CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  The question consist of two statements, one l... Start Learning for Free
The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.
Q. PRINCIPLE: Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent moves that property, such taking is said to commit theft.
FACT: RAMU cuts down a tree on RINKU’s ground, with the intention of dishonestly taking the tree out of RINKU’s possession without RINKU’s consent. A could not take the tree away.
  • a)
    RAMU can be prosecuted for theft
  • b)
    RAMU cannot be prosecuted for theft
  • c)
    RAMU can be prosecuted for attempt to theft
  • d)
    RAMU has neither committed theft nor attempt to commit theft
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each ...
Ramu has committed theft because as soon as he cut the tree out of the land, it becomes moveable property and can be stolen
Free Test
Community Answer
The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each ...
Correct answer is A because all the 4 ingredients which are required to prove theft 1.dishonest intention 2.movable property 3.taking out object without permission 4.taking away
here ramu dishonesty wants to take the tree out from the rinku's land and he is having evil motive and the property is movable
Attention CLAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Top Courses for CLAT

The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q. PRINCIPLE: Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent moves that property, such taking is said to commit theft.FACT: RAMU cuts down a tree on RINKU’s ground, with the intention of dishonestly taking the tree out of RINKU’s possession without RINKU’s consent. A could not take the tree away.a)RAMU can be prosecuted for theftb)RAMU cannot be prosecuted for theftc)RAMU can be prosecuted for attempt to theftd)RAMU has neither committed theft nor attempt to commit theftCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q. PRINCIPLE: Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent moves that property, such taking is said to commit theft.FACT: RAMU cuts down a tree on RINKU’s ground, with the intention of dishonestly taking the tree out of RINKU’s possession without RINKU’s consent. A could not take the tree away.a)RAMU can be prosecuted for theftb)RAMU cannot be prosecuted for theftc)RAMU can be prosecuted for attempt to theftd)RAMU has neither committed theft nor attempt to commit theftCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q. PRINCIPLE: Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent moves that property, such taking is said to commit theft.FACT: RAMU cuts down a tree on RINKU’s ground, with the intention of dishonestly taking the tree out of RINKU’s possession without RINKU’s consent. A could not take the tree away.a)RAMU can be prosecuted for theftb)RAMU cannot be prosecuted for theftc)RAMU can be prosecuted for attempt to theftd)RAMU has neither committed theft nor attempt to commit theftCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q. PRINCIPLE: Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent moves that property, such taking is said to commit theft.FACT: RAMU cuts down a tree on RINKU’s ground, with the intention of dishonestly taking the tree out of RINKU’s possession without RINKU’s consent. A could not take the tree away.a)RAMU can be prosecuted for theftb)RAMU cannot be prosecuted for theftc)RAMU can be prosecuted for attempt to theftd)RAMU has neither committed theft nor attempt to commit theftCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q. PRINCIPLE: Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent moves that property, such taking is said to commit theft.FACT: RAMU cuts down a tree on RINKU’s ground, with the intention of dishonestly taking the tree out of RINKU’s possession without RINKU’s consent. A could not take the tree away.a)RAMU can be prosecuted for theftb)RAMU cannot be prosecuted for theftc)RAMU can be prosecuted for attempt to theftd)RAMU has neither committed theft nor attempt to commit theftCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q. PRINCIPLE: Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent moves that property, such taking is said to commit theft.FACT: RAMU cuts down a tree on RINKU’s ground, with the intention of dishonestly taking the tree out of RINKU’s possession without RINKU’s consent. A could not take the tree away.a)RAMU can be prosecuted for theftb)RAMU cannot be prosecuted for theftc)RAMU can be prosecuted for attempt to theftd)RAMU has neither committed theft nor attempt to commit theftCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q. PRINCIPLE: Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent moves that property, such taking is said to commit theft.FACT: RAMU cuts down a tree on RINKU’s ground, with the intention of dishonestly taking the tree out of RINKU’s possession without RINKU’s consent. A could not take the tree away.a)RAMU can be prosecuted for theftb)RAMU cannot be prosecuted for theftc)RAMU can be prosecuted for attempt to theftd)RAMU has neither committed theft nor attempt to commit theftCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q. PRINCIPLE: Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent moves that property, such taking is said to commit theft.FACT: RAMU cuts down a tree on RINKU’s ground, with the intention of dishonestly taking the tree out of RINKU’s possession without RINKU’s consent. A could not take the tree away.a)RAMU can be prosecuted for theftb)RAMU cannot be prosecuted for theftc)RAMU can be prosecuted for attempt to theftd)RAMU has neither committed theft nor attempt to commit theftCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q. PRINCIPLE: Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent moves that property, such taking is said to commit theft.FACT: RAMU cuts down a tree on RINKU’s ground, with the intention of dishonestly taking the tree out of RINKU’s possession without RINKU’s consent. A could not take the tree away.a)RAMU can be prosecuted for theftb)RAMU cannot be prosecuted for theftc)RAMU can be prosecuted for attempt to theftd)RAMU has neither committed theft nor attempt to commit theftCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q. PRINCIPLE: Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent moves that property, such taking is said to commit theft.FACT: RAMU cuts down a tree on RINKU’s ground, with the intention of dishonestly taking the tree out of RINKU’s possession without RINKU’s consent. A could not take the tree away.a)RAMU can be prosecuted for theftb)RAMU cannot be prosecuted for theftc)RAMU can be prosecuted for attempt to theftd)RAMU has neither committed theft nor attempt to commit theftCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev