UPSC Exam  >  UPSC Questions  >  Assertion (A): The National Council of Women ... Start Learning for Free
Assertion (A): The National Council of Women in India was formed in 1925 as a branch of the International Council of Women.
Reason (R): Its formation was driven by the need to improve the socio-economic and political status of women all over India.
  • a)
    Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.
  • b)
    Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.
  • c)
    A is true, but R is false.
  • d)
    A is false, but R is true.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Assertion (A): The National Council of Women in India was formed in 19...
The National Council of Women in India was indeed formed as a branch of the International Council of Women with the objective of improving women's socio-economic and political status.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
Assertion (A): The National Council of Women in India was formed in 19...
Introduction
The assertion and reason provided relate to the historical context of the National Council of Women in India (NCWI) and its significance in advocating for women's rights.
Assertion (A): True Statement
- The National Council of Women in India was indeed formed in 1925.
- It was established as a branch of the International Council of Women (ICW), which was founded to promote women's rights globally.
- This context highlights its connection to a broader international movement advocating for women's empowerment.
Reason (R): True Statement
- The formation of the NCWI was driven by a pressing need to address the socio-economic and political challenges faced by women in India.
- Activists and leaders sought to improve women's status through education, legal rights, and representation in governance.
- This illustrates the motivation behind the establishment of the NCWI, aligning with the global feminist movements of that era.
Relationship Between A and R
- Both the assertion (A) and reason (R) are true.
- The reason (R) directly explains why the assertion (A) was made, as the need for social reform was a key driving force in the establishment of the NCWI.
Conclusion
Given that both statements are accurate and that the reason provides a correct explanation for the assertion, the correct answer is:
- Option A: Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.
This reflects the intertwined nature of the national and international movements for women's rights during this pivotal time in history.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Similar UPSC Doubts

Passage 1The classical realist theory of international relations has long dominated both academic institutions and the American government. Even at the birth of the nation, early political thinkers, such as Alexander Hamilton, promoted a realist view of international relations and sought to influence the actions of the government based on this perspective. While the classical realist school of international relations is not entirely homogeneous in nature, there are certain premises that all classical realists share.The primary principle underlying classical realism is a concern with issues of war and peace. Specifically, classical realists ask, what are the causes of war and what are the conditions of peace? The members of the classical realist school mainly attribute war and conflict to what is termed the security dilemma. In the absence ofany prevailing global authority, each nation is required to address its own security needs. However, each nations quest for security-through military buildups, alliances, or territorial defenses—necessarily unsettles other nations. These nations react to feelings of insecurity by engaging in their own aggressive actions, which leads other nations to react similarly, perpetuating the cycle.It is important to note that for realists, unlike idealists or liberal internationalists, international conflict is a necessary consequence of the structural anarchy that nations find themselves in. Whereas other schools may see international conflict as the result of evil dictators, historical chance, flawed socio political systems, or ignorance of world affairs, classical realists see war as the logical result of a system that by its nature lacks a true central authority.Hand in hand with this view of conflict as an inevitable condition of the global power structure is the realists view ofthe nation as a unitary actor. Because classical realists see international relations as a continuing struggle for dominance, the nation can not be viewed as a collection of individuals with disparate wants, goals, and ideologies. The realist view requires the formulation of a national interest, which in its simplest terms refers to the nations ability to survive, maintain its security, and achieve some level of power relative to its competitors.Realism is not without its critics, many of whom challenge the premise that war is the natural condition of international relations or that there can be a truly national interest. However, the realist school of international relations continues to shape foreign policy because ofthe successes it has had in describing real world interactions between nations.Q. According to the passage, the formation of a national interest serves what function in the classical realist theory of war and peace?

Passage 1The classical realist theory of international relations has long dominated both academic institutions and the American government. Even at the birth of the nation, early political thinkers, such as Alexander Hamilton, promoted a realist view of international relations and sought to influence the actions of the government based on this perspective. While the classical realist school of international relations is not entirely homogeneous in nature, there are certain premises that all classical realists share.The primary principle underlying classical realism is a concern with issues of war and peace. Specifically, classical realists ask, what are the causes of war and what are the conditions of peace? The members of the classical realist school mainly attribute war and conflict to what is termed the security dilemma. In the absence ofany prevailing global authority, each nation is required to address its own security needs. However, each nations quest for security-through military buildups, alliances, or territorial defenses—necessarily unsettles other nations. These nations react to feelings of insecurity by engaging in their own aggressive actions, which leads other nations to react similarly, perpetuating the cycle.It is important to note that for realists, unlike idealists or liberal internationalists, international conflict is a necessary consequence of the structural anarchy that nations find themselves in. Whereas other schools may see international conflict as the result of evil dictators, historical chance, flawed socio political systems, or ignorance of world affairs, classical realists see war as the logical result of a system that by its nature lacks a true central authority.Hand in hand with this view of conflict as an inevitable condition of the global power structure is the realists view ofthe nation as a unitary actor. Because classical realists see international relations as a continuing struggle for dominance, the nation can not be viewed as a collection of individuals with disparate wants, goals, and ideologies. The realist view requires the formulation of a national interest, which in its simplest terms refers to the nations ability to survive, maintain its security, and achieve some level of power relative to its competitors.Realism is not without its critics, many of whom challenge the premise that war is the natural condition of international relations or that there can be a truly national interest. However, the realist school of international relations continues to shape foreign policy because ofthe successes it has had in describing real world interactions between nations.Q. Which of the following, if true, would best support the classical realist theory of international conflict as it is described in the passage?

Passage 1The classical realist theory of international relations has long dominated both academic institutions and the American government. Even at the birth of the nation, early political thinkers, such as Alexander Hamilton, promoted a realist view of international relations and sought to influence the actions of the government based on this perspective. While the classical realist school of international relations is not entirely homogeneous in nature, there are certain premises that all classical realists share.The primary principle underlying classical realism is a concern with issues of war and peace. Specifically, classical realists ask, what are the causes of war and what are the conditions of peace? The members of the classical realist school mainly attribute war and conflict to what is termed the security dilemma. In the absence ofany prevailing global authority, each nation is required to address its own security needs. However, each nations quest for security-through military buildups, alliances, or territorial defenses—necessarily unsettles other nations. These nations react to feelings of insecurity by engaging in their own aggressive actions, which leads other nations to react similarly, perpetuating the cycle.It is important to note that for realists, unlike idealists or liberal internationalists, international conflict is a necessary consequence of the structural anarchy that nations find themselves in. Whereas other schools may see international conflict as the result of evil dictators, historical chance, flawed socio political systems, or ignorance of world affairs, classical realists see war as the logical result of a system that by its nature lacks a true central authority.Hand in hand with this view of conflict as an inevitable condition of the global power structure is the realists view ofthe nation as a unitary actor. Because classical realists see international relations as a continuing struggle for dominance, the nation can not be viewed as a collection of individuals with disparate wants, goals, and ideologies. The realist view requires the formulation of a national interest, which in its simplest terms refers to the nations ability to survive, maintain its security, and achieve some level of power relative to its competitors.Realism is not without its critics, many of whom challenge the premise that war is the natural condition of international relations or that there can be a truly national interest. However, the realist school of international relations continues to shape foreign policy because ofthe successes it has had in describing real world interactions between nations.Q. The author most likely regards the classical realist theory of international relations with

Directions for the following 8 (eight) questions:Read the following two passages and answer the items that follow each passage. Your answers to these items should be based on these passages only.Passage 1The classical realist theory of international relations has long dominated both academic institutions and the American government. Even at the birth of the nation, early political thinkers, such as Alexander Hamilton, promoted a realist view of international relations and sought to influence the actions of the government based on this perspective. While the classical realist school of international relations is not entirely homogeneous in nature, there are certain premises that all classical realists share.The primary principle underlying classical realism is a concern with issues of war and peace. Specifically, classical realists ask, what are the causes of war and what are the conditions of peace? The members of the classical realist school mainly attribute war and conflict to what is termed the security dilemma. In the absence ofany prevailing global authority, each nation is required to address its own security needs. However, each nations quest for security-through military buildups, alliances, or territorial defenses—necessarily unsettles other nations. These nations react to feelings of insecurity by engaging in their own aggressive actions, which leads other nations to react similarly, perpetuating the cycle.It is important to note that for realists, unlike idealists or liberal internationalists, international conflict is a necessary consequence of the structural anarchy that nations find themselves in. Whereas other schools may see international conflict as the result of evil dictators, historical chance, flawed socio political systems, or ignorance of world affairs, classical realists see war as the logical result of a system that by its nature lacks a true central authority.Hand in hand with this view of conflict as an inevitable condition of the global power structure is the realists view ofthe nation as a unitary actor. Because classical realists see international relations as a continuing struggle for dominance, the nation can not be viewed as a collection of individuals with disparate wants, goals, and ideologies. The realist view requires the formulation of a national interest, which in its simplest terms refers to the nations ability to survive, maintain its security, and achieve some level of power relative to its competitors.Realism is not without its critics, many of whom challenge the premise that war is the natural condition of international relations or that there can be a truly national interest. However, the realist school of international relations continues to shape foreign policy because ofthe successes it has had in describing real world interactions between nations.Q. It can be inferred from the passage that members ofthe classical realist school would be LEAST likely to support.

Top Courses for UPSC

Assertion (A): The National Council of Women in India was formed in 1925 as a branch of the International Council of Women.Reason (R): Its formation was driven by the need to improve the socio-economic and political status of women all over India.a)Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.b)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.c)A is true, but R is false.d)A is false, but R is true.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Assertion (A): The National Council of Women in India was formed in 1925 as a branch of the International Council of Women.Reason (R): Its formation was driven by the need to improve the socio-economic and political status of women all over India.a)Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.b)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.c)A is true, but R is false.d)A is false, but R is true.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2025 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Assertion (A): The National Council of Women in India was formed in 1925 as a branch of the International Council of Women.Reason (R): Its formation was driven by the need to improve the socio-economic and political status of women all over India.a)Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.b)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.c)A is true, but R is false.d)A is false, but R is true.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Assertion (A): The National Council of Women in India was formed in 1925 as a branch of the International Council of Women.Reason (R): Its formation was driven by the need to improve the socio-economic and political status of women all over India.a)Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.b)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.c)A is true, but R is false.d)A is false, but R is true.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Assertion (A): The National Council of Women in India was formed in 1925 as a branch of the International Council of Women.Reason (R): Its formation was driven by the need to improve the socio-economic and political status of women all over India.a)Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.b)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.c)A is true, but R is false.d)A is false, but R is true.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Assertion (A): The National Council of Women in India was formed in 1925 as a branch of the International Council of Women.Reason (R): Its formation was driven by the need to improve the socio-economic and political status of women all over India.a)Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.b)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.c)A is true, but R is false.d)A is false, but R is true.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Assertion (A): The National Council of Women in India was formed in 1925 as a branch of the International Council of Women.Reason (R): Its formation was driven by the need to improve the socio-economic and political status of women all over India.a)Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.b)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.c)A is true, but R is false.d)A is false, but R is true.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Assertion (A): The National Council of Women in India was formed in 1925 as a branch of the International Council of Women.Reason (R): Its formation was driven by the need to improve the socio-economic and political status of women all over India.a)Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.b)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.c)A is true, but R is false.d)A is false, but R is true.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Assertion (A): The National Council of Women in India was formed in 1925 as a branch of the International Council of Women.Reason (R): Its formation was driven by the need to improve the socio-economic and political status of women all over India.a)Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.b)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.c)A is true, but R is false.d)A is false, but R is true.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Assertion (A): The National Council of Women in India was formed in 1925 as a branch of the International Council of Women.Reason (R): Its formation was driven by the need to improve the socio-economic and political status of women all over India.a)Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.b)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.c)A is true, but R is false.d)A is false, but R is true.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Top Courses for UPSC

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev