Directions : In making decisions about important questions, it is desi...
Argument 1 - A country can't follow any other country decision Blindly. May be that country have enough surgeons. So this argument is weak.
Argument 2 - Foreign surgeons use Many high tech surgical instruments. Indian surgeons can work without those instruments easily. Another problem is communication during surgery. So this argument is strong.
Directions : In making decisions about important questions, it is desi...
Understanding the Arguments
In evaluating the question of whether foreign surgeons should be allowed to conduct surgeries in India, we look closely at the two arguments presented.
Argument I: Indian Surgeons' Restrictions
- Content: This argument states that Indian surgeons are not allowed to conduct surgeries abroad.
- Analysis: This point is weak because it highlights a perceived inconsistency without addressing the core issue—whether foreign surgeons should operate in India. It does not provide compelling reasons related to the quality of care or safety, making it a minor consideration.
Argument II: Familiarity with Environment
- Content: This argument posits that foreign surgeons may struggle in an unfamiliar environment, with new assistants and potentially inferior instruments.
- Analysis: This argument is strong because it directly relates to the quality of surgical care that patients might receive. It highlights the challenges that foreign surgeons could face, which may affect patient safety and outcomes. The concerns raised are important as they involve the effectiveness and reliability of medical procedures.
Conclusion
Given the analysis, we conclude that:
- Argument I is weak as it does not address the core issue effectively.
- Argument II is strong as it directly pertains to the operational challenges foreign surgeons may encounter, impacting surgical outcomes.
Thus, the correct answer is option B, indicating that only argument II is strong.