Legal Principle: One of the principles of andlsquo;Natural Justiceandrsquo; states that, andldquo;No person shall be a judge in his own causeandrdquo;.Facts: A, a driver of B, a Branch Manager of ABC Bank was caught, suspecting theft, in the bank premises. The Bank management instituted an enquiry and made B the enquiry officer.Which of the following statements is correct?Options:a)As B is a Bank Manager and not a judge, this principle is inapplicable.b)Since the suspected theft was in the bank premises, the manager is the only competent person to enquire. Hence, the principle is not applicable.c)Since B is the employer of A, B should not be conducting the enquiry on the basis of the given principle.d)The principle will be applicable, only if the theft committed by A was in relation to the car.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Legal Principle: One of the principles of &ls...

Legal Principle: One of the principles of ‘Natural Justice’ states that, “No person shall be a judge in his own cause”.

Facts: A, a driver of B, a Branch Manager of ABC Bank was caught, suspecting theft, in the bank premises. The Bank management instituted an enquiry and made B the enquiry officer.Which of the following statements is correct?
Options:

a)
As B is a Bank Manager and not a judge, this principle is inapplicable.
b)
Since the suspected theft was in the bank premises, the manager is the only competent person to enquire. Hence, the principle is not applicable.
c)
Since B is the employer of A, B should not be conducting the enquiry on the basis of the given principle.
d)
The principle will be applicable, only if the theft committed by A was in relation to the car.

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

Legal Principle: One of the principles of ‘Natural Justice&rsquo...

The Correct Answer is Option C: Since B is the employer of A, B should not be conducting the enquiry on the basis of the given principle.Explanation:Applicability of the Legal Principle:The legal principle of "No person shall be a judge in his own cause" is a fundamental principle of natural justice. It ensures fairness and impartiality in decision-making processes. According to this principle, a person who has a personal interest or bias in a matter should not be allowed to decide the outcome of that matter. This principle applies in situations where a person is expected to act as a judge or decision-maker.Analysis of the Facts:In the given scenario, A, a driver of B (the Branch Manager of ABC Bank), was caught suspecting theft within the bank premises. The bank management decided to institute an enquiry to investigate the matter. B, who is the employer of A, was appointed as the enquiry officer.Evaluation of the Options:A: As B is a Bank Manager and not a judge, this principle is inapplicable.- This statement is incorrect. The principle of "No person shall be a judge in his own cause" is not limited to judges alone. It applies to any situation where a person is expected to act as a decision-maker or judge, regardless of their official title or position.B: Since the suspected theft was in the bank premises, the manager is the only competent person to enquire. Hence, the principle is not applicable.- This statement is incorrect. The fact that B is the manager and the suspected theft occurred within the bank premises does not negate the application of the principle. The principle is based on the need for impartiality and fairness, and it applies regardless of the location or circumstances of the alleged misconduct.C: Since B is the employer of A, B should not be conducting the enquiry on the basis of the given principle.- This statement is correct. B, being the employer of A, has a personal interest in the outcome of the enquiry. This personal interest creates a potential bias, which goes against the principle of natural justice. Therefore, B should not be conducting the enquiry.D: The principle will be applicable, only if the theft committed by A was in relation to the car.- This statement is incorrect. The principle of "No person shall be a judge in his own cause" is not limited to specific types of offenses or situations. It applies to any matter where a person has a personal interest or bias.Conclusion:Based on the analysis, the correct statement is Option C: Since B is the employer of A, B should not be conducting the enquiry on the basis of the given principle. B's personal interest as the employer of A creates a potential bias, which goes against the principle of natural justice. Therefore, B should not be the one conducting the enquiry.

Answered by Glance Learning Institute · View profile

Free Test

FREE

Test: CLAT 2018 Past Year Paper
200 Ques | 120 Min

Start Free Test

View all free CLAT tests

Community Answer

Legal Principle: One of the principles of ‘Natural Justice&rsquo...

This principle is called the 'Right against biased' and is an integral part of the Principle of Natural Justice. It has a very broad meaning. Along with oneself, thus principle includes any person who is directly or indirectly related to the person in question. In this case, B is the employer of A which means they are indirectly related, and a possibility of a biased decision arises. Hence, the answer is C.

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Legal Principle: ‘ Audi alteram partem’ is a Latin phrase which means ‘hear the other side’. It is the principle that no person should be judged without a fair hearing.Fact Situation: Sanjay, in Delhi, is accused of theft and brought before the Court. The magistrate discovers that Sanjay is mute.Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above? Options

View answer

Direction: Given below is a statement of legal principle followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts given below and select the most appropriate answer.Legal Principles: Any intentional false communication, either written or spoken, that harms a person's reputation; decreases the respect, regard, or confidence in which a person is held; or induces disparaging, hostile, or disagreeable opinions or feelings against a person. The statement must tend to lower the claimant in the estimation of rightthinking members of society. A mere vulgar abuse is not defamation. Defamation encompasses both written statements, known as libel, and spoken statements, called slander. A public official or public figure can recover damages for defamation on a matter of public concern only if he proves that the speaker acted with actual malice. Facts: In 2018, a police officer, Suresh Singh, shot and killed Dayal. After the officer was convicted of culpable homicide not amounting to murder, Dayal's family retained a lawyer, Kaushal, to represent them in civil litigation against the officer. In a magazine called Indian Opinion, the Anti-Communist Society accused Kaushal of being a “Naxalite” and a “Communist-fronter” because he chose to represent clients who were suing a law enforcement officer. Because the statements contained serious inaccuracies, Kaushal filed a libel action against the editors of the magazine. Decide whether he will succeed.

View answer

Direction: Given below is a statement of legal principle followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts given below and select the most appropriate answer.Legal Principles:1. Any intentional false communication, either written or spoken, that harms a person's reputation; decreases the respect, regard, or confidence in which a person is held; or induces disparaging, hostile, or disagreeable opinions or feelings against a person.2. The statement must tend to lower the claimant in the estimation of right thinking members of society.3. A mere vulgar abuse is not defamation.4. Defamation encompasses both written statements, known as libel, and spoken statements, called slander.5. A public official or public figure can recover damages for defamation on a matter of public concern only if he proves that the speaker acted with actual malice.Facts: In 2018, a police officer, Suresh Singh, shot and killed Dayal. After the officer was convicted of culpable homicide not amounting to murder, Dayal's family retained a lawyer, Kaushal, to represent them in civil litigation against the officer. In a magazine called Indian Opinion, the Anti-Communist Society accused Kaushal of being a “Naxalite” and a “Communist-fronter” because he chose to represent clients who were suing a law enforcement officer. Because the statements contained serious inaccuracies, Kaushal filed a libel action against the editors of the magazine.Q. Decide whether he will succeed.

View answer

The fundamental rights were included in the constitution because they were considered essential for the development of the personality of every individual and to preserve human dignity. All people, irrespective of race, religion, caste or sex, have been given the right to move the Supreme Court and the High Courts for the enforcement of their fundamental rights. There are seven categories of Fundamental Rights (FR) which are covered from Articles 12-35. Fundamental right shall be made applicable only to the legislative or administrative actions of the state and not the private actions. Any law in contravention of fundamental rights is void, unconstitutional and therefore cannot bind any person.It is a fundamental right that no person shall be denied admission into any educational institution maintained by State or receiving funds from the State only on the ground of religion, race, case, language or any of them.It is a fundamental right of all minorities whether based on religion or language shall have the right to institute or administer educational institution of their choice.State shall not, in granting aid to the educational institution, discriminate against any educational institution on the ground that it is under the management of a minority, based on religion or language. It is a directive principle of state policy to promote with special care, educational interest of weaker section of people including scheduled tribes and castes. Directive principles are not justiciable in a court of law.Q. Mark decided to set up a Christian missionary school in remote village in Bihar for Catholic children. School received funds from state at about 40% of its total expenses and rest by way of private donations.School attained repute in last decade when it was published that 75% of total graduating batch got admitted to the coveted Indian Institute of Aeronautics.Sachin, a Hindu boy, applied for admission but was rejected as the school was meant only for Catholic Children. Hindu majority government decided to derecognise the school citing reasons inter alia public unrest. Which of the statement can most reasonably be inferred by application of above stated principles to the facts of the case?

View answer

Passage - 1The fundamental rights were included in the constitution because they were considered essential for the development of the personality of every individual and to preserve human dignity. All people, irrespective of race, religion, caste or sex, have been given the right to move the Supreme Court and the High Courts for the enforcement of their fundamental rights. There are seven categories of Fundamental Rights (FR) which are covered from Articles 12-35. Fundamental right shall be made applicable only to the legislative or administrative actions of the state and not the private actions. Any law incontravention of fundamental rights is void, unconstitutional and therefore cannot bind any person. It is a fundamental right that no person shall be denied admission into any educational institution maintained by State or receiving funds from the State only on the ground of religion, race, case, language or any of them. It is a fundamental right of all minorities whether based on religion or language shall have the right to institute or administer educational institution of their choice.State shall not, in granting aid to the educational institution, discriminate against any educational institution on the ground that it is under the management of a minority, based on religion or language. It is a directive principle of state policy to promote with special care, educational interest of weaker section of people including scheduled tribes and castes. Directive principles are not justiciable in a court of law.Q.Mark decided to set up a Christian missionary school in remote village in Bihar for Catholic children. School received funds from state at about 40% of its total expenses and rest by way of private donations. School attained repute in last decade when it was published that 75% of total graduating batch got admitted to the coveted Indian Institute of Aeronautics. Sachin, a Hindu boy, applied for admission but was rejected as the school was meant only for Catholic Children. Hindu majority government decided to derecognise the school citing reasons inter alia public unrest. Which of the statement can most reasonably be inferred by application of above stated principles to the facts of the case?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Crash Course for CLAT

CLAT Mock Test Series 2026

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Lucent for GK

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Legal Principle: One of the principles of ‘Natural Justice’ states that, “No person shall be a judge in his own cause”.Facts: A, a driver of B, a Branch Manager of ABC Bank was caught, suspecting theft, in the bank premises. The Bank management instituted an enquiry and made B the enquiry officer.Which of the following statements is correct?Options:a)As B is a Bank Manager and not a judge, this principle is inapplicable.b)Since the suspected theft was in the bank premises, the manager is the only competent person to enquire. Hence, the principle is not applicable.c)Since B is the employer of A, B should not be conducting the enquiry on the basis of the given principle.d)The principle will be applicable, only if the theft committed by A was in relation to the car.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Legal Principle: One of the principles of ‘Natural Justice’ states that, “No person shall be a judge in his own cause”.Facts: A, a driver of B, a Branch Manager of ABC Bank was caught, suspecting theft, in the bank premises. The Bank management instituted an enquiry and made B the enquiry officer.Which of the following statements is correct?Options:a)As B is a Bank Manager and not a judge, this principle is inapplicable.b)Since the suspected theft was in the bank premises, the manager is the only competent person to enquire. Hence, the principle is not applicable.c)Since B is the employer of A, B should not be conducting the enquiry on the basis of the given principle.d)The principle will be applicable, only if the theft committed by A was in relation to the car.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Legal Principle: One of the principles of ‘Natural Justice’ states that, “No person shall be a judge in his own cause”.Facts: A, a driver of B, a Branch Manager of ABC Bank was caught, suspecting theft, in the bank premises. The Bank management instituted an enquiry and made B the enquiry officer.Which of the following statements is correct?Options:a)As B is a Bank Manager and not a judge, this principle is inapplicable.b)Since the suspected theft was in the bank premises, the manager is the only competent person to enquire. Hence, the principle is not applicable.c)Since B is the employer of A, B should not be conducting the enquiry on the basis of the given principle.d)The principle will be applicable, only if the theft committed by A was in relation to the car.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Legal Principle: One of the principles of ‘Natural Justice’ states that, “No person shall be a judge in his own cause”.Facts: A, a driver of B, a Branch Manager of ABC Bank was caught, suspecting theft, in the bank premises. The Bank management instituted an enquiry and made B the enquiry officer.Which of the following statements is correct?Options:a)As B is a Bank Manager and not a judge, this principle is inapplicable.b)Since the suspected theft was in the bank premises, the manager is the only competent person to enquire. Hence, the principle is not applicable.c)Since B is the employer of A, B should not be conducting the enquiry on the basis of the given principle.d)The principle will be applicable, only if the theft committed by A was in relation to the car.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Legal Principle: One of the principles of ‘Natural Justice’ states that, “No person shall be a judge in his own cause”.Facts: A, a driver of B, a Branch Manager of ABC Bank was caught, suspecting theft, in the bank premises. The Bank management instituted an enquiry and made B the enquiry officer.Which of the following statements is correct?Options:a)As B is a Bank Manager and not a judge, this principle is inapplicable.b)Since the suspected theft was in the bank premises, the manager is the only competent person to enquire. Hence, the principle is not applicable.c)Since B is the employer of A, B should not be conducting the enquiry on the basis of the given principle.d)The principle will be applicable, only if the theft committed by A was in relation to the car.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Legal Principle: One of the principles of ‘Natural Justice’ states that, “No person shall be a judge in his own cause”.Facts: A, a driver of B, a Branch Manager of ABC Bank was caught, suspecting theft, in the bank premises. The Bank management instituted an enquiry and made B the enquiry officer.Which of the following statements is correct?Options:a)As B is a Bank Manager and not a judge, this principle is inapplicable.b)Since the suspected theft was in the bank premises, the manager is the only competent person to enquire. Hence, the principle is not applicable.c)Since B is the employer of A, B should not be conducting the enquiry on the basis of the given principle.d)The principle will be applicable, only if the theft committed by A was in relation to the car.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Legal Principle: One of the principles of ‘Natural Justice’ states that, “No person shall be a judge in his own cause”.Facts: A, a driver of B, a Branch Manager of ABC Bank was caught, suspecting theft, in the bank premises. The Bank management instituted an enquiry and made B the enquiry officer.Which of the following statements is correct?Options:a)As B is a Bank Manager and not a judge, this principle is inapplicable.b)Since the suspected theft was in the bank premises, the manager is the only competent person to enquire. Hence, the principle is not applicable.c)Since B is the employer of A, B should not be conducting the enquiry on the basis of the given principle.d)The principle will be applicable, only if the theft committed by A was in relation to the car.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Legal Principle: One of the principles of ‘Natural Justice’ states that, “No person shall be a judge in his own cause”.Facts: A, a driver of B, a Branch Manager of ABC Bank was caught, suspecting theft, in the bank premises. The Bank management instituted an enquiry and made B the enquiry officer.Which of the following statements is correct?Options:a)As B is a Bank Manager and not a judge, this principle is inapplicable.b)Since the suspected theft was in the bank premises, the manager is the only competent person to enquire. Hence, the principle is not applicable.c)Since B is the employer of A, B should not be conducting the enquiry on the basis of the given principle.d)The principle will be applicable, only if the theft committed by A was in relation to the car.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Legal Principle: One of the principles of ‘Natural Justice’ states that, “No person shall be a judge in his own cause”.Facts: A, a driver of B, a Branch Manager of ABC Bank was caught, suspecting theft, in the bank premises. The Bank management instituted an enquiry and made B the enquiry officer.Which of the following statements is correct?Options:a)As B is a Bank Manager and not a judge, this principle is inapplicable.b)Since the suspected theft was in the bank premises, the manager is the only competent person to enquire. Hence, the principle is not applicable.c)Since B is the employer of A, B should not be conducting the enquiry on the basis of the given principle.d)The principle will be applicable, only if the theft committed by A was in relation to the car.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Legal Principle: One of the principles of ‘Natural Justice’ states that, “No person shall be a judge in his own cause”.Facts: A, a driver of B, a Branch Manager of ABC Bank was caught, suspecting theft, in the bank premises. The Bank management instituted an enquiry and made B the enquiry officer.Which of the following statements is correct?Options:a)As B is a Bank Manager and not a judge, this principle is inapplicable.b)Since the suspected theft was in the bank premises, the manager is the only competent person to enquire. Hence, the principle is not applicable.c)Since B is the employer of A, B should not be conducting the enquiry on the basis of the given principle.d)The principle will be applicable, only if the theft committed by A was in relation to the car.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam