Reasons why forced conscription outweighed the advantages of administrative changes in Europe:

Introduction:
During the Napoleonic era, Europe underwent significant administrative changes. However, these changes were overshadowed by the forced conscription into French armies.

Forced Conscription:
Forced conscription refers to the compulsory enlistment of citizens into military service. The French armies, under the leadership of Napoleon, relied heavily on forced conscription to maintain their military prowess. As a result, many young men were taken from their families and forced to serve in the wars. This caused significant hardship for families and communities.

Negative Impact:
Forced conscription had several negative impacts on the population. Firstly, it caused significant social disruption, as families were separated, and communities were left without their young men. Secondly, the forced conscription led to significant mental and physical stress for the soldiers. Thirdly, it caused significant economic hardship, as families lost their primary breadwinners.

Outweighed the Advantages:
The administrative changes introduced during this period aimed to centralize power and create a more efficient government. However, the negative impact of forced conscription outweighed any potential advantages of these changes. The movement and exchange of goods, for example, were significant advantages of the administrative changes. But, this was overshadowed by the impact of forced conscription.

Conclusion:
Forced conscription was a significant negative impact of the Napoleonic era, and it overshadowed any potential advantages of the administrative changes. The impact of forced conscription on families, communities, and the economy outweighed any potential benefits of administrative changes.