The primary limitation of the Radcliff Award regarding the partition of India was the lack of specialized knowledge. The Radcliff Award, also known as the Boundary Award, was named after Sir Cyril Radcliff, the British lawyer who was appointed to determine the borders between India and Pakistan during the partition in 1947. While the award was expected to provide a fair and impartial division of territories, it faced several limitations due to the lack of specialized knowledge.

- Limited understanding of the cultural and religious complexities:
One of the major limitations was the limited understanding of the cultural and religious complexities of the region. Radcliff and his team lacked the deep understanding of the social fabric and the complexities of various communities in India. This lack of knowledge made it challenging for them to accurately assess the impact of the partition on different religious and ethnic groups.

- Insufficient time for research and analysis:
Another limitation was the strict 6-week deadline given to Radcliff to complete the task. The short timeframe limited the amount of research and analysis that could be done, leaving little room for in-depth study of the historical, demographic, and geographic factors that needed to be considered while demarcating the borders. This time constraint resulted in hasty decisions and inadequate understanding of the ground realities.

- Dependence on outdated and incomplete data:
Radcliff had to rely on outdated and incomplete data to make his decisions. The available data was often inadequate and inaccurate, which made it difficult to make informed judgments about the demarcation of borders. This reliance on incomplete information further contributed to the limitations of the Radcliff Award.

- Political pressure and influence:
The partition of India was a highly political and sensitive issue. Radcliff faced immense political pressure and influence from various stakeholders, including the British officials and Indian leaders. This pressure may have impacted his decisions and compromised the objectivity of the award.

In conclusion, the primary limitation of the Radcliff Award regarding the partition of India was the lack of specialized knowledge. The limited understanding of the cultural and religious complexities, insufficient time for research and analysis, dependence on outdated and incomplete data, and political pressure all contributed to the shortcomings of the award. These limitations had a profound impact on the partition process and resulted in significant challenges and conflicts during the division of territories.