UPSC Exam > UPSC Questions > Varun was a mischievous teenager who was alwa...
Start Learning for Free
Varun was a mischievous teenager who was always out and about,never studying or helping his parents with anything. One day, while walking out of his houses, he found d a two thousand rupee note on the ground. Excited,as he had been waiting to buy a new video game , he immediately used the money to purchase it.The money however belonged to his neighbour, Verma. Verma claimed that Varun was a bailee and therefore did not have right to use the money. Is varun liable or not?
Most Upvoted Answer
Varun was a mischievous teenager who was always out and about,never st...
Introduction
In this scenario, Varun discovered a two thousand rupee note that belonged to his neighbor, Verma. The legal implications of this situation revolve around the concept of "bailment" and the responsibilities that arise from it.
Definition of Bailee
- A bailee is someone who receives possession of goods or property for a specific purpose, with the expectation of returning it to the owner.
- In this case, Varun, having found the money, can be considered a bailee.
Responsibilities of a Bailee
- A bailee has a duty to take reasonable care of the property.
- The bailee must not use the property for personal benefit unless explicitly permitted by the owner.
Varun's Actions
- Varun used the money to buy a video game, which constitutes unauthorized use.
- By spending the money, Varun failed to meet his obligation to return it to Verma.
Legal Implications
- Varun is liable for misappropriation of the money as he did not act in accordance with his responsibilities as a bailee.
- Verma can demand the return of the money or its equivalent value from Varun.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Varun is liable for the unauthorized use of the two thousand rupee note. As a bailee, he had a legal duty to return the money to its rightful owner, Verma, and his failure to do so results in legal consequences.
In this scenario, Varun discovered a two thousand rupee note that belonged to his neighbor, Verma. The legal implications of this situation revolve around the concept of "bailment" and the responsibilities that arise from it.
Definition of Bailee
- A bailee is someone who receives possession of goods or property for a specific purpose, with the expectation of returning it to the owner.
- In this case, Varun, having found the money, can be considered a bailee.
Responsibilities of a Bailee
- A bailee has a duty to take reasonable care of the property.
- The bailee must not use the property for personal benefit unless explicitly permitted by the owner.
Varun's Actions
- Varun used the money to buy a video game, which constitutes unauthorized use.
- By spending the money, Varun failed to meet his obligation to return it to Verma.
Legal Implications
- Varun is liable for misappropriation of the money as he did not act in accordance with his responsibilities as a bailee.
- Verma can demand the return of the money or its equivalent value from Varun.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Varun is liable for the unauthorized use of the two thousand rupee note. As a bailee, he had a legal duty to return the money to its rightful owner, Verma, and his failure to do so results in legal consequences.
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|
|
Top Courses for UPSCView all
Varun was a mischievous teenager who was always out and about,never studying or helping his parents with anything. One day, while walking out of his houses, he found d a two thousand rupee note on the ground. Excited,as he had been waiting to buy a new video game , he immediately used the money to purchase it.The money however belonged to his neighbour, Verma. Verma claimed that Varun was a bailee and therefore did not have right to use the money. Is varun liable or not?
Question Description
Varun was a mischievous teenager who was always out and about,never studying or helping his parents with anything. One day, while walking out of his houses, he found d a two thousand rupee note on the ground. Excited,as he had been waiting to buy a new video game , he immediately used the money to purchase it.The money however belonged to his neighbour, Verma. Verma claimed that Varun was a bailee and therefore did not have right to use the money. Is varun liable or not? for UPSC 2025 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Varun was a mischievous teenager who was always out and about,never studying or helping his parents with anything. One day, while walking out of his houses, he found d a two thousand rupee note on the ground. Excited,as he had been waiting to buy a new video game , he immediately used the money to purchase it.The money however belonged to his neighbour, Verma. Verma claimed that Varun was a bailee and therefore did not have right to use the money. Is varun liable or not? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Varun was a mischievous teenager who was always out and about,never studying or helping his parents with anything. One day, while walking out of his houses, he found d a two thousand rupee note on the ground. Excited,as he had been waiting to buy a new video game , he immediately used the money to purchase it.The money however belonged to his neighbour, Verma. Verma claimed that Varun was a bailee and therefore did not have right to use the money. Is varun liable or not?.
Varun was a mischievous teenager who was always out and about,never studying or helping his parents with anything. One day, while walking out of his houses, he found d a two thousand rupee note on the ground. Excited,as he had been waiting to buy a new video game , he immediately used the money to purchase it.The money however belonged to his neighbour, Verma. Verma claimed that Varun was a bailee and therefore did not have right to use the money. Is varun liable or not? for UPSC 2025 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Varun was a mischievous teenager who was always out and about,never studying or helping his parents with anything. One day, while walking out of his houses, he found d a two thousand rupee note on the ground. Excited,as he had been waiting to buy a new video game , he immediately used the money to purchase it.The money however belonged to his neighbour, Verma. Verma claimed that Varun was a bailee and therefore did not have right to use the money. Is varun liable or not? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Varun was a mischievous teenager who was always out and about,never studying or helping his parents with anything. One day, while walking out of his houses, he found d a two thousand rupee note on the ground. Excited,as he had been waiting to buy a new video game , he immediately used the money to purchase it.The money however belonged to his neighbour, Verma. Verma claimed that Varun was a bailee and therefore did not have right to use the money. Is varun liable or not?.
Solutions for Varun was a mischievous teenager who was always out and about,never studying or helping his parents with anything. One day, while walking out of his houses, he found d a two thousand rupee note on the ground. Excited,as he had been waiting to buy a new video game , he immediately used the money to purchase it.The money however belonged to his neighbour, Verma. Verma claimed that Varun was a bailee and therefore did not have right to use the money. Is varun liable or not? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Varun was a mischievous teenager who was always out and about,never studying or helping his parents with anything. One day, while walking out of his houses, he found d a two thousand rupee note on the ground. Excited,as he had been waiting to buy a new video game , he immediately used the money to purchase it.The money however belonged to his neighbour, Verma. Verma claimed that Varun was a bailee and therefore did not have right to use the money. Is varun liable or not? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Varun was a mischievous teenager who was always out and about,never studying or helping his parents with anything. One day, while walking out of his houses, he found d a two thousand rupee note on the ground. Excited,as he had been waiting to buy a new video game , he immediately used the money to purchase it.The money however belonged to his neighbour, Verma. Verma claimed that Varun was a bailee and therefore did not have right to use the money. Is varun liable or not?, a detailed solution for Varun was a mischievous teenager who was always out and about,never studying or helping his parents with anything. One day, while walking out of his houses, he found d a two thousand rupee note on the ground. Excited,as he had been waiting to buy a new video game , he immediately used the money to purchase it.The money however belonged to his neighbour, Verma. Verma claimed that Varun was a bailee and therefore did not have right to use the money. Is varun liable or not? has been provided alongside types of Varun was a mischievous teenager who was always out and about,never studying or helping his parents with anything. One day, while walking out of his houses, he found d a two thousand rupee note on the ground. Excited,as he had been waiting to buy a new video game , he immediately used the money to purchase it.The money however belonged to his neighbour, Verma. Verma claimed that Varun was a bailee and therefore did not have right to use the money. Is varun liable or not? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Varun was a mischievous teenager who was always out and about,never studying or helping his parents with anything. One day, while walking out of his houses, he found d a two thousand rupee note on the ground. Excited,as he had been waiting to buy a new video game , he immediately used the money to purchase it.The money however belonged to his neighbour, Verma. Verma claimed that Varun was a bailee and therefore did not have right to use the money. Is varun liable or not? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup