He is as intelligent if not more intelligent (A) / than his brother who has qualified (B) / for this post.(C) / no error (D)a)He is as intelligent if not more intelligentb)than his brother who has qualifiedc)for this post.d)no errorCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > He is as intelligent if not more intelligent ...

He is as intelligent if not more intelligent (A) / than his brother who has qualified (B) / for this post.(C) / no error (D)

a)
He is as intelligent if not more intelligent
b)
than his brother who has qualified
c)
for this post.
d)
no error

Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

He is as intelligent if not more intelligent (A) / than his brother wh...

Add ‘as’ after ‘as intelligent’.

View all questions of this test

Most Upvoted Answer

He is as intelligent if not more intelligent (A) / than his brother wh...

Error: Incorrect use of comparative degree

Explanation:

- The given sentence is comparing the intelligence of two people - "he" and "his brother".
- The comparison is done using the structure "as...as" which is used to show equality between two things.
- However, the sentence adds another comparative phrase "if not more intelligent" after "as intelligent", which creates a contradictory statement.
- When we say "as intelligent as", we are already saying that both people have equal intelligence. Adding "if not more intelligent" implies that one person might have more intelligence than the other, which contradicts the initial statement of equality.
- Therefore, the correct way to write this sentence is to use only one of the two comparative phrases - either "as intelligent as" or "more intelligent than".
- Since the sentence starts with "as intelligent if not more intelligent", we need to remove the first comparative phrase and keep the second one.

Corrected sentence:

He is more intelligent than his brother who has qualified for this post.

Note: There are no errors in the other parts of the sentence.

Answered by Glance Learning Institute · View profile

Free Test

FREE

Test: Adjective- 1
20 Ques | 15 Min

Start Free Test

View all free CLAT tests

Community Answer

He is as intelligent if not more intelligent (A) / than his brother wh...

The correct usage 'is as intelligent as'. So, part (a) of the sentence is erroneous.

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

"In India, speaking fluently in English is considered a sign of the smart and intelligent individual. When you expose yourself to a broader set of the group occupied in intellectual studies or pursuing a unique art form, then a language is of no importance. For years, the grammar Nazis have judged people based on their English vocabulary. Many times, we come across smart people, extremely talented in subjects like Math, and we are awestruck. Although, their English may have been weak but does that allow us to categorize them as non-intelligent or dumb?How quickly a person’s brain grasps and exercises, displays the “intelligence” of the individual. I do not deny the fact that verbal-linguistics is a measurable factor of intelligence, but that does not imply that the person has to be excellent in the English language. Learning the language is entirely another matter of discussion. Most people are expert in the language because of few basic reasons; part of their upbringing, strict English medium school, love for English literature and the rest of the people master the dialect only to get a reasonable job in the society. So, ideally, anyone working or communicating in Hindi is not a concern or reason for criticizing them; instead, it is a matter of pride. Let’s not forget how the French defend their language! And for all those competent English speakers, accept non-English individuals with the same respect because they know things which you don’t know too. And you never know, the person you ridiculed yesterday may turn into the biggest superstar someday.What can be inferred from the author’s statement about “broader set of the group occupied in intellectual studies”?

View answer

The term 'Emotional Intelligence', first coined by psychologists Mayer and Salovey (1990), refers to one's capacity to perceive, process and regulate emotional information accurately and effectively, both within oneself and in others and to use this information to guide one's thinking and actions and to influence those of others.Emotional intelligence can lead us on the path to a fulfilled and happy life by providing a framework through which to apply standards of intelligence to emotional responses and understand that these responses may be logically consistent or inconsistent with particular beliefs about emotion.As the workplace evolves, so too does the body of research supporting that individuals (from interns to managers) with higher EI are better equipped to work cohesively within teams, deal with change more effectively, and manage stress - thus enabling them to more efficiently pursue business objectives. Goleman (1995) recognized five distinct categories of skills which form the key characteristics of EI and proposed that, unlike one's intelligence quotient (IQ), these categorical skills can be learned where absent and improved upon where present. Thus, EI, unlike its relatively fixed cousin, IQ, is instead a dynamic aspect of one's psyche and includes behavioral traits that, when worked upon, can yield significant benefits, from personal happiness and well-being to elevated success in a professional context.Emotional intelligence has been shown to play a meaningful role in academic success, mental and physical health, as well as attainment in professional domains; the findings of Bar-On (1997) suggested that people with higher EI performed better than those with lower EI in life. In the modern, agile workplace, there is an ever-increasing emphasis from employers on the importance of EI over academic qualifications.The importance of EI should not go unappreciated; the ability to understand and manage your emotions is the first step in realizing your true potential. How can we achieve meaningful progress if we don't recognize and acknowledge the point from where we're starting? When checking directions on your sat-nav, a destination is useless unless we know the origin.Whether it be connecting with others and improving interpersonal communication, achieving success in the workplace or social relationships, dealing with stress and improving motivation or refining decision-making skills - emotional intelligence plays a central role in realizing success in both personal and professional life.Q. How is EI connected to conventional intelligence?

View answer

The term Emotional Intelligence, first coined by psychologists Mayer and Salovey (1990), refers to ones capacity to perceive, process and regulate emotional information accurately and effectively, both within oneself and in others and to use this information to guide ones thinking and actions and to influence those of others. Emotional intelligence can lead us on the path to a fulfilled and happy life by providing a framework through which to apply standards of intelligence to emotional responses and understand that these responses may be logically consistent or inconsistent with particular beliefs about emotion.As the workplace evolves, so too does the body of research supporting that individuals (from interns to managers) with higher EI are better equipped to work cohesively within teams, deal with change more effectively, and manage stress - thus enabling them to more efficiently pursue business objectives. Goleman (1995) recognized five distinct categories of skills which form the key characteristics of EI and proposed that, unlike ones intelligence quotient (IQ), these categorical skills can be learned where absent and improved upon where present. Thus, EI, unlike its relatively fixed cousin, IQ, is instead a dynamic aspect of ones psyche and includes behavioral traits that, when worked upon, can yield significant benefits, from personal happiness and well-being to elevated success in a professional context. Emotional intelligence has been shown to play a meaningful role in academic success, mental and physical health, as well as attainment in professional domains; the findings of Bar-On (1997) suggested that people with higher EI performed better than those with lower EI in life. In the modern, agile workplace, there is an ever-increasing emphasis from employers on the importance of EI over academic qualifications. The importance of EI should not go unappreciated; the ability to understand and manage your emotions is the first step in realizing your true potential. How can we achieve meaningful progress if we dont recognize and acknowledge the point from where were starting? When checking directions on your sat-nav, a destination is useless unless we know the origin.Whether it be connecting with others and improving interpersonal communication, achieving success in the workplace or social relationships, dealing with stress and improving motivation or refining decision-making skills - emotional intelligence plays a central role in realizing success in both personal and professional life. [Extracted, with edits and revisions, from an article from positivepsychology.com, titled: The Importance of Emotional Intelligence, by Elaine Houston]How is EI connected to conventional intelligence?

View answer

[1]Studies of brain evolution are compelling because of their implications for understanding human evolution. [2]Consequently, researchers are motivated by a desire to find the causes of intelligence. [3]What is intelligence? [4]It is inevitably described with respect to human attributes; we consider ourselves intelligent, and we therefore compare other species to ourselves. [5]This view is legitimized by the fact that humans do have very sophisticated brains, exhibit extraordinarily complex behavior, and cope well in novel situations, generalizing from one problem to another.[6]Unfortunately, criteria applicable to humans are not necessarily appropriate for evaluating traits of other organisms. [7]There is no basis for the assumption that all intelligence is human-like intelligence, nor even for the preconception that all primate intelligence is human-like. [8]To say that intellectual prowess is comparative across species and to use humans as the basis for comparison is a continuation of pre-Darwinian ideas of a scala naturae dealing with intelligence. [9]If ranking species in a single phylogenetic line according to criteria based on the extant member is questionable, then certainly since ecological conditions and selection pressures change over time, ranking contemporary species separated by millions of years of evolution based on the traits exhibited by one is unjustifiable. [10]To assume a continuum of intelligence across today's species is incompatible with an evolutionary perspective, and this preconception must not be allowed to guide studies of brain evolution. [11]The information-processing systems of different animals have been designed to respond to different stimuli, diverse ""cognitive substrates,"" and therefore expectations of an interspecific regularity between these IPS and various other body measures are ill-conceived.[12]What # lacking # a good definition # intelligence that will allow us # say something # how an animal copes # its own ecology and not how closely # approximates human behavior. [13]There are undeniable trends in the history of life -- towards larger brains in mammals and larger neocortices in primates -- but to generalize correlations of these trends into a concept of intelligence should not be attempted until an accurate definition is developed. [14]Until that time, the most that comparative brain size studies can do is demonstrate correlations and thereby pose questions for scientists who focus on the evolution of species with one of these correlated characteristics.Q. Which set of words below contains the correct set of antonyms for all of the following words? Sophisticated, continuation, contemporary, diverse

View answer

[1]Studies of brain evolution are compelling because of their implications for understanding human evolution. [2]Consequently, researchers are motivated by a desire to find the causes of intelligence. [3]What is intelligence? [4]It is inevitably described with respect to human attributes; we consider ourselves intelligent, and we therefore compare other species to ourselves. [5]This view is legitimized by the fact that humans do have very sophisticated brains, exhibit extraordinarily complex behavior, and cope well in novel situations, generalizing from one problem to another.[6]Unfortunately, criteria applicable to humans are not necessarily appropriate for evaluating traits of other organisms. [7]There is no basis for the assumption that all intelligence is human-like intelligence, nor even for the preconception that all primate intelligence is human-like. [8]To say that intellectual prowess is comparative across species and to use humans as the basis for comparison is a continuation of pre-Darwinian ideas of a scala naturae dealing with intelligence. [9]If ranking species in a single phylogenetic line according to criteria based on the extant member is questionable, then certainly since ecological conditions and selection pressures change over time, ranking contemporary species separated by millions of years of evolution based on the traits exhibited by one is unjustifiable. [10]To assume a continuum of intelligence across today's species is incompatible with an evolutionary perspective, and this preconception must not be allowed to guide studies of brain evolution. [11]The information-processing systems of different animals have been designed to respond to different stimuli, diverse ""cognitive substrates,"" and therefore expectations of an interspecific regularity between these IPS and various other body measures are ill-conceived.[12]What # lacking # a good definition # intelligence that will allow us # say something # how an animal copes # its own ecology and not how closely # approximates human behavior. [13]There are undeniable trends in the history of life -- towards larger brains in mammals and larger neocortices in primates -- but to generalize correlations of these trends into a concept of intelligence should not be attempted until an accurate definition is developed. [14]Until that time, the most that comparative brain size studies can do is demonstrate correlations and thereby pose questions for scientists who focus on the evolution of species with one of these correlated characteristics.Q. The initial definition of ‘Intelligence’ is given with respect to Humans. This is considered acceptable to some because?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Crash Course for CLAT

CLAT Mock Test Series 2026

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

He is as intelligent if not more intelligent (A) / than his brother who has qualified (B) / for this post.(C) / no error (D)a)He is as intelligent if not more intelligentb)than his brother who has qualifiedc)for this post.d)no errorCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
He is as intelligent if not more intelligent (A) / than his brother who has qualified (B) / for this post.(C) / no error (D)a)He is as intelligent if not more intelligentb)than his brother who has qualifiedc)for this post.d)no errorCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about He is as intelligent if not more intelligent (A) / than his brother who has qualified (B) / for this post.(C) / no error (D)a)He is as intelligent if not more intelligentb)than his brother who has qualifiedc)for this post.d)no errorCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for He is as intelligent if not more intelligent (A) / than his brother who has qualified (B) / for this post.(C) / no error (D)a)He is as intelligent if not more intelligentb)than his brother who has qualifiedc)for this post.d)no errorCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for He is as intelligent if not more intelligent (A) / than his brother who has qualified (B) / for this post.(C) / no error (D)a)He is as intelligent if not more intelligentb)than his brother who has qualifiedc)for this post.d)no errorCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of He is as intelligent if not more intelligent (A) / than his brother who has qualified (B) / for this post.(C) / no error (D)a)He is as intelligent if not more intelligentb)than his brother who has qualifiedc)for this post.d)no errorCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of He is as intelligent if not more intelligent (A) / than his brother who has qualified (B) / for this post.(C) / no error (D)a)He is as intelligent if not more intelligentb)than his brother who has qualifiedc)for this post.d)no errorCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for He is as intelligent if not more intelligent (A) / than his brother who has qualified (B) / for this post.(C) / no error (D)a)He is as intelligent if not more intelligentb)than his brother who has qualifiedc)for this post.d)no errorCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of He is as intelligent if not more intelligent (A) / than his brother who has qualified (B) / for this post.(C) / no error (D)a)He is as intelligent if not more intelligentb)than his brother who has qualifiedc)for this post.d)no errorCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice He is as intelligent if not more intelligent (A) / than his brother who has qualified (B) / for this post.(C) / no error (D)a)He is as intelligent if not more intelligentb)than his brother who has qualifiedc)for this post.d)no errorCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam