Consider the following statements:Statement-I: NOTA votes in Indian el...
Statement-I is correct. NOTA votes in Indian elections are counted as 'invalid votes' and do not alter the election outcomes.
Statement-II is correct. The Supreme Court mandated the introduction of NOTA in 2013 to empower voters.
Statement-II is not the correct explanation for Statement-I as NOTA being 'invalid votes' is a procedural detail and not the reason for its introduction.
View all questions of this test
Consider the following statements:Statement-I: NOTA votes in Indian el...
Analysis of Statements
To evaluate the correctness of the given statements regarding NOTA (None Of The Above) in Indian elections, we will break down each statement.
Statement-I: NOTA votes in Indian elections are counted as invalid votes and do not alter the election outcomes.
- This statement is partially correct. While NOTA votes are treated as valid in the sense that they are counted separately, they do not contribute to the total votes of a candidate. Therefore, they can influence the election indirectly by showing discontent among voters, but they do not change the outcome in terms of winning or losing.
Statement-II: The Supreme Court mandated the introduction of NOTA in 2013 to empower voters.
- This statement is correct. The Supreme Court of India did indeed mandate the introduction of NOTA in September 2013, recognizing it as a means for voters to express their dissatisfaction with all candidates on the ballot. This was aimed at enhancing voter empowerment and providing them with a choice.
Conclusion
- Both statements are correct. However, Statement-II does not serve as a direct explanation for Statement-I. While Statement-I focuses on the procedural aspect of NOTA votes being counted as invalid, Statement-II addresses the empowerment motive behind its introduction.
Hence, the correct answer is:
Option B: Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is not the correct explanation for Statement-I.