Disagreement in Historical Narratives:
The statement that "the history written by the Governor General of India will be different from that of Indian historians" holds true due to several reasons:

1. Perspective:
- The Governor General of India would have a colonial perspective, viewing events through the lens of British imperialism and its interests. This perspective would often downplay or ignore the contributions and struggles of the Indian people.
- Indian historians, on the other hand, would provide a more balanced and nuanced view of history, taking into account the perspectives and experiences of all communities involved.

2. Bias:
- The Governor General of India would have a vested interest in portraying British rule in a positive light, highlighting their supposed civilizing mission and downplaying any negative impacts of colonialism.
- Indian historians, on the contrary, would be more likely to highlight the atrocities committed by the British, the impacts of colonial policies on Indian society, and the resistance movements against colonial rule.

3. Access to Sources:
- The Governor General of India would have access to official British colonial records, which may be biased or incomplete in their portrayal of events.
- Indian historians would draw from a wider range of sources, including oral histories, local records, and non-official sources, providing a more comprehensive and diverse understanding of historical events.

4. Interpretation:
- The Governor General of India may interpret events in a way that justifies British actions and policies, often portraying them as necessary for the development and progress of India.
- Indian historians would interpret events from the perspective of the Indian people, highlighting the impact of colonialism on their lives and society.
In conclusion, the history written by the Governor General of India would indeed be different from that of Indian historians due to differing perspectives, biases, access to sources, and interpretations of historical events. It is important to consider these factors when studying history to gain a more holistic understanding of the past.