Why did the Nuremburg Tribunal sentence only 11 Nazis to death for such a massive genocide?a)Only these 11 Nazis were found guiltyb)The Allies did not want to be harsh on the defeated Germany as they had been after World War Ic)Germany promised never to repeat such an actd)Germany was ready to pay a huge compensation to the Allied countries for these killingsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Question

Answer

The correct answer is "B". Actually,they did not want to repeat the same mistakes that they did after the World War I. The world war II was a way through which the citizens of Nazi Germany sought to take revenge for their humiliation and disgrace caused by the treaty of versailles. In order to avoid such situations,Nuremberg Tribunal decided not to be harsh on them as they had been earlier. Maybe they felt guilty about it.

Answer

The correct answer is 'B'. Actually,they did not want to repeat the same mistakes that they did after the World War I. The world war II was a way through which the citizens of Nazi Germany sought to take revenge for their humiliation and disgrace caused by the treaty of versailles. In order to avoid such situations,Nuremberg Tribunal decided not to be harsh on them as they had been earlier. Maybe they felt guilty about it.

Answer

Introduction
The Nuremberg Tribunal, held after World War II, was an international military tribunal established to prosecute prominent members of the political, military, and economic leadership of Nazi Germany. The question asks why only 11 Nazis were sentenced to death for the massive genocide committed during the war.

Explanation
The correct answer to this question is option B: The Allies did not want to be harsh on the defeated Germany as they had been after World War I. Here is an explanation of why this answer is correct:

1. Desire for a fair and just trial
- The Nuremberg Tribunal aimed to establish a fair and just trial process to hold the Nazis accountable for their crimes.
- The Allies wanted to differentiate themselves from the harsh treatment Germany received after World War I, which many believed contributed to the rise of Nazi ideology and the Second World War.

2. Legal framework and due process
- The Nuremberg Tribunal operated within a legal framework that required sufficient evidence and due process before sentencing individuals to death.
- The defendants were charged with crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity, and the burden of proof was on the prosecution to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

3. Evidence and culpability
- The prosecution had to prove the direct involvement of the defendants in the commission of the crimes.
- While there were many individuals responsible for the atrocities committed during the war, not all of them were present at the trial, and not all of them could be directly linked to specific crimes.

4. Fair representation and international consensus
- The Nuremberg Tribunal sought fair representation by including judges from the four Allied powers (United States, Soviet Union, United Kingdom, and France).
- The decision to sentence only 11 Nazis to death was reached through international consensus, considering the evidence presented and the gravity of their crimes.

5. Symbolic value and lessons learned
- The Nuremberg Trials aimed to establish the principle that individuals could be held accountable for crimes against humanity, even if they were acting on behalf of a state.
- By sentencing some of the highest-ranking Nazis to death, the tribunal sought to send a strong message that such atrocities would not go unpunished.

Conclusion
In conclusion, the Nuremberg Tribunal sentenced only 11 Nazis to death for the massive genocide committed during World War II because the Allies wanted to ensure a fair trial, avoid repeating the mistakes of the past, and establish the principle of individual accountability for crimes against humanity. The decision was reached through a legal process, considering the evidence presented and the international consensus among the judges.

Similar UPSC Doubts

Consider the following statements about Ecocide1. The term ‘Ecocide’ translates to ‘killing one’s home’ or ‘environment’.2. Ecocide is a crime in 11 countries including India.Choose the correct statements

What is the role of international law, human rights norms, and global justice in addressing issues such as genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity within the PSIR syllabus?

Top Courses for UPSCView all

Current Affairs & Hindu Analysis: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Lucent for GK

History for UPSC CSE

Indian Polity for UPSC CSE

CSAT Preparation

Top Courses for UPSC

Top Courses for UPSC

Related Content

About UPSC

UPSC Preparation Material

NCERT Based Study Material

How to Prepare for UPSC Exam?

Famous Books for UPSC Exam

UPSC Subjects

UPSC Optionals

Other Popular Exams

Company