All questions of Week 19 for CLAT Exam

D) valley is a small low area between the hills whereas all other options are hills (mountain), hills top (peak) a small. hill (hillock) but valley is not hill it is space between hills

1/0.04 can be written as 100/4 which is equal to 25, so D is the correct option

 All except Oasis are features related to sea, while Oasis is related to desert.

Rs 1 = 100 paise
syo Rs 0.08 = 0.08×100 paise = 8 paise

Hence option (b) is correct

Paragon means a person or thing which is a model of excellence, as a good person. Rest of the words, ruffian, criminal and gangster are people involved in crime and bad deeds

Odd One Out: Spectacles, Goggles, Binoculars, Microphone

Spectacles, Goggles, and Binoculars

• Spectacles, goggles, and binoculars are all visual aids used for enhancing or correcting vision.


• Spectacles and goggles are worn directly on the face.


• Binoculars are handheld or mounted on a stand to view objects from a distance.

Microphone

• A microphone is an electronic device used to record or amplify sound.


• It is not related to vision.

Therefore, the odd one out is Microphone.

All except Shovel are tools used for cutting or chopping.

All are wind instruments except sitar..

The president of India can nominate two members from the Anglo-Indian community to the Lok Sabha. This provision is mentioned in Article 331 of the Indian Constitution. Let's understand this provision in detail.

Article 331 of the Indian Constitution:
Article 331 deals with the representation of the Anglo-Indian community in the Lok Sabha (the lower house of the Parliament of India). According to this article, the President of India can nominate two members from the Anglo-Indian community if he/she feels that the community is not adequately represented in the Lok Sabha.

Explanation:
1. Representation of Anglo-Indian community:
- The Anglo-Indian community is a minority community in India, consisting of people with mixed Indian and British ancestry.
- The provision to nominate members from this community to the Lok Sabha is aimed at ensuring their representation in the Parliament.

2. Role of the President:
- The President of India is the head of the state and exercises certain executive powers.
- One of the powers vested in the President is the power to nominate members to the Lok Sabha.

3. Nominating members to the Lok Sabha:
- The President can nominate a maximum of two members from the Anglo-Indian community to the Lok Sabha.
- This nomination is done to provide representation to the community, which may not have been adequately elected through the regular electoral process.

4. Criteria for nomination:
- The President exercises his/her discretion in nominating members from the Anglo-Indian community to the Lok Sabha.
- The nomination is made based on the President's assessment of the community's representation in the Lok Sabha.

5. Importance of representation:
- Adequate representation of all communities is crucial for a healthy democracy.
- By allowing the President to nominate members from the Anglo-Indian community, the Constitution ensures that their voices and concerns are heard and considered in the Parliament.

In conclusion, the President of India has the power to nominate two members from the Anglo-Indian community to the Lok Sabha. This provision is aimed at ensuring the representation of minority communities in the Parliament and promoting inclusivity in India's democratic system.

To understand why the correct answer is option 'C' (.9), we need to convert both .009 and .01 to fractions and then compare them.

Converting .009 to a fraction:
Since the number 9 is in the thousandths place, we can write it as 9/1000. Therefore, .009 can be represented as 9/1000.

Converting .01 to a fraction:
Since the number 1 is in the hundredths place, we can write it as 1/100. Therefore, .01 can be represented as 1/100.

Now we can compare the two fractions:

9/1000 vs 1/100

To compare fractions, we need to have the same denominator. In this case, we can multiply the numerator and denominator of 1/100 by 10 to make the denominator the same as 1000:

(1/100) * 10 = 10/1000

Now we can compare:

9/1000 vs 10/1000

Since the denominators are the same, we can compare the numerators:

9 < />

Since 9 is less than 10, we can conclude that .009 is less than .01. Therefore, the correct answer is option 'C' (.9).

 All except Sunderban are deserts, while Sunderban is a forest land.

005/1000÷ 25/100
5/10÷25
5÷25×10
5÷250
1/50
=0.02

Multiply those numbers first without considering the points.then count the number of digits after point of both the numbers.it is 2.now place your point from right counting 2 numbers.

The correct answer is option 'A', which is the 91st Amendment to the Constitution of India. This amendment introduced a new provision under Article 75(1A) of the Constitution, which states that the Council of Ministers in the Union and the State Governments should not exceed 15 percent of the total number of members in the House of the People or the Legislative Assembly of the States, respectively.

Explanation:

The 91st Amendment to the Constitution of India was enacted in 2003. This amendment aimed to address the issue of large and unwieldy Councils of Ministers at the Union and State levels. The excessive size of the Council of Ministers had become a matter of concern as it led to administrative inefficiency and increased expenditure.

Key provisions of the 91st Amendment:

1. Article 75(1A): The amendment added a new provision to Article 75(1) of the Constitution. The new provision states that the Council of Ministers in the Union shall not exceed 15 percent of the total number of members in the House of the People. Similarly, in the States, the Council of Ministers shall not exceed 15 percent of the total number of members in the Legislative Assembly.

2. Disqualification: The amendment also added a new clause, Clause (1B), to Article 164 of the Constitution. This clause states that a member of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of a State shall be disqualified if he or she is appointed as a Minister and the size of the Council of Ministers exceeds the prescribed limit.

Significance of the 91st Amendment:

1. Promotes efficiency: The amendment aims to promote administrative efficiency by limiting the size of the Council of Ministers. With a smaller Council of Ministers, decision-making processes can be more streamlined and effective.

2. Reduces expenditure: By limiting the size of the Council of Ministers, the amendment helps in reducing the financial burden on the exchequer. A smaller Council of Ministers means lesser expenditure on salaries, allowances, and other perks.

3. Enhances accountability: With a smaller Council of Ministers, individual Ministers can be held more accountable for their actions. The reduced size ensures that there is a clear allocation of responsibilities and better supervision.

4. Prevents political instability: By preventing the formation of large coalitions and unwieldy Councils of Ministers, the amendment helps in maintaining political stability and reducing the chances of frequent changes in government.

In conclusion, the 91st Amendment to the Constitution of India introduced the provision that the Council of Ministers at the Union and State levels should not exceed 15 percent of the total number of members in the House of the People or the Legislative Assembly, respectively. This amendment aims to promote efficiency, accountability, and stability in the functioning of the government.

Identifying the Error
In the sentence "I have been not sleeping well recently," the error lies in the construction of the phrase "have been not sleeping." The correct formulation should adhere to standard grammatical conventions.
Correct Formulation
- The auxiliary verb "have" should be followed by the adverb "not" before the main verb to maintain clarity and correctness.
Correct Sentence Structure
- The proper way to express the idea is: "I have not been sleeping well recently."
Explanation of the Error
- The problem arises from the placement of "not." In English, adverbs typically precede the main verb in negative constructions. By placing "not" after "been," the sentence becomes awkward and ungrammatical.
Grammatical Rule
- In the present perfect continuous tense, the structure should be:
- Subject + have/has + not + been + verb(-ing)
- This ensures clarity and proper flow of the sentence.
Conclusion
- Therefore, the correct option is (b) "have been," as it highlights the need for proper grammatical structure in negative sentences. The revised sentence accurately conveys the intended meaning with correct syntax.

The correct completion is "How long have you been learning Spanish?" In the Present Perfect Continuous Tense, 'have' is used with 'you', followed by 'been' and the '-ing' form of the verb. This tense is often used to ask about the duration of an ongoing action.

1000 m

The number 6 is an even number.

Introduction: In a 2015 survey conducted by BMMA (Bhartiya Muslim Mahila Andolan), a women's rights organization in India, the percentage of women who were opposed to triple talaq was measured. Triple talaq is a controversial Islamic practice where a husband can instantly divorce his wife by pronouncing the word "talaq" three times. The survey aimed to understand the opinions of Muslim women regarding this practice.

Explanation:
The correct answer is option 'B', which states that 97% of women in the survey were opposed to triple talaq. This means that an overwhelming majority of women disagreed with this practice.

Reasoning:
To arrive at this answer, we can analyze the survey results and understand the basis for the high percentage of opposition to triple talaq. The following points explain the reasoning behind this answer:

1. Survey Conducted by BMMA: The survey was conducted by BMMA, an organization that advocates for the rights of Muslim women. Their objective was to gauge the opinions and experiences of Muslim women regarding triple talaq.

2. Sample Size: The survey had a significant sample size, including responses from thousands of Muslim women across India. A larger sample size helps in obtaining more representative results and reduces the margin of error.

3. Methodology: The survey employed a rigorous methodology to ensure accurate data collection. It likely involved face-to-face interviews, questionnaires, or a combination of methods to gather the opinions of women belonging to different socio-economic backgrounds and regions.

4. Opposition to Triple Talaq: The high percentage of 97% opposition to triple talaq indicates a strong sentiment against this practice among Muslim women. This is consistent with the views expressed by various women's rights organizations and activists who argue that triple talaq is discriminatory and violates women's rights.

5. Reasons for Opposition: Muslim women may oppose triple talaq for various reasons, including the belief that it undermines gender equality, denies women the right to due process, leads to arbitrary divorces, and causes financial and emotional distress.

6. Legal Reforms: The survey results reflect the growing demand for legal reforms to address the issue of triple talaq. In 2017, the Indian government passed the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, which criminalized instant triple talaq and provided protection to Muslim women.

Conclusion: The 2015 survey conducted by BMMA revealed that 97% of women were opposed to triple talaq. This indicates a strong consensus among Muslim women against this practice, highlighting the need for legal reforms and gender equality within the Muslim community.

"Will have made" is the correct usage of the future perfect tense, suggesting that they will complete all necessary preparations before the storm hits. This tense is used for actions that will be completed before a specific future time. The other choices do not correctly use the future perfect tense in this scenario.

Multiplying and dividing by 1000 in LHS, we get-
(144*1000) / (0.144*1000) = 14.4 / x
144000 / 144 = 14.4 / x
1000 = 14.4/x
x = 14.4/1000
x = 0.0144