CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >   Directions: Kindly read the given informatio... Start Learning for Free
Directions: Kindly read the given information carefully and answer the question that follows.
Principles1: Any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by a public servant is liable for punishment.
Principles2: Nothing is an offence if the person who committed it was winnable to appreciate the consequences of his act, due to intoxication, provided such intoxication was administered against his will and without his consent. (NLS 1990)
Facts: Krishna got drunk of his own volition and on his way back home he assaulted a policeman. He is prosecuted for intimidating a public servant.
Is Mr. Krishna liable for punishment"?
  • a)
    Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he assaulted a policeman.
  • b)
    No, Krishna is not liable for punishment as he was drunk.
  • c)
    Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he got drunk of his own volition and assaulted a policeman.
  • d)
    None of the above
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Directions: Kindly read the given information carefully and answer th...
The Defense of Intoxication is available in the Indian Penal Code when the said state is not caused by voluntary Act. Krishna Drunk on his volition and hence his Act is punishable.
View all questions of this test
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Top Courses for CLAT

Directions: Kindly read the given information carefully and answer the question that follows.Principles1: Any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by a public servant is liable for punishment.Principles2: Nothing is an offence if the person who committed it was winnable to appreciate the consequences of his act, due to intoxication, provided such intoxication was administered against his will and without his consent. (NLS 1990)Facts: Krishna got drunk of his own volition and on his way back home he assaulted a policeman. He is prosecuted for intimidating a public servant.Is Mr. Krishna liable for punishment"?a)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he assaulted a policeman.b)No, Krishna is not liable for punishment as he was drunk.c)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he got drunk of his own volition and assaulted a policeman.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: Kindly read the given information carefully and answer the question that follows.Principles1: Any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by a public servant is liable for punishment.Principles2: Nothing is an offence if the person who committed it was winnable to appreciate the consequences of his act, due to intoxication, provided such intoxication was administered against his will and without his consent. (NLS 1990)Facts: Krishna got drunk of his own volition and on his way back home he assaulted a policeman. He is prosecuted for intimidating a public servant.Is Mr. Krishna liable for punishment"?a)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he assaulted a policeman.b)No, Krishna is not liable for punishment as he was drunk.c)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he got drunk of his own volition and assaulted a policeman.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Kindly read the given information carefully and answer the question that follows.Principles1: Any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by a public servant is liable for punishment.Principles2: Nothing is an offence if the person who committed it was winnable to appreciate the consequences of his act, due to intoxication, provided such intoxication was administered against his will and without his consent. (NLS 1990)Facts: Krishna got drunk of his own volition and on his way back home he assaulted a policeman. He is prosecuted for intimidating a public servant.Is Mr. Krishna liable for punishment"?a)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he assaulted a policeman.b)No, Krishna is not liable for punishment as he was drunk.c)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he got drunk of his own volition and assaulted a policeman.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Kindly read the given information carefully and answer the question that follows.Principles1: Any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by a public servant is liable for punishment.Principles2: Nothing is an offence if the person who committed it was winnable to appreciate the consequences of his act, due to intoxication, provided such intoxication was administered against his will and without his consent. (NLS 1990)Facts: Krishna got drunk of his own volition and on his way back home he assaulted a policeman. He is prosecuted for intimidating a public servant.Is Mr. Krishna liable for punishment"?a)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he assaulted a policeman.b)No, Krishna is not liable for punishment as he was drunk.c)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he got drunk of his own volition and assaulted a policeman.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: Kindly read the given information carefully and answer the question that follows.Principles1: Any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by a public servant is liable for punishment.Principles2: Nothing is an offence if the person who committed it was winnable to appreciate the consequences of his act, due to intoxication, provided such intoxication was administered against his will and without his consent. (NLS 1990)Facts: Krishna got drunk of his own volition and on his way back home he assaulted a policeman. He is prosecuted for intimidating a public servant.Is Mr. Krishna liable for punishment"?a)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he assaulted a policeman.b)No, Krishna is not liable for punishment as he was drunk.c)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he got drunk of his own volition and assaulted a policeman.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Kindly read the given information carefully and answer the question that follows.Principles1: Any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by a public servant is liable for punishment.Principles2: Nothing is an offence if the person who committed it was winnable to appreciate the consequences of his act, due to intoxication, provided such intoxication was administered against his will and without his consent. (NLS 1990)Facts: Krishna got drunk of his own volition and on his way back home he assaulted a policeman. He is prosecuted for intimidating a public servant.Is Mr. Krishna liable for punishment"?a)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he assaulted a policeman.b)No, Krishna is not liable for punishment as he was drunk.c)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he got drunk of his own volition and assaulted a policeman.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Kindly read the given information carefully and answer the question that follows.Principles1: Any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by a public servant is liable for punishment.Principles2: Nothing is an offence if the person who committed it was winnable to appreciate the consequences of his act, due to intoxication, provided such intoxication was administered against his will and without his consent. (NLS 1990)Facts: Krishna got drunk of his own volition and on his way back home he assaulted a policeman. He is prosecuted for intimidating a public servant.Is Mr. Krishna liable for punishment"?a)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he assaulted a policeman.b)No, Krishna is not liable for punishment as he was drunk.c)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he got drunk of his own volition and assaulted a policeman.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Kindly read the given information carefully and answer the question that follows.Principles1: Any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by a public servant is liable for punishment.Principles2: Nothing is an offence if the person who committed it was winnable to appreciate the consequences of his act, due to intoxication, provided such intoxication was administered against his will and without his consent. (NLS 1990)Facts: Krishna got drunk of his own volition and on his way back home he assaulted a policeman. He is prosecuted for intimidating a public servant.Is Mr. Krishna liable for punishment"?a)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he assaulted a policeman.b)No, Krishna is not liable for punishment as he was drunk.c)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he got drunk of his own volition and assaulted a policeman.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Kindly read the given information carefully and answer the question that follows.Principles1: Any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by a public servant is liable for punishment.Principles2: Nothing is an offence if the person who committed it was winnable to appreciate the consequences of his act, due to intoxication, provided such intoxication was administered against his will and without his consent. (NLS 1990)Facts: Krishna got drunk of his own volition and on his way back home he assaulted a policeman. He is prosecuted for intimidating a public servant.Is Mr. Krishna liable for punishment"?a)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he assaulted a policeman.b)No, Krishna is not liable for punishment as he was drunk.c)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he got drunk of his own volition and assaulted a policeman.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Kindly read the given information carefully and answer the question that follows.Principles1: Any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by a public servant is liable for punishment.Principles2: Nothing is an offence if the person who committed it was winnable to appreciate the consequences of his act, due to intoxication, provided such intoxication was administered against his will and without his consent. (NLS 1990)Facts: Krishna got drunk of his own volition and on his way back home he assaulted a policeman. He is prosecuted for intimidating a public servant.Is Mr. Krishna liable for punishment"?a)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he assaulted a policeman.b)No, Krishna is not liable for punishment as he was drunk.c)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he got drunk of his own volition and assaulted a policeman.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev