Question Description
Principles 1: Any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by a public servant is liable for punishment.Principles 2: Nothing is an offence if the person who committed it was winnable to appreciate the consequences of his act, due to intoxication, provided such intoxication was administered against his will and without his consent. (NLS 1990)Facts: Krishna got drunk of his own volition and on his way back home he assaulted a policeman. He is prosecuted for intimidating a public servant.Q. Is Mr. Krishna liable for punishment"?a)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he assaulted a policeman.b)No, Krishna is not liable for punishment as he was drunk.c)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he got drunk of his own volitiond)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principles 1: Any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by a public servant is liable for punishment.Principles 2: Nothing is an offence if the person who committed it was winnable to appreciate the consequences of his act, due to intoxication, provided such intoxication was administered against his will and without his consent. (NLS 1990)Facts: Krishna got drunk of his own volition and on his way back home he assaulted a policeman. He is prosecuted for intimidating a public servant.Q. Is Mr. Krishna liable for punishment"?a)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he assaulted a policeman.b)No, Krishna is not liable for punishment as he was drunk.c)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he got drunk of his own volitiond)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principles 1: Any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by a public servant is liable for punishment.Principles 2: Nothing is an offence if the person who committed it was winnable to appreciate the consequences of his act, due to intoxication, provided such intoxication was administered against his will and without his consent. (NLS 1990)Facts: Krishna got drunk of his own volition and on his way back home he assaulted a policeman. He is prosecuted for intimidating a public servant.Q. Is Mr. Krishna liable for punishment"?a)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he assaulted a policeman.b)No, Krishna is not liable for punishment as he was drunk.c)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he got drunk of his own volitiond)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Principles 1: Any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by a public servant is liable for punishment.Principles 2: Nothing is an offence if the person who committed it was winnable to appreciate the consequences of his act, due to intoxication, provided such intoxication was administered against his will and without his consent. (NLS 1990)Facts: Krishna got drunk of his own volition and on his way back home he assaulted a policeman. He is prosecuted for intimidating a public servant.Q. Is Mr. Krishna liable for punishment"?a)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he assaulted a policeman.b)No, Krishna is not liable for punishment as he was drunk.c)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he got drunk of his own volitiond)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Principles 1: Any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by a public servant is liable for punishment.Principles 2: Nothing is an offence if the person who committed it was winnable to appreciate the consequences of his act, due to intoxication, provided such intoxication was administered against his will and without his consent. (NLS 1990)Facts: Krishna got drunk of his own volition and on his way back home he assaulted a policeman. He is prosecuted for intimidating a public servant.Q. Is Mr. Krishna liable for punishment"?a)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he assaulted a policeman.b)No, Krishna is not liable for punishment as he was drunk.c)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he got drunk of his own volitiond)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Principles 1: Any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by a public servant is liable for punishment.Principles 2: Nothing is an offence if the person who committed it was winnable to appreciate the consequences of his act, due to intoxication, provided such intoxication was administered against his will and without his consent. (NLS 1990)Facts: Krishna got drunk of his own volition and on his way back home he assaulted a policeman. He is prosecuted for intimidating a public servant.Q. Is Mr. Krishna liable for punishment"?a)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he assaulted a policeman.b)No, Krishna is not liable for punishment as he was drunk.c)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he got drunk of his own volitiond)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principles 1: Any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by a public servant is liable for punishment.Principles 2: Nothing is an offence if the person who committed it was winnable to appreciate the consequences of his act, due to intoxication, provided such intoxication was administered against his will and without his consent. (NLS 1990)Facts: Krishna got drunk of his own volition and on his way back home he assaulted a policeman. He is prosecuted for intimidating a public servant.Q. Is Mr. Krishna liable for punishment"?a)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he assaulted a policeman.b)No, Krishna is not liable for punishment as he was drunk.c)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he got drunk of his own volitiond)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principles 1: Any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by a public servant is liable for punishment.Principles 2: Nothing is an offence if the person who committed it was winnable to appreciate the consequences of his act, due to intoxication, provided such intoxication was administered against his will and without his consent. (NLS 1990)Facts: Krishna got drunk of his own volition and on his way back home he assaulted a policeman. He is prosecuted for intimidating a public servant.Q. Is Mr. Krishna liable for punishment"?a)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he assaulted a policeman.b)No, Krishna is not liable for punishment as he was drunk.c)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he got drunk of his own volitiond)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Principles 1: Any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by a public servant is liable for punishment.Principles 2: Nothing is an offence if the person who committed it was winnable to appreciate the consequences of his act, due to intoxication, provided such intoxication was administered against his will and without his consent. (NLS 1990)Facts: Krishna got drunk of his own volition and on his way back home he assaulted a policeman. He is prosecuted for intimidating a public servant.Q. Is Mr. Krishna liable for punishment"?a)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he assaulted a policeman.b)No, Krishna is not liable for punishment as he was drunk.c)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he got drunk of his own volitiond)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.