Why was Pakistan under general Musharraf not called democratic?
Reasons why Pakistan under General Musharraf was not considered democratic:
1. Suspension of the Constitution:
General Musharraf suspended the Pakistani Constitution and imposed emergency rule in 2007, which significantly curtailed civil liberties and undermined democratic principles.
2. Restriction of Media:
During Musharraf's rule, there were significant restrictions placed on media freedom, including censorship and crackdowns on journalists critical of the government. This limited the ability of the press to hold the government accountable and provide unbiased information to the public.
3. Suppression of Political Opposition:
Musharraf's regime cracked down on political opposition, including arresting and detaining opposition leaders, restricting their activities, and manipulating the electoral process to ensure his continued grip on power. This undermined the democratic process and stifled political pluralism.
4. Military Rule:
As a military general who seized power through a coup, Musharraf's rule was characterized by military influence and control over civilian institutions. This military dominance undermined the principles of civilian supremacy and democratic governance.
5. Violation of Human Rights:
Under Musharraf's rule, there were widespread human rights violations, including extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances, and torture. These actions were in clear violation of democratic norms and principles.
Overall, the combination of constitutional suspension, media restrictions, political suppression, military rule, and human rights violations under General Musharraf's leadership led to Pakistan being considered undemocratic during his tenure.
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed UPSC study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in UPSC.