Question Description
In retail chains where store policy includes an allowance for merchandise returns based on dissatisfaction with the products, customers are twice as likely to report that they are dissatisfied with products as they are in retail chains that do not have such a policy. Although there is no objective test for customer satisfaction -- no way to determine whether a customer is telling the truth -- it is not logical to conclude, as some have done, that half of all these claims of dissatisfaction are false, because in retail chains lacking a satisfaction policy for returns, there is often no incentive for customers to report real dissatisfaction in the first place.In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions do which of the following?a)The first is an inference disputed by the argument; the second is a conclusion from that inference.b)The first is a claim whose accuracy is disputed later; the second is evidence that the claim is in fact accurate.c)The first is the basis of a claim disputed in the argument; the second is a reason that the claim might not be accurate.d)The first is evidence for a conclusion supported by other evidence later in the passage; the second is part of the main arguments conclusion.e)The first is evidence used to make a statement the argument accepts; the second is part of the conclusion accepting that argument.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about In retail chains where store policy includes an allowance for merchandise returns based on dissatisfaction with the products, customers are twice as likely to report that they are dissatisfied with products as they are in retail chains that do not have such a policy. Although there is no objective test for customer satisfaction -- no way to determine whether a customer is telling the truth -- it is not logical to conclude, as some have done, that half of all these claims of dissatisfaction are false, because in retail chains lacking a satisfaction policy for returns, there is often no incentive for customers to report real dissatisfaction in the first place.In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions do which of the following?a)The first is an inference disputed by the argument; the second is a conclusion from that inference.b)The first is a claim whose accuracy is disputed later; the second is evidence that the claim is in fact accurate.c)The first is the basis of a claim disputed in the argument; the second is a reason that the claim might not be accurate.d)The first is evidence for a conclusion supported by other evidence later in the passage; the second is part of the main arguments conclusion.e)The first is evidence used to make a statement the argument accepts; the second is part of the conclusion accepting that argument.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for In retail chains where store policy includes an allowance for merchandise returns based on dissatisfaction with the products, customers are twice as likely to report that they are dissatisfied with products as they are in retail chains that do not have such a policy. Although there is no objective test for customer satisfaction -- no way to determine whether a customer is telling the truth -- it is not logical to conclude, as some have done, that half of all these claims of dissatisfaction are false, because in retail chains lacking a satisfaction policy for returns, there is often no incentive for customers to report real dissatisfaction in the first place.In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions do which of the following?a)The first is an inference disputed by the argument; the second is a conclusion from that inference.b)The first is a claim whose accuracy is disputed later; the second is evidence that the claim is in fact accurate.c)The first is the basis of a claim disputed in the argument; the second is a reason that the claim might not be accurate.d)The first is evidence for a conclusion supported by other evidence later in the passage; the second is part of the main arguments conclusion.e)The first is evidence used to make a statement the argument accepts; the second is part of the conclusion accepting that argument.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for In retail chains where store policy includes an allowance for merchandise returns based on dissatisfaction with the products, customers are twice as likely to report that they are dissatisfied with products as they are in retail chains that do not have such a policy. Although there is no objective test for customer satisfaction -- no way to determine whether a customer is telling the truth -- it is not logical to conclude, as some have done, that half of all these claims of dissatisfaction are false, because in retail chains lacking a satisfaction policy for returns, there is often no incentive for customers to report real dissatisfaction in the first place.In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions do which of the following?a)The first is an inference disputed by the argument; the second is a conclusion from that inference.b)The first is a claim whose accuracy is disputed later; the second is evidence that the claim is in fact accurate.c)The first is the basis of a claim disputed in the argument; the second is a reason that the claim might not be accurate.d)The first is evidence for a conclusion supported by other evidence later in the passage; the second is part of the main arguments conclusion.e)The first is evidence used to make a statement the argument accepts; the second is part of the conclusion accepting that argument.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of In retail chains where store policy includes an allowance for merchandise returns based on dissatisfaction with the products, customers are twice as likely to report that they are dissatisfied with products as they are in retail chains that do not have such a policy. Although there is no objective test for customer satisfaction -- no way to determine whether a customer is telling the truth -- it is not logical to conclude, as some have done, that half of all these claims of dissatisfaction are false, because in retail chains lacking a satisfaction policy for returns, there is often no incentive for customers to report real dissatisfaction in the first place.In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions do which of the following?a)The first is an inference disputed by the argument; the second is a conclusion from that inference.b)The first is a claim whose accuracy is disputed later; the second is evidence that the claim is in fact accurate.c)The first is the basis of a claim disputed in the argument; the second is a reason that the claim might not be accurate.d)The first is evidence for a conclusion supported by other evidence later in the passage; the second is part of the main arguments conclusion.e)The first is evidence used to make a statement the argument accepts; the second is part of the conclusion accepting that argument.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of In retail chains where store policy includes an allowance for merchandise returns based on dissatisfaction with the products, customers are twice as likely to report that they are dissatisfied with products as they are in retail chains that do not have such a policy. Although there is no objective test for customer satisfaction -- no way to determine whether a customer is telling the truth -- it is not logical to conclude, as some have done, that half of all these claims of dissatisfaction are false, because in retail chains lacking a satisfaction policy for returns, there is often no incentive for customers to report real dissatisfaction in the first place.In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions do which of the following?a)The first is an inference disputed by the argument; the second is a conclusion from that inference.b)The first is a claim whose accuracy is disputed later; the second is evidence that the claim is in fact accurate.c)The first is the basis of a claim disputed in the argument; the second is a reason that the claim might not be accurate.d)The first is evidence for a conclusion supported by other evidence later in the passage; the second is part of the main arguments conclusion.e)The first is evidence used to make a statement the argument accepts; the second is part of the conclusion accepting that argument.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for In retail chains where store policy includes an allowance for merchandise returns based on dissatisfaction with the products, customers are twice as likely to report that they are dissatisfied with products as they are in retail chains that do not have such a policy. Although there is no objective test for customer satisfaction -- no way to determine whether a customer is telling the truth -- it is not logical to conclude, as some have done, that half of all these claims of dissatisfaction are false, because in retail chains lacking a satisfaction policy for returns, there is often no incentive for customers to report real dissatisfaction in the first place.In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions do which of the following?a)The first is an inference disputed by the argument; the second is a conclusion from that inference.b)The first is a claim whose accuracy is disputed later; the second is evidence that the claim is in fact accurate.c)The first is the basis of a claim disputed in the argument; the second is a reason that the claim might not be accurate.d)The first is evidence for a conclusion supported by other evidence later in the passage; the second is part of the main arguments conclusion.e)The first is evidence used to make a statement the argument accepts; the second is part of the conclusion accepting that argument.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of In retail chains where store policy includes an allowance for merchandise returns based on dissatisfaction with the products, customers are twice as likely to report that they are dissatisfied with products as they are in retail chains that do not have such a policy. Although there is no objective test for customer satisfaction -- no way to determine whether a customer is telling the truth -- it is not logical to conclude, as some have done, that half of all these claims of dissatisfaction are false, because in retail chains lacking a satisfaction policy for returns, there is often no incentive for customers to report real dissatisfaction in the first place.In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions do which of the following?a)The first is an inference disputed by the argument; the second is a conclusion from that inference.b)The first is a claim whose accuracy is disputed later; the second is evidence that the claim is in fact accurate.c)The first is the basis of a claim disputed in the argument; the second is a reason that the claim might not be accurate.d)The first is evidence for a conclusion supported by other evidence later in the passage; the second is part of the main arguments conclusion.e)The first is evidence used to make a statement the argument accepts; the second is part of the conclusion accepting that argument.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice In retail chains where store policy includes an allowance for merchandise returns based on dissatisfaction with the products, customers are twice as likely to report that they are dissatisfied with products as they are in retail chains that do not have such a policy. Although there is no objective test for customer satisfaction -- no way to determine whether a customer is telling the truth -- it is not logical to conclude, as some have done, that half of all these claims of dissatisfaction are false, because in retail chains lacking a satisfaction policy for returns, there is often no incentive for customers to report real dissatisfaction in the first place.In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions do which of the following?a)The first is an inference disputed by the argument; the second is a conclusion from that inference.b)The first is a claim whose accuracy is disputed later; the second is evidence that the claim is in fact accurate.c)The first is the basis of a claim disputed in the argument; the second is a reason that the claim might not be accurate.d)The first is evidence for a conclusion supported by other evidence later in the passage; the second is part of the main arguments conclusion.e)The first is evidence used to make a statement the argument accepts; the second is part of the conclusion accepting that argument.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.