UPSC Exam > UPSC Questions > Statement 1: ESP allows violator companies to...
Start Learning for Free
Statement 1: ESP allows violator companies to continue their activities by paying a financial penalty.
Statement 2: ESP is criticized for potentially allowing violators to circumvent the EIA process.
Statement 2: ESP is criticized for potentially allowing violators to circumvent the EIA process.
- a)Both statements are true.
- b)Both statements are false.
- c)Only statement 1 is true.
- d)Only statement 2 is true.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Statement 1: ESP allows violator companies to continue their activitie...
Both statements are correct. The ESP allows violator companies to continue their activities by paying a penalty and has been criticized for potentially enabling violators to bypass the EIA process.
Most Upvoted Answer
Statement 1: ESP allows violator companies to continue their activitie...
Explanation:
Statement 1: ESP allows violator companies to continue their activities by paying a financial penalty.
- Environmental Safeguard Policies (ESP) are put in place to ensure that companies comply with environmental regulations.
- In some cases, violator companies may be allowed to continue their activities by paying a financial penalty as a form of punishment for non-compliance.
- This approach allows companies to rectify their mistakes while also facing consequences for their actions.
- The financial penalty serves as a deterrent for future violations, encouraging companies to adhere to environmental standards.
Statement 2: ESP is criticized for potentially allowing violators to circumvent the EIA process.
- Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is a process that evaluates the potential environmental effects of a proposed project.
- Critics argue that allowing violator companies to continue their activities under ESP without undergoing a thorough EIA process may lead to further environmental harm.
- By bypassing the EIA process, companies could potentially avoid necessary scrutiny and mitigation measures, putting the environment at risk.
Therefore, both statements are true as ESP's implementation can indeed allow violator companies to continue operations by paying penalties while also facing criticism for potentially circumventing the EIA process.
Statement 1: ESP allows violator companies to continue their activities by paying a financial penalty.
- Environmental Safeguard Policies (ESP) are put in place to ensure that companies comply with environmental regulations.
- In some cases, violator companies may be allowed to continue their activities by paying a financial penalty as a form of punishment for non-compliance.
- This approach allows companies to rectify their mistakes while also facing consequences for their actions.
- The financial penalty serves as a deterrent for future violations, encouraging companies to adhere to environmental standards.
Statement 2: ESP is criticized for potentially allowing violators to circumvent the EIA process.
- Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is a process that evaluates the potential environmental effects of a proposed project.
- Critics argue that allowing violator companies to continue their activities under ESP without undergoing a thorough EIA process may lead to further environmental harm.
- By bypassing the EIA process, companies could potentially avoid necessary scrutiny and mitigation measures, putting the environment at risk.
Therefore, both statements are true as ESP's implementation can indeed allow violator companies to continue operations by paying penalties while also facing criticism for potentially circumventing the EIA process.
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|
|
Top Courses for UPSCView all
Question Description
Statement 1: ESP allows violator companies to continue their activities by paying a financial penalty.Statement 2: ESP is criticized for potentially allowing violators to circumvent the EIA process.a)Both statements are true.b)Both statements are false.c)Only statement 1 is true.d)Only statement 2 is true.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2025 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Statement 1: ESP allows violator companies to continue their activities by paying a financial penalty.Statement 2: ESP is criticized for potentially allowing violators to circumvent the EIA process.a)Both statements are true.b)Both statements are false.c)Only statement 1 is true.d)Only statement 2 is true.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Statement 1: ESP allows violator companies to continue their activities by paying a financial penalty.Statement 2: ESP is criticized for potentially allowing violators to circumvent the EIA process.a)Both statements are true.b)Both statements are false.c)Only statement 1 is true.d)Only statement 2 is true.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Statement 1: ESP allows violator companies to continue their activities by paying a financial penalty.Statement 2: ESP is criticized for potentially allowing violators to circumvent the EIA process.a)Both statements are true.b)Both statements are false.c)Only statement 1 is true.d)Only statement 2 is true.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2025 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Statement 1: ESP allows violator companies to continue their activities by paying a financial penalty.Statement 2: ESP is criticized for potentially allowing violators to circumvent the EIA process.a)Both statements are true.b)Both statements are false.c)Only statement 1 is true.d)Only statement 2 is true.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Statement 1: ESP allows violator companies to continue their activities by paying a financial penalty.Statement 2: ESP is criticized for potentially allowing violators to circumvent the EIA process.a)Both statements are true.b)Both statements are false.c)Only statement 1 is true.d)Only statement 2 is true.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Statement 1: ESP allows violator companies to continue their activities by paying a financial penalty.Statement 2: ESP is criticized for potentially allowing violators to circumvent the EIA process.a)Both statements are true.b)Both statements are false.c)Only statement 1 is true.d)Only statement 2 is true.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Statement 1: ESP allows violator companies to continue their activities by paying a financial penalty.Statement 2: ESP is criticized for potentially allowing violators to circumvent the EIA process.a)Both statements are true.b)Both statements are false.c)Only statement 1 is true.d)Only statement 2 is true.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Statement 1: ESP allows violator companies to continue their activities by paying a financial penalty.Statement 2: ESP is criticized for potentially allowing violators to circumvent the EIA process.a)Both statements are true.b)Both statements are false.c)Only statement 1 is true.d)Only statement 2 is true.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Statement 1: ESP allows violator companies to continue their activities by paying a financial penalty.Statement 2: ESP is criticized for potentially allowing violators to circumvent the EIA process.a)Both statements are true.b)Both statements are false.c)Only statement 1 is true.d)Only statement 2 is true.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Statement 1: ESP allows violator companies to continue their activities by paying a financial penalty.Statement 2: ESP is criticized for potentially allowing violators to circumvent the EIA process.a)Both statements are true.b)Both statements are false.c)Only statement 1 is true.d)Only statement 2 is true.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Statement 1: ESP allows violator companies to continue their activities by paying a financial penalty.Statement 2: ESP is criticized for potentially allowing violators to circumvent the EIA process.a)Both statements are true.b)Both statements are false.c)Only statement 1 is true.d)Only statement 2 is true.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup