In retail chains where store policy includes an allowance for merchandise returns based on dissatisfaction with the products, customers are twice as likely to report that they are dissatisfied with products as they are in retail chains that do not have such a policy. Although there is no objective test for customer satisfaction -- no way to determine whether a customer is telling the truth -- it is not logical to conclude, as some have done, that half of all these claims of dissatisfaction are false, because in retail chains lacking a satisfaction policy for returns, there is often no incentive for customers to report real dissatisfaction in the first place.In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions do which of the following?a)The first is an inference disputed by the argument; the second is a conclusion from that inference.b)The first is a claim whose accuracy is disputed later; the second is evidence that the claim is in fact accurate.c)The first is the basis of a claim disputed in the argument; the second is a reason that the claim might not be accurate.d)The first is evidence for a conclusion supported by other evidence later in the passage; the second is part of the main arguments conclusion.e)The first is evidence used to make a statement the argument accepts; the second is part of the conclusion accepting that argument.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > In retail chains where store policy includes ...

Join the Discussion on the App

In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions do which of the following?

a)
The first is an inference disputed by the argument; the second is a conclusion from that inference.
b)
The first is a claim whose accuracy is disputed later; the second is evidence that the claim is in fact accurate.
c)
The first is the basis of a claim disputed in the argument; the second is a reason that the claim might not be accurate.
d)
The first is evidence for a conclusion supported by other evidence later in the passage; the second is part of the main argument's conclusion.
e)
The first is evidence used to make a statement the argument accepts; the second is part of the conclusion accepting that argument.

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Test: Bold Face CR

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Most Upvoted Answer

In retail chains where store policy includes an allowance for merchand...

Premise

Conclusion
it is not logical to conclude, as some have done, that half of all these claims of dissatisfaction are false. main conclusion

because in retail chains lacking a satisfaction policy for returns, there is often no incentive for customers to report real dissatisfaction in the first place. reason supporting the main conclusion .

Now, we can see that the second bold face supports the main conclusion. As a result we can eliminate A, D and E.
Finally, between B and C. The second bold face is a reason that the claim might not be true. By no means the second bold face is supporting the accuracy of the claim. Therefore the answer is C.

Answered by Talent Skill Learning · View profile

Attention GMAT Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2024

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Directions: Read the Passage carefully and answer the question as follow.The word Inference is used in two different senses, which are often confused but should be carefully distinguished. In the first sense, it means a process of thought or reasoning by which the mind passes from facts or statements presented, to some opinion or expectation. The data may be very vague and slight, prompting no more than a guess or surmise; as from the trick of a man’s face entertain some prejudice as to his character. Or the data may be important and strongly significant, like the footprint that frightened Crusoe into thinking of cannibals, or as when news of war makes the city expect that Consols will fall. These are examples of the act of inferring, or of inference as a process; and with inference in this sense Logic has nothing to do; it belongs to Psychology to explain how it is that our minds pass from one perception or thought to another thought, and how we come to conjecture, conclude and believe. In the second sense, ‘inference’ means not this process of guessing or opining, but the result of it; the surmise, opinion, or belief when formed; in a word, the conclusion: and it is in this sense that Inference is treated off in Logic. The subject-matter of Logic is an inference, judgment or conclusion concerning facts, embodied in a proposition, which is to be examined in relation to the evidence that may be adduced for it, in order to determine whether, or how far, the evidence amounts to proof.Logic is the science of Reasoning in the sense in which ‘reasoning’ means giving reasons, for it shows what sort of reasons are good. Whilst Psychology explains how the mind goes forward from data to conclusions, Logic takes a conclusion and goes back to the data, inquiring whether those data, together with any other evidence (facts or principles) that can be collected, are of a nature to warrant the conclusion. If we think that John Doe is of an amiable disposition, that water expands on freezing, or that one means to national prosperity is popular education, and wish to know whether we have evidence sufficient to justify us in holding these opinions, Logic can tell us what form the evidence should assume in order to be conclusive. But whatever facts constitute the evidence, they must, in order to prove the point, admit of being stated in conformity with certain principles or conditions; and of these principles or conditions Logic is the science. It deals, then, not with the subjective process of inferring, but with the objective grounds that justify or discredit the inference.Q. The passage states which of the following about Logic?

View answer

A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the companys failure to slow production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investors sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case it is clearly not justified. It is true that an increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burtons case it indicates no such thing. Rather, the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

View answer

Educator: Only those students who are genuinely curious about a topic can successfully learn about that topic. They find the satisfaction of their curiosity intrinsically gratifying, and appreciate the inherent rewards of the learning process itself. However, almost no child enters the classroom with sufficient curiosity to learn successfully all that the teacher must instill. A teacher’s job, therefore, _______.Which one of the following most logically completes the educator’s argument?

View answer

A certain credit-card company awards its customers bonus points for using its credit card. Customers can use accumulated points in the purchase of brand name merchandise by mail at prices lower than the manufacturers‘ suggested retail prices. At any given time, therefore, customers who purchase merchandise using the bonus points spend less than they would spend if they purchased the same merchandise in retail stores.Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

View answer

Many people feel that hard work deserves a reward. However, this is not true. Hard work should be its own reward, because such work intrinsically gives the worker satisfaction when it is performed satisfactorily.The author of the argument draws his or her conclusion by

View answer

Top Courses for GMATView all

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2024

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

100 RCs for GMAT

Top Courses for GMAT

View all

In retail chains where store policy includes an allowance for merchandise returns based on dissatisfaction with the products, customers are twice as likely to report that they are dissatisfied with products as they are in retail chains that do not have such a policy. Although there is no objective test for customer satisfaction -- no way to determine whether a customer is telling the truth -- it is not logical to conclude, as some have done, that half of all these claims of dissatisfaction are false, because in retail chains lacking a satisfaction policy for returns, there is often no incentive for customers to report real dissatisfaction in the first place.In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions do which of the following?a)The first is an inference disputed by the argument; the second is a conclusion from that inference.b)The first is a claim whose accuracy is disputed later; the second is evidence that the claim is in fact accurate.c)The first is the basis of a claim disputed in the argument; the second is a reason that the claim might not be accurate.d)The first is evidence for a conclusion supported by other evidence later in the passage; the second is part of the main arguments conclusion.e)The first is evidence used to make a statement the argument accepts; the second is part of the conclusion accepting that argument.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
In retail chains where store policy includes an allowance for merchandise returns based on dissatisfaction with the products, customers are twice as likely to report that they are dissatisfied with products as they are in retail chains that do not have such a policy. Although there is no objective test for customer satisfaction -- no way to determine whether a customer is telling the truth -- it is not logical to conclude, as some have done, that half of all these claims of dissatisfaction are false, because in retail chains lacking a satisfaction policy for returns, there is often no incentive for customers to report real dissatisfaction in the first place.In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions do which of the following?a)The first is an inference disputed by the argument; the second is a conclusion from that inference.b)The first is a claim whose accuracy is disputed later; the second is evidence that the claim is in fact accurate.c)The first is the basis of a claim disputed in the argument; the second is a reason that the claim might not be accurate.d)The first is evidence for a conclusion supported by other evidence later in the passage; the second is part of the main arguments conclusion.e)The first is evidence used to make a statement the argument accepts; the second is part of the conclusion accepting that argument.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about In retail chains where store policy includes an allowance for merchandise returns based on dissatisfaction with the products, customers are twice as likely to report that they are dissatisfied with products as they are in retail chains that do not have such a policy. Although there is no objective test for customer satisfaction -- no way to determine whether a customer is telling the truth -- it is not logical to conclude, as some have done, that half of all these claims of dissatisfaction are false, because in retail chains lacking a satisfaction policy for returns, there is often no incentive for customers to report real dissatisfaction in the first place.In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions do which of the following?a)The first is an inference disputed by the argument; the second is a conclusion from that inference.b)The first is a claim whose accuracy is disputed later; the second is evidence that the claim is in fact accurate.c)The first is the basis of a claim disputed in the argument; the second is a reason that the claim might not be accurate.d)The first is evidence for a conclusion supported by other evidence later in the passage; the second is part of the main arguments conclusion.e)The first is evidence used to make a statement the argument accepts; the second is part of the conclusion accepting that argument.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for In retail chains where store policy includes an allowance for merchandise returns based on dissatisfaction with the products, customers are twice as likely to report that they are dissatisfied with products as they are in retail chains that do not have such a policy. Although there is no objective test for customer satisfaction -- no way to determine whether a customer is telling the truth -- it is not logical to conclude, as some have done, that half of all these claims of dissatisfaction are false, because in retail chains lacking a satisfaction policy for returns, there is often no incentive for customers to report real dissatisfaction in the first place.In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions do which of the following?a)The first is an inference disputed by the argument; the second is a conclusion from that inference.b)The first is a claim whose accuracy is disputed later; the second is evidence that the claim is in fact accurate.c)The first is the basis of a claim disputed in the argument; the second is a reason that the claim might not be accurate.d)The first is evidence for a conclusion supported by other evidence later in the passage; the second is part of the main arguments conclusion.e)The first is evidence used to make a statement the argument accepts; the second is part of the conclusion accepting that argument.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for In retail chains where store policy includes an allowance for merchandise returns based on dissatisfaction with the products, customers are twice as likely to report that they are dissatisfied with products as they are in retail chains that do not have such a policy. Although there is no objective test for customer satisfaction -- no way to determine whether a customer is telling the truth -- it is not logical to conclude, as some have done, that half of all these claims of dissatisfaction are false, because in retail chains lacking a satisfaction policy for returns, there is often no incentive for customers to report real dissatisfaction in the first place.In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions do which of the following?a)The first is an inference disputed by the argument; the second is a conclusion from that inference.b)The first is a claim whose accuracy is disputed later; the second is evidence that the claim is in fact accurate.c)The first is the basis of a claim disputed in the argument; the second is a reason that the claim might not be accurate.d)The first is evidence for a conclusion supported by other evidence later in the passage; the second is part of the main arguments conclusion.e)The first is evidence used to make a statement the argument accepts; the second is part of the conclusion accepting that argument.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of In retail chains where store policy includes an allowance for merchandise returns based on dissatisfaction with the products, customers are twice as likely to report that they are dissatisfied with products as they are in retail chains that do not have such a policy. Although there is no objective test for customer satisfaction -- no way to determine whether a customer is telling the truth -- it is not logical to conclude, as some have done, that half of all these claims of dissatisfaction are false, because in retail chains lacking a satisfaction policy for returns, there is often no incentive for customers to report real dissatisfaction in the first place.In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions do which of the following?a)The first is an inference disputed by the argument; the second is a conclusion from that inference.b)The first is a claim whose accuracy is disputed later; the second is evidence that the claim is in fact accurate.c)The first is the basis of a claim disputed in the argument; the second is a reason that the claim might not be accurate.d)The first is evidence for a conclusion supported by other evidence later in the passage; the second is part of the main arguments conclusion.e)The first is evidence used to make a statement the argument accepts; the second is part of the conclusion accepting that argument.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of In retail chains where store policy includes an allowance for merchandise returns based on dissatisfaction with the products, customers are twice as likely to report that they are dissatisfied with products as they are in retail chains that do not have such a policy. Although there is no objective test for customer satisfaction -- no way to determine whether a customer is telling the truth -- it is not logical to conclude, as some have done, that half of all these claims of dissatisfaction are false, because in retail chains lacking a satisfaction policy for returns, there is often no incentive for customers to report real dissatisfaction in the first place.In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions do which of the following?a)The first is an inference disputed by the argument; the second is a conclusion from that inference.b)The first is a claim whose accuracy is disputed later; the second is evidence that the claim is in fact accurate.c)The first is the basis of a claim disputed in the argument; the second is a reason that the claim might not be accurate.d)The first is evidence for a conclusion supported by other evidence later in the passage; the second is part of the main arguments conclusion.e)The first is evidence used to make a statement the argument accepts; the second is part of the conclusion accepting that argument.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for In retail chains where store policy includes an allowance for merchandise returns based on dissatisfaction with the products, customers are twice as likely to report that they are dissatisfied with products as they are in retail chains that do not have such a policy. Although there is no objective test for customer satisfaction -- no way to determine whether a customer is telling the truth -- it is not logical to conclude, as some have done, that half of all these claims of dissatisfaction are false, because in retail chains lacking a satisfaction policy for returns, there is often no incentive for customers to report real dissatisfaction in the first place.In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions do which of the following?a)The first is an inference disputed by the argument; the second is a conclusion from that inference.b)The first is a claim whose accuracy is disputed later; the second is evidence that the claim is in fact accurate.c)The first is the basis of a claim disputed in the argument; the second is a reason that the claim might not be accurate.d)The first is evidence for a conclusion supported by other evidence later in the passage; the second is part of the main arguments conclusion.e)The first is evidence used to make a statement the argument accepts; the second is part of the conclusion accepting that argument.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of In retail chains where store policy includes an allowance for merchandise returns based on dissatisfaction with the products, customers are twice as likely to report that they are dissatisfied with products as they are in retail chains that do not have such a policy. Although there is no objective test for customer satisfaction -- no way to determine whether a customer is telling the truth -- it is not logical to conclude, as some have done, that half of all these claims of dissatisfaction are false, because in retail chains lacking a satisfaction policy for returns, there is often no incentive for customers to report real dissatisfaction in the first place.In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions do which of the following?a)The first is an inference disputed by the argument; the second is a conclusion from that inference.b)The first is a claim whose accuracy is disputed later; the second is evidence that the claim is in fact accurate.c)The first is the basis of a claim disputed in the argument; the second is a reason that the claim might not be accurate.d)The first is evidence for a conclusion supported by other evidence later in the passage; the second is part of the main arguments conclusion.e)The first is evidence used to make a statement the argument accepts; the second is part of the conclusion accepting that argument.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice In retail chains where store policy includes an allowance for merchandise returns based on dissatisfaction with the products, customers are twice as likely to report that they are dissatisfied with products as they are in retail chains that do not have such a policy. Although there is no objective test for customer satisfaction -- no way to determine whether a customer is telling the truth -- it is not logical to conclude, as some have done, that half of all these claims of dissatisfaction are false, because in retail chains lacking a satisfaction policy for returns, there is often no incentive for customers to report real dissatisfaction in the first place.In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions do which of the following?a)The first is an inference disputed by the argument; the second is a conclusion from that inference.b)The first is a claim whose accuracy is disputed later; the second is evidence that the claim is in fact accurate.c)The first is the basis of a claim disputed in the argument; the second is a reason that the claim might not be accurate.d)The first is evidence for a conclusion supported by other evidence later in the passage; the second is part of the main arguments conclusion.e)The first is evidence used to make a statement the argument accepts; the second is part of the conclusion accepting that argument.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.

Explore Courses for GMAT exam