All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  How can we know that an comprehension is argu... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
How can we know that an comprehension is argumentative,process, expository,descriptive?
Clear all your CLAT doubts with EduRev
Verified Answer
How can we know that an comprehension is argumentative,process, exposi...
Expository writing's main purpose is to explain. It is a subject-oriented writing style, in which authors focus on telling you about a given topic or subject without voicing their personal opinions. These types of essays or articles furnish you with relevant facts and figures but do not include their opinions. This is one of the most common types of writing. You always see it in textbooks and how-to articles. The author just tells you about a given subject, such as how to do something.

Key Points:
Usually explains something in a process.
Is often equipped with facts and figures.
Is usually in a logical order and sequence.

Descriptive writing's main purpose is to describe. It is a style of writing that focuses on describing a character, an event, or a place in great detail. It can be poetic when the author takes the time to be very specific in his or her descriptions.

Example:
In good descriptive writing, the author will not just say: “The vampire killed his lover.”

He or she will change the sentence, focusing on more details and descriptions, like: “The bloody, red-eyed vampire, sunk his rust-colored teeth into the soft skin of his lover and ended her life."

Persuasive writing's main purpose is to convince. Unlike expository writing, persuasive writing contains the opinions and biases of the author. To convince others to agree with the author's point of view, persuasive writing contains justifications and reasons. It is often used in letters of complaint, advertisements or commercials, affiliate marketing pitches, cover letters, and newspaper opinion and editorial pieces.

Key Points:
Persuasive writing is equipped with reasons, arguments, and justifications.
In persuasive writing, the author takes a stand and asks you to agree with his or her point of view.
It often asks for readers to do something about the situation (this is called a call-to-action).

Narrative writing's main purpose is to tell a story. The author will create different characters and tell you what happens to them (sometimes the author writes from the point of view of one of the characters—this is known as first person narration). Novels, short stories, novellas, poetry, and biographies can all fall in the narrative writing style. Simply, narrative writing answers the question: “What happened then?”

Key Points:
A person tells a story or event.
Has characters and dialogue.
This question is part of UPSC exam. View all CLAT courses
Most Upvoted Answer
How can we know that an comprehension is argumentative,process, exposi...
Identifying Types of Comprehension
Understanding the type of comprehension can be crucial in interpreting the content accurately. Here are some key points to consider:

Argumentative Comprehension
- Look for persuasive language and strong opinions in the text.
- Identify claims, evidence, and counterarguments presented.
- Pay attention to the author's tone and intent to persuade the reader.

Process Comprehension
- Notice if the text provides a step-by-step guide or instructions.
- Look for words like "first," "next," "then," which indicate a sequence.
- Identify any diagrams, charts, or visuals that explain a process.

Expository Comprehension
- Look for informative language and facts presented in a neutral tone.
- Identify definitions, explanations, and examples provided in the text.
- Pay attention to the organization of the text, such as headings and subheadings.

Descriptive Comprehension
- Notice detailed descriptions of people, places, or events in the text.
- Look for sensory language that appeals to the reader's senses.
- Identify the use of adjectives and adverbs to create vivid images.
By paying attention to these key points, you can determine whether a comprehension is argumentative, process-oriented, expository, or descriptive. Each type serves a different purpose and requires a specific approach to understanding the content effectively.
Attention CLAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions :Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions given after the passage1. Often, we passionately pursue matters that in the future appear to be contradictory to our real intention or nature and triumph is followed by remorse or regret. There are numerous examples of such a trend in the annals of history and contemporary life.2. Alfred Nobel was the son of Immanuel Nobel, an inventor who experimented extensively with explosives. Alfred too carried out research and experiments with a large range of chemicals he found new methods to blast rocks for the construction of roads and bridges he was engaged in the development of technology and different weapons his life revolved around rockets and cannons and gun powder. The ingenuity of the scientist brought him enough wealth to buy the Bofors armament plant in Sweden.3. Paradoxically, Nobels life was a busy one yet he was lonely and as he grew older, he began suffering from guilt of having invented the dynamite that was being used for destructive purposes. He set aside a huge part of his wealth to institute Nobel Prizes. Besides honouring men and women for their extraordinary achievements in physics, chemistry, medicine and literature, he wished to honour people who worked for the promotion of peace.4. Its strange that the very man whose name was closely connected with explosives and inventions that helped in waging wars willed a large part of his earnings for the people who work for the promotion of peace and the benefit of mankind. The Nobel Peace Prize is intended f or a person who has accomplished the best work for fraternity among nations, for abolition or reduction of war and for promotion of peace.5. Another example that comes to ones mind is that of Albert Einstein. In 1939, fearing that the Nazis would win the race to build the worlds first atomic bomb, Einstein urged President Franklin D Roosevelt to launch an American programme on nuclear research. The matter was considered and a project called the Manhattan Project was initiated. The project involved intense nuclear research the construction of the worlds first atomic bomb. All this while, Einstein had the impression that the bomb would be used to protect the world from the Nazis. But in 1945, when Hiroshima was bombed to end World War II, Einstein was deeply grieved and he regretted his endorsement of the need for nuclear research.6. He also stated that had he known that the Germans would be unsuccessful in making the atomic bomb, he would have probably never recommended making one. In 1947, Einstein began working for the cause of disarmament. But, Einsteins name still continues to be linked with the bomb. Mans fluctuating thoughts, changing opinions, varying opportunities keep the mind in a state of flux. Hence, the paradox of life: its certain that nothing is certain in life.Q.The passage is _____________.

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Cryptocurrencies are a terrible thing. They are the essence of a Ponzi scheme whose value is based entirely on a greater fool prepared to buy it. The promise of alchemy-turning lead into gold has bewitched humanity throughout the ages and cryptocurrencies are just the latest alchemy. Do not get me wrong, if rich people want to lose their money, in this or any other way, they should be allowed to do so. The rich should be the vanguards of new things in case something unforeseen and good falls out of them. But we need to protect those vulnerable consumers whose lives are such that almost any get-rich-quick schemes will be seductive, and seven out of 10 times, they will lose their life savings. Cryptocurrencies are todays South Sea Bubble – one of the earliest recorded financial bubbles that took place in the 1720s Britain. Meme-based currencies like Dogecoin, Dogelon Mars and Doge Dash remind me of the infamous plan of one company during the South Sea Bubble to raise money for carrying on an undertaking of great advantage but nobody to know what it is.The cryptocurrency bubble is worse than tulip mania. Through the veil of technology, cryptocurrency enthusiasts are leaning on policy-makers to permit them to be exempt from regulation, privatize money, and make money so disconnected from the economy that it would reap financial disaster. There are many reasons to avoid financial disasters, but one of them is that they ratchet up poverty and inequality. The current money-credit system is not perfect, but like democracy, it is the worst system barring all the others. It has evolved from the ashes of the system cryptocurrency enthusiasts are trying to resurrect.The current system is vulnerable to attack because money is little understood. Cryptocurrency enthusiasts have attracted a following based on the fiction that the central bank or government creates money and are busy debasing it in their self-interest. This is not the case, but then again, there is some overlap between cryptocurrency advocates, conspiracy theorists, and anti-vaxxers. The time has come for someone to stand up for the current fiat money system and explain that while it could be better still, it has been associated with far more growth, much more distributed, and has responded better to economic crisis than what came before.In todays money-credit system, banks create money when they issue a loan and place the loans proceeds into the account of their customers, creating a deposit. Money is, in fact, a tradable debt. The banks deposit can be used as cash because the bank is a regulated issuer of loans and deposit-taker, which gives the deposit credibility and convertibility. The central bank only influences the creation of money indirectly by its regulatory requirement that a proportion of the loans need to be funded by shareholders profits. They need to have skin in the game. Money creation then is based on thousands of separate decisions by loan officers and is more distributed than a centralized algorithm like Bitcoin. And its supply is determined by the private demand for loans, which means it is closely aligned to the economy.Q.Which of the following does best describe the passage?

Capitalism began as a theory about how the economy functions. It was both descriptive and prescriptive – it offered an account of how money worked and promoted the idea that reinvesting profits in production leads to fast economic growth. But capitalism gradually became far more than just an economic doctrine. It now encompasses an ethic – a set of teachings about how people should behave, educate their children and even think. Its principal tenet is that economic growth is the supreme good, or at least a proxy for the supreme good, because justice, freedom and even happiness all depend on economic growth. Ask a capitalist how to bring justice and political freedom to a place like Zimbabwe or Afghanistan, and you are likely to get a lecture on how economic affluence and a thriving middle class are essential for stable democratic institutions, and about the need therefore, to inculcate Afghan tribesmen in the values of free enterprise, thrift and self-reliance.This new religion has had a decisive influence on the development of modern science, too. Scientific research is usually funded by either governments or private businesses. When capitalist governments and businesses consider investing in a particular scientific project, the first questions are usually, ‘Will this project enable us to increase production and profits? Will it produce economic growth?’ A project that can’t clear these hurdles has little chance of finding a sponsor. No history of modern science can leave capitalism out of the picture.Conversely, the history of capitalism is unintelligible without taking science into account. Capitalism's belief in perpetual economic growth flies in the face of almost everything we know about the universe. A society of wolves would be extremely foolish to believe that the supply of sheep would keep on growing indefinitely. The human economy has nevertheless managed to grow exponentially throughout the modern era, thanks only to the fact that scientists come up with another discovery or gadget every few years – such as the continent of America, the internal combustion engine, or genetically engineered sheep. Banks and governments print money, but ultimately, it is the scientists who foot the bill.Which of the following could be the author's inference about Capitalism from the statement “it now encompasses an ethic”?

Directions: Read the passage and answer the question based on it.The world dismisses curiosity by calling it idle, or mere idle curiosity – even though curious persons are seldom idle. Parents do their best to extinguish curiosity in their children because it makes life difficult to be faced every day with a string of unanswerable questions about what makes fire hot or why grass grows. Children whose curiosity survives parental discipline are invited to join our university. Within the university, they go on asking their questions and trying to find the answers. In the eyes of a scholar, that is mainly what a university is for. Some of the questions that scholars ask seem to the world to be scarcely worth asking, let alone answering. They ask questions too minute and specialized for you and me to understand without years of explanation. If the world inquires one of them why he wants to know the answer to a particular question, he may say, especially if he is a scientist, that the answer will, in some obscure way, make possible a new machine or weapon or gadget. He talks that way because he knows that the world understands and respects utility. But to you who are now part of the university, he will say that he wants to know the answer, simply because he does not know it. The way a mountain climber wants to climb a mountain simply because it is there. Similarly a historian, when asked by outsiders why he studies history, may come out with an argument that he has learnt to repeat on such occasions, something about knowledge of the past, making it possible to understand the present and mould the future. But if you really want to know why a historian studies the past, the answer is much simpler: something happened, and he would like to know what. All this does not mean that the answers which scholars find to their questions have no consequences. They may have enormous consequences, but these seldom form the reason for asking the question or pursuing the answers. It is true that scholars can be put to work answering questions for the sake of the consequences, as thousands are working now, for example, in search of a cure for cancer. But this is not the primary function of the scholar, for the consequences are usually subordinate to the satisfaction of curiosity.Q. Common people consider some of the questions asked by scholars as unimportant

Progress is possible when you are not afraid of competition. Each and every person is unique, but he/she may have better qualities than you. If you want to reach your goal, make sure that you are perfect in it because there are thousands of people out there who want the same goal and who will go out of their way to reach their goal. Here is where competition steps in; many people are scared of it and are against it, but they don’t know the importance of it. Competition makes your goal a living thing; it ignites that fire within you to make your dream possible. Many people dream a new dream every day but the reason why they don’t succeed is because of the lack of better preparation for competition. For example, if a writer knows that there are 80 people out there dreaming the same dream, then he will try to perfect his skill in writing, increase his vocabulary and will do all other things to make himself perfect. This is called preparing for competition in a right way, but, when a person knows the competition but tries to excel in it through unlawful means, then that competition becomes unworthy for him and even though it results in progress, it’s not worth the success. Economics taught us that human wants are unlimited. So beware, don’t let the fire within you burn the goodwill of others. A healthy competition leads to progress: increase in one’s skill, increase in employment capability which in turn results in increase in earning capacity. When competing is treated as a healthy one, it results in national progress. The place where competition is mostly present is, during exams. When you are competing among thousands of individuals, you are merely testing your knowledge and you also get to know where you stand in the crowd. This is the main purpose of the exam, to merely test your knowledge in a competitive way. I think students should know this particular point - competition is just a part of life and not life itself. Sometimes the hunger for success makes your values famished. Now, those people who are not competitive enough or those who don’t stand a chance in the competition, it is an experience for them to know about their flaws and learn from them. Competition is a boon to mankind which leads to progress, progress for him and progress for his country.Q. In the light of the information given, which of the following phrases is least likely to be preferred by the author in describing the spirit of the competition?

Top Courses for CLATView all

Top Courses for CLAT

How can we know that an comprehension is argumentative,process, expository,descriptive?
Question Description
How can we know that an comprehension is argumentative,process, expository,descriptive? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about How can we know that an comprehension is argumentative,process, expository,descriptive? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for How can we know that an comprehension is argumentative,process, expository,descriptive?.
Solutions for How can we know that an comprehension is argumentative,process, expository,descriptive? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of How can we know that an comprehension is argumentative,process, expository,descriptive? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of How can we know that an comprehension is argumentative,process, expository,descriptive?, a detailed solution for How can we know that an comprehension is argumentative,process, expository,descriptive? has been provided alongside types of How can we know that an comprehension is argumentative,process, expository,descriptive? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice How can we know that an comprehension is argumentative,process, expository,descriptive? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup