Principle: wherever the causing of a certain effect, or an attempt to cause that effect, by an act or by an omission, is an offence, it is to be understood that the causing of that effect partly by an act and partly by an omission is the same offence.Facts: A intentionally causes Bandrsquo;s death, partly by illegally omitting to give B food and partly by beating B.a)A has committed murderb)A has committed culpable homicidec)Both a and bd)No offenceCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Principle: wherever the causing of a certain ...

Join the Discussion on the App

Facts: A intentionally causes B’s death, partly by illegally omitting to give B food and partly by beating B.

a)
A has committed murder
b)
A has committed culpable homicide
c)
Both a and b
d)
No offence

Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Test: Criminal Law - 4

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Most Upvoted Answer

Principle: wherever the causing of a certain effect, or an attempt to ...

Analysis:

- The principle states that when the causing of a certain effect is an offence, it is considered the same offence whether it is caused partly by an act and partly by an omission.

Application to the facts:

- In this case, A intentionally caused B's death by both omitting to give B food and by beating B.
- Both the act of omitting to give food and the act of beating B contributed to B's death.
- Therefore, according to the principle, A has committed murder.

Therefore, the correct answer is option 'A' - A has committed murder.

Answered by Glance Learning Institute · View profile

Free Test

FREE

Test: Criminal Law - 4
50 Ques | 30 Min

Start Free Test

View all free CLAT tests

Community Answer

Principle: wherever the causing of a certain effect, or an attempt to ...

Principle says - the causing of that effect partly by an act (here beating) and partly by an omission (illegally omitting) is the same offence.
Thus, A committed murder.

Share via Whatsapp

Attention CLAT Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

CLAT Mock Test Series 2025

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Principle: wherever the causing of a certain effect, or an attempt to cause that effect, by an act or by an omission, is an offence, it is to be understood that the causing of that effect partly by an act and partly by an omission is the same offence.Facts: A intentionally causes B’s death, partly by illegally omitting to give B food and partly by beating B.

View answer

Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: Wherever the causing of a certain effect, or an attempt to cause that effect, by an act or by an omission, is an offence, it is to be understood that the causing of that effect partly by an act and partly by an omission is the same offence.Facts: A intentionally causes Z's death, partly by illegally omitting to give Z food and partly by beating Z.Has A committed murder by not giving food to Z?

View answer

Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: When an offence is committed by means of several acts, whoever intentionally co-operates in the commission of that offence by doing any one of those acts, either singly or jointly with any other person, commits that offence.Facts: A and B are joint jailors. A is B's senior. They have the charge of Z, a prisoner, alternately for six hours at a time. A and B, intending to cause Z's death, knowingly co-operate in causing that effect by illegally omitting, each during the time of his attendance, to furnish Z with food supplied to them for that purpose. Z dies of hunger.Who is/are responsible for the death of Z?

View answer

Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: When an offence is committed by means of several acts, whoever intentionally co-operates in the commission of that offence by doing any one of those acts, either singly or jointly with any other person, commits that offence.Facts: A and B are joint jailors. A is B's senior. They have the charge of Z, a prisoner, alternately for six hours at a time. A and B, intending to cause Z's death, knowingly co-operate in causing that effect by illegally omitting, each during the time of his attendance, to furnish Z with food supplied to them for that purpose. Z dies of hunger.Who is/are responsible for the death of Z?

View answer

Directions:The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.As per Section 107 IPC, a person is said to abet the doing of a thing, who instigates any person to do that thing or engages with one or more other persons in any conspiracy for the doing of that thing, if an act or illegal omission takes place in pursuance of that conspiracy, and in order to the doing of that thing or intentionally aids, by an act or illegal omission, the doing of that thing.Explanations to this section state that a person who, by willful misrepresentation, or by willful concealment of a material fact which he is bound to disclose, voluntarily causes or procures, or attempts to cause or procure, a thing to be done, is said to instigate the doing of that thing. To constitute the offence of abetment, it is not necessary that the act abetted should be committed, or that the effect requisite to constitute the offence should be caused.Whoever, either prior to or at the time of the commission of an act, does anything in order to facilitate the commission of that act, and thereby facilitates the commission thereof, is said to aid the doing of that act.Abetment is completely a separate and distinct offence from conspiracy. Most of the time, abetment is confused with conspiracy. However, abetment involves a mental process of instigating a person or the act of intentionally aiding that person in doing of a thing. Whereas, in the cases of conspiracy, it would also involve the mental process entering into the doing of an act. The act of abetment could take place by instigation, conspiracy or intentional aid. The offence for the abetment of which a person is charged with can only be linked with the proven offence.The term instigate here denotes incitement or urging to do some drastic or inadvisable action. In committing abetment, mens rea is a necessary ingredient. When a person provokes another to do an act prohibited by law, he is said to commit the offence of abetment by instigation.A person is said to abet the commission of an offence by conspiracy if he enters into an agreement with one or more persons to do an illegal act.A person is said to abet the commission of an offence if he intentionally provides assistance or gives aid by doing or omitting an act. Mere intention to provide assistance is not sufficient in these cases. To hold a person guilty and liable for abetment, there must be some active conduct on the part of the abettor and the act must be accomplished in furtherance of that.It is not necessary that the person abetted should be capable by law of committing an offence, or that he should have the same guilty intention or knowledge as that of the abettor, or any guilty intention or knowledge. A person abets an offence within the meaning of this Code who, in India, abets the commission of any act without and beyond India which would constitute an offence if committed in India.Q. Shikha instigates Madan to murder Shubh. Madan in pursuance of the instigation stabs Shubh. Shubh recovers from the wound. Decide the liability and answer accordingly.

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

CLAT Mock Test Series 2025

Crash Course for CLAT

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Principle: wherever the causing of a certain effect, or an attempt to cause that effect, by an act or by an omission, is an offence, it is to be understood that the causing of that effect partly by an act and partly by an omission is the same offence.Facts: A intentionally causes B’s death, partly by illegally omitting to give B food and partly by beating B.a)A has committed murderb)A has committed culpable homicidec)Both a and bd)No offenceCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Principle: wherever the causing of a certain effect, or an attempt to cause that effect, by an act or by an omission, is an offence, it is to be understood that the causing of that effect partly by an act and partly by an omission is the same offence.Facts: A intentionally causes B’s death, partly by illegally omitting to give B food and partly by beating B.a)A has committed murderb)A has committed culpable homicidec)Both a and bd)No offenceCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle: wherever the causing of a certain effect, or an attempt to cause that effect, by an act or by an omission, is an offence, it is to be understood that the causing of that effect partly by an act and partly by an omission is the same offence.Facts: A intentionally causes B’s death, partly by illegally omitting to give B food and partly by beating B.a)A has committed murderb)A has committed culpable homicidec)Both a and bd)No offenceCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle: wherever the causing of a certain effect, or an attempt to cause that effect, by an act or by an omission, is an offence, it is to be understood that the causing of that effect partly by an act and partly by an omission is the same offence.Facts: A intentionally causes B’s death, partly by illegally omitting to give B food and partly by beating B.a)A has committed murderb)A has committed culpable homicidec)Both a and bd)No offenceCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Principle: wherever the causing of a certain effect, or an attempt to cause that effect, by an act or by an omission, is an offence, it is to be understood that the causing of that effect partly by an act and partly by an omission is the same offence.Facts: A intentionally causes B’s death, partly by illegally omitting to give B food and partly by beating B.a)A has committed murderb)A has committed culpable homicidec)Both a and bd)No offenceCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Principle: wherever the causing of a certain effect, or an attempt to cause that effect, by an act or by an omission, is an offence, it is to be understood that the causing of that effect partly by an act and partly by an omission is the same offence.Facts: A intentionally causes B’s death, partly by illegally omitting to give B food and partly by beating B.a)A has committed murderb)A has committed culpable homicidec)Both a and bd)No offenceCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Principle: wherever the causing of a certain effect, or an attempt to cause that effect, by an act or by an omission, is an offence, it is to be understood that the causing of that effect partly by an act and partly by an omission is the same offence.Facts: A intentionally causes B’s death, partly by illegally omitting to give B food and partly by beating B.a)A has committed murderb)A has committed culpable homicidec)Both a and bd)No offenceCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle: wherever the causing of a certain effect, or an attempt to cause that effect, by an act or by an omission, is an offence, it is to be understood that the causing of that effect partly by an act and partly by an omission is the same offence.Facts: A intentionally causes B’s death, partly by illegally omitting to give B food and partly by beating B.a)A has committed murderb)A has committed culpable homicidec)Both a and bd)No offenceCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle: wherever the causing of a certain effect, or an attempt to cause that effect, by an act or by an omission, is an offence, it is to be understood that the causing of that effect partly by an act and partly by an omission is the same offence.Facts: A intentionally causes B’s death, partly by illegally omitting to give B food and partly by beating B.a)A has committed murderb)A has committed culpable homicidec)Both a and bd)No offenceCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Principle: wherever the causing of a certain effect, or an attempt to cause that effect, by an act or by an omission, is an offence, it is to be understood that the causing of that effect partly by an act and partly by an omission is the same offence.Facts: A intentionally causes B’s death, partly by illegally omitting to give B food and partly by beating B.a)A has committed murderb)A has committed culpable homicidec)Both a and bd)No offenceCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam