All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Which one of the following institution is not... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Which one of the following institution is not authorised for requesting for 'Advisory Opinion' of the International Court of Justice ?
  • a)
    Economic and Social Council
  • b)
    The Trusteeship Council
  • c)
    Secretariat
  • d)
    The International Atomic Energy Agency
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Most Upvoted Answer
Which one of the following institution is not authorised for requestin...
The International Court of Justice (abbreviated ICJ) is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations (UN). It settles legal disputes between member states and gives advisory opinions to authorized UN organs and specialized agencies. ... Judges of the ICJ are not able to hold any other post or act as counsel.
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
Which one of the following institution is not authorised for requestin...
Explanation:

Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC):
- The Economic and Social Council is authorized to request advisory opinions from the International Court of Justice.
- It is one of the six main organs of the United Nations and deals with economic, social, cultural, and humanitarian issues.

The Trusteeship Council:
- The Trusteeship Council is authorized to request advisory opinions from the International Court of Justice.
- It was established to ensure that trust territories were administered in the best interests of their inhabitants and for the advancement of their self-government.

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA):
- The International Atomic Energy Agency is not authorized to request advisory opinions from the International Court of Justice.
- The IAEA is an international organization that seeks to promote the peaceful use of nuclear energy and to prevent nuclear weapons proliferation.

Secretariat:
- The Secretariat is not authorized to request advisory opinions from the International Court of Justice.
- The Secretariat is the administrative arm of the United Nations, headed by the Secretary-General, and is responsible for carrying out the day-to-day work of the organization.
Attention CLAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Most large corporations in the United States were once run by individual capitalists who owned enough stock to dominate the board of directors and dictate company policy. Because putting such large amounts of stock on the market would only depress its value, they could not sell out for a quick profit and instead had to concentrate on improving the long-term productivity of their companies. Today, with few exceptions, the stock of large United States corporations is held by large institutions—pension funds, for example—and because these institutions are prohibited by antitrust laws from owning a majority of a company’s stock and from actively influencing a company’s decision-making, they can enhance their wealth only by buying and selling stock in anticipation of fluctuations in its value. A minority shareholder is necessarily a short term trader. As a result, United States productivity is unlikely to improve unless shareholders and the managers of the companies in which they invest are encouraged to enhance long-term productivity (and hence long-term profitability), rather than simply to maximize short-term profits.Since the return of the old-style capitalist is unlikely, today’s short-term traders must be remade into tomorrow’s long-term capitalistic investors. The legal limits that now prevent financial institutions from acquiring a dominant shareholding position in a corporation should be removed, and such institutions should be encouraged to take a more active role in the operations of the companies in which they invest. In addition, any institution that holds twenty percent or more of a company’s stock should be forced to give the public one day’s notice of the intent to sell those shares. Unless the announced sale could be explained to the public on grounds other than anticipated future losses, the value of the stock would plummet and, like the old-time capitalists, major investors could cut their losses only by helping to restore their companies’ productivity. Such measures would force financial institutions to become capitalists whose success depends not on trading shares at the propitious moment, but on increasing the productivity of the companies in which they invest.Q. According to the passage, the purpose of the requirement suggested in lines "In addition, any institution that holds twenty percent or more of a company’s stock should be forced to give the public one day’s notice of the intent to sell those shares." would be which of the following?

The makers of our Constitution designed the institutions of our republic with great care and attention to detail. The deliberations of the Constituent Assembly bear witness to the extraordinary quality of thought which went into the making of these institutions. They were designed to endure and it was expected that as the republic grew, a body of good practices, conventions and intangible legacies would nourish and sustain them and make them stronger.Instead, we have seen every party in power since Indira Gandhi try to weaken and diminish these institutions. The Parliament, the Supreme Court, the Chief Election Commissioner, the Comptroller & Auditor General, the Union Public Service Commission are among the long list of institutions wherein constant attempts have been made to subdue them, erode their autonomy and authority (sometimes in the guise of reform) and have them subordinated to the will of the political executive, particularly the Prime Minister’s Office. Yet, their structural strength has enabled them to resist these attacks and substantially retain their character although each of them is probably weaker than before.The one institution that has received the maximum battering from every quarter is that of the Indian Administrative Service (IAS). In the sixty four years of its existence (it came into existence in 1951 by an Act of Parliament under Article 312 of the Constitution), there have been more than fifty Commissions, Committees, Task Forces etc that have questioned and investigated different aspects of its architecture, tinkered with the recruitment system, and re-engineered it to change the socio-cultural and age profile of the entrants, introduced an OBC quota in addition to the original one for SC and ST, and suggested several other ‘reforms’ which have substantially changed its character.Some changes have been necessitated by major sociological and political developments, for instance, the acceptance of the recommendations of the Mandal Commission. Some others have been motivated by the desire to make the IAS politically and culturally more acceptable. Yet despite these changes in the original architecture — or maybe because of them — the institution remains central to the working of the Government and, in the minds of the public, still exercises disproportionate power in the scheme of things.Q.According to the author, the institutions of our republic with passage of time have

The makers of our Constitution designed the institutions of our republic with great care and attention to detail. The deliberations of the Constituent Assembly bear witness to the extraordinary quality of thought which went into the making of these institutions. They were designed to endure and it was expected that as the republic grew, a body of good practices, conventions and intangible legacies would nourish and sustain them and make them stronger.Instead, we have seen every party in power since Indira Gandhi try to weaken and diminish these institutions. The Parliament, the Supreme Court, the Chief Election Commissioner, the Comptroller & Auditor General, the Union Public Service Commission are among the long list of institutions wherein constant attempts have been made to subdue them, erode their autonomy and authority (sometimes in the guise of reform) and have them subordinated to the will of the political executive, particularly the Prime Minister’s Office. Yet, their structural strength has enabled them to resist these attacks and substantially retain their character although each of them is probably weaker than before.The one institution that has received the maximum battering from every quarter is that of the Indian Administrative Service (IAS). In the sixty four years of its existence (it came into existence in 1951 by an Act of Parliament under Article 312 of the Constitution), there have been more than fifty Commissions, Committees, Task Forces etc that have questioned and investigated different aspects of its architecture, tinkered with the recruitment system, and re-engineered it to change the socio-cultural and age profile of the entrants, introduced an OBC quota in addition to the original one for SC and ST, and suggested several other ‘reforms’ which have substantially changed its character.Some changes have been necessitated by major sociological and political developments, for instance, the acceptance of the recommendations of the Mandal Commission. Some others have been motivated by the desire to make the IAS politically and culturally more acceptable. Yet despite these changes in the original architecture — or maybe because of them — the institution remains central to the working of the Government and, in the minds of the public, still exercises disproportionate power in the scheme of things.Q.If the Indian Administrative Service is diminished, completely weakened and the officers are selected from their birth state and posted to the same. In such a situation according to author

Top Courses for CLATView all

Top Courses for CLAT

Which one of the following institution is not authorised for requesting for Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice ?a)Economic and Social Councilb)The Trusteeship Councilc)Secretariatd)The International Atomic Energy AgencyCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Which one of the following institution is not authorised for requesting for Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice ?a)Economic and Social Councilb)The Trusteeship Councilc)Secretariatd)The International Atomic Energy AgencyCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Which one of the following institution is not authorised for requesting for Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice ?a)Economic and Social Councilb)The Trusteeship Councilc)Secretariatd)The International Atomic Energy AgencyCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Which one of the following institution is not authorised for requesting for Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice ?a)Economic and Social Councilb)The Trusteeship Councilc)Secretariatd)The International Atomic Energy AgencyCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Which one of the following institution is not authorised for requesting for Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice ?a)Economic and Social Councilb)The Trusteeship Councilc)Secretariatd)The International Atomic Energy AgencyCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Which one of the following institution is not authorised for requesting for Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice ?a)Economic and Social Councilb)The Trusteeship Councilc)Secretariatd)The International Atomic Energy AgencyCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Which one of the following institution is not authorised for requesting for Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice ?a)Economic and Social Councilb)The Trusteeship Councilc)Secretariatd)The International Atomic Energy AgencyCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Which one of the following institution is not authorised for requesting for Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice ?a)Economic and Social Councilb)The Trusteeship Councilc)Secretariatd)The International Atomic Energy AgencyCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Which one of the following institution is not authorised for requesting for Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice ?a)Economic and Social Councilb)The Trusteeship Councilc)Secretariatd)The International Atomic Energy AgencyCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Which one of the following institution is not authorised for requesting for Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice ?a)Economic and Social Councilb)The Trusteeship Councilc)Secretariatd)The International Atomic Energy AgencyCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup