Introduction

The development of food plants through genetic engineering is a topic of ongoing debate. While there are potential benefits to this technology, there are also concerns that need to be addressed. Two common arguments against the introduction of genetically engineered food plants are that the economy of developing countries may suffer and that the method itself is costly. Let's examine these points in detail.

Economic Impact on Developing Countries

1. Dependency on Developed Nations: Critics argue that the introduction of genetically engineered food plants may increase the dependency of developing countries on developed nations. This is because the technology is often patented and owned by multinational corporations, which can lead to a situation where developing countries have to rely on these corporations for access to genetically modified seeds and related technologies.

2. Loss of Biodiversity: Another concern is that the adoption of genetically engineered food plants may result in a decrease in biodiversity. This is because genetically modified crops are often designed to be resistant to pests or herbicides, which can lead to a reduction in the diversity of plant species in agricultural systems.

Cost of Genetic Engineering

1. Research and Development Costs: Developing genetically engineered food plants involves extensive research and development, which can be costly. This includes the identification of desirable traits, gene isolation, modification, and testing. These costs are often borne by the biotechnology companies, which may reflect in the price of genetically modified seeds.

2. Regulatory Compliance: Another factor contributing to the cost of genetic engineering is the need for regulatory compliance. Genetically modified crops need to undergo rigorous safety assessments before they can be approved for commercialization. These assessments require significant resources, which can add to the overall cost of the technology.

Conclusion

While the concerns of the economic impact on developing countries and the cost of genetic engineering are valid, it is important to consider the potential benefits of genetically engineered food plants as well. These benefits include increased crop yield, enhanced nutritional content, and improved resistance to pests and diseases. It is crucial to strike a balance between addressing the concerns and harnessing the potential advantages of this technology. Robust regulatory frameworks, fair access to technology, and sustainable agricultural practices can help mitigate the negative impacts and ensure that genetically engineered food plants are developed and deployed responsibly.

Both options are nearly same. I don't feel any difference