Question Description
Direction: Read the following passage and answer the item that follows. Your answer to the item should be based on the passage only.Politics for Gandhiji, was but a part of man’s life, one that encircles men like the coil of a snake from which one cannot get out, no matter how much one tries. Though he thought that an increase in the power of the state can inflict the greatest harm to mankind by destroying individuality which lays at the root of the progress, yet he viewed political power as a means that enabled people to make their conditions better in every department of life. He wrote, “my work of social reform was no way less or subordinate to political work. The fact is, that whenI saw that to a certain extent my social work would be impossible without the help of political work, I took to the latter and only to the extent it served the former”. Political life is not stranger to other aspects of life. He used to say, “My life is one indivisible whole, and all my activities run into one another, and they all have their rise in my insatiable love of mankind”. Political activity of man is closely associated with other activities of man and all these activities, according to Gandhiji, influence each other. That is why he never separated politics from from other walks of man’s life. What he hated in politics was the concentration of power and the use of violence associated with political power. In his own words,” The state represents violence in a concentrated and organized form. The individual has a soul, but the state is soulless machine, it can never be weaned from violence to which it owes its very existence. What I would personally prefer, would be not a centralization of power in the hands of the State but an extension of the sense of trusteeship ….” Politics and for that matter the state, according to him was not an end, but a means that enabled men to make their lives better. An ideal state or political life is one in which men rule themselves. For Gandhiji there is no political power in the ideal state because in it there is no state. But as the ideal was not fully realized in life, Gandhiji contented himself with Thoureau’s classical statement- that government was best which governed the least. From the above passage the following assumptions have been made: I. More the power to the State more the progress of individuals.II. Without State individuals can live better.Which of the above assumptions are / is valid:a)1 only b)2 only c)Both 1 and 2 d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Read the following passage and answer the item that follows. Your answer to the item should be based on the passage only.Politics for Gandhiji, was but a part of man’s life, one that encircles men like the coil of a snake from which one cannot get out, no matter how much one tries. Though he thought that an increase in the power of the state can inflict the greatest harm to mankind by destroying individuality which lays at the root of the progress, yet he viewed political power as a means that enabled people to make their conditions better in every department of life. He wrote, “my work of social reform was no way less or subordinate to political work. The fact is, that whenI saw that to a certain extent my social work would be impossible without the help of political work, I took to the latter and only to the extent it served the former”. Political life is not stranger to other aspects of life. He used to say, “My life is one indivisible whole, and all my activities run into one another, and they all have their rise in my insatiable love of mankind”. Political activity of man is closely associated with other activities of man and all these activities, according to Gandhiji, influence each other. That is why he never separated politics from from other walks of man’s life. What he hated in politics was the concentration of power and the use of violence associated with political power. In his own words,” The state represents violence in a concentrated and organized form. The individual has a soul, but the state is soulless machine, it can never be weaned from violence to which it owes its very existence. What I would personally prefer, would be not a centralization of power in the hands of the State but an extension of the sense of trusteeship ….” Politics and for that matter the state, according to him was not an end, but a means that enabled men to make their lives better. An ideal state or political life is one in which men rule themselves. For Gandhiji there is no political power in the ideal state because in it there is no state. But as the ideal was not fully realized in life, Gandhiji contented himself with Thoureau’s classical statement- that government was best which governed the least. From the above passage the following assumptions have been made: I. More the power to the State more the progress of individuals.II. Without State individuals can live better.Which of the above assumptions are / is valid:a)1 only b)2 only c)Both 1 and 2 d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Read the following passage and answer the item that follows. Your answer to the item should be based on the passage only.Politics for Gandhiji, was but a part of man’s life, one that encircles men like the coil of a snake from which one cannot get out, no matter how much one tries. Though he thought that an increase in the power of the state can inflict the greatest harm to mankind by destroying individuality which lays at the root of the progress, yet he viewed political power as a means that enabled people to make their conditions better in every department of life. He wrote, “my work of social reform was no way less or subordinate to political work. The fact is, that whenI saw that to a certain extent my social work would be impossible without the help of political work, I took to the latter and only to the extent it served the former”. Political life is not stranger to other aspects of life. He used to say, “My life is one indivisible whole, and all my activities run into one another, and they all have their rise in my insatiable love of mankind”. Political activity of man is closely associated with other activities of man and all these activities, according to Gandhiji, influence each other. That is why he never separated politics from from other walks of man’s life. What he hated in politics was the concentration of power and the use of violence associated with political power. In his own words,” The state represents violence in a concentrated and organized form. The individual has a soul, but the state is soulless machine, it can never be weaned from violence to which it owes its very existence. What I would personally prefer, would be not a centralization of power in the hands of the State but an extension of the sense of trusteeship ….” Politics and for that matter the state, according to him was not an end, but a means that enabled men to make their lives better. An ideal state or political life is one in which men rule themselves. For Gandhiji there is no political power in the ideal state because in it there is no state. But as the ideal was not fully realized in life, Gandhiji contented himself with Thoureau’s classical statement- that government was best which governed the least. From the above passage the following assumptions have been made: I. More the power to the State more the progress of individuals.II. Without State individuals can live better.Which of the above assumptions are / is valid:a)1 only b)2 only c)Both 1 and 2 d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction: Read the following passage and answer the item that follows. Your answer to the item should be based on the passage only.Politics for Gandhiji, was but a part of man’s life, one that encircles men like the coil of a snake from which one cannot get out, no matter how much one tries. Though he thought that an increase in the power of the state can inflict the greatest harm to mankind by destroying individuality which lays at the root of the progress, yet he viewed political power as a means that enabled people to make their conditions better in every department of life. He wrote, “my work of social reform was no way less or subordinate to political work. The fact is, that whenI saw that to a certain extent my social work would be impossible without the help of political work, I took to the latter and only to the extent it served the former”. Political life is not stranger to other aspects of life. He used to say, “My life is one indivisible whole, and all my activities run into one another, and they all have their rise in my insatiable love of mankind”. Political activity of man is closely associated with other activities of man and all these activities, according to Gandhiji, influence each other. That is why he never separated politics from from other walks of man’s life. What he hated in politics was the concentration of power and the use of violence associated with political power. In his own words,” The state represents violence in a concentrated and organized form. The individual has a soul, but the state is soulless machine, it can never be weaned from violence to which it owes its very existence. What I would personally prefer, would be not a centralization of power in the hands of the State but an extension of the sense of trusteeship ….” Politics and for that matter the state, according to him was not an end, but a means that enabled men to make their lives better. An ideal state or political life is one in which men rule themselves. For Gandhiji there is no political power in the ideal state because in it there is no state. But as the ideal was not fully realized in life, Gandhiji contented himself with Thoureau’s classical statement- that government was best which governed the least. From the above passage the following assumptions have been made: I. More the power to the State more the progress of individuals.II. Without State individuals can live better.Which of the above assumptions are / is valid:a)1 only b)2 only c)Both 1 and 2 d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction: Read the following passage and answer the item that follows. Your answer to the item should be based on the passage only.Politics for Gandhiji, was but a part of man’s life, one that encircles men like the coil of a snake from which one cannot get out, no matter how much one tries. Though he thought that an increase in the power of the state can inflict the greatest harm to mankind by destroying individuality which lays at the root of the progress, yet he viewed political power as a means that enabled people to make their conditions better in every department of life. He wrote, “my work of social reform was no way less or subordinate to political work. The fact is, that whenI saw that to a certain extent my social work would be impossible without the help of political work, I took to the latter and only to the extent it served the former”. Political life is not stranger to other aspects of life. He used to say, “My life is one indivisible whole, and all my activities run into one another, and they all have their rise in my insatiable love of mankind”. Political activity of man is closely associated with other activities of man and all these activities, according to Gandhiji, influence each other. That is why he never separated politics from from other walks of man’s life. What he hated in politics was the concentration of power and the use of violence associated with political power. In his own words,” The state represents violence in a concentrated and organized form. The individual has a soul, but the state is soulless machine, it can never be weaned from violence to which it owes its very existence. What I would personally prefer, would be not a centralization of power in the hands of the State but an extension of the sense of trusteeship ….” Politics and for that matter the state, according to him was not an end, but a means that enabled men to make their lives better. An ideal state or political life is one in which men rule themselves. For Gandhiji there is no political power in the ideal state because in it there is no state. But as the ideal was not fully realized in life, Gandhiji contented himself with Thoureau’s classical statement- that government was best which governed the least. From the above passage the following assumptions have been made: I. More the power to the State more the progress of individuals.II. Without State individuals can live better.Which of the above assumptions are / is valid:a)1 only b)2 only c)Both 1 and 2 d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: Read the following passage and answer the item that follows. Your answer to the item should be based on the passage only.Politics for Gandhiji, was but a part of man’s life, one that encircles men like the coil of a snake from which one cannot get out, no matter how much one tries. Though he thought that an increase in the power of the state can inflict the greatest harm to mankind by destroying individuality which lays at the root of the progress, yet he viewed political power as a means that enabled people to make their conditions better in every department of life. He wrote, “my work of social reform was no way less or subordinate to political work. The fact is, that whenI saw that to a certain extent my social work would be impossible without the help of political work, I took to the latter and only to the extent it served the former”. Political life is not stranger to other aspects of life. He used to say, “My life is one indivisible whole, and all my activities run into one another, and they all have their rise in my insatiable love of mankind”. Political activity of man is closely associated with other activities of man and all these activities, according to Gandhiji, influence each other. That is why he never separated politics from from other walks of man’s life. What he hated in politics was the concentration of power and the use of violence associated with political power. In his own words,” The state represents violence in a concentrated and organized form. The individual has a soul, but the state is soulless machine, it can never be weaned from violence to which it owes its very existence. What I would personally prefer, would be not a centralization of power in the hands of the State but an extension of the sense of trusteeship ….” Politics and for that matter the state, according to him was not an end, but a means that enabled men to make their lives better. An ideal state or political life is one in which men rule themselves. For Gandhiji there is no political power in the ideal state because in it there is no state. But as the ideal was not fully realized in life, Gandhiji contented himself with Thoureau’s classical statement- that government was best which governed the least. From the above passage the following assumptions have been made: I. More the power to the State more the progress of individuals.II. Without State individuals can live better.Which of the above assumptions are / is valid:a)1 only b)2 only c)Both 1 and 2 d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: Read the following passage and answer the item that follows. Your answer to the item should be based on the passage only.Politics for Gandhiji, was but a part of man’s life, one that encircles men like the coil of a snake from which one cannot get out, no matter how much one tries. Though he thought that an increase in the power of the state can inflict the greatest harm to mankind by destroying individuality which lays at the root of the progress, yet he viewed political power as a means that enabled people to make their conditions better in every department of life. He wrote, “my work of social reform was no way less or subordinate to political work. The fact is, that whenI saw that to a certain extent my social work would be impossible without the help of political work, I took to the latter and only to the extent it served the former”. Political life is not stranger to other aspects of life. He used to say, “My life is one indivisible whole, and all my activities run into one another, and they all have their rise in my insatiable love of mankind”. Political activity of man is closely associated with other activities of man and all these activities, according to Gandhiji, influence each other. That is why he never separated politics from from other walks of man’s life. What he hated in politics was the concentration of power and the use of violence associated with political power. In his own words,” The state represents violence in a concentrated and organized form. The individual has a soul, but the state is soulless machine, it can never be weaned from violence to which it owes its very existence. What I would personally prefer, would be not a centralization of power in the hands of the State but an extension of the sense of trusteeship ….” Politics and for that matter the state, according to him was not an end, but a means that enabled men to make their lives better. An ideal state or political life is one in which men rule themselves. For Gandhiji there is no political power in the ideal state because in it there is no state. But as the ideal was not fully realized in life, Gandhiji contented himself with Thoureau’s classical statement- that government was best which governed the least. From the above passage the following assumptions have been made: I. More the power to the State more the progress of individuals.II. Without State individuals can live better.Which of the above assumptions are / is valid:a)1 only b)2 only c)Both 1 and 2 d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: Read the following passage and answer the item that follows. Your answer to the item should be based on the passage only.Politics for Gandhiji, was but a part of man’s life, one that encircles men like the coil of a snake from which one cannot get out, no matter how much one tries. Though he thought that an increase in the power of the state can inflict the greatest harm to mankind by destroying individuality which lays at the root of the progress, yet he viewed political power as a means that enabled people to make their conditions better in every department of life. He wrote, “my work of social reform was no way less or subordinate to political work. The fact is, that whenI saw that to a certain extent my social work would be impossible without the help of political work, I took to the latter and only to the extent it served the former”. Political life is not stranger to other aspects of life. He used to say, “My life is one indivisible whole, and all my activities run into one another, and they all have their rise in my insatiable love of mankind”. Political activity of man is closely associated with other activities of man and all these activities, according to Gandhiji, influence each other. That is why he never separated politics from from other walks of man’s life. What he hated in politics was the concentration of power and the use of violence associated with political power. In his own words,” The state represents violence in a concentrated and organized form. The individual has a soul, but the state is soulless machine, it can never be weaned from violence to which it owes its very existence. What I would personally prefer, would be not a centralization of power in the hands of the State but an extension of the sense of trusteeship ….” Politics and for that matter the state, according to him was not an end, but a means that enabled men to make their lives better. An ideal state or political life is one in which men rule themselves. For Gandhiji there is no political power in the ideal state because in it there is no state. But as the ideal was not fully realized in life, Gandhiji contented himself with Thoureau’s classical statement- that government was best which governed the least. From the above passage the following assumptions have been made: I. More the power to the State more the progress of individuals.II. Without State individuals can live better.Which of the above assumptions are / is valid:a)1 only b)2 only c)Both 1 and 2 d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: Read the following passage and answer the item that follows. Your answer to the item should be based on the passage only.Politics for Gandhiji, was but a part of man’s life, one that encircles men like the coil of a snake from which one cannot get out, no matter how much one tries. Though he thought that an increase in the power of the state can inflict the greatest harm to mankind by destroying individuality which lays at the root of the progress, yet he viewed political power as a means that enabled people to make their conditions better in every department of life. He wrote, “my work of social reform was no way less or subordinate to political work. The fact is, that whenI saw that to a certain extent my social work would be impossible without the help of political work, I took to the latter and only to the extent it served the former”. Political life is not stranger to other aspects of life. He used to say, “My life is one indivisible whole, and all my activities run into one another, and they all have their rise in my insatiable love of mankind”. Political activity of man is closely associated with other activities of man and all these activities, according to Gandhiji, influence each other. That is why he never separated politics from from other walks of man’s life. What he hated in politics was the concentration of power and the use of violence associated with political power. In his own words,” The state represents violence in a concentrated and organized form. The individual has a soul, but the state is soulless machine, it can never be weaned from violence to which it owes its very existence. What I would personally prefer, would be not a centralization of power in the hands of the State but an extension of the sense of trusteeship ….” Politics and for that matter the state, according to him was not an end, but a means that enabled men to make their lives better. An ideal state or political life is one in which men rule themselves. For Gandhiji there is no political power in the ideal state because in it there is no state. But as the ideal was not fully realized in life, Gandhiji contented himself with Thoureau’s classical statement- that government was best which governed the least. From the above passage the following assumptions have been made: I. More the power to the State more the progress of individuals.II. Without State individuals can live better.Which of the above assumptions are / is valid:a)1 only b)2 only c)Both 1 and 2 d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.