Question Description
PRINCIPLE:“Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person’s use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situation.”FACT: Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in residential locality. Pavan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Jeevan who could not put up with and kind of continuous noise. He led a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his houseb)Pavan is liable, because as s neighbour, he should have realized Jeevan’s delicate nature.c)Pavan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else other then Jeevan.d)noneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about PRINCIPLE:“Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person’s use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situation.”FACT: Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in residential locality. Pavan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Jeevan who could not put up with and kind of continuous noise. He led a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his houseb)Pavan is liable, because as s neighbour, he should have realized Jeevan’s delicate nature.c)Pavan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else other then Jeevan.d)noneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for PRINCIPLE:“Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person’s use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situation.”FACT: Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in residential locality. Pavan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Jeevan who could not put up with and kind of continuous noise. He led a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his houseb)Pavan is liable, because as s neighbour, he should have realized Jeevan’s delicate nature.c)Pavan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else other then Jeevan.d)noneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for PRINCIPLE:“Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person’s use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situation.”FACT: Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in residential locality. Pavan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Jeevan who could not put up with and kind of continuous noise. He led a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his houseb)Pavan is liable, because as s neighbour, he should have realized Jeevan’s delicate nature.c)Pavan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else other then Jeevan.d)noneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of PRINCIPLE:“Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person’s use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situation.”FACT: Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in residential locality. Pavan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Jeevan who could not put up with and kind of continuous noise. He led a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his houseb)Pavan is liable, because as s neighbour, he should have realized Jeevan’s delicate nature.c)Pavan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else other then Jeevan.d)noneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of PRINCIPLE:“Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person’s use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situation.”FACT: Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in residential locality. Pavan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Jeevan who could not put up with and kind of continuous noise. He led a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his houseb)Pavan is liable, because as s neighbour, he should have realized Jeevan’s delicate nature.c)Pavan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else other then Jeevan.d)noneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for PRINCIPLE:“Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person’s use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situation.”FACT: Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in residential locality. Pavan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Jeevan who could not put up with and kind of continuous noise. He led a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his houseb)Pavan is liable, because as s neighbour, he should have realized Jeevan’s delicate nature.c)Pavan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else other then Jeevan.d)noneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of PRINCIPLE:“Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person’s use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situation.”FACT: Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in residential locality. Pavan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Jeevan who could not put up with and kind of continuous noise. He led a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his houseb)Pavan is liable, because as s neighbour, he should have realized Jeevan’s delicate nature.c)Pavan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else other then Jeevan.d)noneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice PRINCIPLE:“Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person’s use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situation.”FACT: Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in residential locality. Pavan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Jeevan who could not put up with and kind of continuous noise. He led a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his houseb)Pavan is liable, because as s neighbour, he should have realized Jeevan’s delicate nature.c)Pavan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else other then Jeevan.d)noneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.