In the twentieth century, the visual arts have embarked on major experimentation, from cubism to expressionism. While tastes always vary, there are certainly some people who find beautiful objects of each of the art movements of the first half of the twentieth century. In the latter half of the twentieth century, though, most works are so abstract or shocking that neither the critic nor the general public uses the word andquot;beautifulandquot; to describe them: indeed, sometimes late twentieth-century artists have, as one of their expressed goals, the creation of a work that no one could find beautiful. Whatever these artists are creating may be intellectually engaging at some level, but it is no longer art.Q.Which of the following is an assumption that supports drawing the conclusion above from the reasons given for that conclusion?a)Art critics generally have a different appraisal of a work of art than does the general publicb)The meaning of any work of art is defined entirely by the ideas of the artist who created it.c)Beauty is a defining quality of art.d)All art movements of the latter half of the twentieth century are responses to the movements of the first half of the century.e)It is not possible for any work to be simultaneously beautiful and intellectually engaging.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > In the twentieth century, the visual arts hav...

Join the Discussion on the App

Q. Which of the following is an assumption that supports drawing the conclusion above from the reasons given for that conclusion?

a)
Art critics generally have a different appraisal of a work of art than does the general public
b)
The meaning of any work of art is defined entirely by the ideas of the artist who created it.
c)
Beauty is a defining quality of art.
d)
All art movements of the latter half of the twentieth century are responses to the movements of the first half of the century.
e)
It is not possible for any work to be simultaneously beautiful and intellectually engaging.

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

GMAT Focus Edition Mock test - 1

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Most Upvoted Answer

In the twentieth century, the visual arts have embarked on major exper...

Assumption Explanation:

Beauty is a defining quality of art:
- The assumption that beauty is a defining quality of art supports the conclusion that late twentieth-century works that are not considered beautiful are not art.
- If beauty is considered a defining quality of art, then works that do not possess this quality may not be classified as art.
- This assumption implies that art is intrinsically linked to beauty, and if a work does not possess this quality, it may not be considered art.

Therefore, the assumption that beauty is a defining quality of art supports the conclusion that late twentieth-century works that are not considered beautiful may not be classified as art.

Answered by Talent Skill Learning · View profile

Free Test

FREE

GMAT Focus Edition Mock test - 1
64 Ques | 135 Min

Start Free Test

View all free GMAT tests

Community Answer

In the twentieth century, the visual arts have embarked on major exper...

The argument makes a number of factual statements. Art in the first half of the 20th century are, or could be considered, beautiful. Works by artists in the latter half of the 20th century are not supposed to be beautiful, and even, are supposed to be devoid of beauty. Then the argument draws a bold powerful conclusion: therefore, they are not art! The assumption seems to be something that links beauty to whether something qualifies as art. We definitely need an answer to speak to the question: what does, or doesn't, qualify as art?

(C) is credited answer. If something needs to be beautiful, or potentially beautiful, to qualify as art, then this would explain that works that "no one could find beautiful" would fall outside the author's definition of art.

The other answers are all quite tempting, because we could imagine an art professor or someone in an art class arguing for any one of them.

(A) is irrelevant. Critics & the general public might have different appraisals, but what one or the other thinks does not, in and of itself, seem to determine whether something is art.

(B) is also irrelevant: who determines the meaning is a separate question from whether the work qualifies at art in the first place. (BTW, exceedingly few modern critics would accept the interpretive idea contained in choice .)

(D) is undeniably true, but not relevant: again: it provides no standard by which we could say the former objects are art and the latter objects aren’t.

(E) is a far-flung idea, unrelated to the discussion. The passage doesn't address the issue of whether any works of art are intellectually engaging.

Share via Whatsapp

Attention GMAT Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2024

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Logical arguments are usually classified as either deductive or inductive, depending on the process used to arrive at them. In the process of deduction, you begin with some statements, called premises, which are assumed to be true, and you then determine what else would have to be true if the premises are true. For example, in mathematics you can begin with some axioms and then determine what you can prove to be true given those axioms are true. With deduction you can provide absolute proof of your conclusions,since your premises are considered correct. The premises themselves, however, remain unproven and unprovable; they must be accepted on face value, or by faith, or for the purpose of exploration.On the other hand, in the process of induction, you begin with some data, and then determine what general conclusion(s) can logically be derived from that data. In other words, you determine what theory or theories could explain the data. For example, you note that the probability of becoming schizophrenic is greatly increased if at least one parent is schizophrenic, and from that you conclude that schizophrenia may be inherited. That is certainly a reasonable hypothesis given the data. Note, however, that induction does not prove that the theory is correct. There are often alternative theories that are also supported by the data. For example, the behavior of the schizophrenic parent may cause the child to be schizophrenic, not the genes. What is important in induction is that the theory does indeed offer a logical explanation of the data. To conclude that the parents have no effect on the schizophrenia of the children is not supportable given the data, and would not be a logical conclusion.Both deduction and induction by themselves are inadequate for a scientific approach. While deduction gives absolute proof, it never makes contact with the real world; there is no place for observation or experimentation - no way to test the validity of the premises. And, while induction is driven by observation, it never approaches actual proof of a theory. Accordingly, a synthesis of these two logical approaches is required for an actual scientific method.Which one of the following statements is true as per the information given in the passage?

View answer

Scholars studying diversity in students pursuing higher education stress the need for diversity among the faculty and staff of institutions offering such education. It is seen as a way of creating a more welcoming and supportive environment for minorities and of enhancing education for all students. Accordingly, they argue that hiring more Native American faculty and staff is a potential way to help others in the university to become more aware of and responsive to the challenges faced by some Native American students, thereby leading to more effective and culturally competent programs. However, this argument ignores a crucial ground reality. Even though many proponents of the idea discuss variations in cultural orientations among indigenous people, there seems to be an assumption that Native American professors and students share common values and hence teachers of Native American ethnicity are thought to have more insight than their counterparts from other ethnicities into Native American students. But the reality is that Native Americans form an extremely heterogeneous population. Students and teachers of Native American origin can differ in a variety of ways, such as tribal background and level of connection to their culture, and therefore making blanket assumptions about the cultural identity of Native American people who become faculty is just as inappropriate as it is to make stereotypical assumptions about Native American people in general. Accordingly, before any key changes are implemented, it would be reasonable to probe how Native American people who have achieved an extensive background in higher education differ culturally from their tribal communities of origin.What can be inferred from the following statement made in the passage?making blanket assumptions about the cultural identity of Native American people who become faculty is just as inappropriate as it is to make stereotypical assumptions about Native American people in general...

View answer

Dolphins can swim at high speeds and achieve high acceleration in the water. In 1936, Sir James Gray calculated the force dolphins should be able to exert based on their physiology. He concluded that the propulsive force they were able to exert was not enough to explain how fast they swim and accelerate. In the 2000s, experimenters used special computer-enhanced measurements of the water in which dolphins were swimming. Through mathematical modeling, they were able to measure the force dolphins exert with their tails. As it turns out, dolphins exert considerably more force with their tails than Sir James Gray or anybody else ever expected. Therefore, the force exerted by their tails easily explains how fast they swim and accelerate.In the argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

View answer

It is often thought that our own modern age is unique in having a large number of people who live into old age. It has frequently been assumed that plagues, wars, and harsh working conditions killed off most people in previous ages before they could reach old age. However, recent research shows that in 17th century Europe, for example, people over sixty comprised 10 percent of the population. The studies also revealed that although infant mortality remained high until the 20th century in Europe, people who survived to adulthood could expect to live to be old.The portions in boldface (underline d) play which of the following roles in the argument above?

View answer

Though considered aesthetically primitive at the time, Henri Rousseau has become an iconic figure ofPost-Impressionism for his dream-like canvases painted like he was naive.

View answer

Top Courses for GMATView all

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2024

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

100 RCs for GMAT

Top Courses for GMAT

View all

In the twentieth century, the visual arts have embarked on major experimentation, from cubism to expressionism. While tastes always vary, there are certainly some people who find beautiful objects of each of the art movements of the first half of the twentieth century. In the latter half of the twentieth century, though, most works are so abstract or shocking that neither the critic nor the general public uses the word "beautiful" to describe them: indeed, sometimes late twentieth-century artists have, as one of their expressed goals, the creation of a work that no one could find beautiful. Whatever these artists are creating may be intellectually engaging at some level, but it is no longer art.Q.Which of the following is an assumption that supports drawing the conclusion above from the reasons given for that conclusion?a)Art critics generally have a different appraisal of a work of art than does the general publicb)The meaning of any work of art is defined entirely by the ideas of the artist who created it.c)Beauty is a defining quality of art.d)All art movements of the latter half of the twentieth century are responses to the movements of the first half of the century.e)It is not possible for any work to be simultaneously beautiful and intellectually engaging.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
In the twentieth century, the visual arts have embarked on major experimentation, from cubism to expressionism. While tastes always vary, there are certainly some people who find beautiful objects of each of the art movements of the first half of the twentieth century. In the latter half of the twentieth century, though, most works are so abstract or shocking that neither the critic nor the general public uses the word "beautiful" to describe them: indeed, sometimes late twentieth-century artists have, as one of their expressed goals, the creation of a work that no one could find beautiful. Whatever these artists are creating may be intellectually engaging at some level, but it is no longer art.Q.Which of the following is an assumption that supports drawing the conclusion above from the reasons given for that conclusion?a)Art critics generally have a different appraisal of a work of art than does the general publicb)The meaning of any work of art is defined entirely by the ideas of the artist who created it.c)Beauty is a defining quality of art.d)All art movements of the latter half of the twentieth century are responses to the movements of the first half of the century.e)It is not possible for any work to be simultaneously beautiful and intellectually engaging.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about In the twentieth century, the visual arts have embarked on major experimentation, from cubism to expressionism. While tastes always vary, there are certainly some people who find beautiful objects of each of the art movements of the first half of the twentieth century. In the latter half of the twentieth century, though, most works are so abstract or shocking that neither the critic nor the general public uses the word "beautiful" to describe them: indeed, sometimes late twentieth-century artists have, as one of their expressed goals, the creation of a work that no one could find beautiful. Whatever these artists are creating may be intellectually engaging at some level, but it is no longer art.Q.Which of the following is an assumption that supports drawing the conclusion above from the reasons given for that conclusion?a)Art critics generally have a different appraisal of a work of art than does the general publicb)The meaning of any work of art is defined entirely by the ideas of the artist who created it.c)Beauty is a defining quality of art.d)All art movements of the latter half of the twentieth century are responses to the movements of the first half of the century.e)It is not possible for any work to be simultaneously beautiful and intellectually engaging.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for In the twentieth century, the visual arts have embarked on major experimentation, from cubism to expressionism. While tastes always vary, there are certainly some people who find beautiful objects of each of the art movements of the first half of the twentieth century. In the latter half of the twentieth century, though, most works are so abstract or shocking that neither the critic nor the general public uses the word "beautiful" to describe them: indeed, sometimes late twentieth-century artists have, as one of their expressed goals, the creation of a work that no one could find beautiful. Whatever these artists are creating may be intellectually engaging at some level, but it is no longer art.Q.Which of the following is an assumption that supports drawing the conclusion above from the reasons given for that conclusion?a)Art critics generally have a different appraisal of a work of art than does the general publicb)The meaning of any work of art is defined entirely by the ideas of the artist who created it.c)Beauty is a defining quality of art.d)All art movements of the latter half of the twentieth century are responses to the movements of the first half of the century.e)It is not possible for any work to be simultaneously beautiful and intellectually engaging.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for In the twentieth century, the visual arts have embarked on major experimentation, from cubism to expressionism. While tastes always vary, there are certainly some people who find beautiful objects of each of the art movements of the first half of the twentieth century. In the latter half of the twentieth century, though, most works are so abstract or shocking that neither the critic nor the general public uses the word "beautiful" to describe them: indeed, sometimes late twentieth-century artists have, as one of their expressed goals, the creation of a work that no one could find beautiful. Whatever these artists are creating may be intellectually engaging at some level, but it is no longer art.Q.Which of the following is an assumption that supports drawing the conclusion above from the reasons given for that conclusion?a)Art critics generally have a different appraisal of a work of art than does the general publicb)The meaning of any work of art is defined entirely by the ideas of the artist who created it.c)Beauty is a defining quality of art.d)All art movements of the latter half of the twentieth century are responses to the movements of the first half of the century.e)It is not possible for any work to be simultaneously beautiful and intellectually engaging.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of In the twentieth century, the visual arts have embarked on major experimentation, from cubism to expressionism. While tastes always vary, there are certainly some people who find beautiful objects of each of the art movements of the first half of the twentieth century. In the latter half of the twentieth century, though, most works are so abstract or shocking that neither the critic nor the general public uses the word "beautiful" to describe them: indeed, sometimes late twentieth-century artists have, as one of their expressed goals, the creation of a work that no one could find beautiful. Whatever these artists are creating may be intellectually engaging at some level, but it is no longer art.Q.Which of the following is an assumption that supports drawing the conclusion above from the reasons given for that conclusion?a)Art critics generally have a different appraisal of a work of art than does the general publicb)The meaning of any work of art is defined entirely by the ideas of the artist who created it.c)Beauty is a defining quality of art.d)All art movements of the latter half of the twentieth century are responses to the movements of the first half of the century.e)It is not possible for any work to be simultaneously beautiful and intellectually engaging.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of In the twentieth century, the visual arts have embarked on major experimentation, from cubism to expressionism. While tastes always vary, there are certainly some people who find beautiful objects of each of the art movements of the first half of the twentieth century. In the latter half of the twentieth century, though, most works are so abstract or shocking that neither the critic nor the general public uses the word "beautiful" to describe them: indeed, sometimes late twentieth-century artists have, as one of their expressed goals, the creation of a work that no one could find beautiful. Whatever these artists are creating may be intellectually engaging at some level, but it is no longer art.Q.Which of the following is an assumption that supports drawing the conclusion above from the reasons given for that conclusion?a)Art critics generally have a different appraisal of a work of art than does the general publicb)The meaning of any work of art is defined entirely by the ideas of the artist who created it.c)Beauty is a defining quality of art.d)All art movements of the latter half of the twentieth century are responses to the movements of the first half of the century.e)It is not possible for any work to be simultaneously beautiful and intellectually engaging.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for In the twentieth century, the visual arts have embarked on major experimentation, from cubism to expressionism. While tastes always vary, there are certainly some people who find beautiful objects of each of the art movements of the first half of the twentieth century. In the latter half of the twentieth century, though, most works are so abstract or shocking that neither the critic nor the general public uses the word "beautiful" to describe them: indeed, sometimes late twentieth-century artists have, as one of their expressed goals, the creation of a work that no one could find beautiful. Whatever these artists are creating may be intellectually engaging at some level, but it is no longer art.Q.Which of the following is an assumption that supports drawing the conclusion above from the reasons given for that conclusion?a)Art critics generally have a different appraisal of a work of art than does the general publicb)The meaning of any work of art is defined entirely by the ideas of the artist who created it.c)Beauty is a defining quality of art.d)All art movements of the latter half of the twentieth century are responses to the movements of the first half of the century.e)It is not possible for any work to be simultaneously beautiful and intellectually engaging.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of In the twentieth century, the visual arts have embarked on major experimentation, from cubism to expressionism. While tastes always vary, there are certainly some people who find beautiful objects of each of the art movements of the first half of the twentieth century. In the latter half of the twentieth century, though, most works are so abstract or shocking that neither the critic nor the general public uses the word "beautiful" to describe them: indeed, sometimes late twentieth-century artists have, as one of their expressed goals, the creation of a work that no one could find beautiful. Whatever these artists are creating may be intellectually engaging at some level, but it is no longer art.Q.Which of the following is an assumption that supports drawing the conclusion above from the reasons given for that conclusion?a)Art critics generally have a different appraisal of a work of art than does the general publicb)The meaning of any work of art is defined entirely by the ideas of the artist who created it.c)Beauty is a defining quality of art.d)All art movements of the latter half of the twentieth century are responses to the movements of the first half of the century.e)It is not possible for any work to be simultaneously beautiful and intellectually engaging.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice In the twentieth century, the visual arts have embarked on major experimentation, from cubism to expressionism. While tastes always vary, there are certainly some people who find beautiful objects of each of the art movements of the first half of the twentieth century. In the latter half of the twentieth century, though, most works are so abstract or shocking that neither the critic nor the general public uses the word "beautiful" to describe them: indeed, sometimes late twentieth-century artists have, as one of their expressed goals, the creation of a work that no one could find beautiful. Whatever these artists are creating may be intellectually engaging at some level, but it is no longer art.Q.Which of the following is an assumption that supports drawing the conclusion above from the reasons given for that conclusion?a)Art critics generally have a different appraisal of a work of art than does the general publicb)The meaning of any work of art is defined entirely by the ideas of the artist who created it.c)Beauty is a defining quality of art.d)All art movements of the latter half of the twentieth century are responses to the movements of the first half of the century.e)It is not possible for any work to be simultaneously beautiful and intellectually engaging.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.

Explore Courses for GMAT exam