CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >   Directions: The question consists of two sta... Start Learning for Free
Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.
Principle: Where anything which is an offence is made up of parts, any of which parts is itself an offence, the offender shall not be punished with the punishment of more than one of such his of­fences, unless it is so expressly provided.
Facts: While A is beating Z, Y interferes, and A intentionally strikes Y. The blow given to Y is not the part of the act as A is voluntarily causing hurt to Z.
Would beating Y be counted as a voluntary offence or not?
  • a)
    Yes, because both Y and Z are beaten equally.
  • b)
    No, because Y himself interfered in the matter of A and Z.
  • c)
    Yes, because Y is beaten intentionally while A was beating Z.
  • d)
    No, because beating Y is secondary offence committed by A.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as ...
A is liable to one punishment for voluntarily causing hurt to Z, and to another for the blow given to Y. Beating Y cannot be treated as the voluntary offence because in the beginning, A did not have intention to beat Y and according to the given principle, where anything, which is an offence, is made up of parts, any of which parts is itself an offence, the offender shall not be punished with the punishment of more than one of such his of­fences, unless it is so expressly provided.
Attention CLAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The Code on the basis of the gravity of the physical assault has classified hurt into simple and grievous so that the accused might be awarded punishment commensurate to his guilt. Though it is very difficult and absolutely impossible to draw a thin line of distinction between the two forms of hurts - simple and grievous - with perfect accuracy, the Code has attempted to classify certain kinds of hurt as grievous. According to section 320, I.P.C., eight kinds of hurts are designated as grievous, and this section reads: 320. Grievous hurt- The following kinds of hurt only are designated as "grievous":-- Firstly.—Emasculation. Secondly.-- Permanent privation of the sight of either eye. Thirdly. Permanent privation of the hearing of either ear, Fourthly.-- Privation of any member or joint. Fifthly.-- Destruction or permanent impairing of the powers of any member or joint. Sixthly.--Permanent disfiguration of the head or face. Seventhly.-- Fracture or dislocation of a bone or tooth. Eighthly.-- Any hurt which endangers life or which causes the sufferer to be during the space of twenty days in severe bodily pain, or unable to follow his ordinary pursuits. Dangerous Hurt: The provisions contained in clause 8 of section 320, I.P.C., are of a general nature. This clause is borrowed from French Penal Code. It refers to three classes of injuries which are not covered under any one of the above clauses 1 to 7 of the section 320. It labels the following hurts as grievous, viz., those: (i) which endangers life; or (ii) which causes the sufferer to be, during the space of 20 days, in severe bodily pain; or (iii) which causes the sufferer to be, during the space of twenty days, unable to follow his ordinary pursuits; State of Gujarat v. Samaj, MANU/GJ/0064/1969 : AIR 1969 Guj 337.From the above discussions, it is clear that grievous hurt is more serious kind of hurt. It must be a hurt of any of the kinds stated in section 320, I.P.C. and must be caused voluntarily. Sections 321 and 322, I.P.C. define, what is meant by expression "voluntarily causing hurt" and "voluntarily causing grievous hurt" respectively.Q.Which of the following statements is accurate regarding the situation where Ravi, while driving recklessly on a busy street, accidentally struck a pedestrian, resulting in severe injuries to the pedestrian, who experienced severe bodily pain for more than 20 days and was unable to pursue their ordinary activities during that time?

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Once the Supreme Court announces its final judgement in a case involving capital punishment, the death row convict may file a mercy petition directly, or through prison officials, or through the governor of the state where he is imprisoned or via the union home ministry.The philosophy underlying the pardon power is that "every civilised country recognises and provides for the pardoning power as an act of grace and humanity in course of law".The pardoning power is founded on the consideration of public good and is to be exercised on the grounds of public welfare, which is the legitimate objective of all punishments.Article 72 of the Constitution deals with the grant of pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence where the sentence is a sentence of death. While the state governor also has pardoning powers, death sentences are not part of these.The recommendations of the Home Ministry may be returned to get further clarifications. The ministry can also itself recall its recommendation to provide a fresh input.There is no fixed time frame to decide on the recommendation of the ministry of home affairs.Q. With reference to the procedure of the Mercy petitions in India, consider the following statements:Statement I: A mercy petition can be filed only by Indian Citizens.Statement II: There is no time limit for the president to respond on the mercy petition.Statement III: In India, the authority to pardon a death sentence is with the President only.Which among the above statement(s) is/are correct?

Top Courses for CLAT

Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: Where anything which is an offence is made up of parts, any of which parts is itself an offence, the offender shall not be punished with the punishment of more than one of such his of­fences, unless it is so expressly provided.Facts: While A is beating Z, Y interferes, and A intentionally strikes Y. The blow given to Y is not the part of the act as A is voluntarily causing hurt to Z.Would beating Y be counted as a voluntary offence or not?a)Yes, because both Y and Z are beaten equally.b)No, because Y himself interfered in the matter of A and Z.c)Yes, because Y is beaten intentionally while A was beating Z.d)No, because beating Y is secondary offence committed by A.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: Where anything which is an offence is made up of parts, any of which parts is itself an offence, the offender shall not be punished with the punishment of more than one of such his of­fences, unless it is so expressly provided.Facts: While A is beating Z, Y interferes, and A intentionally strikes Y. The blow given to Y is not the part of the act as A is voluntarily causing hurt to Z.Would beating Y be counted as a voluntary offence or not?a)Yes, because both Y and Z are beaten equally.b)No, because Y himself interfered in the matter of A and Z.c)Yes, because Y is beaten intentionally while A was beating Z.d)No, because beating Y is secondary offence committed by A.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: Where anything which is an offence is made up of parts, any of which parts is itself an offence, the offender shall not be punished with the punishment of more than one of such his of­fences, unless it is so expressly provided.Facts: While A is beating Z, Y interferes, and A intentionally strikes Y. The blow given to Y is not the part of the act as A is voluntarily causing hurt to Z.Would beating Y be counted as a voluntary offence or not?a)Yes, because both Y and Z are beaten equally.b)No, because Y himself interfered in the matter of A and Z.c)Yes, because Y is beaten intentionally while A was beating Z.d)No, because beating Y is secondary offence committed by A.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: Where anything which is an offence is made up of parts, any of which parts is itself an offence, the offender shall not be punished with the punishment of more than one of such his of­fences, unless it is so expressly provided.Facts: While A is beating Z, Y interferes, and A intentionally strikes Y. The blow given to Y is not the part of the act as A is voluntarily causing hurt to Z.Would beating Y be counted as a voluntary offence or not?a)Yes, because both Y and Z are beaten equally.b)No, because Y himself interfered in the matter of A and Z.c)Yes, because Y is beaten intentionally while A was beating Z.d)No, because beating Y is secondary offence committed by A.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: Where anything which is an offence is made up of parts, any of which parts is itself an offence, the offender shall not be punished with the punishment of more than one of such his of­fences, unless it is so expressly provided.Facts: While A is beating Z, Y interferes, and A intentionally strikes Y. The blow given to Y is not the part of the act as A is voluntarily causing hurt to Z.Would beating Y be counted as a voluntary offence or not?a)Yes, because both Y and Z are beaten equally.b)No, because Y himself interfered in the matter of A and Z.c)Yes, because Y is beaten intentionally while A was beating Z.d)No, because beating Y is secondary offence committed by A.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: Where anything which is an offence is made up of parts, any of which parts is itself an offence, the offender shall not be punished with the punishment of more than one of such his of­fences, unless it is so expressly provided.Facts: While A is beating Z, Y interferes, and A intentionally strikes Y. The blow given to Y is not the part of the act as A is voluntarily causing hurt to Z.Would beating Y be counted as a voluntary offence or not?a)Yes, because both Y and Z are beaten equally.b)No, because Y himself interfered in the matter of A and Z.c)Yes, because Y is beaten intentionally while A was beating Z.d)No, because beating Y is secondary offence committed by A.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: Where anything which is an offence is made up of parts, any of which parts is itself an offence, the offender shall not be punished with the punishment of more than one of such his of­fences, unless it is so expressly provided.Facts: While A is beating Z, Y interferes, and A intentionally strikes Y. The blow given to Y is not the part of the act as A is voluntarily causing hurt to Z.Would beating Y be counted as a voluntary offence or not?a)Yes, because both Y and Z are beaten equally.b)No, because Y himself interfered in the matter of A and Z.c)Yes, because Y is beaten intentionally while A was beating Z.d)No, because beating Y is secondary offence committed by A.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: Where anything which is an offence is made up of parts, any of which parts is itself an offence, the offender shall not be punished with the punishment of more than one of such his of­fences, unless it is so expressly provided.Facts: While A is beating Z, Y interferes, and A intentionally strikes Y. The blow given to Y is not the part of the act as A is voluntarily causing hurt to Z.Would beating Y be counted as a voluntary offence or not?a)Yes, because both Y and Z are beaten equally.b)No, because Y himself interfered in the matter of A and Z.c)Yes, because Y is beaten intentionally while A was beating Z.d)No, because beating Y is secondary offence committed by A.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: Where anything which is an offence is made up of parts, any of which parts is itself an offence, the offender shall not be punished with the punishment of more than one of such his of­fences, unless it is so expressly provided.Facts: While A is beating Z, Y interferes, and A intentionally strikes Y. The blow given to Y is not the part of the act as A is voluntarily causing hurt to Z.Would beating Y be counted as a voluntary offence or not?a)Yes, because both Y and Z are beaten equally.b)No, because Y himself interfered in the matter of A and Z.c)Yes, because Y is beaten intentionally while A was beating Z.d)No, because beating Y is secondary offence committed by A.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: Where anything which is an offence is made up of parts, any of which parts is itself an offence, the offender shall not be punished with the punishment of more than one of such his of­fences, unless it is so expressly provided.Facts: While A is beating Z, Y interferes, and A intentionally strikes Y. The blow given to Y is not the part of the act as A is voluntarily causing hurt to Z.Would beating Y be counted as a voluntary offence or not?a)Yes, because both Y and Z are beaten equally.b)No, because Y himself interfered in the matter of A and Z.c)Yes, because Y is beaten intentionally while A was beating Z.d)No, because beating Y is secondary offence committed by A.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev