UPSC Exam  >  UPSC Questions  >  Why was Pakistan under general Musharraf not ... Start Learning for Free
Why was Pakistan under general Musharraf not called democratic?
Most Upvoted Answer
Why was Pakistan under general Musharraf not called democratic?
Reasons why Pakistan under General Musharraf was not considered democratic:
1. Suspension of the Constitution:
General Musharraf suspended the Pakistani Constitution and imposed emergency rule in 2007, which significantly curtailed civil liberties and undermined democratic principles.
2. Restriction of Media:
During Musharraf's rule, there were significant restrictions placed on media freedom, including censorship and crackdowns on journalists critical of the government. This limited the ability of the press to hold the government accountable and provide unbiased information to the public.
3. Suppression of Political Opposition:
Musharraf's regime cracked down on political opposition, including arresting and detaining opposition leaders, restricting their activities, and manipulating the electoral process to ensure his continued grip on power. This undermined the democratic process and stifled political pluralism.
4. Military Rule:
As a military general who seized power through a coup, Musharraf's rule was characterized by military influence and control over civilian institutions. This military dominance undermined the principles of civilian supremacy and democratic governance.
5. Violation of Human Rights:
Under Musharraf's rule, there were widespread human rights violations, including extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances, and torture. These actions were in clear violation of democratic norms and principles.
Overall, the combination of constitutional suspension, media restrictions, political suppression, military rule, and human rights violations under General Musharraf's leadership led to Pakistan being considered undemocratic during his tenure.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Similar UPSC Doubts

Passage 2The USA officially ended its 3 year old surge in Afghanistan. The surge was the tactical employment of 30000 additional troops with the purpose of giving the government of Hamid Karzai enough security to build an Afghan National Army and bring the Taliban to the negotiating table.The end of the surge marks the end of the USA willingness to militarily support a liberal and progressive Kabul regime. Nation building, as it were, is no longer part of the international agenda regarding Afghanistan.It is important not to assume that Afghanistan will inevitably become a Taliban playground as the USA withdrawal continues. The USA is likely to keep several thousand Special Forces soldiers and a fleet of drones in Afghanistan for years to come. The Karzai government will receive several billion dollars a year in foreign assistance.The sense is a stalemate. Neither Mr Karzai nor the Taliban can win. But there is also no evidence that Kabul is in a position to constructively bring the insurgents to the negotiating table- one of the unfulfilled goals of the surge. This means that the USA withdrawal is likely to be accompanied by more violence.As the USA disengages, the main external player will increasingly become Pakistan, but Afghanistan today will be a lot harder to control for Rawalpindi than it was in the 1980s- this is the centre of the Afghan dilemma when it comes to India. Pakistan wants security guarantees regarding Afghanistan that would convert Kabul into a vassal State. Indias desire is for a Kabul that is not dominated by Islamists.Bridging the gap between Pakistani paranoia and Indian interests will be crucial to place Afghanistan on an even keel. This will be determined on the battlefield partially vacated by the USA. India is unwilling to be involved through boots on the ground. But there are several ways it should seek to ensure that a USA withdrawal doesnot mean an Afghan terrain that tilts in the direction of the Taliban closest to Pakistan.Q.What is the difference between the interests of India and Pakistan with reference to Afghanistan?

Top Courses for UPSC

Why was Pakistan under general Musharraf not called democratic?
Question Description
Why was Pakistan under general Musharraf not called democratic? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Why was Pakistan under general Musharraf not called democratic? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Why was Pakistan under general Musharraf not called democratic?.
Solutions for Why was Pakistan under general Musharraf not called democratic? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Why was Pakistan under general Musharraf not called democratic? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Why was Pakistan under general Musharraf not called democratic?, a detailed solution for Why was Pakistan under general Musharraf not called democratic? has been provided alongside types of Why was Pakistan under general Musharraf not called democratic? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Why was Pakistan under general Musharraf not called democratic? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Top Courses for UPSC

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev