Arguments against Separate Electorate in the Constitution Assembly:

1. Promotes Division:
- Separate electorates based on religion can lead to further division among communities.
- It can create a sense of 'us vs. them' mentality, which goes against the idea of a united nation.

2. Hinders National Integration:
- Separate electorates can hinder the process of national integration by emphasizing differences rather than promoting unity.
- It can lead to the formation of exclusive communities rather than a cohesive society.

3. Violates Principles of Equality:
- Separate electorates based on religion go against the principle of equality among citizens.
- It can lead to unequal representation and discrimination based on religious beliefs.

4. Encourages Vote Bank Politics:
- Separate electorates can encourage vote bank politics, where politicians exploit religious sentiments for electoral gains.
- It can lead to the neglect of development issues in favor of communal politics.

5. Contradicts Secularism:
- Separate electorates based on religion contradict the secular principles of the Constitution.
- It can undermine the idea of a secular state where religion should not play a role in politics.
In conclusion, the inclusion of separate electorates in the Constitution Assembly can have negative consequences on the unity, equality, and secular fabric of the nation. It is essential to promote a society where citizens are treated equally regardless of their religious beliefs.

It’s was regarded that separate electorates was a necessary creation of the imperial rule in India .It followed the concept of divide and rule, and if it continues it would be a major threat to majority and minority.The minorities would never be able to live a better life .