All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >   Directions: The question consists of two sta... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.
Principle: Wherever the causing of a certain effect, or an attempt to cause that effect, by an act or by an omission, is an offence, it is to be understood that the causing of that effect partly by an act and partly by an omission is the same offence.
Facts: A intentionally causes Z's death, partly by illegally omitting to give Z food and partly by beating Z.
Has A committed murder by not giving food to Z?
  • a)
    Yes, because the offence of beating has been done along with reducing availability of food.
  • b)
    No, because not giving food cannot be counted as murder.
  • c)
    Yes, because A had intention to murder Z.
  • d)
    None of these
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as ...
A has committed murder because behind not giving food he had part intention to cause the death of Z; and wherever the intention is either by an act or by an omission, it is an offence. It is to be understood that the causing of that effect partly by an act and partly by an omission is the same offence.
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as ...
Principle:

Principle: Wherever the causing of a certain effect, or an attempt to cause that effect, by an act or by an omission, is an offence, it is to be understood that the causing of that effect partly by an act and partly by an omission is the same offence.

Facts:

Facts: A intentionally causes Z's death, partly by illegally omitting to give Z food and partly by beating Z.

Explanation:

According to the principle provided, if the causing of an effect is an offence by an act or an omission, causing the effect partly by an act and partly by an omission is considered the same offence. In this case, A intentionally caused Z's death by both illegal omission (not giving food) and an act (beating Z). Since the principle states that both act and omission leading to an effect constitute the same offence, A can be considered to have committed murder by intentionally causing Z's death.

Conclusion:

Therefore, based on the principle and application to the facts provided, it can be concluded that A has committed murder by not giving food to Z, along with other contributing factors like beating Z.
Attention CLAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: When an offence is committed by means of several acts, whoever intentionally co-operates in the commission of that offence by doing any one of those acts, either singly or jointly with any other person, commits that offence.Facts: A and B are joint jailors. A is B's senior. They have the charge of Z, a prisoner, alternately for six hours at a time. A and B, intend­ing to cause Z's death, knowingly co-operate in causing that effect by illegally omitting, each during the time of his attendance, to furnish Z with food supplied to them for that purpose. Z dies of hunger.Who is/are responsible for the death of Z?

Directions: Questions 4 - 6 are based on a common set of principles and facts. Answer accordingly.Principle 1: Any person (Principal) authorizing another person (Agent) to do a certain act will be liable for all acts of such person done within the course of employment. The tests of control anddirection must be complied with.Principle 2: A wrongful act authorized by the Principal as well as a lawful act done in a wrongfulmanner would be considered to have been within the course of employment unless specific directions were given regarding the mode of performance of the act.Principle 3: For an act to fall outside the scope of employment, the act should either have beenperformed after the authorized act had come to an end or must be of such nature that it can becompletely divorced from the authorized act.Principle 4: Such a relationship need not be a long term arrangement and can be set up for one specific transaction.Facts: Aggubai instructed her long standing childhood friend Annubai to go to Palampur and strike a deal with Tagesh, a spirit supplier, for the purchase of 1000 bottles of McDowell‘s No.1 whisky, which Aggubai intended to sell at her retail store in Mumbai. Annubai was also instructed to keep in touch with Aggubai over phone regarding the deal. Accordingly, Annubai took a train to Palampur, planned a meeting with Tagesh and made the requisite purchase.Q.Did Annubai and Aggubai have a principalagent relationship?

Direction: Given below is a statement of legal principle followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts given below and select the most appropriate answer.Legal Principles: Any intentional false communication, either written or spoken, that harms a person's reputation; decreases the respect, regard, or confidence in which a person is held; or induces disparaging, hostile, or disagreeable opinions or feelings against a person. The statement must tend to lower the claimant in the estimation of rightthinking members of society. A mere vulgar abuse is not defamation. Defamation encompasses both written statements, known as libel, and spoken statements, called slander. A public official or public figure can recover damages for defamation on a matter of public concern only if he proves that the speaker acted with actual malice. Facts: In 2018, a police officer, Suresh Singh, shot and killed Dayal. After the officer was convicted of culpable homicide not amounting to murder, Dayal's family retained a lawyer, Kaushal, to represent them in civil litigation against the officer. In a magazine called Indian Opinion, the Anti-Communist Society accused Kaushal of being a “Naxalite” and a “Communist-fronter” because he chose to represent clients who were suing a law enforcement officer. Because the statements contained serious inaccuracies, Kaushal filed a libel action against the editors of the magazine. Decide whether he will succeed.

Top Courses for CLATView all

Top Courses for CLAT

Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: Wherever the causing of a certain effect, or an attempt to cause that effect, by an act or by an omission, is an offence, it is to be understood that the causing of that effect partly by an act and partly by an omission is the same offence.Facts: A intentionally causes Z's death, partly by illegally omitting to give Z food and partly by beating Z.Has A committed murder by not giving food to Z?a)Yes, because the offence of beating has been done along with reducing availability of food.b)No, because not giving food cannot be counted as murder.c)Yes, because A had intention to murder Z.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: Wherever the causing of a certain effect, or an attempt to cause that effect, by an act or by an omission, is an offence, it is to be understood that the causing of that effect partly by an act and partly by an omission is the same offence.Facts: A intentionally causes Z's death, partly by illegally omitting to give Z food and partly by beating Z.Has A committed murder by not giving food to Z?a)Yes, because the offence of beating has been done along with reducing availability of food.b)No, because not giving food cannot be counted as murder.c)Yes, because A had intention to murder Z.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: Wherever the causing of a certain effect, or an attempt to cause that effect, by an act or by an omission, is an offence, it is to be understood that the causing of that effect partly by an act and partly by an omission is the same offence.Facts: A intentionally causes Z's death, partly by illegally omitting to give Z food and partly by beating Z.Has A committed murder by not giving food to Z?a)Yes, because the offence of beating has been done along with reducing availability of food.b)No, because not giving food cannot be counted as murder.c)Yes, because A had intention to murder Z.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: Wherever the causing of a certain effect, or an attempt to cause that effect, by an act or by an omission, is an offence, it is to be understood that the causing of that effect partly by an act and partly by an omission is the same offence.Facts: A intentionally causes Z's death, partly by illegally omitting to give Z food and partly by beating Z.Has A committed murder by not giving food to Z?a)Yes, because the offence of beating has been done along with reducing availability of food.b)No, because not giving food cannot be counted as murder.c)Yes, because A had intention to murder Z.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: Wherever the causing of a certain effect, or an attempt to cause that effect, by an act or by an omission, is an offence, it is to be understood that the causing of that effect partly by an act and partly by an omission is the same offence.Facts: A intentionally causes Z's death, partly by illegally omitting to give Z food and partly by beating Z.Has A committed murder by not giving food to Z?a)Yes, because the offence of beating has been done along with reducing availability of food.b)No, because not giving food cannot be counted as murder.c)Yes, because A had intention to murder Z.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: Wherever the causing of a certain effect, or an attempt to cause that effect, by an act or by an omission, is an offence, it is to be understood that the causing of that effect partly by an act and partly by an omission is the same offence.Facts: A intentionally causes Z's death, partly by illegally omitting to give Z food and partly by beating Z.Has A committed murder by not giving food to Z?a)Yes, because the offence of beating has been done along with reducing availability of food.b)No, because not giving food cannot be counted as murder.c)Yes, because A had intention to murder Z.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: Wherever the causing of a certain effect, or an attempt to cause that effect, by an act or by an omission, is an offence, it is to be understood that the causing of that effect partly by an act and partly by an omission is the same offence.Facts: A intentionally causes Z's death, partly by illegally omitting to give Z food and partly by beating Z.Has A committed murder by not giving food to Z?a)Yes, because the offence of beating has been done along with reducing availability of food.b)No, because not giving food cannot be counted as murder.c)Yes, because A had intention to murder Z.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: Wherever the causing of a certain effect, or an attempt to cause that effect, by an act or by an omission, is an offence, it is to be understood that the causing of that effect partly by an act and partly by an omission is the same offence.Facts: A intentionally causes Z's death, partly by illegally omitting to give Z food and partly by beating Z.Has A committed murder by not giving food to Z?a)Yes, because the offence of beating has been done along with reducing availability of food.b)No, because not giving food cannot be counted as murder.c)Yes, because A had intention to murder Z.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: Wherever the causing of a certain effect, or an attempt to cause that effect, by an act or by an omission, is an offence, it is to be understood that the causing of that effect partly by an act and partly by an omission is the same offence.Facts: A intentionally causes Z's death, partly by illegally omitting to give Z food and partly by beating Z.Has A committed murder by not giving food to Z?a)Yes, because the offence of beating has been done along with reducing availability of food.b)No, because not giving food cannot be counted as murder.c)Yes, because A had intention to murder Z.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Principle(s) and the other as Facts. You are to examine the Principle(s) and apply it/them to the given Facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle: Wherever the causing of a certain effect, or an attempt to cause that effect, by an act or by an omission, is an offence, it is to be understood that the causing of that effect partly by an act and partly by an omission is the same offence.Facts: A intentionally causes Z's death, partly by illegally omitting to give Z food and partly by beating Z.Has A committed murder by not giving food to Z?a)Yes, because the offence of beating has been done along with reducing availability of food.b)No, because not giving food cannot be counted as murder.c)Yes, because A had intention to murder Z.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup