The poet experiences conflicting emotions on seeing the snake under the influence of his education and civilization that have shaped his thought processes. Instinctively, he begins to like the snake and treats him like a guest who has come to drink water at his trough. But rationally he thinks that he should kill the snake as it is poisonous. So he hurls a log at the snake influenced by the voice of his education.

The poet was conflicted between two thoughts i.e :-
i.. he thought that the snake had came to his home like a guest so he have to treat him like a guest but
ii.. he also thought the snake is poisonous so he should kill him.

Introduction:
The poet experiences conflicting emotions on seeing the snake due to the complex nature of the encounter. The encounter with the snake stirs up a mixture of fear, admiration, and guilt within the poet, leading to conflicting emotions.

Fear:
The poet initially experiences fear upon seeing the snake. The snake is described as "a golden color" and "like a king in exile," which signifies its majestic and intimidating presence. The poet's fear arises from the inherent danger associated with snakes, as they are often associated with venomous bites and potential harm to humans. This fear is heightened by the snake's sudden appearance and its "soft-bellied" movement, which contrasts with the poet's perception of snakes as dangerous creatures.

Admiration:
Despite the fear, the poet also experiences a sense of admiration for the snake. The poet describes the snake as "earth-brown, earth-golden," highlighting its connection to nature and its beauty. The snake's gracefulness and elegance in its movement evoke a sense of awe and admiration in the poet. The poet is captivated by the snake's ability to move effortlessly and silently, praising its "perfect patterned skin" and its "neck in undulation."

Guilt:
Alongside fear and admiration, the poet also experiences guilt upon seeing the snake. The poet reflects on the snake's displacement and loss of habitat, describing it as a "king in exile" and a "stranger." This evokes a sense of empathy and guilt within the poet, as they recognize the impact of human activities on the natural world. The poet's guilt is further emphasized when they mention throwing a log at the snake, a momentary act of aggression that they immediately regret. This guilt arises from the poet's realization that their fear and instinctive reaction have disrupted the snake's peaceful presence.

Conclusion:
The conflicting emotions of fear, admiration, and guilt experienced by the poet upon seeing the snake stem from the complex nature of the encounter. The snake's intimidating presence triggers fear, while its beauty and gracefulness evoke admiration. Simultaneously, the poet feels guilty for disturbing the snake's tranquility and recognizes the impact of human actions on nature. This emotional conflict highlights the intricate relationship between humans and the natural world.