All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
UPSC Exam  >  UPSC Questions  >  The water cycle is an interconversion of the ... Start Learning for Free
The water cycle is an interconversion of the state of water . Justify?
Clear all your UPSC doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
The water cycle is an interconversion of the state of water . Justify?



  1. The Water Cycle: An Interconversion of Water States
    The water cycle is a continuous process in which water moves between the Earth's surface, the atmosphere, and back again. This cycle involves the interconversion of water between its three states - liquid, solid, and gas.


  2. Evaporation
    Evaporation is the process by which water changes from a liquid state to a gaseous state. This occurs when heat energy from the sun causes water on the Earth's surface to evaporate and rise into the atmosphere as water vapor.


  3. Condensation
    Condensation is the process by which water vapor in the atmosphere cools and changes back into a liquid state. This process forms clouds in the sky, which eventually lead to precipitation.


  4. Precipitation
    Precipitation occurs when water droplets in clouds become heavy enough to fall back to the Earth's surface as rain, snow, sleet, or hail. This completes the cycle as water returns to the Earth in its liquid or solid state.


  5. Importance of the Water Cycle
    The water cycle plays a crucial role in maintaining the Earth's ecosystems and supporting life. It helps distribute freshwater across the planet, replenishes groundwater sources, and regulates the Earth's temperature through the process of evaporation and condensation.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Similar UPSC Doubts

The biggest gain from the Union Governments welcome decision to notify the final award of the Cauvery Water Dispute Tribunal is that it may be the first and most significant step towards a permanent solution to the persistent conflict over sharing the inter-State rivers waters. A positive feature is that implementation ofthe final award will involve the formation of a Cauvery Management Board to regulate the supply of water and a Water Regulation Committee, which will post representatives in each of the eight reservoirs in the basin states, to ensure that the decisions are carried out. Giving finality to the award through the notification may help take the issue away from politics and place it in the hands of a technical, expert body. The February 2007 award has been questioned by way of clarification petitions before the Tribunal itself as well as suits in the Supreme Court by both parties and sceptics may wonder how useful the gazette notification may be now. The parties are still free to pursue their clarification petitions and appeals, but in the larger interest of a long term solution and to end seasonal acrimony, they would do well to give the award a chance.The fact that notifying the award has been a long pending demand ofTamil Nadu should not make one believe that the action redounds to one partys benefit to the detriment of the other. It was the Supreme Court that made the suggestion that thefinal decision be notified and counsel for all the basin states have agreed that it should be done. It may be argued that gazetting the award will not resolve the present standoff over judicial and administrative directives to Karnataka to release water to save standing crops in Tamil Nadu. The Cauvery Monitoring Committee, while asking Karnataka to ensure 12 thousand million cubic feet of water to Tamil Nadu in December, has itself admitted that its decision is unlikely to satisfy either party, given that both states have less water in their reservoirs than in previous years. Yet, is has opted for a pragmatic solution under which both states will be in deficit of approximately 47 tmcft. It is the same spirit of pragmatism that both states must now approach the larger problem of sharing water as per a judicially determined solution in both normal and distress years. The two should not let posterity say of them that long after equitable distribution has entrenched itself as the most acceptable doctrine in riverine jurisprudence, they did not allow a judicially determines system for sharing to work.Q.Which of the following options cannot be inferred as a negation with respect to the award of the tribunal?

The biggest gain from the Union Governments welcome decision to notify the final award of the Cauvery Water Dispute Tribunal is that it may be the first and most significant step towards a permanent solution to the persistent conflict over sharing the inter-State rivers waters. A positive feature is that implementation ofthe final award will involve the formation of a Cauvery Management Board to regulate the supply of water and a Water Regulation Committee, which will post representatives in each of the eight reservoirs in the basin states, to ensure that the decisions are carried out. Giving finality to the award through the notification may help take the issue away from politics and place it in the hands of a technical, expert body. The February 2007 award has been questioned by way of clarification petitions before the Tribunal itself as well as suits in the Supreme Court by both parties and sceptics may wonder how useful the gazette notification may be now. The parties are still free to pursue their clarification petitions and appeals, but in the larger interest of a long term solution and to end seasonal acrimony, they would do well to give the award a chance.The fact that notifying the award has been a long pending demand ofTamil Nadu should not make one believe that the action redounds to one partys benefit to the detriment of the other. It was the Supreme Court that made the suggestion that thefinal decision be notified and counsel for all the basin states have agreed that it should be done. It may be argued that gazetting the award will not resolve the present standoff over judicial and administrative directives to Karnataka to release water to save standing crops in Tamil Nadu. The Cauvery Monitoring Committee, while asking Karnataka to ensure 12 thousand million cubic feet of water to Tamil Nadu in December, has itself admitted that its decision is unlikely to satisfy either party, given that both states have less water in their reservoirs than in previous years. Yet, is has opted for a pragmatic solution under which both states will be in deficit of approximately 47 tmcft. It is the same spirit of pragmatism that both states must now approach the larger problem of sharing water as per a judicially determined solution in both normal and distress years. The two should not let posterity say of them that long after equitable distribution has entrenched itself as the most acceptable doctrine in riverine jurisprudence, they did not allow a judicially determines system for sharing to work.Q.Consider the following assumptions:1. The 2 parties in the dispute should favour the setting up of the tribunal as it will bring some resolution to the issue2. The dispute between the 2 parties is best solved through the judicial route.Which of the following assumptions are valid?

Top Courses for UPSCView all

Top Courses for UPSC

The water cycle is an interconversion of the state of water . Justify?
Question Description
The water cycle is an interconversion of the state of water . Justify? for UPSC 2025 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about The water cycle is an interconversion of the state of water . Justify? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The water cycle is an interconversion of the state of water . Justify?.
Solutions for The water cycle is an interconversion of the state of water . Justify? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The water cycle is an interconversion of the state of water . Justify? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The water cycle is an interconversion of the state of water . Justify?, a detailed solution for The water cycle is an interconversion of the state of water . Justify? has been provided alongside types of The water cycle is an interconversion of the state of water . Justify? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The water cycle is an interconversion of the state of water . Justify? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Top Courses for UPSC

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup