign gold ornaments and 1 kg silver articles. After four months of the marriage, Bhim and his family demanded more dowry in the form of cash and jewels.The appellant was not able to satisfy the said demand and had to face violence from her in-law. Out of mental agony and pain, she committed suicide. Based on the author's reasoning in the passage above:a)This should be labelled as homicide rather than suicide.b)This should be labelled as murder under mysterious circumstancesc)This should be considered as an offence culpable homicide.d)This should be considered as death caused by domestic violence.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The suicide of an actress in Mumbai had grabbed newspaper headlines. As the interpersonal relationship of the victim and her boyfriend was put under the microscope, details of the relationship began to emerge, where it was alleged that the actress was fine the day before, was subjected to controlling behavior of the boyfriend on previous occasions. However, amidst the minutiae of the personal story, suicide was never construed as an act of domestic violence.In contrast, when a man walked on the streets of Pune with the chopped head of his wife in his hand, the act was immediately reported as a murder or an act of violence. Public condemnation and outrage was widespread in denouncing the insane act of the husband.However, what happens when a man walks out of an interpersonal relationship killing a woman, but without the head of a woman in his hand? In this circumstance, the death of a woman is instantly labeled as a suicide rather than a result of domestic violence. This trend of labeling "deaths under mysterious circumstances" as suicides negates the experiences of violence endured by women in the intimate relationship and contributes to the invisibility of domestic violence in intimate relationships.Treating the suicide as an unnatural death rather than as violence is out of sync with the current literature on domestic violence as well as the legal definition of domestic violence provided under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), 2005.We must adopt a socio-legal perspective to critically examine the social phenomenon of systematically downgrading the death of women in intimate relationships to a suicide as an outcome of a personal or private affair of two individuals. When the death in intimate relationships is termed as a suicide, the label ignores the social context of the correlation between the interpersonal realm and the act of death. It mitigates the personal circumstances of the women, who experience different forms of violence from their intimate partners over a period.Q. Saraswathy and Bhim, a powerful and resource rich businessman, are married to each other. Under the pressure of dowry demand she brought 50 sovereign gold ornaments and 1 kg silver articles. After four months of the marriage, Bhim and his family demanded more dowry in the form of cash and jewels.The appellant was not able to satisfy the said demand and had to face violence from her in-law. Out of mental agony and pain, she committed suicide. Based on the author's reasoning in the passage above:a)This should be labelled as homicide rather than suicide.b)This should be labelled as murder under mysterious circumstancesc)This should be considered as an offence culpable homicide.d)This should be considered as death caused by domestic violence.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.