LR Exam > LR Questions > Principle:Nothing, which is not intended to c...
Start Learning for Free
Principle: Nothing, which is not intended to cause death, is an offence by reason of any harm which it may cause, or be intended by the doer to cause, or be known by the doer to be likely to cause, to any person for whose benefit it is done in good faith, and who has given a consent, whether express or implied, to suffer that harm, or to take the risk of that harm.
Facts: A fake Doctor operated on a man for internal piles by cutting them out with an ordinary knife. The man died of hemorrhage.
- a)Doctor is guilty of murder
- b)Doctor is not guilty
- c)Doctor is guilty of death caused by rash and negligent act.
- d)None of the above
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Principle:Nothing, which is not intended to cause death, is an offence...
Of course the answer is A. The first line itself says a 'fake' doctor. Which means he is not authorised to operate, yet he decided to treat a patient. This is not allowed by the law. Only a trained professional is permitted, mind you, after he/she has obtained a licence, to operate upon a patient. Hence the answer will be A, the man is liable for murder.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
Principle:Nothing, which is not intended to cause death, is an offence...
Principle:
According to the principle mentioned, nothing which is not intended to cause death is an offense if the harm caused is for the benefit of the person who has given consent. The harm caused should be done in good faith and the person should have given express or implied consent to suffer or take the risk of that harm.
Facts:
A fake doctor operated on a man for internal piles using an ordinary knife. Unfortunately, the man died due to hemorrhage.
Answer:
The correct answer is option 'A': The doctor is guilty of murder.
Explanation:
The principle states that no offense is caused if the harm is not intended to cause death and if the person for whose benefit it is done has given consent. However, there are certain exceptions to this principle. In this case, the doctor is not a qualified professional and is a fake doctor. Operating on someone without proper medical knowledge and qualifications is considered a reckless and negligent act.
Death caused by a rash and negligent act:
The doctor, in this case, performed a surgical procedure using an ordinary knife instead of the appropriate medical instruments. This act shows a lack of skill, knowledge, and proper medical judgment. Operating on a person without the necessary expertise and using improper instruments can lead to serious complications and, in this case, resulted in the man's death due to hemorrhage. Such an act can be deemed as a rash and negligent act.
Murder:
Murder is the intentional killing of a person with malice aforethought. In this case, although the doctor did not intend to cause the man's death, the act of performing a surgical procedure without proper qualifications and using an ordinary knife shows a reckless disregard for the man's life. The doctor's actions can be considered as a clear case of gross negligence, which led to the man's death. Therefore, the doctor can be held guilty of murder.
Conclusion:
Considering the facts and applying the principle, it is evident that the doctor is guilty of murder due to the reckless and negligent act of operating on the man without proper qualifications and using an ordinary knife, which resulted in his death.
According to the principle mentioned, nothing which is not intended to cause death is an offense if the harm caused is for the benefit of the person who has given consent. The harm caused should be done in good faith and the person should have given express or implied consent to suffer or take the risk of that harm.
Facts:
A fake doctor operated on a man for internal piles using an ordinary knife. Unfortunately, the man died due to hemorrhage.
Answer:
The correct answer is option 'A': The doctor is guilty of murder.
Explanation:
The principle states that no offense is caused if the harm is not intended to cause death and if the person for whose benefit it is done has given consent. However, there are certain exceptions to this principle. In this case, the doctor is not a qualified professional and is a fake doctor. Operating on someone without proper medical knowledge and qualifications is considered a reckless and negligent act.
Death caused by a rash and negligent act:
The doctor, in this case, performed a surgical procedure using an ordinary knife instead of the appropriate medical instruments. This act shows a lack of skill, knowledge, and proper medical judgment. Operating on a person without the necessary expertise and using improper instruments can lead to serious complications and, in this case, resulted in the man's death due to hemorrhage. Such an act can be deemed as a rash and negligent act.
Murder:
Murder is the intentional killing of a person with malice aforethought. In this case, although the doctor did not intend to cause the man's death, the act of performing a surgical procedure without proper qualifications and using an ordinary knife shows a reckless disregard for the man's life. The doctor's actions can be considered as a clear case of gross negligence, which led to the man's death. Therefore, the doctor can be held guilty of murder.
Conclusion:
Considering the facts and applying the principle, it is evident that the doctor is guilty of murder due to the reckless and negligent act of operating on the man without proper qualifications and using an ordinary knife, which resulted in his death.
|
Explore Courses for LR exam
|
|
Similar LR Doubts
Principle:Nothing, which is not intended to cause death, is an offence by reason of any harm which it may cause, or be intended by the doer to cause, or be known by the doer to be likely to cause, to any person for whose benefit it is done in good faith, and who has given a consent, whether express or implied, to suffer that harm, or to take the risk of that harm.Facts: A fake Doctor operated on a man for internal piles by cutting them out with an ordinary knife. The man died of hemorrhage.a)Doctor is guilty of murderb)Doctor is not guiltyc)Doctor is guilty of death caused by rash and negligent act.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Principle:Nothing, which is not intended to cause death, is an offence by reason of any harm which it may cause, or be intended by the doer to cause, or be known by the doer to be likely to cause, to any person for whose benefit it is done in good faith, and who has given a consent, whether express or implied, to suffer that harm, or to take the risk of that harm.Facts: A fake Doctor operated on a man for internal piles by cutting them out with an ordinary knife. The man died of hemorrhage.a)Doctor is guilty of murderb)Doctor is not guiltyc)Doctor is guilty of death caused by rash and negligent act.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for LR 2025 is part of LR preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the LR exam syllabus. Information about Principle:Nothing, which is not intended to cause death, is an offence by reason of any harm which it may cause, or be intended by the doer to cause, or be known by the doer to be likely to cause, to any person for whose benefit it is done in good faith, and who has given a consent, whether express or implied, to suffer that harm, or to take the risk of that harm.Facts: A fake Doctor operated on a man for internal piles by cutting them out with an ordinary knife. The man died of hemorrhage.a)Doctor is guilty of murderb)Doctor is not guiltyc)Doctor is guilty of death caused by rash and negligent act.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for LR 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle:Nothing, which is not intended to cause death, is an offence by reason of any harm which it may cause, or be intended by the doer to cause, or be known by the doer to be likely to cause, to any person for whose benefit it is done in good faith, and who has given a consent, whether express or implied, to suffer that harm, or to take the risk of that harm.Facts: A fake Doctor operated on a man for internal piles by cutting them out with an ordinary knife. The man died of hemorrhage.a)Doctor is guilty of murderb)Doctor is not guiltyc)Doctor is guilty of death caused by rash and negligent act.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Principle:Nothing, which is not intended to cause death, is an offence by reason of any harm which it may cause, or be intended by the doer to cause, or be known by the doer to be likely to cause, to any person for whose benefit it is done in good faith, and who has given a consent, whether express or implied, to suffer that harm, or to take the risk of that harm.Facts: A fake Doctor operated on a man for internal piles by cutting them out with an ordinary knife. The man died of hemorrhage.a)Doctor is guilty of murderb)Doctor is not guiltyc)Doctor is guilty of death caused by rash and negligent act.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for LR 2025 is part of LR preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the LR exam syllabus. Information about Principle:Nothing, which is not intended to cause death, is an offence by reason of any harm which it may cause, or be intended by the doer to cause, or be known by the doer to be likely to cause, to any person for whose benefit it is done in good faith, and who has given a consent, whether express or implied, to suffer that harm, or to take the risk of that harm.Facts: A fake Doctor operated on a man for internal piles by cutting them out with an ordinary knife. The man died of hemorrhage.a)Doctor is guilty of murderb)Doctor is not guiltyc)Doctor is guilty of death caused by rash and negligent act.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for LR 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle:Nothing, which is not intended to cause death, is an offence by reason of any harm which it may cause, or be intended by the doer to cause, or be known by the doer to be likely to cause, to any person for whose benefit it is done in good faith, and who has given a consent, whether express or implied, to suffer that harm, or to take the risk of that harm.Facts: A fake Doctor operated on a man for internal piles by cutting them out with an ordinary knife. The man died of hemorrhage.a)Doctor is guilty of murderb)Doctor is not guiltyc)Doctor is guilty of death caused by rash and negligent act.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Principle:Nothing, which is not intended to cause death, is an offence by reason of any harm which it may cause, or be intended by the doer to cause, or be known by the doer to be likely to cause, to any person for whose benefit it is done in good faith, and who has given a consent, whether express or implied, to suffer that harm, or to take the risk of that harm.Facts: A fake Doctor operated on a man for internal piles by cutting them out with an ordinary knife. The man died of hemorrhage.a)Doctor is guilty of murderb)Doctor is not guiltyc)Doctor is guilty of death caused by rash and negligent act.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for LR.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for LR Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Principle:Nothing, which is not intended to cause death, is an offence by reason of any harm which it may cause, or be intended by the doer to cause, or be known by the doer to be likely to cause, to any person for whose benefit it is done in good faith, and who has given a consent, whether express or implied, to suffer that harm, or to take the risk of that harm.Facts: A fake Doctor operated on a man for internal piles by cutting them out with an ordinary knife. The man died of hemorrhage.a)Doctor is guilty of murderb)Doctor is not guiltyc)Doctor is guilty of death caused by rash and negligent act.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Principle:Nothing, which is not intended to cause death, is an offence by reason of any harm which it may cause, or be intended by the doer to cause, or be known by the doer to be likely to cause, to any person for whose benefit it is done in good faith, and who has given a consent, whether express or implied, to suffer that harm, or to take the risk of that harm.Facts: A fake Doctor operated on a man for internal piles by cutting them out with an ordinary knife. The man died of hemorrhage.a)Doctor is guilty of murderb)Doctor is not guiltyc)Doctor is guilty of death caused by rash and negligent act.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle:Nothing, which is not intended to cause death, is an offence by reason of any harm which it may cause, or be intended by the doer to cause, or be known by the doer to be likely to cause, to any person for whose benefit it is done in good faith, and who has given a consent, whether express or implied, to suffer that harm, or to take the risk of that harm.Facts: A fake Doctor operated on a man for internal piles by cutting them out with an ordinary knife. The man died of hemorrhage.a)Doctor is guilty of murderb)Doctor is not guiltyc)Doctor is guilty of death caused by rash and negligent act.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle:Nothing, which is not intended to cause death, is an offence by reason of any harm which it may cause, or be intended by the doer to cause, or be known by the doer to be likely to cause, to any person for whose benefit it is done in good faith, and who has given a consent, whether express or implied, to suffer that harm, or to take the risk of that harm.Facts: A fake Doctor operated on a man for internal piles by cutting them out with an ordinary knife. The man died of hemorrhage.a)Doctor is guilty of murderb)Doctor is not guiltyc)Doctor is guilty of death caused by rash and negligent act.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Principle:Nothing, which is not intended to cause death, is an offence by reason of any harm which it may cause, or be intended by the doer to cause, or be known by the doer to be likely to cause, to any person for whose benefit it is done in good faith, and who has given a consent, whether express or implied, to suffer that harm, or to take the risk of that harm.Facts: A fake Doctor operated on a man for internal piles by cutting them out with an ordinary knife. The man died of hemorrhage.a)Doctor is guilty of murderb)Doctor is not guiltyc)Doctor is guilty of death caused by rash and negligent act.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice LR tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for LR exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup