What is the primary aim of substantive equality as emphasized in the ...
Substantive equality, as highlighted by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, aims to address the actual disparities and disadvantages faced by individuals or groups due to their unique circumstances or historical injustices. Unlike formal equality, substantive equality seeks to level the playing field by recognizing and addressing specific needs and barriers that different individuals or groups encounter. It does not focus on treating everyone the same but rather on providing support and adjustments based on historical contexts and unique challenges faced by various groups.
View all questions of this test
What is the primary aim of substantive equality as emphasized in the ...
Primary Aim of Substantive Equality in the Context of SC and ST Quota:
The primary aim of substantive equality, as emphasized in the recent judgment by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, is to focus on historical injustices and specific needs for different groups within the Scheduled Caste (SC) and Scheduled Tribe (ST) communities.
Explanation:
- Historical Injustices: Substantive equality recognizes that different groups within the SC and ST communities have faced varying degrees of discrimination and historical injustices. Therefore, it aims to address these disparities by providing specific concessions or reservations to those who have been most marginalized.
- Specific Needs: Substantive equality takes into account the unique challenges and requirements of different sub-groups within the SC and ST communities. By allowing for sub-classification within the reservation quota, it ensures that those in greatest need of support receive the necessary benefits.
- Customized Approach: Instead of treating everyone the same without exceptions, substantive equality advocates for a more nuanced and tailored approach to addressing inequalities. This means that different sub-groups may receive different levels of support based on their specific circumstances.
By emphasizing substantive equality in the context of sub-classification within the SC and ST quota, Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud's judgment highlights the importance of recognizing and addressing the diverse needs and historical injustices faced by different groups within these communities.