Consider the following statements Originally, the Constitution of India expressedly mentioned five privileges. The parliamentary privileges do not extend to the president who is also an integral part of the Parliament. Till now, the Parliament of India has not made any special law to exhaustively codify all the privileges.How many of the given above statement(s) is/are correct?a)Only oneb)Only twoc)All threed)NoneCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

UPSC Exam > UPSC Questions > Consider the following statements Originally,...

Join the Discussion on the App

Consider the following statements

Originally, the Constitution of India expressedly mentioned five privileges.
The parliamentary privileges do not extend to the president who is also an integral part of the Parliament.
Till now, the Parliament of India has not made any special law to exhaustively codify all the privileges.

How many of the given above statement(s) is/are correct?

a)
Only one
b)
Only two
c)
All three
d)
None

Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Test: Weekly Current Affairs: March 1 to 7, 2024

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Most Upvoted Answer

Consider the following statements Originally, the Constitution of Indi...

Only statements 2 and 3 are correct.
Context: The Supreme Court ruled that MPs and MLAs can’t claim immunity for bribery. Article 105(2) and 194(2) protections have been overturned.
- The case involved Sita Soren (daughter-in-law of JMM chief Shibu Soren) accused of taking bribes for the vote.
S2: The parliamentary privileges do not extend to the President who is also an integral part of the Parliament. Article 361 of the Constitution provides for privileges for the President.
S1 and S3: Originally, the Constitution (Article 105) expressedly mentioned two privileges, that is, freedom of speech in Parliament and right of publication of its proceedings. With regard to other privileges, it provided that they were to be the same as those of the British House of Commons, its committees and its members on the date of its commencement (ie, 26 January, 1950), until defined by Parliament.
The 44th Amendment Act of 1978 provided that the other privileges of each House of Parliament, its committees and its members are to be those which they had on the date of its commencement (ie, 20 June, 1979), until defined by Parliament. This means that the position with regard to other privileges remains same. In other words, the amendment has made only verbal changes by dropping a direct reference to the British House of Commons, without making any change in the implication of the provision.
It should be noted here that the Parliament, till now, has not made any special law to exhaustively codify all the privileges. They are based on five sources, namely, 1. Constitutional provisions, 2. Various laws made by Parliament, 3. Rules of both the Houses, 4. Parliamentary conventions, and 5. Judicial interpretations.

Answered by Notes Wala · View profile

Attention UPSC Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed UPSC study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in UPSC.

Current Affairs & Hindu Analysis: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Lucent for GK

History for UPSC CSE

Indian Polity for UPSC CSE

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Similar UPSC Doubts

With reference to the Parliamentary Privileges, consider the following statements: The Constitution of India defines the powers, privileges and immunities of the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha. A Member of Parliament (MP) cannot be arrested in a civil case, 40 days before the commencement of the session. Judiciary is the sole authority to ascertain if there has been a contempt of the House. The Chairman of the Rajya Sabha possesses the authority to independently refer any question of privilege to the Committee of Privileges for examination, investigation and report. How many of the above statements is/are incorrect?

View answer

Consider the following statements about Parliamentary Privileges in Lok Sabha: Parliamentary Privileges are available only for the Members of Parliament. Courts have no jurisdiction to take action against a member for his speech made in the House. Parliament exclusively has the power to punish any individual for breach of privilege or contempt of the House. It depends solely on the Parliamentary Affairs Minister to refer any question of privilege to the Committee of Privileges.Which of the statements given above are Correct?

View answer

Consider the following statements regarding parliamentary privileges. There are codified list of all privileges the Members of Parliament are entitled to, like right of free expression in the course of Parliamentary debates. If there is a belief that such a privilege has been breached, a motion can be raised by any member. The right to raise a question of privilege is based on the condition that the question shall be restricted to a specific matter of recent occurrence.How many of the above statements are correct?

View answer

Consider the following pairs:1. Parliamentary Privileges: Special rights granted to Parliament members to ensure effective functioning.2. Privilege Motion: A motion moved to censure a member for breach of privilege.3. Sturgeons: Migratory fish known for their role in river ecosystems.4. CITES: An organization that regulates international trade of sturgeon species to prevent exploitation.How many pairs given above are correctly matched?

View answer

Consider the following statements: The Constitution of India bestows privileges to the members of the Parliament and its Committees, but no such privileges have been bestowed upon the members of State Legislative Assembly. The Constitution (44th Amendment) Act, 1978, resulted in the codification of the Parliamentary Privileges for the members of the Parliament and its Committees. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

View answer

Top Courses for UPSCView all

Current Affairs & Hindu Analysis: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Lucent for GK

History for UPSC CSE

Indian Polity for UPSC CSE

CSAT Preparation

Top Courses for UPSC

View all

Consider the following statements Originally, the Constitution of India expressedly mentioned five privileges. The parliamentary privileges do not extend to the president who is also an integral part of the Parliament. Till now, the Parliament of India has not made any special law to exhaustively codify all the privileges.How many of the given above statement(s) is/are correct?a)Only oneb)Only twoc)All threed)NoneCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Consider the following statements Originally, the Constitution of India expressedly mentioned five privileges. The parliamentary privileges do not extend to the president who is also an integral part of the Parliament. Till now, the Parliament of India has not made any special law to exhaustively codify all the privileges.How many of the given above statement(s) is/are correct?a)Only oneb)Only twoc)All threed)NoneCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Consider the following statements Originally, the Constitution of India expressedly mentioned five privileges. The parliamentary privileges do not extend to the president who is also an integral part of the Parliament. Till now, the Parliament of India has not made any special law to exhaustively codify all the privileges.How many of the given above statement(s) is/are correct?a)Only oneb)Only twoc)All threed)NoneCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Consider the following statements Originally, the Constitution of India expressedly mentioned five privileges. The parliamentary privileges do not extend to the president who is also an integral part of the Parliament. Till now, the Parliament of India has not made any special law to exhaustively codify all the privileges.How many of the given above statement(s) is/are correct?a)Only oneb)Only twoc)All threed)NoneCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Consider the following statements Originally, the Constitution of India expressedly mentioned five privileges. The parliamentary privileges do not extend to the president who is also an integral part of the Parliament. Till now, the Parliament of India has not made any special law to exhaustively codify all the privileges.How many of the given above statement(s) is/are correct?a)Only oneb)Only twoc)All threed)NoneCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Consider the following statements Originally, the Constitution of India expressedly mentioned five privileges. The parliamentary privileges do not extend to the president who is also an integral part of the Parliament. Till now, the Parliament of India has not made any special law to exhaustively codify all the privileges.How many of the given above statement(s) is/are correct?a)Only oneb)Only twoc)All threed)NoneCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Consider the following statements Originally, the Constitution of India expressedly mentioned five privileges. The parliamentary privileges do not extend to the president who is also an integral part of the Parliament. Till now, the Parliament of India has not made any special law to exhaustively codify all the privileges.How many of the given above statement(s) is/are correct?a)Only oneb)Only twoc)All threed)NoneCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Consider the following statements Originally, the Constitution of India expressedly mentioned five privileges. The parliamentary privileges do not extend to the president who is also an integral part of the Parliament. Till now, the Parliament of India has not made any special law to exhaustively codify all the privileges.How many of the given above statement(s) is/are correct?a)Only oneb)Only twoc)All threed)NoneCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Consider the following statements Originally, the Constitution of India expressedly mentioned five privileges. The parliamentary privileges do not extend to the president who is also an integral part of the Parliament. Till now, the Parliament of India has not made any special law to exhaustively codify all the privileges.How many of the given above statement(s) is/are correct?a)Only oneb)Only twoc)All threed)NoneCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Consider the following statements Originally, the Constitution of India expressedly mentioned five privileges. The parliamentary privileges do not extend to the president who is also an integral part of the Parliament. Till now, the Parliament of India has not made any special law to exhaustively codify all the privileges.How many of the given above statement(s) is/are correct?a)Only oneb)Only twoc)All threed)NoneCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.

Explore Courses for UPSC exam