CLAT Legal Aptitude or Legal Reasoning is a section in law entrance exams that holds maximum weightage and demands candidates to possess good knowledge of fundamentals. Roughly 25% of questions in CLAT Exam will be asked from the Legal Reasoning Section making it one of the most common and important sections of this Law Entrance Exam.
Legal Reasoning- A Tie Breaker Section: CLAT Legal Reasoning section is quite important for an additional reason as it's a tiebreaker section. By tiebreaker section of CLAT, we mean that you get a better ranking with the help of the scores you get in the CLAT Legal Reasoning Section.
Most students appear in front of their mentors in a state of panic, worried about the many legal principles they need to memorise. The good news is that you are not required to memorise any of them! This is not a test of Legal Knowledge. Instead, they test your ability to interpret the given principle correctly, strictly adhere to it and apply it to the given facts. It is more of a test of language and reasoning skills.
Here are stepwise strategies compiled by EduRev Experts on the guidance of various CLAT toppers which will help you to clear Legal Reasoning for CLAT in an excellent manner.
CLAT Legal Reasoning questions will mainly follow the pattern of principle-fact-based questions, herein you are provided with a legal proposition (principle) and a set of facts to which the proposition (principle) has to be applied. Legal Aptitude for CLAT has become a comprehension-based aptitude test wherein the questions are indirect and inference-based.
Question Pattern and Marking Overview
In this section, you will be expected to read passages of around 450 words each. The passages may relate to fact situations or scenarios involving legal matters, public policy questions or moral philosophical enquiries. You will not require any prior knowledge of law to attempt the questions in this section. You will benefit from a general awareness of contemporary legal and moral issues to better apply general principles or propositions to the given fact scenarios.
Each passage would be followed by a series of questions that will require you to:
The thing you should know before starting the preparation for the CLAT Legal Aptitude section is that this section is only going to test your legal reasoning. Legal reasoning is not about knowledge, it’s about reasoning as you can tell from the name. Your knowledge of the law is not being assessed here.
Generally, the passages of legal reasoning are taken from legal journals, newspapers, articles, and editorials involving legal matters, public policy questions, or moral philosophical inquiries.
Here are some of the most important legal reasoning topics you should focus on while preparing for the exam:
CLAT Legal Reasoning can be divided into 3 categories:
(i) Legal Theory
(ii) Current Legal Affairs
(iii) Legal Maxims, Foreign Phrases & Legal Terms
Here's how you can tackle them individually:
Lot of you would be of the opinion that what is the need of studying legal theory because the pattern has changed and the passage that will come in the exam would be related to some legal concept or some general legal news. But studying the Legal Theory portion is important for you to understand the passage.
Reading Legal Theory on regular basis is very important to understand the concepts and to apply those concepts in your factual situation so that you can easily figure out the answer.
The following topics are covered in the Legal Theory-
The above topics are written in order of their importance, For example, we can say that Torts, Contracts, and Criminal Law are the most important topics.
You should start with reading the Constitution of India, Criminal Law, Torts, Contracts, Family Law and Miscellaneous Laws like: Concepts of CRPC, Basic Consumer Laws, Basic Environmental Laws. Terms and concepts of various laws
Recent judgments and questions on the legal field related to legal affairs will be asked under this section.
Direct Questions from these topics might not come. However, this section will require you to have basic knowledge of concepts of law and other legal principles and Latin terms which are used in Law.
Do not forget to have a look at following important topics:
23 docs, 81 videos & 51 tests
CLAT is a lengthy paper in which candidates are required to read complex legal and non-legal texts in a short time. So, the focus should be on increasing reading speed while studying legal awareness.
Allocate at least 2 hours daily to your CLAT Study Plan for Legal Reasoning. Consistency is key in mastering Legal Reasoning. Invest regular time to cover topics, attempt questions, and revise concepts.
Look for all the mistakes that you have committed.
Look for all the questions that you couldn't solve.
Look for all the wrong answers that you marked.
Fortnightly: Revise Legal Theory. At least revise theory of a particular topic once in 15 days.
Here are a few CLAT Legal Aptitude Preparation Tips you can follow to quickly answer all the questions asked in the Legal Aptitude section:
Mock Test Series for CLAT
Includes 45 tests
Practice with as many previous year papers as you can get. Make a list of the principles on which questions were framed in the past. Read all of them and then mark a set of principles that have been repeated time and again. And of course, there will be a completely new set of principles every year. Be prepared for anything that you might not have expected.
Contract of Law:
(i) Contract Of Law Test-1
(ii) Contract Of Law Test-2
(iii) Contract Of Law Test-3
(iv) Contract Of Law Test-4
(v) Contract Of Law Test-5
Criminal Law:
(i) Criminal Law Test-1
(ii) Criminal Law Test-2
(iii) Criminal Law Test-3
(iv) Criminal Law Test-4
(v) Criminal Law Test-5
(vi) For more tests - Legal Aptitude Practice test
CLAT Past Year Papers
Includes 15 tests
Till 2019, you were presented with the statements and facts. But from 2020, you are expected to comprehend the passages and draw facts and arguments independently.
The following are some of the important CLAT Logical Reasoning questions.
(1) The old woman didn’t like the look or sound of the kid. She scowled at her husband. ‘Where did you pick up this kitten from? Why do we need her?’ When the old man told her she was a goat kid, she picked her up and exclaimed in amazement: ‘Yes, she is a goat kid!’ All night, they went over how the kid had come into their hands.
That same night the old lady gave the goat kid that resembled a kitten a nickname: Poonachi. She once had a cat by the same name. In memory of that beloved cat, this goat kid, too, was named Poonachi. They had acquired her without spending a penny. Now they had to look after her somehow. Her husband had told her a vague story about meeting a demon who looked like Bakasuran and receiving the kid from him as a gift. She wondered if he could have stolen it from a goatherd. Someone might come looking for it tomorrow. Maybe her husband had told her the story only to cover up his crime?
The old woman was not used to lighting lamps at night. The couple ate their evening meal and went to bed at dusk. That night, though, she took a large earthen lamp and filled it with castor oil extracted the year before. There was no cotton for a wick. She tore off a strip from a discarded loincloth of her husband’s and fashioned it into a wick.
She looked at the kid under the lamplight in that shed as though she were seeing her own child after a long time. There was no bald spot or bruise anywhere on her body. The kid was all black. As she stared at the lamp, her wide-open eyes were starkly visible. There was a trace of fatigue on her face. The old woman thought the kid looked haggard because she had not been fed properly. She must be just a couple of days old. A determination that she must somehow raise this kid to adulthood took root in her heart.
She called the old man to come and see the kid. She looked like a black lump glittering in the lamplight on that pitch-black night. He pulled fondly at her flapping ears and said, ‘Aren’t you lucky to come and live here?’
It had been a long time since the couple had such pleasant chit-chat. Because of the kid’s sudden entry into their lives, they talked about the old days.
[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from Poonachi, or the Story of a Black Goat, by Perumal Murugan, translated by N. Kalyan Raman, Context, 2018.]
Question 1: Why did the old woman doubt her husband’s story about how he had got the kid?
(a) Because goat kids are only sold in livestock markets.
(b) She thought the story was vague and that he had stolen it from a goatherd.
(c) Because she did not think Bakasuran was so generous as to gift him a goat kid.
(d) Her husband was a habitual thief and regularly stole things from others.
Rationale: The correct answer is (b) – because she thought the story was vague and that he had actually stolen it from a goatherd. Both these points are set out in the third paragraph. No information in the passage would support the claim in option (a); similarly, there is nothing in the passage to indicate that the old woman thought Bakasuran was not generous, and neither is there any information in the passage to indicate that her husband was a habitual thief, and so, neither (a), (c), nor (d) is correct.
Question 2: Why did the old woman name the goat kid ‘Poonachi’?
(a) Because the kid made small bleating noises that sounded like ‘Poonachi’.
(b) Because the kid reminded the old woman of her husband, whose name was also Poonachi.
(c) Because the old woman had first thought the kid was a kitten, she named it after a beloved cat she had once had.
(d) Because ‘Poonachi’ was the name typically given to goat kids in the area the couple lived in.
Rationale: The correct answer is (c) – because the old woman had first thought the kid was a kitten, and so she named it after a beloved cat she had once had. This is apparent from the first three sentences of the third paragraph. There is no indication of any noises made by the kid in the passage, so option (a) cannot be correct. Similarly, there is no indication of the old woman’s husband’s name in the passage, so option (b) cannot be correct either. Option (d) cannot be correct since there is no information in the passage about what name was typically given to kids in the area where the old couple lived.
Question 3: What does the word ‘haggard’ as used in the passage mean?
(a) Dark in colour and hard to see.
(b) Looking exhausted and unwell.
(c) Direct and outspoken.
(d) Furry and warm.
Rationale: The correct answer is (b) – looking exhausted and unwell. This can be inferred from the information in the fifth paragraph, which indicates a trace of fatigue on the kid’s face and that the old woman thought the kid looked haggard because she had not been fed properly. Both these pieces of information, that is, that the kid looked fatigued, and had not been fed properly, would support the meaning of ‘haggard’ set out in option (b). While the passage also discusses how dark the kid is, this discussion is not related to using the word ‘haggard’ in any way, so option (a) cannot be correct. Nothing in the passage indicates that the kid made any sounds, so option (c) cannot be correct. Neither is there any discussion in the passage about how furry the kid may have been, so option (d) cannot be correct.
Question 4: Why was the old woman not used to lighting lamps at night?
(a) Because the couple usually ate their evening meal and slept at dusk.
(b) Because her daughter used to light the lamps in their household.
(c) Because the couple was very poor and could not afford oil for lamps.
(d) Because the old couple did not usually exchange pleasant chit-chat.
Rationale: The correct answer is (a) – because the old couple usually ate their evening meal and slept at dusk. This is apparent from the first two lines of the fourth paragraph. The passage does not mention the couple’s daughter, so option (b) cannot be correct. Neither option (c) nor option (d) is related to the author’s explanation of why the old woman was not used to lighting lamps at night.
Q.1. How do I increase the speed of solving legal reasoning questions in CLAT?
Q.2. What should be an ideal strategy for solving legal reasoning in the new CLAT pattern and tackle the lengthy passages?
Q.3. Is there negative marking in the CLAT Legal Reasoning Section?
Yes, there is negative marking in the CLAT Exam, including the Legal Reasoning section. One-fourth (0.25) marks will be deducted for each wrong answer.
Q.4. What is the weightage of Legal Reasoning section in CLAT?
The Legal Reasoning section usually carries a weightage of 25% in the CLAT Exam.
2 videos|10 docs|83 tests
|
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|