A is beating Z and Y jumps in to stop beating. In the process A intent...
If while A is beating Z, Y interferes, and A intentionally strikes Y, here as the blow given to Y, is not part of the act whereby A voluntarily causes hurt to Z, A is liable to separate punishments. One for beating Z, another for intentionally striking Y.
A is beating Z and Y jumps in to stop beating. In the process A intent...
Explanation:
Context: A is beating Z and Y jumps in to stop the beating. In the process, A intentionally strikes Y.
Legal Principle: In criminal law, a person can be held liable for multiple offenses if they commit multiple acts that constitute separate offenses. Each offense is considered as a separate act and can be punished individually.
Application:
1. Voluntarily causing hurt to Z:
- A is liable for voluntarily causing hurt to Z because A was beating Z initially.
- This offense is a separate act from the subsequent act of striking Y.
- A can be punished for this act under the relevant provisions of the law.
2. Intentionally striking Y:
- A intentionally strikes Y while Y tries to stop the beating of Z.
- This act constitutes a separate offense from the act of beating Z.
- A can be held liable for voluntarily causing hurt to Y and can be punished for this act under the relevant provisions of the law.
Conclusion: Based on the legal principle and the application to the given scenario, the correct answer is option 'A': A is liable to one punishment for voluntarily causing hurt to Z and to another punishment for the blow given to Y. A can be held accountable for both acts separately and can be punished accordingly.
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.