CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  PRINCIPLE:Whoever, intending to take dishones... Start Learning for Free
PRINCIPLE: Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent moves that property, such taking is said to commit theft.
FACT: RAMU cuts down a tree on RINKU’S ground, with the intention of dishonestly taking the tree out of RINKU’S profession without RINKU’S consent. A could not take the tree away.
  • a)
    RAMU can be prosecuted for theft
  • b)
    RAMU cannot be prosecuted for theft
  • c)
    RAMU can be prosecuted for attempt to theft
  • d)
    RAMU has neither committed theft nor attempt to commit theft
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
PRINCIPLE:Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any movable property ...
Ramu will be prosecuted for theft, since he had theintention of taking away the tree after cutting it.
The principle clearly talks about the intention of taking away property.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
PRINCIPLE:Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any movable property ...
Ramu could not take that tree away though he had intention to take it .Then option C must be correct
Free Test
Community Answer
PRINCIPLE:Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any movable property ...
As ramu tried to take the tree without the knowledge and consent of rinku, which is theft, but he was unable to take it so he is not liable to be punished....but hi act was attempt to theft for which he should be prosecuted
Attention CLAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Top Courses for CLAT

PRINCIPLE:Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent moves that property, such taking is said to commit theft.FACT:RAMU cuts down a tree on RINKU’S ground, with the intention of dishonestly taking the tree out of RINKU’S profession without RINKU’S consent. A could not take the tree away.a)RAMU can be prosecuted for theftb)RAMU cannot be prosecuted for theftc)RAMU can be prosecuted for attempt to theftd)RAMU has neither committed theft nor attempt to commit theftCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
PRINCIPLE:Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent moves that property, such taking is said to commit theft.FACT:RAMU cuts down a tree on RINKU’S ground, with the intention of dishonestly taking the tree out of RINKU’S profession without RINKU’S consent. A could not take the tree away.a)RAMU can be prosecuted for theftb)RAMU cannot be prosecuted for theftc)RAMU can be prosecuted for attempt to theftd)RAMU has neither committed theft nor attempt to commit theftCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about PRINCIPLE:Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent moves that property, such taking is said to commit theft.FACT:RAMU cuts down a tree on RINKU’S ground, with the intention of dishonestly taking the tree out of RINKU’S profession without RINKU’S consent. A could not take the tree away.a)RAMU can be prosecuted for theftb)RAMU cannot be prosecuted for theftc)RAMU can be prosecuted for attempt to theftd)RAMU has neither committed theft nor attempt to commit theftCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for PRINCIPLE:Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent moves that property, such taking is said to commit theft.FACT:RAMU cuts down a tree on RINKU’S ground, with the intention of dishonestly taking the tree out of RINKU’S profession without RINKU’S consent. A could not take the tree away.a)RAMU can be prosecuted for theftb)RAMU cannot be prosecuted for theftc)RAMU can be prosecuted for attempt to theftd)RAMU has neither committed theft nor attempt to commit theftCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for PRINCIPLE:Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent moves that property, such taking is said to commit theft.FACT:RAMU cuts down a tree on RINKU’S ground, with the intention of dishonestly taking the tree out of RINKU’S profession without RINKU’S consent. A could not take the tree away.a)RAMU can be prosecuted for theftb)RAMU cannot be prosecuted for theftc)RAMU can be prosecuted for attempt to theftd)RAMU has neither committed theft nor attempt to commit theftCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of PRINCIPLE:Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent moves that property, such taking is said to commit theft.FACT:RAMU cuts down a tree on RINKU’S ground, with the intention of dishonestly taking the tree out of RINKU’S profession without RINKU’S consent. A could not take the tree away.a)RAMU can be prosecuted for theftb)RAMU cannot be prosecuted for theftc)RAMU can be prosecuted for attempt to theftd)RAMU has neither committed theft nor attempt to commit theftCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of PRINCIPLE:Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent moves that property, such taking is said to commit theft.FACT:RAMU cuts down a tree on RINKU’S ground, with the intention of dishonestly taking the tree out of RINKU’S profession without RINKU’S consent. A could not take the tree away.a)RAMU can be prosecuted for theftb)RAMU cannot be prosecuted for theftc)RAMU can be prosecuted for attempt to theftd)RAMU has neither committed theft nor attempt to commit theftCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for PRINCIPLE:Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent moves that property, such taking is said to commit theft.FACT:RAMU cuts down a tree on RINKU’S ground, with the intention of dishonestly taking the tree out of RINKU’S profession without RINKU’S consent. A could not take the tree away.a)RAMU can be prosecuted for theftb)RAMU cannot be prosecuted for theftc)RAMU can be prosecuted for attempt to theftd)RAMU has neither committed theft nor attempt to commit theftCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of PRINCIPLE:Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent moves that property, such taking is said to commit theft.FACT:RAMU cuts down a tree on RINKU’S ground, with the intention of dishonestly taking the tree out of RINKU’S profession without RINKU’S consent. A could not take the tree away.a)RAMU can be prosecuted for theftb)RAMU cannot be prosecuted for theftc)RAMU can be prosecuted for attempt to theftd)RAMU has neither committed theft nor attempt to commit theftCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice PRINCIPLE:Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent moves that property, such taking is said to commit theft.FACT:RAMU cuts down a tree on RINKU’S ground, with the intention of dishonestly taking the tree out of RINKU’S profession without RINKU’S consent. A could not take the tree away.a)RAMU can be prosecuted for theftb)RAMU cannot be prosecuted for theftc)RAMU can be prosecuted for attempt to theftd)RAMU has neither committed theft nor attempt to commit theftCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev