M is the father of N who is the son of V. In order to know the relatio...
M is the father of N and N is the son of V.
Hence, V is the mother of N.
From (1), P is the brother of V
Therefore, M is the brother-in-law of P because V is the wife of M.
From (2), the daughter of N, is the granddaughter of V. From this we do not get any relation of M to P.
View all questions of this test
M is the father of N who is the son of V. In order to know the relatio...
To determine the relation of M to P, we need to analyze the given statements.
Statement 1: P is the brother of V.
Statement 2: The daughter of N is the granddaughter of V.
Let's break down the statements and analyze them.
Statement 1: P is the brother of V.
This statement provides information about the relationship between P and V. It states that P is the brother of V, which means they share a sibling relationship. However, this statement does not provide any direct information about the relationship between M and P. Therefore, we cannot determine the relation of M to P solely based on this statement.
Statement 2: The daughter of N is the granddaughter of V.
This statement provides information about the relationship between N and V. It states that the daughter of N is the granddaughter of V. From this statement, we can infer that N is the child of M (as M is the father of N) and that V is the parent of N (as V is the grandfather/mother of N). However, this statement does not provide any direct information about the relationship between M and P. Therefore, we cannot determine the relation of M to P solely based on this statement.
Combining the statements:
Neither statement provides direct information about the relationship between M and P. Therefore, we cannot determine the relation of M to P by considering both statements together.
Conclusion:
Based on the given statements, we cannot determine the relation of M to P. Hence, either statement alone is not sufficient. Therefore, the correct answer is option A: only statement 1 is necessary.