CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Directions : In making decisions about import...
Start Learning for Free
Directions : In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between “strong” arguments and “weak” arguments in so far as they relate to the question. “Strong” arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. “Weak” arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.
Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the argument is a “strong” argument is and which is a “weak” argument. Give answer
If only argument I is “strong”.
If only argument II is “strong”.
If neither I nor II is “strong”.
If both I and II are “strong”.
Q Statement: Should books be abridged?
Arguments:
I. Yes, it will be a great service to those who can’t afford time.
II. No, it will be a great disservice to the author because the original flavour will be lost.
- a)1
- b)2
- c)3
- d)4
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Directions : In making decisions about important questions, it is desi...
Abridging a book can make it worse than it's original form and reading inaccurate content is worse than completing the book faster.
Hence only second argument is correct
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions : In making decisions about important questions, it is desi...
I think the answer is B because Abridging a book can make it worse than it's original form and reading inaccurate content is worse than completing the book faster.
Hence only second argument is correct
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
Directions : In making decisions about important questions, it is desi...
Understanding the Arguments
In evaluating the question of whether books should be abridged, we need to analyze both arguments presented to determine their strength.
Argument I: Yes, it will be a great service to those who can't afford time.
- This argument suggests that abridging books serves a practical purpose.
- It highlights a significant issue: the time constraints faced by many readers.
- However, while it addresses a valid concern, it does not consider the potential loss of content and depth that abridgment entails.
Argument II: No, it will be a great disservice to the author because the original flavour will be lost.
- This argument emphasizes the integrity of the author's work.
- It points out the importance of preserving the original message and essence of the book.
- This is a strong argument as it directly relates to the value of literature and respects the creative intent of authors.
Conclusion
- Argument I is more about convenience, which, while important, does not directly address the core issue of the book's integrity.
- Argument II strongly defends the author's perspective and the literary quality of the work.
Final Decision
Given the analysis, the correct answer is option 'B' — only argument II is strong. It effectively captures the essence of the debate surrounding abridged books by focusing on the importance of maintaining the author's original work.
In evaluating the question of whether books should be abridged, we need to analyze both arguments presented to determine their strength.
Argument I: Yes, it will be a great service to those who can't afford time.
- This argument suggests that abridging books serves a practical purpose.
- It highlights a significant issue: the time constraints faced by many readers.
- However, while it addresses a valid concern, it does not consider the potential loss of content and depth that abridgment entails.
Argument II: No, it will be a great disservice to the author because the original flavour will be lost.
- This argument emphasizes the integrity of the author's work.
- It points out the importance of preserving the original message and essence of the book.
- This is a strong argument as it directly relates to the value of literature and respects the creative intent of authors.
Conclusion
- Argument I is more about convenience, which, while important, does not directly address the core issue of the book's integrity.
- Argument II strongly defends the author's perspective and the literary quality of the work.
Final Decision
Given the analysis, the correct answer is option 'B' — only argument II is strong. It effectively captures the essence of the debate surrounding abridged books by focusing on the importance of maintaining the author's original work.
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Top Courses for CLATView all
Question Description
Directions : In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between “strong” arguments and “weak” arguments in so far as they relate to the question. “Strong” arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. “Weak” arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the argument is a “strong” argument is and which is a “weak” argument. Give answer If only argument I is “strong”. If only argument II is “strong”. If neither I nor II is “strong”. If both I and II are “strong”. Q Statement: Should books be abridged?Arguments:I. Yes, it will be a great service to those who can’t afford time.II. No, it will be a great disservice to the author because the original flavour will be lost.a)1b)2c)3d)4Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions : In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between “strong” arguments and “weak” arguments in so far as they relate to the question. “Strong” arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. “Weak” arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the argument is a “strong” argument is and which is a “weak” argument. Give answer If only argument I is “strong”. If only argument II is “strong”. If neither I nor II is “strong”. If both I and II are “strong”. Q Statement: Should books be abridged?Arguments:I. Yes, it will be a great service to those who can’t afford time.II. No, it will be a great disservice to the author because the original flavour will be lost.a)1b)2c)3d)4Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions : In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between “strong” arguments and “weak” arguments in so far as they relate to the question. “Strong” arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. “Weak” arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the argument is a “strong” argument is and which is a “weak” argument. Give answer If only argument I is “strong”. If only argument II is “strong”. If neither I nor II is “strong”. If both I and II are “strong”. Q Statement: Should books be abridged?Arguments:I. Yes, it will be a great service to those who can’t afford time.II. No, it will be a great disservice to the author because the original flavour will be lost.a)1b)2c)3d)4Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Directions : In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between “strong” arguments and “weak” arguments in so far as they relate to the question. “Strong” arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. “Weak” arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the argument is a “strong” argument is and which is a “weak” argument. Give answer If only argument I is “strong”. If only argument II is “strong”. If neither I nor II is “strong”. If both I and II are “strong”. Q Statement: Should books be abridged?Arguments:I. Yes, it will be a great service to those who can’t afford time.II. No, it will be a great disservice to the author because the original flavour will be lost.a)1b)2c)3d)4Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions : In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between “strong” arguments and “weak” arguments in so far as they relate to the question. “Strong” arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. “Weak” arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the argument is a “strong” argument is and which is a “weak” argument. Give answer If only argument I is “strong”. If only argument II is “strong”. If neither I nor II is “strong”. If both I and II are “strong”. Q Statement: Should books be abridged?Arguments:I. Yes, it will be a great service to those who can’t afford time.II. No, it will be a great disservice to the author because the original flavour will be lost.a)1b)2c)3d)4Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions : In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between “strong” arguments and “weak” arguments in so far as they relate to the question. “Strong” arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. “Weak” arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the argument is a “strong” argument is and which is a “weak” argument. Give answer If only argument I is “strong”. If only argument II is “strong”. If neither I nor II is “strong”. If both I and II are “strong”. Q Statement: Should books be abridged?Arguments:I. Yes, it will be a great service to those who can’t afford time.II. No, it will be a great disservice to the author because the original flavour will be lost.a)1b)2c)3d)4Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions : In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between “strong” arguments and “weak” arguments in so far as they relate to the question. “Strong” arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. “Weak” arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the argument is a “strong” argument is and which is a “weak” argument. Give answer If only argument I is “strong”. If only argument II is “strong”. If neither I nor II is “strong”. If both I and II are “strong”. Q Statement: Should books be abridged?Arguments:I. Yes, it will be a great service to those who can’t afford time.II. No, it will be a great disservice to the author because the original flavour will be lost.a)1b)2c)3d)4Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions : In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between “strong” arguments and “weak” arguments in so far as they relate to the question. “Strong” arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. “Weak” arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the argument is a “strong” argument is and which is a “weak” argument. Give answer If only argument I is “strong”. If only argument II is “strong”. If neither I nor II is “strong”. If both I and II are “strong”. Q Statement: Should books be abridged?Arguments:I. Yes, it will be a great service to those who can’t afford time.II. No, it will be a great disservice to the author because the original flavour will be lost.a)1b)2c)3d)4Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Directions : In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between “strong” arguments and “weak” arguments in so far as they relate to the question. “Strong” arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. “Weak” arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the argument is a “strong” argument is and which is a “weak” argument. Give answer If only argument I is “strong”. If only argument II is “strong”. If neither I nor II is “strong”. If both I and II are “strong”. Q Statement: Should books be abridged?Arguments:I. Yes, it will be a great service to those who can’t afford time.II. No, it will be a great disservice to the author because the original flavour will be lost.a)1b)2c)3d)4Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions : In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between “strong” arguments and “weak” arguments in so far as they relate to the question. “Strong” arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. “Weak” arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the argument is a “strong” argument is and which is a “weak” argument. Give answer If only argument I is “strong”. If only argument II is “strong”. If neither I nor II is “strong”. If both I and II are “strong”. Q Statement: Should books be abridged?Arguments:I. Yes, it will be a great service to those who can’t afford time.II. No, it will be a great disservice to the author because the original flavour will be lost.a)1b)2c)3d)4Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions : In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between “strong” arguments and “weak” arguments in so far as they relate to the question. “Strong” arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. “Weak” arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the argument is a “strong” argument is and which is a “weak” argument. Give answer If only argument I is “strong”. If only argument II is “strong”. If neither I nor II is “strong”. If both I and II are “strong”. Q Statement: Should books be abridged?Arguments:I. Yes, it will be a great service to those who can’t afford time.II. No, it will be a great disservice to the author because the original flavour will be lost.a)1b)2c)3d)4Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Directions : In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between “strong” arguments and “weak” arguments in so far as they relate to the question. “Strong” arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. “Weak” arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the argument is a “strong” argument is and which is a “weak” argument. Give answer If only argument I is “strong”. If only argument II is “strong”. If neither I nor II is “strong”. If both I and II are “strong”. Q Statement: Should books be abridged?Arguments:I. Yes, it will be a great service to those who can’t afford time.II. No, it will be a great disservice to the author because the original flavour will be lost.a)1b)2c)3d)4Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up
within 7 days!
within 7 days!
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup