The CFO attributes our increased sales last year to the new markets in Eastern Europe. Nevertheless, a careful study of our revenue reveals a boom of sales in Southeast Asia, while the markets in Eastern Europe, after an early surge, settled at levels much lower than expected. After all, in Eastern Europe, our firm has fierce competition from both German and Russian exports, some of which offer exceptionally high quality at low cost. By contrast, no producers in this sector operate to the East of Turkey, and our firm is the only one in our sector with significant inroads into India, Thailand, Vietnam, and Taiwan. Current plans call for expansion into Eastern Europe, but the Southeast Asian markets hold much more promise.Q. In the argument given, the two portions in boldface (underlined) play which of the following roles?a)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion the argument challenges; the second is a competing conclusion that the argument favors.c)The first is an objection against a conclusion defended by the argument; the second is that conclusion.d)The first is evidence that has been used to support an alternate conclusion that the author challenges; the second is this alternate conclusion.e)The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is at issue in the argument; the second is a conclusion drawn on the basis of that claim.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > The CFO attributes our increased sales last y...

Join the Discussion on the App

The CFO attributes our increased sales last year to the new markets in Eastern Europe. Nevertheless, a careful study of our revenue reveals a boom of sales in Southeast Asia, while the markets in Eastern Europe, after an early surge, settled at levels much lower than expected. After all, in Eastern Europe, our firm has fierce competition from both German and Russian exports, some of which offer exceptionally high quality at low cost. By contrast, no producers in this sector operate to the East of Turkey, and our firm is the only one in our sector with significant inroads into India, Thailand, Vietnam, and Taiwan. Current plans call for expansion into Eastern Europe, but the Southeast Asian markets hold much more promise.

Q. In the argument given, the two portions in boldface (underlined) play which of the following roles?

a)
The first provides evidence to support the conclusion; the second is that conclusion.
b)
The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion the argument challenges; the second is a competing conclusion that the argument favors.
c)
The first is an objection against a conclusion defended by the argument; the second is that conclusion.
d)
The first is evidence that has been used to support an alternate conclusion that the author challenges; the second is this alternate conclusion.
e)
The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is at issue in the argument; the second is a conclusion drawn on the basis of that claim.

Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

GMAT Focus Edition Mock test - 5

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Most Upvoted Answer

The CFO attributes our increased sales last year to the new markets in...

The credited answer is (A). The second bold statement is definitely the author's conclusion and the main conclusion of the argument. The first statement, a research study, is evidence, and it supports this conclusion.

It is true that the speaker challenges the CFO's argument, and the second bold statement, the main conclusion, could be seen as challenging the CFO's conclusion. BUT, the first bold statement supports the main conclusion, not the CFO's conclusion, so choice (B) is incorrect.

The bold statement could be seen as an objection against the CFO's conclusion, but his conclusion is not the main conclusion of the argument --- the second bold statement, the main conclusion, opposes what the CFO said. Choice (C) is incorrect.

It is true that the speaker is different from the CFO's argument, and the second bold statement, the main conclusion, could be seen as an alternative conclusion to the CFO's conclusion. BUT, the first bold statement supports the main conclusion, not the CFO's conclusion, so choice (D) is incorrect.

The first statement is not a claim, an opinion: it is a "careful study", which implies that the strength of its data is beyond dispute. A scientific research "study" would be evidence, not a claim. Choice (E) is incorrect.

Answered by Talent Skill Learning · View profile

Free Test

FREE

GMAT Focus Edition Mock test - 5
64 Ques | 135 Min

Start Free Test

View all free GMAT tests

Community Answer

The CFO attributes our increased sales last year to the new markets in...

Understanding the Argument Structure
The argument presented analyzes sales performance across different markets, particularly contrasting Eastern Europe and Southeast Asia. The boldface portions play specific roles in the argument's structure.

First Boldface Portion: Evidence for the Conclusion
- The first portion highlights that the CFO attributes increased sales to new markets in Eastern Europe.
- This statement serves as **evidence** supporting the conclusion that the firm should continue to focus on Eastern Europe for growth.

Second Boldface Portion: Conclusion of the Argument
- The second portion reveals the author’s conclusion that Southeast Asian markets hold more promise for future growth.
- This conclusion is based on the observation that sales in Southeast Asia have significantly outperformed those in Eastern Europe.

Why Option A is Correct
- The two boldface portions work together: the first provides a rationale (the CFO's attribution) for focusing on Eastern Europe, while the second counters this by presenting a more promising opportunity in Southeast Asia.
- The argument ultimately suggests a reevaluation of priorities based on actual revenue trends, favoring the Southeast Asian markets over Eastern Europe.

Conclusion
In summary, the first boldface portion acts as evidence supporting the CFO’s conclusion, while the second boldface portion presents the counter-conclusion favored by the author. This interplay clearly aligns with option A, making it the correct answer.

Share via Whatsapp

Attention GMAT Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2024

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

School Principal: There has been much ado against competition among children; those arguing passionately against it, in all probability, do not realize that the issue is with the way competition is administered and not with the competition itself. Healthy competition inspires kids to do their best- not just good enough. If students compete, they will become more inquisitive, research independently, and learn to work with others. They will strive to do more than is required. These abilities prepare children for future situations of all kinds. Whether it’s applying to college, seeking a promotion, or finding a cure for cancer, the ability to be competitive will give them an important edge.In the argument given, the portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

View answer

Recently,some economists have concluded that the major impediment to job growth in the U.S. is the enormous national debt. While many politicians would like to stimulate job growth by increasing government spending, these economists believe it will have the opposite effect and thus want to cut spending immediately.Historically, when total debt levels exceed 90% of domestic GDP, economic growth falls significantly causing job losses and overall economic malaise.The current U.S. debt is over 96% of GDP, so it is hard to argue the importance of decreasing this percentage and the economists are correct on this point. However, what these economists fail to understand is that cutting spending at this critical juncture would put too much pressure on a fragile economy. In the short term, spending should be left at current levels and revenue should be increased by increasing taxes on wealthy individuals and some corporations. As the economy strengthens, then spending can be decreased with the goal of reducing the debt percentage of GDP to a figure below 90%.Q. The portions inunderlineplay which of the following roles?

View answer

Editorial in Krenlandian Newspaper:Krenland’s steelmakers are losing domestic sales because of lower-priced imports, in many cases because foreign governments subsidize their steel industries in ways that are banned by international treaties. But whatever the cause, the cost is ultimately going to be jobs in Krenland’s steel industry. Therefore, it would protect not only steel companies but also industrial employment in Krenland if our government took measures to reduce cheap steel imports.Q.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the editorial’s argument?

View answer

Editorial in Krenlandian Newspaper:Krenland’s steelmakers are losing domestic sales because of lower-priced imports, in many cases because foreign governments subsidize their steel industries in ways that are banned by international treaties. But whatever the cause, the cost is ultimately going to be jobs in Krenland’s steel industry. Therefore, it would protect not only steel companies but also industrial employment in Krenland if our government took measures to reduce cheap steel imports.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the editorial’s argument?

View answer

In a cooking competition, various family-owned restaurants cooked dishes made from recipes that have been in their families for generations. The cake that won the competition was made from a recipe that head-chef Pierre Limore claims has been in his family for three generations since the 1940s. Although the sous-chef who actually baked the winning dish used an ingredient that has only recently become popular in the baking industry, around the late 1920s the same ingredient had been commonly used by chefs before it was temporarily declared unfit for human consumption.Which of the following can be concluded on the basis of the information given above?

View answer

Top Courses for GMATView all

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2024

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

100 RCs for GMAT

Top Courses for GMAT

View all

The CFO attributes our increased sales last year to the new markets in Eastern Europe. Nevertheless, a careful study of our revenue reveals a boom of sales in Southeast Asia, while the markets in Eastern Europe, after an early surge, settled at levels much lower than expected. After all, in Eastern Europe, our firm has fierce competition from both German and Russian exports, some of which offer exceptionally high quality at low cost. By contrast, no producers in this sector operate to the East of Turkey, and our firm is the only one in our sector with significant inroads into India, Thailand, Vietnam, and Taiwan. Current plans call for expansion into Eastern Europe, but the Southeast Asian markets hold much more promise.Q. In the argument given, the two portions in boldface (underlined) play which of the following roles?a)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion the argument challenges; the second is a competing conclusion that the argument favors.c)The first is an objection against a conclusion defended by the argument; the second is that conclusion.d)The first is evidence that has been used to support an alternate conclusion that the author challenges; the second is this alternate conclusion.e)The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is at issue in the argument; the second is a conclusion drawn on the basis of that claim.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
The CFO attributes our increased sales last year to the new markets in Eastern Europe. Nevertheless, a careful study of our revenue reveals a boom of sales in Southeast Asia, while the markets in Eastern Europe, after an early surge, settled at levels much lower than expected. After all, in Eastern Europe, our firm has fierce competition from both German and Russian exports, some of which offer exceptionally high quality at low cost. By contrast, no producers in this sector operate to the East of Turkey, and our firm is the only one in our sector with significant inroads into India, Thailand, Vietnam, and Taiwan. Current plans call for expansion into Eastern Europe, but the Southeast Asian markets hold much more promise.Q. In the argument given, the two portions in boldface (underlined) play which of the following roles?a)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion the argument challenges; the second is a competing conclusion that the argument favors.c)The first is an objection against a conclusion defended by the argument; the second is that conclusion.d)The first is evidence that has been used to support an alternate conclusion that the author challenges; the second is this alternate conclusion.e)The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is at issue in the argument; the second is a conclusion drawn on the basis of that claim.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about The CFO attributes our increased sales last year to the new markets in Eastern Europe. Nevertheless, a careful study of our revenue reveals a boom of sales in Southeast Asia, while the markets in Eastern Europe, after an early surge, settled at levels much lower than expected. After all, in Eastern Europe, our firm has fierce competition from both German and Russian exports, some of which offer exceptionally high quality at low cost. By contrast, no producers in this sector operate to the East of Turkey, and our firm is the only one in our sector with significant inroads into India, Thailand, Vietnam, and Taiwan. Current plans call for expansion into Eastern Europe, but the Southeast Asian markets hold much more promise.Q. In the argument given, the two portions in boldface (underlined) play which of the following roles?a)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion the argument challenges; the second is a competing conclusion that the argument favors.c)The first is an objection against a conclusion defended by the argument; the second is that conclusion.d)The first is evidence that has been used to support an alternate conclusion that the author challenges; the second is this alternate conclusion.e)The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is at issue in the argument; the second is a conclusion drawn on the basis of that claim.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The CFO attributes our increased sales last year to the new markets in Eastern Europe. Nevertheless, a careful study of our revenue reveals a boom of sales in Southeast Asia, while the markets in Eastern Europe, after an early surge, settled at levels much lower than expected. After all, in Eastern Europe, our firm has fierce competition from both German and Russian exports, some of which offer exceptionally high quality at low cost. By contrast, no producers in this sector operate to the East of Turkey, and our firm is the only one in our sector with significant inroads into India, Thailand, Vietnam, and Taiwan. Current plans call for expansion into Eastern Europe, but the Southeast Asian markets hold much more promise.Q. In the argument given, the two portions in boldface (underlined) play which of the following roles?a)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion the argument challenges; the second is a competing conclusion that the argument favors.c)The first is an objection against a conclusion defended by the argument; the second is that conclusion.d)The first is evidence that has been used to support an alternate conclusion that the author challenges; the second is this alternate conclusion.e)The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is at issue in the argument; the second is a conclusion drawn on the basis of that claim.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for The CFO attributes our increased sales last year to the new markets in Eastern Europe. Nevertheless, a careful study of our revenue reveals a boom of sales in Southeast Asia, while the markets in Eastern Europe, after an early surge, settled at levels much lower than expected. After all, in Eastern Europe, our firm has fierce competition from both German and Russian exports, some of which offer exceptionally high quality at low cost. By contrast, no producers in this sector operate to the East of Turkey, and our firm is the only one in our sector with significant inroads into India, Thailand, Vietnam, and Taiwan. Current plans call for expansion into Eastern Europe, but the Southeast Asian markets hold much more promise.Q. In the argument given, the two portions in boldface (underlined) play which of the following roles?a)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion the argument challenges; the second is a competing conclusion that the argument favors.c)The first is an objection against a conclusion defended by the argument; the second is that conclusion.d)The first is evidence that has been used to support an alternate conclusion that the author challenges; the second is this alternate conclusion.e)The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is at issue in the argument; the second is a conclusion drawn on the basis of that claim.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of The CFO attributes our increased sales last year to the new markets in Eastern Europe. Nevertheless, a careful study of our revenue reveals a boom of sales in Southeast Asia, while the markets in Eastern Europe, after an early surge, settled at levels much lower than expected. After all, in Eastern Europe, our firm has fierce competition from both German and Russian exports, some of which offer exceptionally high quality at low cost. By contrast, no producers in this sector operate to the East of Turkey, and our firm is the only one in our sector with significant inroads into India, Thailand, Vietnam, and Taiwan. Current plans call for expansion into Eastern Europe, but the Southeast Asian markets hold much more promise.Q. In the argument given, the two portions in boldface (underlined) play which of the following roles?a)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion the argument challenges; the second is a competing conclusion that the argument favors.c)The first is an objection against a conclusion defended by the argument; the second is that conclusion.d)The first is evidence that has been used to support an alternate conclusion that the author challenges; the second is this alternate conclusion.e)The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is at issue in the argument; the second is a conclusion drawn on the basis of that claim.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The CFO attributes our increased sales last year to the new markets in Eastern Europe. Nevertheless, a careful study of our revenue reveals a boom of sales in Southeast Asia, while the markets in Eastern Europe, after an early surge, settled at levels much lower than expected. After all, in Eastern Europe, our firm has fierce competition from both German and Russian exports, some of which offer exceptionally high quality at low cost. By contrast, no producers in this sector operate to the East of Turkey, and our firm is the only one in our sector with significant inroads into India, Thailand, Vietnam, and Taiwan. Current plans call for expansion into Eastern Europe, but the Southeast Asian markets hold much more promise.Q. In the argument given, the two portions in boldface (underlined) play which of the following roles?a)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion the argument challenges; the second is a competing conclusion that the argument favors.c)The first is an objection against a conclusion defended by the argument; the second is that conclusion.d)The first is evidence that has been used to support an alternate conclusion that the author challenges; the second is this alternate conclusion.e)The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is at issue in the argument; the second is a conclusion drawn on the basis of that claim.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The CFO attributes our increased sales last year to the new markets in Eastern Europe. Nevertheless, a careful study of our revenue reveals a boom of sales in Southeast Asia, while the markets in Eastern Europe, after an early surge, settled at levels much lower than expected. After all, in Eastern Europe, our firm has fierce competition from both German and Russian exports, some of which offer exceptionally high quality at low cost. By contrast, no producers in this sector operate to the East of Turkey, and our firm is the only one in our sector with significant inroads into India, Thailand, Vietnam, and Taiwan. Current plans call for expansion into Eastern Europe, but the Southeast Asian markets hold much more promise.Q. In the argument given, the two portions in boldface (underlined) play which of the following roles?a)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion the argument challenges; the second is a competing conclusion that the argument favors.c)The first is an objection against a conclusion defended by the argument; the second is that conclusion.d)The first is evidence that has been used to support an alternate conclusion that the author challenges; the second is this alternate conclusion.e)The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is at issue in the argument; the second is a conclusion drawn on the basis of that claim.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The CFO attributes our increased sales last year to the new markets in Eastern Europe. Nevertheless, a careful study of our revenue reveals a boom of sales in Southeast Asia, while the markets in Eastern Europe, after an early surge, settled at levels much lower than expected. After all, in Eastern Europe, our firm has fierce competition from both German and Russian exports, some of which offer exceptionally high quality at low cost. By contrast, no producers in this sector operate to the East of Turkey, and our firm is the only one in our sector with significant inroads into India, Thailand, Vietnam, and Taiwan. Current plans call for expansion into Eastern Europe, but the Southeast Asian markets hold much more promise.Q. In the argument given, the two portions in boldface (underlined) play which of the following roles?a)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion the argument challenges; the second is a competing conclusion that the argument favors.c)The first is an objection against a conclusion defended by the argument; the second is that conclusion.d)The first is evidence that has been used to support an alternate conclusion that the author challenges; the second is this alternate conclusion.e)The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is at issue in the argument; the second is a conclusion drawn on the basis of that claim.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The CFO attributes our increased sales last year to the new markets in Eastern Europe. Nevertheless, a careful study of our revenue reveals a boom of sales in Southeast Asia, while the markets in Eastern Europe, after an early surge, settled at levels much lower than expected. After all, in Eastern Europe, our firm has fierce competition from both German and Russian exports, some of which offer exceptionally high quality at low cost. By contrast, no producers in this sector operate to the East of Turkey, and our firm is the only one in our sector with significant inroads into India, Thailand, Vietnam, and Taiwan. Current plans call for expansion into Eastern Europe, but the Southeast Asian markets hold much more promise.Q. In the argument given, the two portions in boldface (underlined) play which of the following roles?a)The first provides evidence to support the conclusion; the second is that conclusion.b)The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion the argument challenges; the second is a competing conclusion that the argument favors.c)The first is an objection against a conclusion defended by the argument; the second is that conclusion.d)The first is evidence that has been used to support an alternate conclusion that the author challenges; the second is this alternate conclusion.e)The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is at issue in the argument; the second is a conclusion drawn on the basis of that claim.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.

Explore Courses for GMAT exam